Based on the emotion-as-frames model and theories of political psychology, this study examines how the emotional frames (anger, anxiety, sexual) of news on sexual assault are associated with different news engagement behaviors in social media news pages with more conservative or liberal users. Results revealed that the approach or avoidance action tendencies of the emotional frames were associated with corresponding engagement behaviors. Anxiety was associated with less engagement, while sexual frames were associated with more engagement. The associations were stronger among news organizations with more conservative users and not significant among news organizations with more liberal users.
AnsolabehereS.IyengarS. (1999). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink & polarize the electorate. Free Press.
2.
AquinoJ. M.ArnellK. M. (2007). Attention and the processing of emotional words: Dissociating effects of arousal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194084
3.
BantumE. O. C.OwenJ. E. (2009). Evaluating the validity of computerized content analysis programs for identification of emotional expression in cancer narratives. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014643
4.
BenklerY.FarisR.RobertsH.ZuckermanE. (2017). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 1(41), 7.
5.
BergerJ.MilkmanK. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353
6.
BothS.EveraerdW.LaanE.JanssenE. (2007). Desire emerges from excitement: A psychophysiological perspective on sexual motivation. The Psychophysiology of Sex, 327–339.
CappellaJ. N.KimH. S.AlbarracínD. (2015). Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: Psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology, 18(3), 396–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.941112
9.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x
10.
CastilloC.El-HaddadM.PfefferJ.StempeckM. (2014). Characterizing the life cycle of online news stories using social media reactions [Paper presentation]. The proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
11.
ChangP. F.BazarovaN. N. (2016). Managing stigma: Disclosure-response communication patterns in pro-anorexic websites. Health Communication, 31(2), 217–229.
12.
CloreG. L.GasperK.GarvinE. (2001). Affect as information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
de los SantosT. M.NabiR. L. (2019). Emotionally charged: Exploring the role of emotion in online news information seeking and processing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1566861
14.
DoddM. D.BalzerA.JacobsC. M.GruszczynskiM. W.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: Connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0268
15.
EcklerP.BollsP. (2011). Spreading the virus: Emotional tone of viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 11(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2011.10722180
16.
EpsteinS. (1972). The nature of anxiety with emphasis upon its relationship to expectancy. In SpielbergerD. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 291–337). Academic Press.
17.
FeinbergM.AntonenkoO.WillerR.HorbergE.JohnO. P. (2014). Gut check: Reappraisal of disgust helps explain liberal–conservative differences on issues of purity. Emotion, 14(3), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033727
18.
FischerA. H.RosemanI. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103
19.
GolderS. A.MacyM. W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science, 333(6051), 1878–1881. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202775
20.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
21.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
22.
HaidtJ. (2003). The moral emotions. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (Vol. 11, pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
25.
HaidtJ.HershM. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02489.x
26.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192
27.
HutchersonC. A.GrossJ. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022408
28.
Janoff-BulmanR. (2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028581
29.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
30.
KahnJ. H.TobinR. M.MasseyA. E.AndersonJ. A. (2007). Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. The American Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/20445398
31.
KimH. J.CameronG. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38(6), 826–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210385813
32.
KimH. S. (2015). Attracting views and going viral: How message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 512–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12160
33.
KoukounasE.McCabeM. P. (2001). Sexual and emotional variables influencing sexual response to erotica: A psychophysiological investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010261315767
34.
KoukounasE.OverR. (1999). Allocation of attentional resources during habituation and dishabituation of male sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(6), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018769200845
35.
KramerA. D.GuilloryJ. E.HancockJ. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111
36.
KühneR.SchemerC. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514599
37.
KümpelA. S.KarnowskiV.KeylingT. (2015). News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141
38.
LangP. J.DavisM.ÖhmanA. (2000). Fear and anxiety: Animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00343-8
LeeY.-H.GetzB.XiaoM. (2019). Does that sound right? The effects of regulatory fit and nonfit headline frames on motivated information processing. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1575158
41.
LernerJ. S.HanS.KeltnerD. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: Extending the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70027-X
42.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment.
45.
MillsM.GonzalezF. J.GiuseffiK.SievertB.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R.DoddM. D. (2016). Political conservatism predicts asymmetries in emotional scene memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 306, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.025
46.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.MollF. T.IgnácioF. A.BramatiI. E.Caparelli-DáquerE. M.EslingerP. J. (2005). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnn.0000152236.46475.a7
47.
NabiR. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
48.
NabiR. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference?Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881
49.
OhJ.BellurS.SundarS. S. (2018). Clicking, assessing, immersing, and sharing: An empirical model of user engagement with interactive media. Communication Research, 45(5), 737–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600493
50.
PaltoglouG.ThelwallM. (2012). Twitter, MySpace, Digg: Unsupervised sentiment analysis in social media. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 3(4), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1145/2337542.2337551
RosemanI. J.WiestC.SwartzT. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206
55.
SchnallS.HaidtJ.CloreG. L.JordanA. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206
56.
SchwartzS. H.CapraraG. V.VecchioneM. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x
TausczikY. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676
60.
TiedensL. Z.LintonS. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
61.
ValenzuelaS.PiñaM.RamírezJ. (2017). Behavioral effects of framing on social media users: How conflict, economic, human interest, and morality frames drive news sharing. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 803–826.
62.
WrightW. F.BowerG. H. (1992). Mood effects on subjective probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(2), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90039-A
