Social media allow users not only to read news, but also to evaluate, reconstruct, and share it. This study conceptualizes curatorial news use via social media as an important news use behavior, which involves evaluating the existing news, adding new values by reconstructing it, and then sharing it with other social media users. An analysis of survey data from 650 South Korean adults shows that curatorial news use on social media has a significantly positive association with political knowledge, internal political efficacy, and offline and online political participation. The interaction of social media news use and curatorial news use is also significantly associated with high levels of political knowledge and political participation.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (7th ed.). Deerfield, IL: Author.
3.
AndolinaM. W.JenkinsK.ZukinC.KeeterS. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. Political Science & Politics, 36, 275-280.
4.
BaumM. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence?Political Communication, 20, 173-190.
5.
BeamM. A.HutchensM. J.HmielowskiJ. D. (2016). Clicking vs. sharing: The relationship between online news behaviors and political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 215-220.
6.
BeckerH.NaamanM.GravanoL. (2010, February). Learning similarity metrics for event identification in social media. In Proceedings of the third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 291-300). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
BentleyT. (2006). Imagine a child of five today. London, England: Demos and HTI.
9.
BestS. J.KruegerB. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27, 183-216.
10.
BrunsA. (2006). Towards produsage: Futures for user-led content production. Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4863/1/4863_1.pdf
11.
BrunsA. (2015). Working the story: News curation in social media as a second wave of citizen journalism. In AttonC. (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 379-388). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
BrunsA.HighfieldT. (2012). Blogs, Twitter, and breaking news: The produsage of citizen journalism. Produsing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory, 80, 15-32.
13.
CampbellA.GurinG.MillerW. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
14.
CarpentierN. (2007). Journalism, media and democracy. In Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and democratic media roles, European communication research and education association series (Vol. 3, pp. 151-156). Chicago, IL: Intellect Books.
15.
ChaffeeS. H.MetzgerM. J. (2001). The end of mass communication?Mass Communication and Society, 4, 365-379.
16.
ChaffeeS. H.ZhaoX.LeshnerG. (1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21, 305-324.
17.
ChanM.WuX.HaoY.XiR.JinT. (2012). Microblogging, online expression, and political efficacy among young Chinese citizens: The moderating role of information and entertainment needs in the use of Weibo. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 345-349.
18.
ChoiJ.LeeJ. K.MetzgarE. (2013, August). Networks versus news media, or networks and news media? The interactive effects of network heterogeneity and news sharing on social network services (SNSs) on citizens’ participatory activities. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Washington, DC.
19.
ClarkJ.AufderheideP. (2009). Public media 2.0: Dynamic, engaged publics. Washington DC: Center for Social Media.
20.
CookT. E. (1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
21.
CraigS. C.NiemiR. G.SilverG. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12, 289-314.
22.
DavidC. C. (2009). Learning political information from the news: A closer look at the role of motivation. Journal of Communication, 59, 243-261.
23.
de BoerC.VelthuijsenA. S. (2001). Participation in conversations about the news. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 140-158.
24.
Delli CarpiniM. X.CookF. L.JacobsL. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
25.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans don’t know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
DeuzeM. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5, 203-230.
27.
de VreeseC. H.BoomgaardenH. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41, 317-341.
28.
de ZúñigaH. G. (2016). Modeling the process of political participation in the EU. In ThielM. (Ed.), European identity and culture: Narratives of transnational belonging (pp. 75-95). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
de ZúñigaH. G.BachmannI.HsuS. H.BrundidgeJ. (2013). Expressive versus consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538-1559.
30.
de ZúñigaH. G.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319-336.
31.
de ZúñigaH. G.Puig-I-AbrilE.RojasH. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11, 553-574.
32.
DiehlT.WeeksB. E.de ZúñigaH. G. (2016). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society, 18, 1875-1895.
33.
di GennaroC.DuttonW. (2006). The internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59, 299-313.
34.
EvelandW. P.Jr. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28, 571-601.
35.
EvelandW. P.Jr. (2002). News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 26-40.
36.
EvelandW. P.Jr. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177-193.
37.
EvelandW. P.Jr.ShahD. V.KwakN. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359-386.
GoodeL. (2009). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society, 11, 1287-1305.
