Against a backdrop of substantial and persistent disruption in Australian federal politics, this article examines the uses of Twitter in campaigning in the 2013 and 2016 federal elections. We comprehensively tracked the tweets posted by, and directed at, all candidates during the final 2 weeks of these campaigns, and compare patterns in candidate and audience activity across the two elections. This documents considerable shifts in campaigning strategies, electorate responses, and central themes of the debate from 2013 to 2016; we show that these shifts are in line with the changing electoral fortunes of Australia’s major party blocs during an exceptionally tumultuous period in federal politics.
BimberB. (2014). Digital media in the Obama campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the personalized political communication environment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 130-150. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.895691
2.
BorraE.RiederB. (2014). Programmed method: Developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 262-278.
3.
BrunsA. (2017). Tweeting to save the furniture: The 2013 Australian election campaign on Twitter. Media International Australia, 162, 49-64. doi:10.1177/1329878X16669001
4.
BrunsA.BurgessJ. (2011). #ausvotes: How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 37-56.
5.
BrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge companion to social media and politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BrunsA.MoonB.MünchF.SadkowskyT. (2017). The Australian Twittersphere in 2016: Mapping the follower/followee network. Social Media & Society, 3(4), 1-15. doi:10.1177/2056305117748162
ChadwickA.DennisJ.SmithA. P. (2016). Politics in the age of hybrid media: Power, systems, and media logics. In BrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 7-22). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
DixonD. (2012). Analysis tool or research methodology? Is there an epistemology for patterns? In BerryD. M. (Ed.), Understanding digital humanities (pp. 191-209). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
FlewT. (2008). Not yet the Internet election: Online media, political commentary and the 2007 Australian federal election. Media International Australia, 126, 5-13.
12.
HabermasJ. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411-426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
13.
HighfieldT. (2013). National and state-level politics on social media: Twitter, Australian political discussions, and the online commentariat. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(4), 342-360. doi:10.1504/IJEG.2013.060648
JungherrA.JürgensP.SchoenH. (2012). Why the Pirate Party won the German election of 2009 or The trouble with predictions: A response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. “Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment.”Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 229-234. doi:10.1177/0894439311404119
17.
LangloisG.ReddenR.ElmerG. (Eds.). (2015). Compromised data: From social media to big data. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
18.
LarssonA. O.MoeH. (2016). From emerging to established? A comparison of Twitter use during Swedish election campaigns in 2010 and 2014. In BrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 311-324). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
LillekerD. G.JacksonN.Koc-MichalskaK. (2016). Social media in the UK election campaigns 2008-2014: Experimentation, innovation, and convergence. In BrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 325-337). New York, NY: Routledge.
MarxK. (2008). The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York, NY: Wildside Press. (Original work published 1852)
22.
MerazS. (2007). Analyzing political conversation on the Howard Dean candidate blog. In TremayneM. (Ed.), Blogging, citizenship, and the future of media (pp. 59-81). New York, NY: Routledge.
PapacharissiZ. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
26.
RossiL.OreficeM. (2016). Comparing Facebook and Twitter during the 2013 general election in Italy. In BrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 434-446). New York, NY: Routledge.
StieglitzS.Dang-XuanL. (2013). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277-1291. doi:10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
30.
TumasjanA.SprengerT. O.SandnerP. G.WelpeI. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In HearstM.CohenW.GoslingS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 178-185). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Press. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1441/1852
31.
TumasjanA.SprengerT. O.SandnerP. G.WelpeI. M. (2012). Where there is a sea there are pirates: Response to Jungherr, Jürgens, and Schoen. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 235-239. doi:10.1177/0894439311404123
WrightS.GrahamT.JacksonD. (2016). Third space, social media, and everyday political talk. In BrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 74-88). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
YoungS. (2010). The journalism “crisis”: Is Australia immune or just ahead of its time?Journalism Studies, 11(4), 610-624.
ZappavignaM. (2014). Enjoy your snags Australia . . . oh and the voting thing too #ausvotes #auspol: Iconisation and affiliation in electoral microblogging. Global Media Journal: Australian Edition, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.hca.westernsydney.edu.au/gmjau/?p=1139
