Using a two-wave panel dataset, this study sought to better understand the relationship between mainstream news media trust, countermedia attendance, and political knowledge. The results of a lagged autoregressive path model indicated that mainstream news media trust was negatively associated with countermedia attendance and that countermedia attendance was negatively associated with political learning. An additional model suggested that frequent attendance to countermedia sources is also supportive of diminished levels of trust in the mainstream news media.
AalbergT.CurranJ. (2011). How media inform democracy. Routledge.
2.
AbdullaR. A.GarrisonB.SalwenM. B.DriscollP. D.CaseyD. (2005). Online news credibility. In SalwenM. B.GarrisonB.DriscollP. D. (Eds.), Online news and the public (pp. 147–163). Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AbramowitzM. J.RepucciS. (2018). The freedom house survey for 2017: Democracy beleaguered. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 128–142.
4.
AdornoT. (1994). The stars down to earth (2nd ed.). Routledge.
5.
AllcottH.GentzkowM. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
6.
AndersenK.ShehataA.AnderssonD. (2023). Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412
7.
AtkinC. K.GallowayJ.NaymanO. B. (1974). Reciprocal causality among political interest, political knowledge, and mass media exposure [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA, United States.
8.
BensonR. (2003). Commercialism and critique: California’s alternative weeklies. In CurranJ.CouldryN. (Eds.), Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world (pp. 111–127). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
9.
BolisaniE.Cegarra NavarroJ. G.Garcia-PerezA. (2021). Managing counter-knowledge in the context of a pandemic: Challenges for scientific institutions and policymakers. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.1911606
10.
BorahP.SuY.XiaoX.LeeD. K. L. (2022). Incidental news exposure and COVID-19 misperceptions: A moderated-mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 129(1), 107173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107173
11.
CacciatoreM. A.YeoS. K.ScheufeleD. A.XenosM. A.BrossardD.CorleyE. A. (2018). Is Facebook making us dumber? Exploring social media use as a predictor of political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018770447
12.
CampbellD. E.NiemiR. G. (2016). Testing civics: State-level civic education requirements and political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000368
13.
ChenH. T. (2021). Second screening and the engaged public: The role of second screening for news and political expression in an O-S-R-O-R model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 526–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019866432
14.
ChristiansC. G.GlasserT. L.McQuailD.NordenstrengK.WhiteR. A. (2009). Theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.
De VreeseC. H.BoomgaardenH. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41(1), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500164
20.
DimitrovaD. V.ShehataA.StrömbäckJ.NordL. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021142600
21.
DowningJ. (2001) Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Sage.
22.
FallisD. (2016). Mis-and dis-information. In FloridiL. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of information (pp. 332–346). Routledge.
23.
FarkasJ.SchouJ. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost—The Public, 25(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047
24.
FletcherR.ParkS. (2017). The impact of trust in the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1279979
25.
FordeS. (1998). Monitoring the establishment: The development of the alternative press in Australia. Media International Australia, 87(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X9808700112
26.
FulgoniG. M.LipsmanA. (2017). The downside of digital word of mouth and the pursuit of media quality: How social sharing is disrupting digital advertising models and metrics. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(2), 127–131.
Gil de ZúñigaH.WeeksB.Ardèvol-AbreuA. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12185
30.
GuessA.NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 presidential campaign. European Research Council, 9, 4.
31.
GuessA.NaglerJ.TuckerJ. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
32.
GuessA.NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x
33.
GuoJ.ChenH. T.LuS. (2024). Better informed or stay naïve? Revisiting different types of selective exposure and the impact on political learning. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 68(3), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2024.2341031
34.
HaasT. (2004). Research note: Alternative media, public journalism and the pursuit of democratization. Journalism Studies, 5(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670032000174783
35.
HallerA.HoltK.de La BrosseR. (2019). The “other” alternatives: Political right-wing alternative media. Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00039_2
36.
HallinD. C. (1986). The “uncensored war”: The media and Vietnam. University of California Press.
37.
HallinD. C. (2005). Field theory, differentiation theory, and comparative media research. In BensonR.NeveuE. (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 224–243). Polity Press.
38.
HameleersM.YektaN. (2023). Entering an information era of parallel truths? A qualitative analysis of legitimizing and de-legitimizing truth claims in established versus alternative media outlets. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231189685
39.
HaytonJ. C.AllenD. G.ScarpelloV. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675
40.
HolbertR. L. (2005). Back to basics: Revisiting, resolving, and expanding some of the fundamental issues of political communication research. Political Communication, 22(4), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600500311436
41.
HoppT.FerrucciP. (2020). A spherical rendering of deviant information resilience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(2), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020916428
42.
HoppT.FerrucciP.VargoC. J.FisherJ. (2020). Exposure to difference on Facebook, trust, and political knowledge. Mass Communication and Society, 23(6), 779–809.
43.
HoppT.FerrucciP.VargoC. J. (2020). Why do people share ideologically extreme, false, and misleading content on social media? A self-report and trace data-based analysis of countermedia content dissemination on Facebook and Twitter. Human Communication Research, 46(4), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz022
44.
HoppT.FerrucciP.VargoC. J.LiuL. (2023). Is online textual political expression associated with political knowledge?Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221113808
45.
HoppT.KazmiS. (2023). Assessing the potential conditioning effects of mis and disinformation self-efficacy on the relationship between general social media use and political knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1226861
IhlebækK. A.FigenschouT. U. (2022). Knock, knock! Right-wing alternative media is at the door. In FerrucciP.EldridgeS. A.III (Eds.), The institutions changing journalism: Barbarians inside the gate (pp. 17–31). Routledge.
