The nexus of science communication, visual framing, and marginalized communities remains an under-researched area. In this study, we analyze the influence of multiple types of visual framing on social media audience engagement through a quantitative content analysis of photographs posted by Indigenous environmental organizations. Using multiple operationalizations of visual framing (decontextualization, recontextualization, and solutions), we find that social media posts featuring greater visual variety in composition, combined with human-focused content, predict greater engagement.
AsheI.LoughK. (2025). Seeing beyond crisis: Analyzing photographs and photographer bylines in solutions-oriented environmental journalism stories. Journalism Studies, 26(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2412210
2.
AzocarC. L.LaPoeV.OlsonC. S. C.LaPoeB.HazarikaB. (2021). Indigenous communities and COVID 19: Reporting on resources and resilience. Howard Journal of Communications, 32(5), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2021.1892552
BrondízioE. S.Aumeeruddy-ThomasY.BatesP.CarinoJ.Fernández-LlamazaresÁ.FerrariM. F.GalvinK.Reyes-GarcíaV.McElweeP.MolnárZ.SamakovA.ShresthaU. B. (2021). Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: Indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127
CacciatoreM. A.ScheufeleD. A.IyengarS. (2016). The end of framing as we know it . . . and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
8.
CapleH.KnoxJ. S. (2015). A framework for the multimodal analysis of online news galleries: What makes a “good” picture gallery?Social Semiotics, 25(3), 292–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.1002174
9.
ChapmanD. A.CornerA.WebsterR.MarkowitzE. M. (2016). Climate visuals: A mixed methods investigation of public perceptions of climate images in three countries. Global Environmental Change, 41, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.003
10.
ChenS. (2019). How to discredit a social movement: Negative framing of “Idle No More” in Canadian print media. Environmental Communication, 13(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1546201
11.
ChiblowS.MeighanP. J. (2022). Language is land, land is language: The importance of Indigenous languages. Human Geography, 15(2), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786211022899
12.
ColemanC.-L. (2020). Environmental clashes on Native American land: Framing environmental and scientific disputes. Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
ColemanR. (2010). Framing the pictures in our heads: Exploring the framing and agenda-setting effects of visual images. In D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A. (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (1. publ, pp. 233–261). Routledge.
14.
ComfortR. N. (2022a). Exploring environmental communication in the U.S. Indigenous diaspora. Environmental Communication, 16(5), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2130388
15.
ComfortR. N. (2022b). Political macroenvironments & cultural information protection: The challenge of communication in Native American environmental and natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 35(12), 1258–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2113846
16.
ComfortR. N.GruszczynskiM. (2024). Indigenous biologists and culture frames: Effects on stereotype perceptions and conservation policy support in environmental news. Science Communication, 47(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470241264755
17.
CooperE. A.PiazzaE. A.BanksM. S. (2012). The perceptual basis of common photographic practice. Journal of Vision, 12(5), 8–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.5.8
18.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
19.
DahmenN. S.ThierK.WalthB. (2021). Creating engagement with solutions visuals: Testing the effects of problem-oriented versus solution-oriented photojournalism. Visual Communication, 20(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219838601
20.
DemingW. E. (1966). Some theory of sampling. Dover Publications.
21.
Den OudenA. E.O’BrienJ. M. (Eds.). (2013). Recognition, sovereignty struggles, & indigenous rights in the United States: A sourcebook. The University of North Carolina Press.
22.
DePaulaN.DincelliE.HarrisonT. M. (2018). Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003
23.
DhaneshG.DuthlerG.LiK. (2022). Social media engagement with organization-generated content: Role of visuals in enhancing public engagement with organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102174
24.
DhaneshG. S.RahmanN. (2021). Visual communication and public relations: Visual frame building strategies in war and conflict stories. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102003
25.
DunawayF. (2008). Gas masks, pogo, and the ecological indian: Earth day and the visual politics of American environmentalism. American Quarterly, 60(1), 67–99.
26.
EckertL. E.BanN. C.TallioS.-C.TurnerN. (2018). Linking marine conservation and Indigenous cultural revitalization: First Nations free themselves from externally imposed social-ecological traps. Ecology and Society, 23(4), art23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10417-230423
27.
