This study explicates and explores the concept of “vibe coding,” or the use of AI platforms to teach relevant programming skills in a communication context. By integrating flow theory, the research presents a student-centered model for AI-augmented coding education, applying flow traits to achieve desired outcomes. Using student feedback from a mobile application development course, the study demonstrates how AI tools can enhance coding education by providing code samples, explanations, and troubleshooting assistance. The findings suggest that vibe coding can make coding more accessible and useful to a broader audience by applying the model in digital development education and practices.
BarkerV.DozierD. M.WeissA. S.BordenD. L. (2015). Harnessing peer potency: Predicting positive outcomes from social capital affinity and online engagement with participatory websites. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1603–1623.
2.
BerginS.ReillyR. (2005). Programming: Factors that influence success. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 37(1), 411–415.
3.
BowenJ. A.WatsonC. E. (2024). Teaching with AI: A practical guide to a new era of human learning. JHU Press.
4.
BroussardM.DiakopoulosN.GuzmanA. L.AbebeR.DupagneM.ChuanC. H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 673–695.
5.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. (Vol. 1990, p. 1). Harper & Row.
6.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 153–172). Springer.
8.
DasguptaS.HillB. M. (2017). Scratch community blocks: Supporting children as data scientists. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3620–3631). Association for Computing Machinery.
9.
DoddsT.VandendaeleA.SimonF. M.HelbergerN.ResendezV.YeungW. N. (2025). Knowledge silos as a barrier to responsible AI practices in journalism? Exploratory evidence from four Dutch news organisations. Journalism Studies, 26(6), 740–758.
10.
EngeserS.RheinbergF. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158–172.
11.
FawzyA.TahirA.BlincoeK. (2025). Vibe coding in practice: Motivations, challenges, and a future outlook—A grey literature review. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2510.00328. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00328
FoustJ. C.BradshawK. A. (2020). Pushing boundaries: How coding is (and isn’t) taught in accredited journalism programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 75(3), 335–347.
14.
FranciosiS. J. (2011). A comparison of computer game and language-learning task design using flow theory. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 12(1), 11–25.
15.
FridmanM.KrøvelR.PalumboF. (2023). How (not to) run an AI project in investigative journalism. Journalism Practice, 19(6), 1362–1379.
16.
GaddeA. (2025). Democratizing software engineering through generative ai and vibe coding: The evolution of no-code development. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(4), 556–572.
17.
GeY.MeiL.DuanZ.LiT.ZhengY.WangY.WangL.YaoJ.LiuT.CaiY.BiB.GuoF.GuoJ.LiuS.ChengX. (2025). A survey of vibe coding with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12399. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12399
GuzmanA. L.LewisS. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70–86.
20.
HanG.NewellJ. (2014). Enhancing student learning in knowledge-based courses: Integrating team-based learning in mass communication theory classes. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69(2), 180–196.
21.
HolmesW.BialikM.FadelC. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
22.
HongJ.-W.ChangH.-C. H.TewksburyD. (2025). Can AI become Walter Cronkite? Testing the machine heuristic, the hostile media effect, and political news written by artificial intelligence. Digital Journalism, 13(4), 845–868.
23.
HorvatM. (2025). What is vibe coding and when should you use it (or not)?Authorea Preprints.
24.
HossainM. S.WengerD. (2024). Has journalism education kept up with digital transformation?Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 79(2), 129–146.
Jannie MøllerH.Bonde ThylstrupN. (2025). The algorithmic gut feeling—Articulating journalistic doxa and emerging epistemic frictions in AI-driven data work. Digital Journalism, 13(3), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2319641
27.
KanukaH.JugdevK. (2006). Distance education MBA students: An investigation into the use of an orientation course to address academic and social integration issues. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 21(2), 153–166.
28.
KarpathyA. [@karpathy]. (2025, February2). There’s a new kind of coding I call “vibe coding,” where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists. . . [X Post]. X. https://x.com/karpathy/status/1886192184808149383
29.
KasneciE.SesslerK.KüchemannS.BannertM.DementievaD.FischerF.GasserU.GrohF.GünnemannS.HüllermeierE.KruscheS.KutyniokG.MichaeliT.NerdelC.PfefferJ.PoquetO.SailerM.SchmidtA.SeidelT.. . .KasneciG. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
30.
KhanS. (2024). Brave new words: How AI will revolutionize education (and why that’s a good thing). Penguin.
