The scholarly literature on Fox News has largely focused on the network’s ideological disposition, assuming Fox News to be a journalistic operation. However, a handful of scholars have challenged those assumptions. Conway, Grabe, and Grieve found one of the network’s prime-time programs to be practicing propaganda, not journalism. This article seeks to further the work of Conway et al. by employing a qualitative textual analysis of Fox News’ prime-time coverage of health-care reform in 2009 and 2014 to determine whether the network’s programs worked within the traditional values of objective journalism, aside from the network’s ideological disposition, or whether the programs’ practices were more consistent with propaganda or the rhetorical concept of persuasion. The study finds that in both periods, Fox News’ prime-time programs employed multiple themes based on nonfactual premises to oppose health-care reform, which were more in line with propaganda than journalism or persuasion.
AdayS. (2010). Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan war coverage on NBC and Fox News Channel. Journal of Communication, 60, 144–164.
2.
AdayS.LivingstonS.HebertM. (2005). Embedding the truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq war. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 3–21.
3.
BardM. T. (2016). The role of differing host styles in Fox News’ prime-time coverage of health care reform in August 2009. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 659–676.
4.
BardM. T. (2014, 8). Just like Fox News? MSNBC’s prime-time coverage of health care reform in August 2009. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Educators of Journalism and Mass Communication in Montreal, Quebec.
5.
BennettW. L. (2001). News: The politics of illusion (4th ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
ChalifR. S. (2011). Selective politics: The fragmentation and polarization of news on cable TV (Master’s thesis), Georgetown University. Retrieved from ProQuest.
11.
CoeK.TewksburyD.BondB. J.DrogosK. L.PorterR. W.YahnA.ZhangY. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219.
12.
ConwayM.GrabeM. E.GrievesK. (2007). Villains, victims and the virtuous in Bill O’Reilly’s ‘No-Spin Zone’: Revisiting World War propaganda techniques. Journalism Studies, 8, 197–223.
13.
CunninghamB. (2003). Re-thinking objectivity. Columbia Journalism Review, 42, 24–32.
14.
DellaVignaS.KaplanE. (2007). The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1187–1234.
EllulJ. (1965). The characteristics of propaganda. In JowettG. S.O’DonnellV. (Eds.), Readings in propaganda and persuasion: New and classic essays. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
GroelingT. (2008). Who’s the fairest of them all? An empirical test for partisan bias on ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 38, 631–657.
IksanderA. (2005). “The Great American Bubble”: Fox News Channel, the “mirage” of objectivity, and the isolation of American public opinion. In ArtzL.KamalipourY. R. (Eds.), Bring ‘em on: Media and politics in the Iraq War (pp. 155–174). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
IyengarS.HahnK. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39.
32.
JamiesonK. H.CappellaJ. N. (2008). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
JonesJ. P. (2012). The “new” news as no “news”: US cable news channels as branded political entertainment television. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 144, 146–155.
McQuailD. (1996). Mass media in the public interest: Towards a framework of norms for media performance. In CurranJ.GurevitchM. (Eds.), Mass media and society(2nd ed.) (pp. 66–80). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
44.
MeirickP. C. (2013). Motivated misperception? Party, education, partisan news, and belief in “death panels.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 39–57.
45.
MindichD. T. Z. (1998). Just the facts: How “objectivity” came to define American journalism. New York: New York University Press.
46.
MorrisJ. S. (2005). The Fox News factor. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 56–79.
47.
O’ReillyB. (2009, 810). The O’Reilly factor. Retrieved from LexisNexis.
48.
O’ReillyB. (2012, 827). The O’Reilly factor. Retrieved from LexisNexis.
PapacharissiZ.de Fatima OliveiraM. (2008). News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in U.S. and U.K. newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 52–74.
51.
PelosiN.HoyerS. (2009, 810). “Un-American” attacks can’t derail health care debate. USA Today, p. 7A.
52.
PetersC. (2010). No-spin zones: The rise of the American cable news magazine and Bill O’Reilly. Journalism Studies, 11, 832–851.
PratkanisA.AronsonE. (2002). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
57.
RyanM. (2001). Journalistic ethics, objectivity, existential journalism, standpoint epistemology, and public journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 16, 3–22.
ShermanG. (2014). The loudest voice in the room: How the brilliant, bombastic roger Ailes built Fox News—and divided a Country. New York, NY: Random House.
StelterB. (2011, 46). Glenn Beck to end daily Fox News program. New York Times, p. B1.
65.
VragaE. K.EdgerlyS.BodeS.CarrD. J.BardM.JohnsonC. N.…ShahD. V. (2012). The correspondent, the comic, and the combatant: The consequences of host style in political talk shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 5–22.
