Influencers,Amplifiers,and Icons: A Systematic Approach to Understanding the Roles of Islamophobic Actors on Twitter

Abstract

In the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, an unprecedented number of American Muslims ran for public office, including the first two Muslim women elected to Congress. This study analyzes the anti-Muslim/anti-immigrant Twitter discourse surrounding Ilhan Omar, one of these two successful candidates. The results identify three categories of accounts that linked Omar to clusters of accounts that shaped the Islamophobia/xenophobic narrative: Influencers, Amplifiers, and Icons. This cadre of accounts played a synergistic and disproportionate role in raising the level of hate speech as a vast network containing a high proportion of apparently inauthentic accounts magnified the messages generated by a handful of provocateurs.

Keywords

Twitter Islamophobia hate speech bots influencers social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilera-Carnerero

Azeez

A. H.

(2016). ‘Islamonausea, not Islamophobia’: The many faces of cyber hate speech. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 9(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.9.1.21_1

Albadi

Kurdi

Mishra

(2019). Hateful people or hateful bots? Detection and characterization of bots spreading religious hatred in Arabic Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359163

Ali

Duss

Fang

Keyes

Shakir

(2011). Fear, Inc.: The roots of the Islamophobia network in America. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2011/08/pdf/islamophobia.pdf

Anti-Muslim Activities in the United States. (2019). Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America. https://www.newamerica.org/in-depth/anti-muslim-activity/

Bail

(2015). Terrified: How anti-Muslim fringe organizations became mainstream. Princeton University Press.

Baker

(2001). Moral panic and alternative identity construction in Usenet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1), Article JCMC711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00136.x

Bakshy

Hofman

Mason

Watts

(2011). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on twitter [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web search and data mining (WSDM’ 11), pp. 65–74, ACM, New York, United States.

Benkler

Faris

Roberts

(2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.

Beydoun

K. A.

(2018). American Islamophobia: Understanding the roots and rise of fear. University of California Press.

10.

Bhat

Krishnaswamy

(2017). An analysis of propaganda bots on Twitter. Medium.com. Para 8. https://medium.com/@robhat/identifying-propaganda-bots-on-twitter-5240e7cb81a9

11.

Binns

(2012). Don’t feed the trolls! Journalism Practice, 6(4), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.648988

12.

Bleich

(2011). What is Islamophobia and how much is there? Theorizing and measuring an emerging comparative concept. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(12), 1581–1600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409387

13.

Bond

(2018, November 5). A NC candidate like no other. Duke Reporters’s Lab. https://reporterslab.org/a-nc-candidate-like-no-other/

14.

Borgmann

Loeb

Salem

Thomas

Haferkamp

Murphy

D. G.

Tsaur

(2016). Activity, content, contributors, and influencers of the twitter discussion on urologic oncology. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 34(9), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.02.021

15.

Brin

Page

(1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X

16.

Bruns

Burgess

(2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, United Kingdom.

17.

Calfano

B. R.

Lajevardi

Michelson

M. R.

(2019). Trumped up challenges: Limitations, opportunities, and the future of political research on Muslim Americans. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(2), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1386573

18.

Caverlee

Liu

Webb

(2008). Socialtrust: Tamper-resilient trust establishment in online communities [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/1378889.1378908

19.

Cheng

Bernstein

Danescu-Niculecu-Mizil

Leskovec

(2017). Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions [Conference session]. CSCW Conference Computer Supported Cooperative Work. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791909/

20.

Chua

(2018). Tribal world. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2018-06-14/tribal-world

21.

Coles

B. A.

West

(2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233–244.

22.

Community Standards—Misrepresentation. (n.d.). https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/misrepresentation

23.

Conway

(1997). Islamophobia: A challenge for us all. https://www.runnymedetrust.org/companies/17/74/Islamophobia-A-Challenge-for-Us-All.html

24.

Crosset

Tanner

Campana

(2018). Researching far right groups on Twitter: Methodological challenges 2.0. New Media & Society, 21(4), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818817306

25.

Desai

Dhingra

Shariff

Lerma

Singla

. . . Fang

(2016). Quantifying the Twitter influence of third party commercial entities versus healthcare providers in Thirteen Medical Conferences from 2011–2013. PLOS ONE, 11(9), Article e0162376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162376

26.

Douek

(2020). What does “coordinated inauthentic behavior” actually mean? Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2020/07/coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-facebook-twitter.html?mc_cid=8f1d04032d&mc_eid=86a9d28ce8.

27.

Ellison

N. B.

Vitak

(2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In Shyam Sundar

(Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–223). Wiley.

28.

Ernst

C. W.

(2013). Islamophobia in America: The anatomy of intolerance. Palgrave Macmillan.

29.

Esposito

J. L.

Kalın

(2011). Islamophobia: The challenge of pluralism in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.

30.

