Research on the origin, dissemination, and support of conspiracy theories has skyrocketed. Studies reveal how individual antecedents such as people’s personality traits, intrinsic motivations, and broad social-psychological processes explain this phenomenon. Fewer studies, however, explored the role of cable news exposure. This study casts a new light on how exposure to Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC relate to people’s levels of general conspiracy mentality fueled by the belief in “secret-plotting orchestrated by powerful others.” Results from K-mean cluster algorithms, ordinary least squares (OLS) causal-autoregressive regressions, and cross-lagged panel structural equation model tests show Fox News exposure fosters people’s conspiracy mentality.
AdayS. (2010). Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan war coverage on NBC and Fox News Channel. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01472.x
Ardèvol-AbreuA.Gil de ZúñigaH.GámezE. (2020). The influence of conspiracy beliefs on conventional and unconventional forms of political participation: The mediating role of political efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12366
4.
BanasJ. A.MillerG. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39(2), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12000
5.
BartlettJ.MillerC. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. Demos.
6.
BaumW. C. (1960). The conspiracy theory of politics of the radical right in the United States. University of Iowa Press.
7.
BenklerY.FarisR.RobertsH. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
8.
BertinP.NeraK.DelouvéeS. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs, rejection of vaccination, and support for hydroxychloroquine: A conceptual replication-extension in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 565128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128
BruderM.HaffkeP.NeaveN.NouripanahN.ImhoffR. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 225. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
11.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
12.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M.CichockaA. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
13.
DuranN. D.NicholsonS. P.DaleR. (2017). The hidden appeal and aversion to political conspiracies as revealed in the response dynamics of partisans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.008
14.
EinsteinK. L.GlickD. M. (2015). Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories. Political Behavior, 37(3), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z
15.
EndersA. M.FarhartC.MillerJ.UscinskiJ.SaundersK.DrochonH. (2022). Are republicans and conservatives more likely to believe conspiracy theories?Political Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09812-3
16.
EndersA. M.SmallpageS. M. (2019). Informational cues, partisan-motivated reasoning, and the manipulation of conspiracy beliefs. Political Communication, 36(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493006
17.
EndersA. M.UscinskiJ. E.SeeligM. I.KlofstadC. A.WuchtyS.FunchionJ. R.MurthiM. N.PremaratneK.StolerJ. (2021). The relationship between social media use and beliefs in conspiracy theories and misinformation. Political Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6
18.
EzrowL.TavitsM.HomolaJ. (2014). Voter polarization, strength of partisanship, and support for extremist parties. Comparative Political Studies, 47(11), 1558–1583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512605
19.
FeldmanL.MaibachE. W.Roser-RenoufC.LeiserowitzA. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410
20.
FelleT. (2016). Digital watchdogs? Data reporting and the news media’s traditional “fourth estate” function. Journalism, 17(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915593246
21.
FinkelS. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data (Issue 105). SAGE.
22.
GarrettR. K.StroudN. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro-and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
23.
Gil de ZúñigaH.CorreaT.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Selective exposure to cable news and immigration in the U.S.: The relationship between FOX News, CNN, and attitudes toward Mexican immigrants. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732138
24.
Gil de ZúñigaH.MarnéH. M.CartyE. (2022). Abating dissonant public spheres: Exploring the effects of affective, ideological and perceived societal political polarization on social media political persuasion. Political Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2139310
25.
GlynnC. J.HerbstS.LindemanM.O’KeefeG. J. (2015). Public opinion (3rd ed.). Routledge.
GoldbergR. A. (2008). Enemies within: The culture of conspiracy in modern America. Yale University Press.
28.
GoreisA.VoracekM. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
29.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
30.
HarmonM.MuenchenR. (2009). Semantic framing in the build-up to the Iraq war: Fox v. CNN and other US broadcast news programs. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 66(1), 12–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42578893
31.
HollanderB. A. (2010). Persistence in the perception of Barack Obama as a Muslim in the 2008 presidential campaign. Journal of Media and Religion, 9(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348421003738769
32.
HollanderB. A. (2014). The role of media use in the recall versus recognition of political knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.875019
33.