EllisonN. B.TriệuP.SchoenebeckS.BrewerR.IsraniA. (2020). Why we don’t click: Interrogating the relationship between viewing and clicking in social media contexts by exploring the “non-click.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(6), 402–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa013
GeigerN.SargeM. A.ComfortR. N. (2022). An examination of expertise, caring and salient value similarity as source factors that garner support for advocated climate policies. Environmental Communication, 16(6), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2080242
30.
GeiseS.BadenC. (2015). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25(1), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12048
31.
GeiseS.XuY. (2024). Effects of visual framing in multimodal media environments: A systematic review of studies between 1979 and 2023. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241257586
32.
HanuschF. (2014). Dimensions of Indigenous journalism culture: Exploring Māori news-making in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 15(8), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913495757
33.
Haro de RosarioA.Sáez-MartínA.del Carmen Caba-PérezM. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook?New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652
HernandezJ. (2022). Fresh banana leaves: Healing Indigenous landscapes through Indigenous science. North Atlantic Books.
36.
HickmanC. R.ThorstensonJ.CarlisleA.HoaglandS. J.AlbertS. (2023). Research with tribes: A suggested framework for the co-production of knowledge. In HoaglandS. J.AlbertS. (Eds.), Wildlife stewardship on tribal lands: Our place is in our soul (pp. 229–247). Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
HuntK.GruszczynskiM. (2021). The influence of new and traditional media coverage on public attention to social movements: The case of the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. Information, Communication & Society, 24(7), 1024–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1670228
38.
IvesA. (2015). For testing the significance of regression coefficients, go ahead and log-transform count data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(7), 828–835.
39.
KimmererR. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants (1st ed.). Milkweed Editions.
40.
KobreK. (2017). Photojournalism: The professionals’ approach (7th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
41.
KraftR. N.GreenJ. S. (1989). Distance perception as a function of photographic area of view. Perception & Psychophysics, 45(5), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210720
42.
KrechS. (2000). The ecological Indian: Myth and history (1. publ. as a Norton paperback). Norton.
43.
LaPoeV. L.Carter OlsonC. S.AzocarC. L.LaPoeB. R.HazarikaB.JainP. (2022). A comparative analysis of health news in Indigenous and mainstream media. Health Communication, 37(9), 1192–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1945179
44.
LaPoeV.LaPoeB. R. (2017). Indian country: Telling a story in a digital age. Michigan State University Press.
45.
LaPoeV.TallentR.AhtoneT.LaPoe IIB. R. (2018). Ethics and reporting on Native communities: Going beyond the parachute story. In LaPoeV.Carter OlsonC. S.LaPoeB. R. (Eds.), Underserved communities and digital discourse: Getting voices heard (pp. 185–203). Lexington Books.
46.
LeeN. M.VanDykeM. S. (2015). Set it and forget it: The one-way use of social media by government agencies communicating science. Science Communication, 37(4), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015588600
47.
LeeN. M.VanDykeM. S.CumminsR. G. (2018). A missed opportunity? NOAA’s use of social media to communicate climate science. Environmental Communication, 12(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1269825
48.
LeónB.NegredoS.ErvitiM. C. (2022). Social engagement with climate change: Principles for effective visual representation on social media. Climate Policy, 22(8), 976–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2077292
49.
LepofskyD.ArmstrongC. G.GreeningS.JackleyJ.CarpenterJ.GuernseyB.MathewsD.TurnerN. J. (2017). Historical ecology of cultural keystone places of the Northwest coast. American Anthropologist, 119(3), 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12893
50.
LiuB. F.HorsleyJ. S. (2007). The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701402473
51.
LoewP.MellaK. (2005). Black ink and the new red power: Native American newspapers and tribal sovereignty. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 7(3), 99–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/152263790500700301
52.
LoughK.AsheI. (2021). Journalism’s visual construction of place in environmental coverage. Newspaper Research Journal, 42(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329211018527
53.
LupiaA.AllisonD. B.JamiesonK. H.HeimbergJ.SkipperM.WolfS. M. (2024). Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(11), e2319488121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2319488121
54.
