Previous research showed that political trust declines when politicians debate in uncivil ways. This article extends this research by analyzing how the news media’s tendency to focus on and even overstate incivility in post-debate coverage affects political trust and the news media’s own credibility. The results of two preregistered survey experiments show that politicians’ use of incivility decreases their perceived trustworthiness. The effects of incivility-focused news coverage on politicians’ perceived trustworthiness are more mixed with one experiment revealing a negative effect and one revealing no significant effect. Both experiments furthermore show that incivility-focused coverage decreases the news media’s own credibility.
BarberB. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press.
3.
BenoitW. L.CurrieH. (2001). Inaccuracies in media coverage of the 1996 and 2000 presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2001.11821554
Ben-PorathE. N. (2010). Interview effects: Theory and evidence for the impact of televised political interviews on viewer attitudes. Communication Theory, 20(3), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01365.x
6.
BorahP. (2013). Interactions of news frames and incivility in the political blogosphere: Examining perceptual outcomes. Political Communication, 30(3), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737426
7.
BosL.van der BrugW.de VreeseC. H. (2013). An experimental test of the impact of style and rhetoric on the perception of right-wing populist and mainstream party leaders. Acta Politica, 48(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2012.27
8.
BrookesS.WhitleyE.PetersT.MulheranP.EggerM.Davey SmithG. (2001). Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: Quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Health Technology Assessment, 5(33), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta5330
9.
BrooksD. J.GeerJ. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x
10.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1996). News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001007
11.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
12.
ChenG. M.MuddimanA.WilnerT.PariserE.StroudN. J. (2019). We should not get rid of incivility online. Social Media and Society, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119862641
13.
ChoJ.ShahD.NahS.BrossardD. (2009). “Split Screens” and “Spin Rooms”: Debate modality, post-debate coverage, and the new videomalaise. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902907827
14.
CitrinJ.MusteC. (1999). Trust in government. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measure of political attitudes (pp. 465–532). Academic Press.
DruckmanJ. N.HennessyC. L.CharlesK.WebberJ. (2010). Competing rhetoric over time: Frames versus cues. Journal of Politics, 72(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990521
17.
DryzekJ. S.BächtigerA.ChambersS.CohenJ.DruckmanJ. N.FelicettiA.FishkinJ. S.FarrellD. M.FungA.GutmannA.LandemoreH.MansbridgeJ.MarienS.NebloM. A.NiemeyerS.SetäläM.SlothuusR.SuiterJ.ThompsonD.WarrenM. E. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694
18.
EnliG.RosenbergL. T. (2018). Trust in the age of social media: Populist politicians seem more authentic. Social Media and Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764430
19.
EsserF.StrömbäckJ. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies. Palgrave Macmillan.
FicoF.RichardsonJ. D.EdwardsS. M. (2004). Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 7(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_3
22.
FogartyB.WolakJ. (2009). The effects of media interpretation for citizen evaluations of politicians’ messages. American Politics Research, 37(1), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08319953
23.
ForgetteR.MorrisJ. S. (2006). High-conflict television news and public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900312
24.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x
25.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J.GershonS. A.WoodallG. S. (2008). Spinning debates: The impact of the news media’s coverage of the final 2004 presidential debate. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161207312677
Gil de ZúñigaH.DiehlT.Ardèvol-AbreuA. (2018). Assessing civic participation around the world: How evaluations of journalists’ performance leads to news use and civic participation across 22 countries. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(8), 1116–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218764239
28.
GoovaertsI.MarienS. (2020). Uncivil communication and simplistic argumentation: Decreasing political trust, increasing persuasive power?Political Communication, 37(6), 768–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1753868
29.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
30.
HalmburgerA.RothmundT.BaumertA.MaierJ. (2019). Trust in politicians—Understanding and measuring the perceived trustworthiness of specific politicians and politicians in general as multidimensional constructs. In BytzekE.RosarU.SteinbrecherM. (Eds.), Wahrnehmung—Persönlichkeit—Einstellungen. Wahlen und politische Einstellungen (pp. 235–302). Springer.
31.
HamiltonM.HunterJ. (1998). The effect of language intensity on receiver evaluations of message, source, and topic. In AllenM.PreissR. W. (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 99–138). Hampton Press.
32.
HaoX.WenN.GeorgeC. (2014). News consumption and political and civic engagement among young people. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(9), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.901490
33.
HenkeJ.LeissnerL.MöhringW. (2020). How can journalists promote news credibility? Effects of evidences on trust and credibility. Journalism Practice, 14(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1605839
34.
