Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-3
How Misinformation and Rebuttals in Online Comments Affect People’s Intention to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines: The Roles of Psychological Reactance and Misperceptions
This study investigated how exposure to negative and misleading online comments about the COVID-19 vaccination persuasive messages and the ensuing corrective rebuttals of these comments affected people’s attitudes and intentions regarding vaccination. An online experiment was performed with 344 adults in the United States. The results showed that rebuttals by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rather than those by social media users, indirectly increased people’s willingness to receive the vaccine by reducing their psychological reactance to persuasive messages and their belief in the misinformation contained in the comments. Rebuttals by social media users became more effective in reducing reactance when people initially had stronger pro-vaccination attitudes.
AllisonP. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.
2.
ArpanL. M.NabiR. L. (2011). Exploring anger in the hostile media process: Effects on news preferences and source evaluation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 5–22.
3.
BessarabovaE.FinkE. L.TurnerM. (2013). Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: Comparative statics. Human Communication Research, 39(3), 339–364.
4.
BhattacharyaS.SrinivasanP.PolgreenP. (2017). Social media engagement analysis of U.S. federal health agencies on Facebook. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(1), 1–12.
5.
BodeL.VragaE. K. (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131–1140.
6.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
7.
BrehmS. S.BrehmJ. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
8.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Taylor & Francis Group.
9.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s Mturk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160.
ChiaS. C. (2010). How social influence mediates media effects on adolescents’ materialism. Communication Research, 37(3), 400–419.
12.
CronbachL. J.FurbyL. (1970). How we should measure “change”: Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 68–80.
13.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168.
14.
FaulF.BuchnerA.ErdfelderE.MayrS. (2007). A short tutorial of Gpower. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 51–59.
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
16.
FeatherstoneJ. D.ZhangJ. (2020). Feeling angry: The effects of vaccine misinformation and refutational messages on negative emotions and vaccination attitude. Journal of Health Communication, 25(9), 692–702.
17.
FieldA. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
18.
FlynnD. J.NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127–150.
19.
FreedG. L.ClarkS. J.ButchartA. T.SingerD. C.DavisM. M. (2011). Sources and perceived credibility of vaccine-safety information for parents. Pediatrics, 127(Suppl. 1), S107–S112.
20.
FuchsC. (2011). Web 2.0, prosumption, and surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 8(3), 288–308.
21.
GardnerL.LeshnerG. (2016). The role of narrative and other-referencing in attenuating psychological reactance to diabetes self-care messages. Health Communication, 31(6), 738–751.
22.
GuntherA. C. (2017). Hostile media effect. In RösslerP.HoffnerC. A.ZoonenL. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–10). John Wiley.
23.
HarrisC. W. (1963). Problems in measuring change. University of Wisconsin Press.
24.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
25.
HeldmanA. B.SchindelarJ.WeaverJ. B. (2013). Social media engagement and public health communication: Implications for public health organizations being truly “social.” Public Health Reviews, 35(1), 1–18.
26.
HocevarK. P.MetzgerM.FlanaginA. J.HocevarK. P.MetzgerM.FlanaginA. J. (2017). Source credibility, expertise, and trust in health and risk messaging. In NussbaumJ. F. (Ed.), The Oxford research encyclopedia of communication (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
27.
HoffmanB. L.FelterE. M.ChuK.-H.ShensaA.WilliamsD.HimmelR.WolynnR.HermannC.WolynnT.PrimackB. A. (2019). The emerging landscape of anti-vaccination sentiment on Facebook. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(2), S136.
28.
HovlandC. I.JanisI. L.KelleyH. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
31.
JacksonS. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. Guilford Press.
32.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLOS ONE, 9(2), Article e89177.
33.
KangY.CappellaJ.FishbeinM. (2006). The attentional mechanism of message sensation value: Interaction between message sensation value and argument quality on message effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 73(4), 351–378.
34.
KeesJ.BerryC.BurtonS.SheehanK. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155.
35.
KimH. J. (2016). The role of emotions and culture in the third-person effect process of news coverage of election poll results. Communication Research, 43(1), 109–130.
36.
KimH. Y.SeoY.YoonH. J.HanJ. Y.KoY. (2021). The effects of user comment valence of Facebook health messages on intention to receive the flu vaccine: The role of pre-existing attitude towards the flu vaccine and psychological reactance. International Journal of Advertising, 40(7), 1187–1208.
37.
KimS.-Y.LevineT. R.AllenM. (2013). Comparing separate process and intertwined models for reactance. Communication Studies, 64(3), 273–295.
38.
KimS.-Y.LevineT. R.AllenM. (2017). The intertwined model of reactance for resistance and persuasive boomerang. Communication Research, 44(7), 931–951.
39.
KlineR. (2015). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
40.
KohlerU.KreuterF. (2012). Data analysis using stata (3rd ed.). Stata Press.
41.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
42.
LeeS.AtkinsonL.SungY. H. (2022). Online bandwagon effects: Quantitative versus qualitative cues in online comments sections. New Media & Society, 24, 580–599.
43.
