Since Edward Snowden exposed the National Security Agency’s use of controversial online surveillance programs in 2013, there has been widespread speculation about the potentially deleterious effects of online government monitoring. This study explores how perceptions and justification of surveillance practices may create a chilling effect on democratic discourse by stifling the expression of minority political views. Using a spiral of silence theoretical framework, knowing one is subject to surveillance and accepting such surveillance as necessary act as moderating agents in the relationship between one’s perceived climate of opinion and willingness to voice opinions online. Theoretical and normative implications are discussed.
AskayD. A. (2015). Silence in the crowd: The spiral of silence contributing to the positive bias of opinions in an online review system. New Media & Society, 17, 1811-1829. doi:10.1177/1461444814535190
2.
BrownI. (2014). Social media surveillance. The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs122
3.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1991). Reflections on the “spiral of silence.”Communication Yearbook, 14, 288-297.
4.
DinevT.HartP.MullenM. R. (2008). Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 214-233.
5.
DomkeD.ShahD. V.WackmanD. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 51-74.
FoslynM. R. (1999). Perceiving public opinion of political figures: Examining the link between individual and collective opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 213-232.
8.
FoxJ.WarberK. M. (2015). Queer identity management and political self-expression on social networking sites: A co-cultural approach to the spiral of silence. Journal of Communication, 65, 79-100.
9.
GearhartS.ZhangW. (2014). Gay bullying and online opinion expression: Testing spiral of silence in the social media environment. Social Science Computer Review, 32, 18-36.
10.
GearhartS.ZhangW. (2015). “Was it something I said?” “No, it was something you posted!” A study of the spiral of silence theory in social media contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 208-213.
11.
GellmanB.PoitrasL. (2013, June7). US, British intelligence mining data from nine US Internet companies in broad secret program. The Washington Post, p. 6.
12.
GlynnC. J.HayesA. F.ShanahanJ. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 452-463.
13.
GraberD. (2003). Styles of image management during crises: Justifying press censorship. Discourse & Society, 14, 539-557.
14.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
15.
GreenwaldG. (2014). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.93.3.258
19.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
20.
HayesA. F.GlynnC. J.ShanahanJ. (2005). Willingness to self-censor: A construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 298-323.
21.
HayesA. F.ScheufeleD. A.HugeM. E. (2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28, 259-283.
22.
HoS. S.McLeodD. M. (2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 190-207.
23.
IyengarS.KinderD. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
JangS. M.LeeH.JinP. Y. (2014). The more friends, the less political talk? Predictors of Facebook discussions among college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 271-275.
25.
KimS.-H.KimH.OhS.-H. (2014). Talking about Genetically Modified (GM) foods in South Korea: The role of the Internet in the spiral of silence process. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 713-732.
26.
KruegerB. S. (2005). Government surveillance and political participation on the Internet. Social Science Review, 23, 439-452.
LiuX.FahmyS. (2011). Exploring the spiral of silence in the virtual world: Individuals’ willingness to express personal opinions in online versus offline settings. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 3(2), 45-57.
29.
MatthesJ. (2015). Observing the “spiral” in the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27, 155-176.
30.
MiyataK.YamamotoH.OgawaY. (2015). What affects the spiral of silence and the hard core on Twitter? An analysis of the nuclear power issue in Japan. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1129-1141.
31.
MutzD. C.MartinP. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95, 97-114.
ReddickC. G.ChatfieldA. T.JaramilloP. A. (2015). Public opinion on National Security Agency surveillance programs: A multi-method approach. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 129-141.
39.
Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.Roskos-EwoldsenB.Dillman CarpentierF. (2009). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 74-93). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
ScheufeleD. A.MoyP. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 3-28.
41.
SchulzA.RoesserP. (2012). The spiral of silence and the internet: Selection of online content and the perception of the public opinion climate in computer-mediated communication environment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 346-367.
42.
ShanahanJ.GlynnC.HayesA. (2007). The spiral of silence: A meta-analysis and its impact. In PreissR. W.GayleB. M.BurrellN.AllenM.BryantJ. (Eds.), Mass media effects: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 415-427). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
SohnD.GeidnerN. (2015). Collective dynamics of the spiral of silence: The role of ego-network size. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv005
44.
SoloveD. J. (2007). “I’ve got nothing to hide” and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Review, 44, 745-772.
ValenzuelaS.KimY.GildeZunigaH. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 163-184.
47.
YunG. W.ParkS.-Y. (2011). Selective posting: Willingness to a post a message online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 201-227.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
