Using two experimental studies, we examine how the selection and consumption of cable news influences news consumers’ cognitive processing, attitudes, and policy preferences. As expected, participants overwhelmingly self-selected into an ideologically aligned cable news network. Then, ideologically congruent messaging from Fox News and MSNBC was likely to prompt higher levels of agreement and lower levels of disagreement for those with mid- and high levels of trust in their selected cable news network. Our findings indicate a reinforcing spiral effect among both MSNBC and Fox News consumers who have high levels of trust in the cable news network they select.
ArendtF.NorthupT.CamajL. (2019). Selective exposure and news media brands: Implicit and explicit attitudes as predictors of news choice. Media Psychology, 22(3), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1338963
2.
BurleighT.KennedyR.CliffordS. (2018). How to screen out VPS and international respondents using Qualtrics: A protocol. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3265459
3.
ChoiH. (2022). How partisan cable news mobilizes viewers: Partisan media, discussion networks and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66, 129–152. https://10.1080/08838151.2021.2013220
4.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
5.
EwoldsenD.HoeweJ.GradyS. (2022). A cognitive processing framework for media interpretation. Journal of Media Psychology, 34(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000326
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. (2006). Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 280–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/499414
9.
Gil de ZúñigaH.CorreaT.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Selective exposure to cable news and immigration in the US: The relationship between Fox News, CNN, and attitudes toward Mexican immigrants. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732138
GuessA.CoppockA. (2020). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000327
13.
GuntherA. C.EdgerlyS.AkinH.BroeschJ. A. (2012). Partisan evaluation of partisan information. Communication Research, 39(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212441794
14.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
15.
HoeweJ. (2018). Coverage of a crisis: The effects of international news portrayals of refugees and misuse of the term “immigrant.”American Behavioral Scientist, 62(4), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759579
16.
HoeweJ.BrownellK.WiemerE. C. (2020). The role and impact of Fox News. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, 18(3), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2020-2014
17.
HoeweJ.PeacockC.KimB.BarnidgeM. (2020). The relationship between Fox News use and Americans’ policy preferences regarding refugees and immigrants. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2036–2056. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12402
HollanderB. A. (2018). Partisanship, individual differences, and news media exposure as predictors of conspiracy beliefs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017728919
20.
HovlandC. I.JanisI. L.KelleyH. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
21.
HwangH.KimY.KimY. (2018). Influence of discussion incivility on deliberation: An examination of the mediating role of moral indignation. Communication Research, 45(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215616861
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MengJ. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333030
MichaelsJ. L.VallacherR. R.LiebovitchL. S. (2013). Volatile psychological dynamics in social interactions: Attitudes and emotions react asymmetrically to interaction shifts between agreement and disagreement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613482985
MorrisJ. S. (2007). Slanted objectivity? Perceived media bias, cable news exposure, and political attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00479.x
35.
MourãoR. R.ThorsonE.KrystonK.TunneyC. (2023). Predicting audience verification intention: The impact of partisanship, source, importance, and information familiarity on willingness to verify headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(2), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221130992
36.
PalanS.SchitterC. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
37.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.acquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
PornpitakpanC. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 342(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
SegestenA. D.BossettaM.HolmbergN.NiehorsterD. (2022). The cueing power of comments on social media: How disagreement in Facebook comments affects user engagement with news. Information, Communication & Society, 25, 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1850836
43.
SilviaP. J. (2006). Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: Multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.309
44.
SimonovA.SacherS.DubéJ. P.BiswasS. (2021). The persuasive effect of Fox News: Noncompliance with social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Marketing Science, 41, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1328
45.
SlaterM. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
46.
SlaterM. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
47.
StrömbäckJ.TsfatiY.BoomgaardenH.DamstraA.LindgrenE.VliegenthartR.LindholmT. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
48.
StroudN. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
49.
StroudN. J.MuddimanA. (2012). The American media system today: Is the public fragmenting? In RidoutT. N. (Ed.), New directions in media and politics (pp. 6–23). Routledge.
WeaverD. A.ScaccoJ. M. (2013). Revisiting the protest paradigm: The Tea Party as filtered through prime-time cable news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212462872
52.
WesterwickA.JohnsonB. K.Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2017). Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1272761
53.
XuA. J.WyerR. S.Jr. (2012). The role of bolstering and counterarguing mind-sets in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1086/661112
54.
YoungD. G. (2020). Irony and outrage: The polarized landscape of rage, fear, and laughter in the United States. Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
