This study examines how the term “fake news” is strategically deployed in U.S. alternative media by analyzing Newsmax and Occupy Democrats as right- and left-leaning outlets. Drawing on Hallin’s sphere model and Egelhofer et al.’s coding categories, it uses manual content analysis and latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling to identify rhetorical functions and patterns. Findings show that the term “fake news” functions mainly as a weaponized label to delegitimize opponents rather than describe misinformation. The results show how alternative media redraw boundaries between consensus, controversy, and deviance, underscoring their role in intensifying partisan discourse and redefining political communication.
AbodayehA.HejaziR.NajjarW.ShihadehL.LatifR. (2023). Web scraping for data analytics: A beautifulsoup implementation. In 2023 Sixth International Conference of Women in Data Science at Prince Sultan University (WiDS PSU) (pp. 65–69). https://doi.org/10.1109/wids-psu57071.2023.00025
2.
AllcottH.GentzkowM. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
3.
AtkinsonJ. D.IngmanK.PierandozziJ.StumpP. (2021). At the intersection of Mainstream & Alternative Media: Spygate & the Hannity rant. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 45(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859920961027
BenklerY.FarisR.RobertsH.ZuckermanE. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
6.
BirdS.KleinE.LoperE. (2009). Natural language processing with Python: Analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. O’Reilly Media.
BrodaE.StrömbäckJ. (2024). Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: Lessons from an interdisciplinary, Systematic Literature Review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 48(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2024.2323736
9.
BrummetteJ.DiStasoM.VafeiadisM.MessnerM. (2018). Read all about it: The politicization of “Fake news” on Twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018769906
10.
ChambersS. (2021). Truth, deliberative democracy, and the virtues of accuracy: Is fake news destroying the public sphere?Political Studies, 69(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890811
11.
ChoiJ.LeeJ. K. (2022). Confusing effects of fake news on clarity of political information in the Social Media Environment. Journalism Practice, 16(10), 2147–2165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1903971
12.
CoddingtonM.MolyneuxL. (2024). Alternative epistemologies as distinguishing features of right-wing and left-wing media in the United States. Digital Journalism, 13, 1442–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2340603
CollierJ.Van DuynE. (2023). Fake news by any other name: Phrases for false content and effects on public perceptions of U.S. news media. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 51(4), 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2022.2148487
15.
DennerN.PeterC. (2017). Der Begriff Lügenpresse in deutschen Tageszeitungen [The term “lying press” in German newspapers]. Publizistik, 62, 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-017-0354-4
16.
EgelhoferJ. L.LechelerS. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
17.
EgelhoferJ. L.AalderingL.EberlJ.M.GalygaS.LechelerS. (2020). From novelty to normalization? how journalists use the term “fake news” in their reporting. Journalism Studies, 21(10), 1323–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1745667
18.
EiseleO.HeidenreichT.LitvyakO.BoomgaardenH. G. (2023). Capturing a News Frame – Comparing Machine-Learning Approaches to Frame Analysis with Different Degrees of Supervision. Communication Methods and Measures, 17(3), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2023.2230560
19.
FarkasJ.SchouJ. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost—The Public, 25(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047
20.
FeinererI.HornikK.MeyerD. (2008). Text Mining Infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05
21.
FrischlichL.KuhfeldtL.Schatto-EckrodtT.CleverL. (2023). Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the COVID-19 crisis. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259
22.
FuQ.ZhuangY.GuJ.ZhuY.GuoX. (2021). Agreeing to disagree: Choosing among eight topic-modeling methods. Big Data Research, 23, Article 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100173
GrimmerJ.StewartB. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
25.
GrünB.HornikK. (2011). topicmodels: An R Package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13
GuessA.NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 U.S. election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x
28.
HallinD. C. (1986). The uncensored war: The media and Vietnam. University of California Press.
29.
HameleersM.HarffD.SchmuckD. (2025). The alternative truth kept hidden from us: The effects of multimodal disinformation disseminated by ordinary citizens and alternative hyper-partisan media: Evidence from the US and India. Digital Journalism, 13(8), 1351–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2210616
30.
HoltK. (2018). Alternative media and the notion of anti-systemness: Towards an analytical framework. Media and Communication, 6(4), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1467
IsoahoK.GritsenkoD.MäkeläE. (2019). Topic modeling and text analysis for Qualitative Policy Research. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 300–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12343
33.
JamiesonK. H.CappellaJ. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford University Press.
34.
LarssonA. O. (2019). News use as amplification: Norwegian national, regional, and Hyperpartisan Media on Facebook. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019831439
35.
LazerD.BaumM.BenklerY.BerinskyA.GreenhillK.MenczerF.MetzgerM.NyhanB.PennycookG.RothschildD.SchudsonM.SlomanS.ThorsonE.WattsD.ZittrainJ. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
36.
LiD.FuL.ChenL. (2025). Developing and validating a four-dimensional misinformation correction scale: A mixed-methods approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251378663
37.
LindeS.WilkersonJ.CasasA. (2025). Rethinking scaling up content analysis: A reappraisal of justifications and practices for large-scale approaches. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251378122
38.
MayerhöfferE. (2021). How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1814846
MontaniI.HonnibalM.BoydA.Van LandeghemS.PetersH. (2023). explosion/spaCy: v3.7.2: Fixes for APIs and requirements [Software]. Zenodo.
41.
MottaM.SteculaD.FarhartC. E. (2020). How right-leaning media coverage of Covid-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/a8r3p
42.
NelsonL. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703
43.
NickersonR. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
NutsugahN.MensahK.OdoomR.AyarnahA. (2025). Social media, misinformation and fake news in the pandemic: The dominant gaps and future research avenues. Online Information Review, 49(2), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2022-0366
46.
NygaardS. (2023). On the mainstream/alternative continuum: Mainstream media reactions to right-wing alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1311–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1894962
47.
PennycookG.RandD. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.TingleyD. (2016). Navigating the local modes of big data: The case of topic models. In AlvarezR. M. (Ed.), Computational social science: Discovery and prediction (pp. 51–97). Cambridge University Press.
51.
RobertsonC. T.MourãoR. R. (2020). Faking alternative journalism? an analysis of self-presentations of “fake news” sites. Digital Journalism, 8(8), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1743193
van DuynE.CollierJ. (2019). Priming and fake news: The effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news media. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
