Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Navigating Expressions of Femininity in Online Influencer Culture: A Content Analysis of Collegiate Women Athlete Branding in the Age of “Name,Image,and Likeness”
The National Collegiate Athletic Association’s 2021 “name, image, and likeness” policy granted athletes the right to their own publicity and allowed them to build complex, digital brands. Using Goffman’s theory of self-representation, this article analyzes how three women athletes—Olivia Dunne, Haley Cavinder, and Hanna Cavinder—represented themselves on Instagram and TikTok during the first year of this policy. Findings show that these athletes portrayed themselves primarily in backstage settings; however, they also acknowledged their athleticism through competition-adjacent photographs and videos that complicate Goffman’s binary understanding of self-representation. These findings advance understandings of women athlete self-expression in the influencer economy.
AbidinC. (2020). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
3.
AndersonE. D. (2009). The maintenance of masculinity among the stakeholders of sport. Sport Management Review, 12(1), 3–14.
4.
BruceT.HovdenJ.MarkulaP. (2010). Sportswomen at the olympics. Brill.
5.
BullinghamL.VasconcelosA. C. (2013). “The presentation of self in the online world”: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512470051
6.
BushC. (2020). “She was not a girly girl”: Athletic apparel, female masculinity and the endorsement of difference. In ReillyA.BarryB. (Eds.), Crossing gender boundaries: Fashion to create, disrupt, and transcend (pp. 109–121). The University of Chicago Press.
7.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
8.
Caro-CastañoL. (2022). Playing to be influencers: A comparative study on Spanish and Colombian young people on Instagram. Communication & Society, 35(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.1.81-99
9.
ChadwickS.BurtonN. (2008). From Beckham to Ronaldo: Assessing the nature of football player brands. Journal of Sponsorship, 1(4), 307–317.
10.
CoccoA. R.MoormanA. M. (2022). Untapped potential: An examination of name, image, and likeness earnings estimates for community college athletes. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 15, 256–271.
11.
CocheR. (2014). How golfers and tennis players frame themselves: A content analysis of Twitter profile pictures. Journal of Sports Media, 9(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsm.2014.0003
12.
CohenR. L. (2013). Femininity, childhood and the non-making of a sporting celebrity: The Beth Tweddle case. Sociological Research Online, 18(3), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3193
13.
CookyC.CouncilL. D.MearsM. A.MessnerM. A. (2021). One and done: The long eclipse of women’s televised sports, 1989–2019. Communication & Sport, 9(3), 347–371.
14.
CorrC.WeinerJ.StokowskiS. (2023). “We do everything on our own”: FBS athletes’ perceptions of NIL value and support. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16(1), 333–351.
15.
CruzE. G.ThornhamH. (2015). Selfies beyond self-representation: The (theoretical) f(r)ictions of a practice. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 7(1), Article 28073. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v7.28073
DrentenJ.GurrieriL.TylerM. (2019). Sexualized labour in digital culture: Instagram influencers, porn chic and the monetization of attention. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12354
18.
DuffyB. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press.
19.
DuffyB. E.HundE. (2019). Gendered visibility on social media: Navigating Instagram’s authenticity bind. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4983–5002. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11729
20.
EhrlichS. C.SabinJ.TernesN. C. (2023). With name, image, and likeness, college sports enters the gig economy. Journal of Sport Management, 37(5), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0152
21.
FinkJ. S. (2015). Female athletes, women’s sport, and the sport media commercial complex: Have we really “come a long way, baby”?. Sport Management Review, 18(3), 331–342.
22.
FisherB. (2021). Swipe up: Reality stars-turned-influencers vs. college athletes and the road ahead with name, image, and likeness. Mississippi State Law Review, 101(1), 239–260.
23.
FrierS. (2021). No filter: The inside story of Instagram. Simon & Schuster.
24.
GladdenJ. M.MilneG. R.SuttonW. A. (1998). A conceptual framework for assessing brand equity in Division I College Athletics. Journal of Sport Management, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.12.1.1
25.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life [Monograph]. University of Edinburgh Social Science Research Centre, 2, 1–162.
HaenleinM.AnadolE.FarnsworthT.HugoH.HunichenJ.WelteD. (2020). Navigating the new era of influencer marketing: How to be successful on Instagram, Tiktok, & Co. California Management Review, 63(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620958166
HarrisH. A.BrisonN. T. (2024). Collegiate female athlete experiences with name, image, and likeness. Journal of Athlete Development and Experience, 6(1), 47–63.
30.
Hayes SauderM.BlaszkaM. (2018). 23 players, 23 voices: An examination of the U.S. women’s national soccer team on Twitter during the 2015 world cup. Communication & Sport, 62(2), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479516685579
31.
IsardR. F.MeltonE. N. (2022). Does sport media raise her name? Examining intersectional representation in media barratives. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 12(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-02-2021-0015
32.
JessopA.SabinJ. (2021). The sky is not falling: Why name, image, and likeness legislation does not violate title IX and could narrow the publicity gap between men’s sport and Women’s Sport Athletes. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 31(2), 253–288. https://doi.org/10.18060/25602
33.
KaneM. J.LaVoiN. M.FinkJ. S. (2013). Exploring elite female athletes’ interpretations of sport media images: A window into the construction of social identity and “selling sex” in women’s sports. Communication & Sport, 1(3), 269–298.
34.
LebelK.DanylchukK. (2012). How tweet it is: A gendered analysis of professional tennis players’ self-presentation on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 461–480.
35.
LeeJ. W.MilochK. S.KraftP.TatumL. (2008). Building the brand: A case study of Troy University. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17(3), 178–182.
