This study looks at political polarization from Italian political journalists’ perspectives and investigates (a) how they conceive political polarization and (b) how they navigate it in their daily work. Empirical data shed light on a number of main factors shaping journalists’ perceptions of political polarization, pinpointing the existence of “media polarization.” The findings also revealed five ideal-typical strategies adopted to deal with a polarized environment: mitigating, aligning, nurturing, creating, and ignoring polarization. The reflections proposed throughout the article suggest new perspectives through which to analyze the topic, fostering a debate beyond the case study.
BarberM.McCartyN. (2013). Causes and consequences of polarization. In MansbridgeJ.MartinC. (Eds.), Negotiating agreement in politics (pp. 37–90). American Political Science Association.
2.
BarnidgeM. (2017). Exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face and anonymous online settings. Political Communication, 34(2), 302–321.
3.
BentivegnaS.MarchettiR. (2018). Journalists at a crossroads: Are traditional norms and practices challenged by Twitter?Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 19(2), 270–290.
4.
CarlsonM. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368.
5.
ChadwickA. (2011). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the “Bullygate” affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3–29.
6.
ChadwickA. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
7.
ColleoniE.RozzaA.ArvidssonA. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64, 317–332.
8.
CorniaA. (2014). Will Italian political journalism ever change? In KuhnR.NielsenR. K. (Eds.), Political journalism in transition: Western Europe in a comparative perspective (pp. 47–73). Tauris.
9.
DuboisE.BlankG. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745.
10.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588.
11.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J. (2012). Disconnect: The breakdown of representation in American politics. University of Oklahoma Press.
12.
FletcherR.ParkS. (2017). The impact of trust in the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281–1299.
13.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. (2006). Media bias and reputation (NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper, 11664). http://www.nber.org/papers/w11664
14.
GidronN.AdamsJ.HorneW. (2019). Toward a comparative research agenda on affective polarization in mass publics. APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter, 29, 30–36.
15.
HalberstamY.KnightB. (2016). Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter. Journal of Public Economics, 143, 73–88.
16.
HallinD. C. (1989). The uncensored war: The media and Vietnam. University of California Press.
17.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HanitzschT.VosT. P. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive constitution of journalism. Communication Theory, 27(2), 115–135.
19.
HanuschF.BrunsA. (2017). Journalistic branding on Twitter: A representative study of Australian journalists’ profile descriptions. Digital Journalism, 5(1), 26–43.
20.
HanuschF.NöllekeD. (2019). Journalistic homophily on social media. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 22–44.
21.
IannelliL. (2016). Hybrid politics: Media and participation. Sage.
22.
IyengarS.HahnK. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39.
23.
IyengarS.SoodG.LelkesY. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.
24.
KlofstadC. A.SokheyA. E.McClurgS. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134.
25.
KubinE.von SikorskiC. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206.
26.
LauR. R.AndersenD. J.DitontoT. M.KleinbergM. S.RedlawskD. P. (2017). Effect of media environment diversity and advertising tone on information search, selective exposure, and affective polarization. Political Behavior, 39(1), 231–255.
27.
LevenduskyM. N.Malhotra. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes?Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301.
28.
LuY.LeeJ. K. (2019). Partisan information sources and affective polarization: Panel analysis of the mediating role of anger and fear. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 767–783.
29.
ManciniP. (2015). Parallelism, political. In MazzoleniG (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 919–923). John Wiley & Sons.
30.
MeyersD. G.LammH. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 602–627.
31.
MolyneuxL. (2015). What journalists retweet: Opinion, humor, and brand development on Twitter. Journalism, 16(7), 920–935.
32.
MolyneuxL.MourãoR. R. (2019). Political journalists’ normalization of Twitter: Interaction and new affordances. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 248–266.
33.
MutzD. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126.
34.
MutzD. C.MondakJ. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–156.
OjalaM. (2021). Is the age of impartial journalism over? The neutrality principle and audience (dis)trust in mainstream news. Journalism Studies, 22(15), 2042–2060.
37.
PoellT.NieborgD.BrookeE. D. (2022). Platforms and cultural production. Polity.
38.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.
39.
RojasY.WojcieszakM.AalbergT.CoenS.CurranJ.IyengarS.JonesP. K.MazzoleniG.PapathanassopoulosS.RheeJ. W.RoweD.SorokaS.TiffenR. (2016). Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 349–367.
40.
SelvikK.HøigiltJ. (2021). Journalism under instrumentalized political parallelism. Journalism Studies, 22(5), 653–669.
41.
Seymour-UreC. (1974). The political impact of mass media. Sage.
42.
SkovsgaardM.van DalenA. (2013). The fading public voice. Journalism Studies, 14(3), 371–386.
43.
SplendoreS.CuriniL. (2020). Proximity between citizens and journalists as a determinant of trust in the media: An application to Italy. Journalism Studies, 21(9), 1167–1185.
44.
SuiterJ.FletcherR. (2020). Polarization and partisanship: Key drivers of distrust in media old and new?European Journal of Communication35(5), 484–501.
45.
TuckerJ. A.GuessA.BarberáP.VaccariC.SiegelA.SanovichS.StukalDNyhanB. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. William & Flora Hewlett Foundation.
46.
van DalenA. (2021). Red economy, blue economy: How media-party parallelism affects the partisan economic perception gap. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 385–409.
47.
WojcieszakM. (2011). Deliberation and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 61, 596–617.
48.
WojcieszakM. (2016). Polarization, political. In MazzoleniG (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
49.
WojcieszakM.ArzoutR.De VreeseC. (2017). Waving the red cloth: Media coverage of a contentious issue triggers polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 87–109.
50.
WojcieszakM.BimberB.FeldmanL.StroudN. J. (2015). Partisan news and political participation: Exploring mediated relationships. Political Communication, 33(2), 241–260.
51.
WolfgangJ. D.VosT. P.KellingK.ShinS. (2021). Political journalism and democracy: How journalists reflect political viewpoint diversity in their reporting. Journalism Studies, 22(10), 1339–1357.
