Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Conspiracy beliefs have been found to have negative real-world consequences that can impact interpersonal relationships; however, this remains an under-researched area. With the current popularity of conspiracy movements such as QAnon, more research into these phenomena is necessary. The present research therefore aimed to explore the impact of QAnon belief on interpersonal relationships. Fifteen participants aged 21–54 (M = 41) with a QAnon-affiliated loved one were interviewed about how QAnon has changed their relationship. Using thematic analysis, four main themes were identified: Malignant Q, Distance, Qonflict, and Attempts at Healing. Participants characterized QAnon as a malignant force in their relationships and communicated with their loved ones less as a result. Although QAnon was a source of conflict and tension for all participants, they were motivated to understand their loved ones. Most participants who still had relationships with their loved ones were motivated to heal or maintain their relationships, while those who no longer did had previously tried many different strategies to save their relationships. These findings provide greater insight into how QAnon can impact relationships, offering fruitful directions for future research examining how individuals can heal from QAnon-afflicted relationships.

Keywords

Conspiracy beliefs conspiracy theories political polarization QAnon radicalization relationships relationship maintenance relationship quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afifi

T. D.

Merrill

A. F.

Davis

(2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159

Barkun

(2018). Failed prophecies won't stop trump's true believers. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/11/08/failed-prophecies-wont-stop-trumps-true-believers/

Beene

Greer

(2021). A call to action for librarians: Countering conspiracy theories in the age of Qanon. The Journal of Academic Librarianship , 47(1), Article 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102292

Bloom

Moskalenko

(2021). Pastels and pedophiles: Inside the mind of QAnon. Stanford University Press.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun

Clarke

(2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Coelho

Foster

Nedri

Marques

M. D.

(2022). Increased belief in vaccination conspiracy theories predicts increases in vaccination hesitancy and powerlessness: Results from a longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine, 315(December 2022), 115522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115522

Cohen

S. J.

(2022). QAnon as an online-facilitated cult: Integrating models of belief, practice, and identity. Journal of Religion and Violence, 10(1), 37–71. https://doi.org/10.5840/jrv202272197

Darwin

Neave

Holmes

(2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1289–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027

10.

Douglas

K. M.

Sutton

R. M.

Cichocka

(2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261

11.

Douglas

K. M.

Uscinski

J. E.

Sutton

R. M.

Cichocka

Nefes

Ang

C. S.

Deravi

(2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568

12.

Franks

Bangerter

Bauer

M. W.

Hall

Noort

M. C.

(2017). Beyond “monologicality”? Exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2017), 861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861

13.

Garry

Walther

Rukaya

Mohammed

(2021). QAnon conspiracy theory: Examining its evolution and mechanisms of radicalization. Journal for Deradicalization, Spring 2021(26), 152–216.

14.

Gergen

K. J.

(1985). Social constructionist inquiry: Context and implications. In Gergen

K. J.

Davis

K. E.

(Eds.), The social construction of the person. Springer Series in Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5076-0_1

15.

Goldenberg

Riggleman

Baumgartner

Brozowski

Marchl

Reid-Ross

Finkelstein

Hughes

Cain

Criezis

White

Miller-Idris

(2021). The QAnon conspiracy: Destroying families, dividing communities, undermining democracy. Eagleton Institute of Politics. https://eagleton.rutgers.edu/article/destroying-families-dividing-communities-undermining-democracy/

16.

Jolley

Douglas

K. M.

Marchlewska

Cichocka

Sutton

R. M.

(2022). Examining the links between conspiracy beliefs and the EU “Brexit” referendum vote in the UK: Evidence from a two-wave survey. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12829

17.

Keeley

B. L.

(1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564659

18.

Lantian

Bagneux

Delouvée

Gauvrit

(2021). Maybe a free thinker but not a critical one: High conspiracy belief is associated with low critical thinking ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3790

19.

Lewandowsky

Ecker

U. K.

Seifert

C. M.

Schwarz

Cook

(2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018

20.

Liekefett

Christ

Becker

J. C.

(2021). Can conspiracy beliefs be beneficial? Longitudinal linkages between conspiracy beliefs, anxiety, uncertainty aversion, and existential threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211060965

21.

Lifton

R. J.

(1961). Thought reform and the psychology of totalism. Norton.

22.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427

23.

Lytvynenko

(2020). Friends and family members of QAnon believers are going through a “surreal goddamn nightmare”. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/janelytvynenko/qanon-families-friends

24.

Melton

(2021). As Qanon strains relationships, loved ones try to show A way out. VOA. https://www.voanews.com/a/usa_qanon-strains-relationships-loved-ones-try-show-way-out/6208393.html

25.

Moskalenko

(2022, April). Radicalization into QAnon [conference paper]. International Studies Association, Nashville, TN. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359828335_Radicalization_into_QAnon

26.

Moskalenko

Burton

B. S.

Fernández-Garayzábal González

Bloom

M. M.

(2022). Secondhand conspiracy theories: The social, emotional and political tolls on loved ones of QAnon followers. Democracy and Security, 19(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2022.2111305

27.

Mousaw

(2022). “I love who he was but hate who he’s become”: The impacts of conspiracy theories on interpersonal relationships [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Colorado.

28.

Naik

(2021). 'They're unrecognizable': One woman reflects on losing her parents to QAnon. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/12/tech/qanon-followers-family-lost-loved-ones/index.html

29.

Nyhan

Reifler

(2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2

30.

Oliver

J. E.

Wood

T. J.

(2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084

31.

PRRI Staff . (2022). The persistence of QAnon in the post-trump era: An analysis of who believes the conspiracies. PRRI. https://www.prri.org/research/the-persistence-of-qanon-in-the-post-trump-era-an-analysis-of-who-believes-the-conspiracies/

32.

Ripp

Röer

J. P.

(2022). Systematic review on the association of COVID-19-related conspiracy belief with infection-preventive behavior and vaccination willingness. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00771-2

33.

Rottweiler

Gill

(2022). Conspiracy beliefs and violent extremist intentions: The contingent effects of self-efficacy, self-control and law-related morality. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(7), 1485–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1803288

34.

Sommer

(2023). Trust the plan: The rise of QAnon and the conspiracy that unhinged America. Harper.

35.

Sullivan

Landau

M. J.

Rothschild

Z. K.

(2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017457

36.

Sutton

R. M.

Douglas

K. M.

(2022). Rabbit hole syndrome: Inadvertent, accelerating, and entrenched commitment to conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48(December 2022), Article 101462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101462

37.

Tandoc

E. C.

Lim

Ling

(2019). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325

38.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

39.

Uscinski

J. E.

(2022). Getting QAnon wrong and right. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 89(3), 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2022.0038

40.

Uscinski

J. E.

Enders

A. M.

(2021). Unfounded fears about sex trafficking did not begin with Qanon and go far beyond it. LSE Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2021/03/09/unfounded-fears-about-sex-trafficking-did-not-begin-with-qanon-and-go-far-beyond-it/

41.

Van Duyn

(2023). Negotiating news: How cross-cutting romantic partners select, consume, and discuss news together. Political Communication, 41(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2270445

42.

Waltman

(2023). QAnon's ideology of hate. Family Communication and Cultural Transformation, (pp. 57–76). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220480-4

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

“I one-hundred thousand percent blame it on QAnon”: The impact of QAnon belief on interpersonal relationships

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material