LupienP. (2020). Indigenous movements, collective action, and social media: New opportunities or new threats?Social Media + Society, 6(2), 205630512092648. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926487
55.
McIntyreK. (2019). Solutions journalism: The effects of including solution information in news stories about social problems. Journalism Practice, 13(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1409647
56.
MenziesA. K.BowlesE.McGregorD.FordA. T.PoppJ. N. (2024). Sharing Indigenous values, practices and priorities as guidance for transforming human–environment relationships. People and Nature, 6(5), 2109–2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10707
MidberryJ.BrownD. K.PotterR. F.ComfortR. N. (2024). The influence of visual frame combinations in solutions journalism stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(1), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221109235
59.
MiheljS.KondorK.ŠtětkaV. (2022). Establishing trust in experts during a crisis: Expert trustworthiness and media use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Communication, 44(3), 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221100558
60.
MooreE. E. (2019). Journalism, politics, and the Dakota Access Pipeline: Standing Rock and the framing of injustice. Routledge.
61.
MourãoR. R.BrownD. K. (2022). Black Lives Matter coverage: How protest news frames and attitudinal change affect social media engagement. Digital Journalism, 10(4), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1931900
62.
MullenL. (1998). Close-ups of the president: Photojournalistic distance from 1945 to 1974. Visual Communication Quarterly, 5(2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551399809363378
63.
MurphyJ. E.MurphyS. (1981). Let my people know: American Indian journalism, 1828–1978 (1st ed.). University of Oklahoma Press.
64.
MurphyS. M. (2010). Journalism in Indian Country: Story telling that makes sense. Howard Journal of Communications, 21(4), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2010.519590
65.
NelsonM. K.ShillingD. (2018). Traditional ecological knowledge: Learning from indigenous practices for environmental sustainability. Cambridge University Press.
66.
O’NeillS.Nicholson-ColeS. (2009). “Fear Won’t Do It”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
67.
OstromE. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
68.
RaymondC. M.SinghG. G.BenessaiahK.BernhardtJ. R.LevineJ.NelsonH.TurnerN. J.NortonB.TamJ.ChanK. M. A. (2013). Ecosystem services and beyond: Using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships. BioScience, 63(7), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
69.
RiffeD.LacyS.WatsonB.FicoF. (2019). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Routledge.
RothL. (2005). Something new in the air: The story of First Peoples television broadcasting in Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
72.
SalazarG.MonroeM. C.EnnesM.JonesJ. A.VeríssimoD. (2022). Testing the influence of visual framing on engagement and pro-environmental action. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(10), e12812. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12812
73.
SeoK.DillardJ. P.ShenF. (2013). The effects of message framing and visual image on persuasion. Communication Quarterly, 61(5), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2013.822403
74.
SmithL. T. (2022). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd edn). Bloomsbury Academic.
75.
SmithS. L.FrehnerB. (Eds.). (2010). Indians & energy: Exploitation and opportunity in the American Southwest (1st ed.). School for Advanced Research Press.
76.
SobaciM. Z. (2016). Social media and local governments: An overview. In SobaciM. Z. (Ed.), Social media and local governments: Theory and practice (pp. 3–21). Springer.
77.
TachineA.NicolazzoZ.PatelL.YangK. W. (Eds.). (2022). Introduction. In Weaving an otherwise: In-relations methodological practice (1st ed., pp. 1–11). Stylus.
78.
VanDykeM. S.LeeN. M. (2020). Science public relations: The parallel, interwoven, and contrasting trajectories of public relations and science communication theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101953
79.
VaskeJ.DonnellyM.WilliamsD.JonkerS. (2001). Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society & Natural Resources, 14(9), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419201753210585
80.
WagemansJ.ElderJ. H.KubovyM.PalmerS. E.PetersonM. A.SinghM.Von Der HeydtR. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029333
81.
WhyteK. P. (2013). On the role of traditional ecological knowledge as a collaborative concept: A philosophical study. Ecological Processes, 2(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-2-7
82.
WilsonP.StewartM. (2008). Indigeneity and indigenous media on the global stage. In WilsonP.StewartM. (Eds.), Global indigenous media: Cultures, poetics, and politics (pp. 1–35). Duke University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