Ferrara

Varol

Davis

Menczer

Flammini

(2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104.

31.

Fornacciari

Mordononi

Poggi

Sani

Tomaiuolo

(2018). A holistic system for troll detection on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 89(Dec), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.008

32.

Frahm

Shepelyansky

(2012). Google matrix of Twitter. The European Physical Journal B, 85(10), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2012-30599-6

33.

Friedberg

Donovan

(2019, August). On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a bot: Pseudoanonymous influence operations and networked Social movements. Journal of Design and Science, (6). https://doi.org/10.21428/7808da6b.45957184

34.

GhaneaBassiri

(2010). A history of Islam in America: From the new world to the new world order. Cambridge University Press.

35.

Ghanem

(2018, November 7). The “Blue Wave” was also a “Muslim Wave.” Inter-Hemispheric Resource Center Press.

36.

Gimenez-Garcia

J. M.

Thakkar

Zimmermann

(2016, May 30). Assessing Trust with PageRank in the Web of Data [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Dataset PROFIling and fEderated Search for Linked Data (PROFILES’16) co-located with the 13th ESWC 2016 Conference, Anissaras, Greece.

37.

Gruzd

Wellman

Dubois

Gaffney

(2014). The multiple facets of Influence: Identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260–1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527088

38.

Haberman

Stolberg

S. G.

(2019, April 15). In Attacking Ilhan Omar, Trump revives his familiar refrain against Muslims. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/15/us/politics/trump-ilhan-omar.html

39.

Huntington

S. P.

(2011). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order ( Simon Schuster hardcover ed.). Simon & Schuster.

40.

Islam

(2018). Soft Islamophobia. Religions, 9(9), Article 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9090280

41.

Jin

S.-A. A.

Phua

(2014). Following celebrities’ Tweets about brands: The impact of Twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.827606

42.

Karnowski

(2018, August 16). Victory offers Muslim candidate new platform to oppose Trump. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/96d0aa845fc340e9a8d0e0994a04a202

43.

Keller

T. R.

Klinger

(2019). Social bots in election campaigns: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological implications. Political Communication, 36(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1526238

44.

Kerner

S. M.

(2018, October 29). Facebook is moving fast to limit coordinated inauthentic behavior. eWeek. https://www.eweek.com/security/facebook-is-moving-fast-to-limit-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior

45.

Kollanyi

(2016). Where do bots come from? An analysis of bot codes shared on GitHub. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4932–4951.

46.

Korostelina

K. V.

(2017). Trump effect. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

47.

Kouznetsov

Tsvetovat

(2011). Social network analysis for startups. O’Reilly.

48.

Kramer

(2017, November). Identifying viral bots and cyborgs in social media. O’Reilly Media. https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/identifying-viral-bots-and-cyborgs-in-social-media

49.

Krippendorff

(2006). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x

50.

Kwak

Lee

Park

Moon

(2010, April 26). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM, New York, United States.

51.

Labs

(2017, October 31). Identifying propaganda bots on Twitter. Medium.com. https://medium.com/@robhat/identifying-propaganda-bots-on-twitter-5240e7cb81a9

52.

Lajevardi

Oskooii

K. A. R.

(2018). Old-fashioned racism, contemporary Islamophobia, and the Isolation of Muslim Americans in the age of Trump. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 3(1), 112–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2017.37

53.

The Legislator: Ilhan Omar. (2017). time.com. https://time.com/collection/firsts/4898550/ilhan-omar-firsts/

54.

Lombard

Snyder-Duch

Campanella Bracken

(2018). Intercoder reliability. In Allen

(Ed.), SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 722–724). SAGE.

55.

Love

(2017). Islamophobia and racism in America. New York University Press.

56.

MacKinnon

Zuckerman

(2012). Don’t feed the trolls. Index on Censorship, 41(4), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306422012467413

57.

Mansell

(2018, July 12). Who is Laura Loomer? Activist accosts “Jihadi” Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlab at campaign event. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/ilhan-omar-laura-loomer-muslim-rashida-tlaib-video-1069942

58.

Mayer

(2016, May 30). Sting of myself. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/05/30/james-okeefe-accidentally-stings-himself

59.

McCarthy

(2019, July 18). Trump rally crowd chants “send her back” after president attacks Ilhan Omar. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/17/trump-rally-send-her-back-ilhan-omar

60.

McGregor

S. C.

Molyneux

(2020). Twitter’s influence on news judgment: An experiment among journalists. Journalism, 21(5), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918802975

61.

Meer

(2013). Racialization and religion: Race, culture and difference in the study of antisemitism and Islamophobia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(3), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.734392

62.

Mogahed

Mahmood

(2019, April 29). American Muslim Poll 2019. https://www.ispu.org/american-muslim-poll-2019-full-report/

63.

Moosavi

(2015). The racialization of Muslim converts in Britain and their experiences of Islamophobia. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513504601

64.

