This study adopts a multilevel framework to test whether perceived credibility of local newspapers is explained by individual- and community-level factors. Data from a community survey in the United States show that structural pluralism is negatively related to local newspaper credibility. Data also reveal that conservative ideology, newspaper use, social trust, and political trust are significantly related to local newspaper credibility.
AalbergT.StrömbäckJ.de VreeseC. H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, opertionalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 162-178. doi:10.1177/1464884911427799
2.
ArmstrongC. L. (2006). Revisiting structural pluralism: A two-dimensional conception of community power. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 287-300.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
5.
BucyE. P. (2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on air and online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 247-264.
6.
CappellaJ. N. (2002). Cynicism and social trust in the new media environment. Journal of Communication, 52, 229-241. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02541.x
7.
CarrD. J.BarnidgeM.LeeB. G.TsangS. L. (2014). Cynics and skeptics: Evaluating the credibility of mainstream and citizen journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, 452-470. doi:10.1177/1077699014538828
8.
ChoJ.ShahD. V.NahS.BrossardD. (2009). “Split screens” and “spin rooms”: Debate modality, post-debate coverage, and the new videomalaise. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 242-261. doi:10.1080/08838150902907827
9.
ClarkeP. (2008). When can group level clustering be ignored? Multilevel models versus single-level models with sparse data. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62, 752-758. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.060798
10.
ClarkeP.WheatonB. (2007). Addressing data sparseness in contextual population research: Using cluster analysis to create synthetic neighborhoods. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 311-351. doi:10.1177/0049124106292362
11.
DemersD. K. (1998). Structural pluralism, corporate newspaper structure, and news source perceptions: Another test of the editorial vigor hypothesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 572-592. doi:10.1177/107769909807500311
12.
DemersD. P. (1996). The menace of the corporate newspaper: Fact or fiction. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
13.
DiehlT.WeeksB. E.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2015). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society, 18, 1875-1895. doi:10.1177/1461444815616224
14.
DimitrovaD. V.StrömbäckJ. (2012). Election news in Sweden and the United States: A comparative study of sources and media frames. Journalism, 13, 604-619.
15.
DonohueG. A.TichenorP. J.OlienC. N. (1973). Mass media functions, knowledge and social control. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 652-659.
16.
DonohueG. A.TichenorP. J.OlienC. N. (1995). A guard dog perspective on the role of media. Journal of Communication, 45, 115-132. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00732.x
17.
DunawayJ.LawrenceR. G. (2015). What predicts the game frame? Media ownership, electoral context, and campaign news. Political Communication, 32, 43-60. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.880975
18.
DurkheimE. (1997). The division of labor in society (HallsW. D., Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press (Original work published 1893).
19.
FischerC. S. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 1319-1341. doi:10.1086/225993
20.
FlanaginA. J.MetzgerM. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of Web-based information. New Media & Society, 9, 319-342.
21.
GuntherA. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public?Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147-167. doi:10.1086/269308
22.
HallinD. C. (1986). The “uncensored war”: The media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
HindmanD. B. (1996). Community newspapers, community structural pluralism, and local conflict with nonlocal groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 708-721. doi:10.1177/107769909607300315
24.
HindmanD. B.LittlefieldR.PrestonA.NeumannD. (1999). Structural pluralism, ethnic pluralism, and community newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 250-263. doi:10.1177/107769909907600205
25.
JeffresL.HorowitzE.BrackenC. C.JianG.NeuendorfK. A.YoonS. (2012). Structural pluralism and the community context: How and when does the environment matter?Mass Communication and Society, 14, 787-815. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.515371
26.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (1998). Cruising is believing: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325-340.
27.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2010). Still cruising and believing? An analysis of online credibility across three presidential campaigns. American Behavioral Scientists, 54, 57-77. doi:10.1177/0002764210376311
28.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2014). Credibility of social network sites for political information among politically interested Internet users. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 19, 957-974. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12084
29.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2016). Some like it lots: The influence of interactivity and reliance on credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 136-145. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.012
30.
KimM. (2015). Partisans and controversial news online: Comparing perceptions of bias and credibility in news content from blogs and mainstream media. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 17-36. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.877486
31.
KiousisS. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 381-403. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_4
32.
KirchhoffS. M. (2011). The U.S. newspaper industry in transition. Journal of Current Issues in Media and Telecommunications, 2, 27-51.
33.
LarsonS. G. (2006). Media and minorities: The politics of race in news and entertainment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
LeeF. L. F. (2014). “Tolerated one way but not the other”: Levels and determinants of social and political tolerance in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 118, 711-727. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0433-5
35.
LeeT.-T. (2005). The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing media bias perception. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 43-64. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4
36.
LeeT.-T. (2010). Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 8-21. doi:10.1177/0002764210376308
37.
LeipD. (2008). US president general—County level vote data (Dave Leip’s atlas of U.S. presidential elections). Available from http://uselectionatlas.org/
38.
LichterD. T.BrownD. L. (2011). Rural American in an urban society: Changing spatial and social boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 565-592. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150208
39.
MargolisM.ResnickD.LevyJ. (2003). Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle: US elections and the Internet. In GibsonR.NixonP.WardS. (Eds.), Net gain? Political parties and the impact of new information communication technologies (pp. 53-69). London, England: Routledge.
40.
MassC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 86-92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
41.
McLeodD. M.HertogJ. K. (1999). Social control, social change and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups. In DemersD.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change: A macrosocial perspective (pp. 305-330). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
42.
McLeodJ. M.ScheufeleD. A.MoyP. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336. doi:10.1080/105846099198659
43.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
44.
MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J.EyalK.LemusD.McCannR. (2003). Credibility in the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 293-335.
45.
NahS.ArmstrongC. (2011). Structural pluralism in journalism and media studies: A concept explication and theory construction. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 857-878. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.615446
46.
PeughJ. L.EndersC. K. (2005). Using the SPSS MIXED procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 717-741. doi:10.1177/0013164405278558
PinkletonB. E.AustinE. W. (2001). Individual motivations, perceived media importance, and political disaffection. Political Communication, 18, 321-334. doi:10.1080/10584600152400365
49.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
50.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster.
51.
RobinsonM. J.KohutA. (1988). Believability and the press. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 174-189. doi:10.1086/269093
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In HaganJ.PetersonR. D. (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37-56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54.
ScheufeleD. A.HardyB. W.BrossardD.Waismel-ManorI. S.NisbetE. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56, 728-753. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x
55.
ScheufeleD. A.NisbetM. C.BrossardD.NisbetE. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and interpersonal variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315-338. doi:10.1080/10584600490481389
56.
StroudN. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341-366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
57.
SundarS. S. (1999). Exploring receivers’ criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 373-386. doi:10.1177/107769909907600213
58.
TichenorP. J.DonohueG. A.OlienC. N. (1980). Community conflict & the press. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
59.
TsfatiY.ArielyG. (2014). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650213485972
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WilsonT. C. (1986). Community population size and social heterogeneity: An empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1154-1169.
63.
YamamotoM.LeeT.-T.RanW. (2016). Media trust in a community context: A multilevel analysis of individual- and prefecture-level sources of media trust in Japan. Communication Research, 43, 131-154. doi:10.1177/0093650214565894