HetheringtonM. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press.
JacksonS. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. Guilford Press.
37.
JennstålJ.UbaK.ÖbergP. (2020). Deliberative civic culture: Assessing the prevalence of deliberative conversational norms. Political Studies, 69(2), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719899036
38.
KenskiK.CoeK.RainsS. A. (2020). Perceptions of uncivil discourse online: An examination of types and predictors. Communication Research, 47(6), 795–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699933
39.
KleinnijenhuisJ.van HoofA.OegemaD. (2006). Negative news and the sleeper effect of distrust. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06286417
40.
KochT.PeterC. (2017). Effects of equivalence framing on the perceived truth of political messages and the trustworthiness of politicians. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(4), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx019
41.
LefevereJ.SeebergH.WalgraveS. (2020). Negatively affecting voters’ issue considerations. An experimental study of parties’ attack communication. Political Communication, 37(6), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1760407
42.
MaierS. R. (2005). Accuracy matters: A cross-market assessment of newspaper error and credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200304
43.
MarienS.HoogheM. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x
44.
MasulloG. M.LeeT.RiedlM. J. (2021). Signaling news outlet credibility in a Google search. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211047964
MillerA. H.ListhaugO. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 357–386. https://www.jstor.org/stable/193915
MuddimanA. (2017). Personal and public levels of political incivility. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3182–3202.
49.
MuddimanA. (2018). Attributions of incivility in presidential campaign news. In WarnerB.BystromD.McKinneyM.BanwartM. (Eds.), An unprecedented election: Media, communication, and the electorate in the 2016 campaign (pp. 115–133). Praeger.
50.
MukherjeeS.WeikumG. (2015). Leveraging joint interactions for credibility analysis in news communities [Conference session]. 24th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/2806416.2806537
51.
MutzD. C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton University Press.
52.
MutzD. C.ReevesB. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. The American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051452
53.
NaabT. K.HeinbachD.ZiegeleM.GrasbergerM. T. (2020). Comments and credibility: How critical user comments decrease perceived news article credibility. Journalism Studies, 21(6), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1724181
54.
NaabT. K.NaabT.BrandmeierJ. (2021). Uncivil user comments increase users’ intention to engage in corrective actions and their support for authoritative restrictive actions. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 566–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019886586
55.
NorrisP. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford University Press.
56.
NorrisP. (2017). The conceptual framework of political support. In ZmerliS.van der MeerT. (Eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 19–32). Edward Elgar.
57.
PapacharissiZ. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444
58.
ProchazkaF.WeberP.SchweigerW. (2018). Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1161497
59.
RinkeE. M. (2016). Mediated deliberation. In MazzoleniG.BarnhurstK.IkedaK.MaiaR.WesslerH. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 813–826). Wiley-Blackwell.
60.
RossiniP. (2020). Beyond incivility: Understanding patterns of uncivil and intolerant discourse in online political talk. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314
SingerE.YeC. (2013). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645(1), 112–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212458082
SkytteR. (2020). Dimensions of Elite partisan polarization: Disentangling the effects of incivility and issue polarization. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1457–1475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000760
65.
SobierajS.BerryJ. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
66.
StrömbäckJ. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950
67.
StrömbäckJ.TsfatiY.BoomgaardenH.DamstraA.LindgrenE.VliegenthartR.LindholmT. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
SydnorE. (2019). Disrespectful democracy: The psychology of political incivility. Columbia University Press.
70.
ThorsonE.WicksR.LeshnerG. (2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430066
71.
ThorsonK.VragaE.EkdaleB. (2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903225571
72.
TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
73.
TsfatiY.CohenJ. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05280776
74.
TsfatiY.MeyersO.PeriY. (2006). What is good journalism? Comparing Israeli public and journalists’ perspectives. Journalism, 7(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884906062603
75.
van der WurffR.De SwertK.LechelerS. (2018). News quality and public opinion: The impact of deliberative quality of news media on citizens’ argument repertoire. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw024
76.
van der WurffR.SchoenbachK. (2014). Civic and citizen demands of news media and journalists: What does the audience expect from good journalism?Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014538974
77.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
78.
von SikorskiC.HerbstC. (2020). Not practicing what they preached! Exploring negative spillover effects of news about ex-politicians’ hypocrisy on party attitudes, voting intentions, and political trust. Media Psychology, 23(3), 436–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1604237
79.
WantaW.HuY. (1994). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100109
YorkC. (2013). Cultivating political incivility: Cable news, network news, and public perceptions. Electronic News, 7(3), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243113507926
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