48.
JenkinsJ.WolfgangJ. D. (2017). A place to protest: Assessing alternative newsweeklies’ ideal roles and creation of alternative publics. Journalism Practice, 11(8), 960–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1209976
Jones-JangS. M.KimD. H.KenskiK. (2021). Perceptions of mis- or disinformation exposure predict political cynicism: Evidence from a two-wave survey during the 2018 US midterm elections. New Media & Society, 23(10), 3105–3125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820943878
51.
KaufholdK.ValenzuelaS.De ZúñigaH. G. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 515–529.
52.
KleinbergS. M.LauR. (2019). The importance of political knowledge for effective citizenship: Differences between the broadcast and Internet generations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(2), 338–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz025
53.
KohringM.MatthesJ. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298071
54.
LaddJ. M. (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton University Press.
MoellerJ.de VreeseC. (2019). Spiral of political learning: The reciprocal relationship of news media use and political knowledge among adolescents. Communication Research, 46(8), 1078–1094.
58.
MourãoR. R.RobertsonC. T. (2019). Fake news as discursive integration: An analysis of sites that publish false, misleading, hyperpartisan and sensational information. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2077–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871
59.
NoppariE.HiltunenI.AhvaL. (2019). User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland. Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00041_1
ProchazkaF.SchweigerW. (2019). How to measure generalized trust in news media? An adaptation and test of scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1506021
63.
PyrhönenN.BauvoisG. (2020). Conspiracies beyond fake news. Produsing reinformation on presidential elections in the transnational hybrid media system. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 705–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12339
ReiterF.MatthesJ. (2023). Correctives of the mainstream media? A panel study on mainstream media use, alternative digital media use, and the erosion of political interest as well as political knowledge. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1974916
66.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
67.
SherryJ. L. (2004). Media effects theory and the nature/nurture debate: A historical overview and directions for future research. Media Psychology, 6(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_4
68.
SlaterM. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
69.
StrömbäckJ.TsfatiY.BoomgaardenH.DamstraA.LindgrenE.VliegenthartR.LindholmT. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
TandocE. C.Jr.SeetS. K. (2022). War of the words: How individuals respond to “fake news,” “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “online falsehoods.”Journalism Practice, 18(6), 1503–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2110929
73.
ThomasF.ShehataA.OttoL. P.MöllerJ.PresteleE. (2021). How to capture reciprocal communication dynamics: Comparing longitudinal statistical approaches in order to analyze within-and between-person effects. Journal of Communication, 71(2), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab003
74.
ToivanenP.NelimarkkaM.ValaskiviK. (2022). Remediation in the hybrid media environment: Understanding countermedia in context. New Media & Society, 24(9), 2127–2152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821992701
75.
TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_2
76.
ValaskiviK.RobertsonD. G. (2022). Introduction: Epistemic contestations in the hybrid media environment. Popular Communication, 20(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2057998
77.
ValenzuelaS.BachmannI.LawrenceR. G.GildeZúñigaH. (2023). Politics and media in journalism & mass communication quarterly: A centennial research retrospective. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(4), 808–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231203542
Van AelstP.TothF.CastroL.ŠtětkaV.VreeseC. D.AalbergT.CardenalA. S.CorbuN.EsserF.HopmannD. N.Koc-MichalskaK.MatthesJ.SchemerC.SheaferT.SplendoreS.StanyerJ.StępińskaA.StrömbäckJ.TheocharisY. (2021). Does a crisis change news habits? A comparative study of the effects of COVID-19 on news media use in 17 European countries. Digital Journalism, 9(9), 1208–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1943481
80.
Van DuynE.CollierJ. (2019). Priming and fake news: The effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news media. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
81.
VannetteD. L.KrosnickJ. A. (2009). The Palgrave handbook of survey research. Palgrave McMillan.
WeeksB. E.LaneD. S.HahnL. B. (2022). Online incidental exposure to news can minimize interest-based political knowledge gaps: Evidence from two U.S. elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221991550
85.
YaleR. N.JensenJ. D.CarcioppoloN.SunY.LiuM. (2015). Examining first- and second-order factor structures for news credibility. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(3), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.106165242F
86.
YamamotoM.YangF. (2021). Does news help us become knowledgeable or think we are knowledgeable? Examining a linkage of traditional and social media use with political knowledge. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1969611
87.
YangS.KrauseN. M.BaoL.CaliceM. N.NewmanT. P.ScheufeleD. A.XenosM. A.BrossardD. (2023). In AI we trust: The tnterplay of media use, political ideology, and trust in shaping emerging AI Attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231190868
88.
Ylä-AnttilaT. (2018). Populist knowledge: “Post-truth” repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5(4), 356–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2017.1414620
89.
Ylä-AnttilaT.BauvoisG.PyrhönenN. (2019). Politicization of migration in the countermedia style: A computational and qualitative analysis of populist discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 32, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100326
90.
ZhangJ.CooksE.KimB.ViehouserM.BarnidgeM. (2024). Who says what? Social networks and digital inequalities in online political expression and content creation. The Information Society, 40(5), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2024.2360511
91.
ZimmermannF.KohringM. (2020). Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: A panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 German parliamentary election. Political Communication, 37(2), 215–237.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
