Multiscreening (using a device like a smartphone while watching TV) is pervasive and may have beneficial and detrimental consequences for informed citizenship. This national survey (N = 847) examines how multiscreening during debates and TV news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign was related to political learning. Multiscreening was associated with higher levels of thinking about politics (elaboration) and greater confidence about knowledge (information efficacy) but lower actual knowledge. The positive relationship with efficacy yet negative relationship with knowledge raises the possibility that multiscreening contributes to overconfidence. Implications for cognitive resource theories are discussed.
AalbergT.van AelstP.CurranJ. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15, 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210367422
2.
ArmoudianM.CriglerA. N. (2010). Constructing the vote: Media effects in a constructionist model. In LeighleyJ. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior (pp. 300–325). Oxford University Press.
3.
BanducciS.GieblerH.KritzingerS. (2017). Knowing more from less: How the information environment increases knowledge of party positions. British Journal of Political Science, 47, 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00007123415000204
4.
BarabasJ.JeritJ. (2009). Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00358.x
5.
BarnidgeM.Gil de ZuñigaH.DiehlT. (2017). Second screening and political persuasion on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61, 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309416
6.
BenoitW. L.HansenG. J.VerserR. M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000179133
7.
BerkmanR.KitchL. W. (1986). Politics in the media age. McGraw-Hill.
BraselS. A.GipsJ. (2011). Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0350
10.
BraselS. A.GipsJ. (2017). Media multitasking: How visual cues affect switching behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 258–265.
11.
BrophyJ. (2010). Motivating students to learn. Taylor & Francis.
12.
CacciatoreM. A.YeoS. K.ScheufeleD. A.XenosM. A.BrossardD.CorleyE. A. (2018). Is Facebook making us dumber? Exploring social media use as a predictor of political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018770447
13.
CarrierL. M.CheeverN. A.RosenL. D.BenitezS.ChangJ. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 483–489.
14.
ChadwickA. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
15.
ChadwickA.O’LoughlinB.VaccariC. (2017). Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309415
ChenH.-T. (2019). Second screening and the engaged public: The role of second screening for news and political expression in an O-S-R-O-R model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019866432
20.
de VreeseC. H.NeijensP. C. (2016). Measuring media exposure in a changing communications environment. Communication Methods and Measures, 10, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150441
21.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
22.
DilliplaneS.GoldmanS. K.MutzD. C. (2013). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00600.x
23.
DimitrovaD. V.ShehataA.StrombackJ.NordL. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004
24.
DrewD.WeaverD. H. (1998). Voter learning in the 1996 presidential election: Did the media matter?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500205
25.
DuffB. R. L.SegijnC. M. (2019). Advertising in a media multitasking era: Considerations and future directions. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 27–37.
26.
EisingaR.GrotenhuisM.PelzerB. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
EvelandW. P.HutchensM. J.ShenF. (2009). Exposure, attention, or “use” of news? Assessing aspects of the reliability and validity of a central concept in political communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 3, 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450903378925
29.
GeersS.BosL.de VreeseC. H. (2017). Informed switchers? How the impact of election news exposure on vote change depends on political information efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1857–1878. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6063
Gil de ZuñigaH.Garcia-PerdomoV.McGregorS. C. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65, 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12174
32.
Gil de ZuñigaH.LiuJ. H. (2017). Second screening politics in the social media sphere: Advancing research on dual screen use in political communication with evidence from 20 countries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62, 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309420
33.
GottfriedJ. A.HardyB. W.HolbertL. R.WinnegK. M.JamiesonK. H. (2017). The changing nature of political debate consumption: Social media, multitasking, and knowledge acquisition. Political Communication, 34, 172–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1154120
34.
GroshekJ.DimitrovaD. V. (2011). A cross-section of voter learning, campaign interest and intention to vote in the 2008 American election: Did Web 2.0 matter?Communication Studies Journal, 9, 355–375.
35.
HuberB.Gil de ZuñigaH.DiehlT.LiuJ. (2019). Effects of second screening: Building social media social capital through dual screen use. Human Communication Research, 45, 334-365. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz004
36.
JeongS.HwangY. (2012). Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. Journal of Communication, 62, 571–587.
37.
JeongS.HwangY. (2016). Media multitasking effects on cognitive vs. attitudinal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 42, 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12089
38.
JungN.KimY.Gil de ZuñigaH. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
39.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.
40.
KaidL. L.McKinneyM. S.TedescoJ. C. (2007). Political information efficacy and young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1093–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207300040
41.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
42.
LangA. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
43.
MaruyamaM.RobertsonS. P.DouglasS.SemaanB.FaucettH. (2014). Hybrid media consumption: How tweeting during a televised political debate influences the vote decision. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 1422–1432). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531719
44.
McKinneyM.ChattopadhyayS. (2007). Political engagement through debates: Young citizens’ reactions to the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207300050
45.
MitchellA. (2018, December3). Americans still prefer watching to reading the news—and mostly still through television. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2018/12/03
46.
NeeR. C.DozierD. M. (2017). Second screen effects: Linking multiscreen media use to television engagement and incidental learning. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23, 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592510
Oeldorf-HirschA. (2018). The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society, 21, 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022
49.
PaivioA. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
50.
PerloffR. M. (2018). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.
51.
PriorM. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211172
52.
PriorM. (2013). The challenge of measuring media exposure: Reply to Dilliplane, Goldman, and Mutz. Political Communication, 30, 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.819539
53.
RanW.YamamotoM. (2019). Media multitasking, second screening, and political knowledge: Task-relevant and task-irrelevant second screening during election news consumption. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1565659
54.
RanW.YamamotoM.XuS. (2016). Media multitasking during political news consumption: A relationship with factual and subjective political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.015
55.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
56.
SalvucciD. D.TaatgenN. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115, 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.101
57.
SchaapG.KleemansM.van CauwenbergeA. (2018). Second screening for news: Effects of presentation on information processing and program liking. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 76–85.
58.
SchunkD. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359–382.
59.
SegijnC. M.VoorveldH. A. M.VandebergL.PennekampS. F.SmitE. G. (2017). Insight into everyday media use with multiple screens. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 779–797.
60.
SegijnC. M.VoorveldH. A. M.SmitE. G. (2017). How related multiscreening could positively affect advertising outcomes. Journal of Advertising, 46(4), 455–472.
61.
ShehataA.StrombackJ. (2018). Learning political news from social media: Network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217749354
62.
SlaterM. D. (2004). Operationalizing and analyzing exposure: The foundation of media effects research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100112
VaccariC.ChadwickA.O’LoughlinB. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65, 1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12187
66.
van CauwenbergeA.SchaapG.van RoyR. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.021
67.
VoorveldH. A. M.van der GootM. (2013). Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.816709
68.
WangZ.IrwinM.CooperC.SrivastavaJ. (2015). Multidimensions of media multitasking and adaptive media selection. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 102–127.
69.
WangZ.TchernevJ. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62, 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x
70.
WeiR.LoV. (2008). News media use and knowledge about the 2006 U.S. midterm elections: Why exposure matters in voter learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn032
XenosM.MoyP. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57, 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.2007.57.issue-4
73.
YooS. W.KimJ. W.Gil de ZuñigaH. (2017). Cognitive benefits for senders: Antecedents and effects of political expression on social media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654438