HollanderB. A. (2018). Partisanship, individual differences, and news media exposure as predictors of conspiracy beliefs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017728919
34.
HuckfeldtR.JohnsonP. E.SpragueJ. (2005). Individuals, dyads, and networks: Autoregressive patterns of political influence. In ZuckermanA. S. (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 21–48). Temple University Press.
35.
ImhoffR.BertlichT.FrenkenM. (2022). Tearing apart the “evil” twins: A general conspiracy mentality is not the same as specific conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, Article 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101349
36.
ImhoffR.ZimmerF.KleinO.AntónioJ. H. C.BabinskaM.BangerterA.BilewiczM.BlanušaN.BovanK.BužarovskaR.CichockaA.DelouvéeS.DouglasK. M.DyrendalA.EtienneT.GjoneskaB.GrafS.GualdaE.HirschbergerG.. . .van ProoijenJ.-W. (2022). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
JamiesonK. H.AlbarracinD. (2020). The relation between media consumption and misinformation at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the US. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-012
39.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018
KeeleL.KellyN. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj006
42.
KenskiK.StroudN. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
43.
KimM.CaoX. (2016). The Impact of exposure to media messages promoting government conspiracy theories on distrust in the government: Evidence from a two-stage randomized experiment. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3808–3827.
KnightP.ButterM. (2018). The history of conspiracy theory research: A review and commentary. In UscinskiJ. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 33–46). Oxford University Press.
46.
LeeN.-J.ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M. (2013). Processes of political socialization: A communication mediation approach to youth civic engagement. Communication Research, 40(5), 669–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212436712
MariS.Gil de ZúñigaH.SuerdemA.HankeK.BrownG.VilarR.BoerD.BilewiczM. (2021). Conspiracy theories and institutional trust: Examining the role of uncertainty avoidance and active social media use. Political Psychology, 43(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12754
49.
MaxwellS. E.ColeD. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
50.
MeirickP. C. (2013). Motivated misperception? party, education, partisan news, and belief in “death panels.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012468696
51.
MeirickP. C.BessarabovaE. (2016). Epistemic factors in selective exposure and political misperceptions on the right and left. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 16(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12101
52.
MorrisJ. S.FranciaP. L. (2010). Cable news, public opinion, and the 2004 party conventions. Political Research Quarterly, 63(4), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909338463
53.
MottaM.SteculaD.FarhartC. (2020). How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the US. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 53(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000396
54.
MulderJ. D.HamakerE. L. (2021). Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738
55.
OliverJ. E.WoodT. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
56.
OroszG.KrekóP.PaskujB.Tóth-KirályI.BőtheB.Roland-LévyC. (2016). Changing conspiracy beliefs through rationality and ridiculing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01525
57.
PreacherK. J. (2006). Quantifying parsimony in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(3), 227–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_1
58.
RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2021a). Patterns of media use, strength of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and the prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), Article e25215. https://doi.org/10.2196/25215
59.
RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2021b). Conspiratorial thinking, selective exposure to conservative media, and response to COVID-19 in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 291, Article 114480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114480
60.
RoseC. (2017). The measurement and prediction of conspiracy beliefs. The Victoria University of Wellington.
61.
Seton-WatsonH. (1960). The triumph of tyranny: The Nazi and Soviet conquest of central Europe. International Affairs, 36(4), 525–526.
62.
SmallpageS. M.EndersA. M.UscinskiJ. E. (2017). The partisan contours of conspiracy theory beliefs. Research & Politics, 4(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017746554
63.
StempelC.HargroveT.StempelG. H. (2007). Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400210
64.
StroudN. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
SwamiV.FurnhamA.SmythN.WeisL.LayA.ClowA. (2016). Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084
UscinskiJ. E.KlofstadC.AtkinsonM. D. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915621621
69.
UscinskiJ. E.ParentJ. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.
70.
Van der LindenS. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
71.
WarnerB. R.Neville-ShepardR. (2014). Echoes of a conspiracy: Birthers, truthers, and the cultivation of extremism. Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2013.822407
72.
WeiR.LoV. (2008). News media use and knowledge about the 2006 US midterm elections: Why exposure matters in voter learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn032
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