Morales

A. J.

Borondo

Losada

J. C.

Benito

R. M.

(2015). Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25(3), Article 033114.

65.

Nelson

(2018, August 12). Former Project Veritas staffer crashes Ilhan Omar campaign event in Minneapolis. Star Tribune. http://www.startribune.com/former-project-veritas-staffer-crashes-ilhan-omar-campaign-event-in-minneapolis/490661421/

66.

Neuendorf

K. A.

(2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE.

67.

Ott

B. L.

(2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686

68.

Pal

Counts

(2011). Identifying topical authorities in microblogs [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the fourth ACM International Conference on Web search and data mining, Hong Kong, China. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935843

69.

Pintak

(2006). Reflections in a bloodshot lens: America, Islam and the War of Ideas. Pluto.

70.

Pintak

Bowe

B. J.

Albright

(2019, March 13). Islamophobes came for Americans on the Campaign Trail. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/13/islamophobes-came-for-americans-on-the-campaign-trail/

71.

Political Polarization, 1994-2017. (2017, October 20). https://www.people-press.org/interactives/political-polarization-1994-2017/

72.

Ratkiewicz

Conover

M. D.

Meiss

Gonçalves

Flammini

Menczer

F. M.

(2011). Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media [Paper presentation]. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain.

73.

Riffe

Lacy

Fico

(2014). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (3rd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

74.

Romero

Galuba

Asur

Huberman

(2010). Influence and Passivity in Social Media. arXiv.org.

75.

Rules and policies. (2019). https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies#twitter-rules

76.

Shaffer

(2017, June 5). Spot a bot: Identifying automation and disinformation on social media. Data for Democracy. https://medium.com/data-for-democracy/spot-a-bot-identifying-automation-and-disinformation-on-social-media-2966ad93a203

77.

Shyrock

(2010). Introduction. In Shyrock

(Ed.), Islamophobia/Islamophilia: Beyond the politics of enemy and friend (pp. 1–25). Indiana University Press.

78.

Siddiqui

Alwa

Chouhoud

Mogahed

(2016, April 5). American Muslims in the 2016 election and beyond. https://www.ispu.org/american-muslims-in-the-2016-election-and-beyond-3/

79.

Slacktivism. (n.d.). Lexico powered by Oxford. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/slacktivism

80.

Steinback

(2011, June 7). The anti-Muslim inner circle. Intelligence Report. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2011/anti-muslim-inner-circle

81.

Suler

(2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.42

82.

Taras

(2013). ‘Islamophobia never stands still’: Race, religion, and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.734388

83.

Tesler

(2018). Islamophobia in the 2016 election. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 3(1), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2018.8

84.

Thelwall

(2015). Evaluating the comprehensiveness of Twitter Search API results: A four step method. Cybermetrics, 18, 1–10.

85.

Tinati

Carr

Hall

Bentwood

(2012). Identifying communicator roles in Twitter [Paper presentation]. 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/344870/1/ICTD2012_-_Ramine_Tinati_-_Final_Camera_Ready_Abstract.pdf

86.

Tommasel

Godoy

(2015). A novel metric for assessing user influence based on user behaviour [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Influence Analysis, Vol. 1398, pp. 15–21, Aachen, Germany.

87.

Tucker

J. A.

Guess

Barbera

Vaccari

Siegel

Sanovich

. . . Nyhan

(2018, March). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. https://bit.ly/2ZOfcFq

88.

van Prooijen

J.-W.

Krouwel

A. P. M.

(2016). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616671403

89.

Wang

Zheng

(2014). On macro and micro exploration of hashtag diffusion in Twitter [Paper presentation]. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Beijing, China.

90.

Wei

Sankaranarayanan

Samet

(2017). Measuring spatial influence of Twitter users by interactions [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Analytics for Local Events and News, Redondo Beach, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148044.3148046

91.

Weng

Lim

E.-P.

Jiang

(2010). TwitterRank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the third ACM International Conference on Web search and data mining, New York, NY, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718487.1718520

92.

White

Kristofferson

(2018). Slacktivism. In Warf

(Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of the Internet (pp. 781–782). SAGE.

93.

Willis

Fisher

Lvov

(2015). Mapping networks of influence: Tracking Twitter conversations through time and space. Participations: The Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 12(1), 494–530.

94.

Hofman

J. M.

Mason

W. A.

Watts

D. J.

(2011, October). Who says what to whom on Twitter [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, Hyderabad, India.

95.

Zengin Alp

Gündüz

Öğüdücü, Ş.

(2018). Identifying topical influencers on twitter based on user behavior and network topology. Knowledge-Based Systems, 141, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.11.021

96.

Zhang

Wells

Wang

Rohe

(2018). Attention and amplification in the hybrid media system: The composition and activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter following during the 2016 presidential election. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3161–3182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744390