LewandowskyS.EckerU. K. H.SeifertC. M.SchwarzN.CookJ. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131.
44.
LiR.SundarS. S. (2021). Can interactive media attenuate psychological reactance to health messages? A study of the role played by user commenting and audience metrics in persuasion. Health Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1888450.
45.
MacKinnonD. P.FritzM. S.WilliamsJ.LockwoodC. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 384–389.
46.
MardiaK. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530.
47.
MasonW.SuriS. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23.
48.
McCroskeyJ. C.TevenJ. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103.
49.
Mendoza-HerreraK.Valero-MoralesI.Ocampo-GranadosM. E.Reyes-MoralesH.Arce-AmaréF.BarqueraS. (2020). An overview of social media use in the field of public health nutrition: Benefits, scope, limitations, and a latin American experience. Preventing Chronic Disease, 17, 1–7.
50.
MillerC. H.LaneL. T.DeatrickL. M.YoungA. M.PottsK. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 219–240.
51.
MorenoM. A.Arseniev-KoehlerA.LittD.ChristakisD. (2016). Evaluating college students’ displayed alcohol references on Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(5), 527–532.
52.
NanX.MaddenK. (2012). HPV vaccine information in the blogosphere: How positive and negative blogs influence vaccine-related risk perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Health Communication, 27(8), 829–836.
53.
NeigerB. L.ThackerayR.van WagenenS. A.HansonC. L.WestJ. H.BarnesM. D.FagenM. C. (2012). Use of social media in health promotion: Purposes, key performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health Promotion Practice, 13(2), 159–164.
54.
NirL. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504–532.
55.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.
56.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2015). Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine, 33(3), 459–464.
57.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ.RicheyS.FreedG. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), e835–e842.
58.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ.UbelP. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about Health Care Reform. Medical Care, 51(2), 127–132.
59.
O’KeefeD. A. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. SAGE.
ParkH.RodgersS.StemmleJ. (2011). Health organizations’ use of Facebook for health advertising and promotion. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 62–77.
PornpitakpanC. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.
65.
QuickB. L.StephensonM. T. (2008). Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 448–476.
66.
RaackeJ.Bonds-RaackeJ. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(2), 169–174.
67.
RainsS. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 47–73.
68.
RainsS. A.TurnerM. M. (2007). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 241–269.
69.
RatcliffC. L. (2019). Characterizing reactance in communication research: A review of conceptual and operational approaches. Communication Research, 48(7), 1033–1058.
70.
Reynolds-TylusT. (2019). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1–12.
71.
Reynolds-TylusT.BigsbyE.QuickB. L. (2021). A comparison of three approaches for measuring negative cognitions for psychological reactance. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(1), 43–59.
72.
ShenL. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397–422.
73.
ShenL. (2015). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 30(10), 975–985.
74.
SherrickB.HoeweJ. (2018). The effect of explicit online comment moderation on three spiral of silence outcomes. New Media & Society, 20(2), 453–474.
75.
ShiR.MessarisP.CappellaJ. N. (2014). Effects of online comments on smokers’ perception of antismoking public service announcements. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 19(4), 975–990.
76.
SilviaP. J. (2005). Deflecting reactance: The role of similarity in increasing compliance and reducing resistance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 277–284.
77.
SmithN.GrahamT. (2019). Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1310–1327.
78.
SongH.McComasK. A.SchulerK. L. (2018). Source effects on psychological reactance to regulatory policies: The role of trust and similarity. Science Communication, 40(5), 591–620.
79.
StroudN. J.Van DuynE.PeacockC. (2016, March). Survey of commenters and comment readers. Center for Media Engagement.
80.
SundarS. S. (2008). The MAIN Model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J. (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). The MIT Press.
81.
TaberC. S.LodgeM. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
82.
TaylorA. B.MacKinnonD. P.TeinJ.-Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 241–269.
83.
TianY. (2011). Communication behaviors as mediators: Examining links between political orientation, political communication, and political participation. Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 380–394.
84.
VragaE. K.BodeL. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621–645.
85.
VragaE. K.BodeL. (2018). I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1337–1353.
86.
WalterN.CohenJ.HolbertR. L.MoragY. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375.
87.
WaltherJ. B.DeAndreaD.KimJ.AnthonyJ. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 469–492.
88.
WrightS. (2006). Government-run online discussion fora: Moderation, censorship and the shadow of control. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8(4), 550–547x.
89.
YounS.KimS. (2019). Understanding ad avoidance on Facebook: Antecedents and outcomes of psychological reactance. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 232–2025.
90.
ZhangQ.SappD. A. (2013). Psychological reactance and resistance intention in the classroom: Effects of perceived request politeness and legitimacy, relationship distance, and teacher credibility. Communication Education, 62(1), 1–7008.
91.
ZhangX. (2020). Effects of freedom restoration, language variety, and issue type on psychological reactance. Health Communication, 35(11), 1316–131565.
92.
ZiegeleM.JostP. B. (2020). Not funny? The effects of factual versus sarcastic journalistic responses to uncivil user comments. Communication Research, 47(6), 891–91854.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