40.
HardyB. W.ScheufeleD. A. (2005). Examining differential gains from internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions. Journal of Communication, 55, 71-84.
41.
HargittaiE.WalejkoG. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information Communication and Society, 11, 239-256.
42.
HolbertR. L.LambeJ. L.DudoA. D.CarltonK. A. (2007). Primacy effects of the daily show and national TV news viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 20-38.
43.
HolmbergC. (2015). Politicization of the low-carb high-fat diet in Sweden, promoted on social media by non-conventional experts. International Journal of E-Politics, 6, 27-42.
JenkinsH. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
46.
JenkinsH.FordS.GreenJ. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.
47.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2015). Reasons to believe: Influence of credibility on motivations for using social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 544-555.
48.
KaufholdK.ValenzuelaS.de ZúñigaH. G. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 515-529.
49.
KayeB. K. (2010). Between Barack and a net place: Users and uses of social network sites and blogs for political information. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.), The networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 208-231). New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
KayeB. K.JohnsonT. J. (2015). I only have eyes for YouTube: Motives for political use. Journal of Social Media Studies, 1, 91-104.
51.
KayeB. K.JohnsonT. J. (2017, July). An appetite for apps: A comparison of app reliant users on political activity and media reliance. Paper presented at the World Association for Public Opinion Research annual conference. Lisbon, Portugal.
52.
KenskiK.StroudN. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173-192.
53.
KimY.HsuS. H.de ZúñigaH. G. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63, 498-516.
54.
KsiazekT. B.MalthouseE. C.WebsterJ. G. (2010). News-seekers and avoiders: Exploring patterns of total news consumption across media and the relationship to civic participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 551-568.
55.
KsiazekT. B.PeerL.LessardK. (2016). User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society, 18, 502-520.
56.
KuderG. F.RichardsonM. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151-160.
57.
LeungL. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11, 1327-1347.
58.
MerrinW. (2009). Media Studies 2.0: Upgrading and open-sourcing the discipline. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 1, 17-34.
59.
MorrellM. E. (2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of political efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 589-602.
60.
NapoliP. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
61.
NavasE.GallagherO. (2014). Routledge companion to remix studies. London, England: Routledge.
62.
NiemiR. G.CraigS. C.MatteiF. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1407-1413.
63.
ParkC. S. (2017). Citizen news podcasts and engaging journalism: The formation of a counter-public sphere in South Korea. Pacific Journalism Review, 23, 231-248.
64.
ParkC. S. (in press). Do social media facilitate political learning? Social media use for news, reasoning and political knowledge. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 6, 206-238.
65.
ParkC. S.KaranK. (2014). Unraveling the relationships between smartphone use, exposure to heterogeneity, political efficacy, and political participation: A mediation model approach. Asian Journal of Communication, 24, 370-389.
66.
PennebakerJ. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162-166.
67.
PicardR. G. (2014). Twilight or new dawn of journalism?Digital Journalism, 15, 500-510.
PingreeR. J. (2007). How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. Communication Theory, 17, 439-461.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York, NY: Macmillan.
73.
ScheufeleD. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29, 46-65.
74.
SchudsonM. (2008). Why democracies need an unlovable press. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
75.
SeitzingerJ. (2014, April). Curate Me! Exploring online identity through social curation in networked learning. In 9th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 7-9). Brussels, Belgium: Electronic Platform for Adult Learning in Europe.
76.
ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M.LeeN. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26, 102-117.
77.
SnyderI. (2015). Discourses of “curation” in digital times. In HarrisR. H.ChikA.HafnerC. (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age (pp. 209-225). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
78.
ThorsonK.WellsC. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26, 309-328.
ValenzuelaS.ArriagadaA.SchermanA. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62, 299-314.
81.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
82.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics (Vol. 4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
VilliM.MoisanderJ.JoyA. (2012). Social curation in consumer communities: Consumers as curators of online media content. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 490-495.
WeiL.YanY. (2010, March). Knowledge production and political participation: Reconsidering the knowledge gap theory in the web 2.0 environment. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, Chengdu, China.
86.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
87.
ZhangY. (2012). College students’ uses and perceptions of social networking sites for health and wellness information. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 17(3), 1-20.