36.
LiB.StokowskiS.DittmoreS. W.MalmoJ. R.RolfeD. T. (2017). A case study of self-representation on Twitter: A gender analysis of how student-athletes portray themselves. Global Sport Journal, 5(1), 61–75.
37.
LinesG. (2001). Villains, fools or heroes? Sports stars as role models for young people. Leisure Studies, 20, 285–303.
38.
LobpriesJ.BennettG.BrisonN. (2018). How I perform is not enough: Exploring branding barriers faced by elite female athletes. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 27(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.32731/smq.271.032018.01
39.
MarshallK.ChamberlainK.HodgettsD. (2018). Female bodybuilders on Instagram: Negotiating an empowered femininity. Feminism &Amp; Psychology, 29(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353518808319
40.
McClearenJ. (2021). Fighting visibility: Sports media and female athletes in the UFC. University of Illinois Press.
41.
McEvoyC. (2006). The impact of elite individual athletic performance on university applicants for admission in NCAA division I-A football. The Sport Journal, 2006, 1–7.
42.
MeyerJ.ZimbalistA. (2021). A win-win: College athletes get paid for their names, images, and likenesses and colleges maintain the primacy of academics. In ZimablistA. (Ed.), Whither college sports: Amateurism, athlete safety, and academic integrity (pp. 93–153). Rutgers University Press.
43.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
44.
NagelM. S.McGeeL. W. (2012). Building an athletic brand: The University of South Carolina Beaufort crafts a new image. Case Studies in Sport Management, 1(1), 59–75. Retrieved Jul 15, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1123/cssm.1.1.59
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, Article 220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
48.
PosberghA.AndrewsD. L.ClevengerS. M. (2023a). “Willpower knows no obstacles”: Examining neoliberal postfeminist messaging in Nike’s transnational advertisements for women. Communication & Sport, 11(4), 724–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795211063537
49.
PosberghA.ClevengerS. M.KaneC. E. (2023b). Caster Semenya as a “can-do” hero for “at-risk” girls: Analyzing Nike’s neoliberal postfeminist advertisements. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 40(2–3), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2023.2228382
50.
PunchS.RussellZ.CairnsB. (2020). (Per)forming identity in the mind-sport bridge: Self, partnership and Community. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 56(6), 804–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690220959648
51.
RahikainenK.ToffolettiK. (2022). “I just don’t wanna deal with the headache of people fighting over the internet”: A study of sponsored female climbers’ digital labor. Sociology of Sport Journal, 39(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2020-0177
52.
SandersonJ.BrowningB.SchmittelA. (2015). Education on the digital terrain: A case study exploring college athletes’ perceptions of social-media training. International Journal of Sport Communication, 8(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526438133
53.
ScovelS. (2024). Mentioned, quoted, and promoted: How sports journalists constructed a narrative of athletes’ value in the “name, image, and likeness” era. International Journal of Sport Communication, 17, 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2024-0063
54.
ScovelS. M. (2023). Name, image, and likeness: A content analysis of how women student athletes share their stories and lived experiences on social media in the age of NIL [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland.
55.
SelviA. (2019). Qualitative content analysis. In McKinleyJ.RoseH. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 440–452). Routledge.
56.
SimmonsI. (2023). But who really wins? College athletes’ analysis of name image likeness policy narratives [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern California, University of Southern California Digital Library.
57.
SmithL. R.SandersonJ. (2015). I’m going to Instagram it! An analysis of athlete self-presentation on Instagram. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029125
58.
SuY.BakerB. J.DoyleJ. P.YanM. (2020). Fan engagement in 15 seconds: Athletes relationship marketing during a pandemic via TikTok. International Journal of Sport Communication, 13(3), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2020-0238
ThorpeH.ToffolettiK.BruceT. (2017). Sportswomen and social media: Bringing third-wave feminism, postfeminism, and neoliberal feminism into conversation. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 41(5), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723517730808
61.
ToffolettiK.ThorpeH. (2018a). The athletic labour of femininity: The branding and consumption of global celebrity sportswomen on Instagram. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517747068
62.
ToffolettiK.ThorpeH. (2018b). Female athletes’ self-representation on social media: A feminist analysis of neoliberal marketing strategies in “Economies of visibility..”Feminism &Amp; Psychology, 28(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517726705
63.
WangS. (2020). Personal branding strategies of female entertainment influencers on TikTok [Master’s thesis]. Rochester Institute of Technology.
64.
WanzerC. V.PfenderE. J.TravisN. P.BleakleyA. (2024). Mapping the field: A content analysis of marketable NCAA athletes’ social media self-presentation. Communication & Sport, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795241232404
65.
WinslowL.BrowningB.IshakA. W. (2024). Swag, social media, and the rhetoric of style in college athletic-recruitment discourse. International Journal of Sport Communication, 17(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0168
66.
WolterS. (2021). A longitudinal analysis of espnW: Almost 10 years of challenging hegemonic masculinity. Communication & Sport, 9(5), 718–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519895479
67.
ZaffutoJ. S. (2023). Producing graphic media for sports: New Horizons and possibilities for the Motion Media Specialist. Routledge.
CavinderH.CavinderH. [@cavindertwins]. (2021a, October14). CAVINDER TWINS x PSDstill can’t believe we have our own @psdunderwear collection: Available in men’s and women’s—None of this would be possible without you guys! Link in bioGo shop! [Photo]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CVBA0Uup6rY/?img_index=2
[Photograph]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CUBeRBVJLm1/?hl=en
[Photograph]. Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/CYsbmn3r75-/?hl=en
[Photo]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CcogZtUL9Bq/?img_index=1