LeeY. M. (2022). Digital skills of mobile journalists: Exploring learning needs and learner experiences of just-in-time learning with smartphones. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 77(1), 43–60.
33.
LewisN. P. (2021). Defining and teaching data journalism: A typology. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 76(1), 78–90.
34.
LiuT. Y. (2016). Using educational games and simulation software in a computer science course: Learning achievements and student flow experiences. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 724–744.
35.
LuiD.KafaiY.LittsB.WalkerJ.WidmanS. (2020). Pair physical computing: high school students’ practices and perceptions of collaborative coding and crafting with electronic textiles. Computer Science Education, 30(1), 72–101.
36.
LuttrellR.WallaceA.McColloughC.LeeJ. (2020). The digital divide: Addressing artificial intelligence in communication education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 75(4), 470–482.
37.
MartinJ. (2025, July7). “Vibe coding” surges as a quarter of Y Combinator startups now get AI to write their code. Exploding Topics. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/vibe-coding
38.
MazidI.WallaceA.ChenJ.ChoiS. (2025). Exploring key drivers for embracing artificial intelligence in public relations pedagogy. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 80(2), 175–196.
MeskeC.HermannsT.von der WeidenE.LoserK.-U.BergerT. (2025). Vibe coding as a reconfiguration of intent mediation in software development: Definition, implications, and research agenda. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21928. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21928
41.
MetzC. (2022). Genius makers: The mavericks who brought AI to Google, Facebook, and the world. Penguin.
PerreaultG. P.LewisS. C.ElyM. (2025). ChatGPT, generative AI, and an epistemic opportunity for journalistic authority. Digital Journalism. Advance Online Publication.
46.
PimenovaV.FakhouryS.BirdC.StoreyM.-A.EndresM. (2025). Good vibrations? A qualitative study of co-creation, communication, flow, and trust in vibe coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.12491. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12491
47.
RayP. P. (2025). A review on vibe coding: Fundamentals, state-of-the-art, challenges and future directions. Authorea Preprints.
ResnickM.MaloneyJ.Monroy-HernándezA.RuskN.EastmondE.BrennanK.MillnerA.RosenbaumE.SilverJ.SilvermanB.KafaiY. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.
50.
RoumeliotisK. I.TselikasN. D. (2023). ChatGPT and Open-AI models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6), 192.
51.
RoyalC. (2005). Teaching web design in journalism and mass communications programs: Integration, judgment, and perspective. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 59(4), 399–414.
52.
RoyalC. (2017). Coding the curriculum in global Journalism education in the 21st century: Challenges and Innovations (GoodmanR. S.SteynE. K., Eds.). Center for Journalism in the Americas.
RoyalC. (2025). Prompting, patience and perspective: Applying transformational teaching theory to using artificial intelligence in a coding course. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 80(2), 156–174.
55.
RoyalC.KosterichA. (2024). Coding competencies across roles: Developing computer programming practices in media organizations. Journalism Studies, 25, 738–758.
56.
Sørmo StrømmeE. (2023). Should I stay or should I code? Of collaboration and do-it-yourself programming in investigative journalism. Digital Journalism, 12(7), 965–984.
57.
SarkarA.DrososI. (2025). Vibe coding: Programming through conversation with artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23253. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23253
58.
ShernoffD. J.CsikszentmihalyiM.SchneiderB.ShernoffE. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In Applications of flow in human development and education: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 475–494). Springer.
59.
StencelM.PerryK. (2016). Superpowers: The digital skills media leaders say newsrooms need going forward. Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism.
60.
TreadwellG.RossT.LeeA.LowensteinJ. K. (2016). A numbers game: Two case studies in teaching data journalism. Journalism, 71(3), 297–308.
61.
UsherN. (2025). Generative AI and journalism: Hype, the always already new, and directions for scholarly imagination. Digital Journalism. Advance Online Publication.
62.
VeenstraA. S.WilderM.ShimuF.SchlauderL.DousdebésF. (2025). Journalism students’ use, expectations, and understanding of generative AI tools. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 80(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958241296474
WuS. (2024). Journalists as individual users of artificial intelligence: Examining journalists’ “value-motivated use” of ChatGPT and other AI tools within and without the newsroom. Journalism, 27(2), 388–406.
65.
YangA. (2025). Preparing public relations’ practitioners for the AI era: Advancing pedagogical principles in public relations’ artificial intelligence education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 80(1), 3–24.
Zabava FordW. S.WolvinA. D. (1993). The differential impact of a basic communication course on perceived communication competencies in class, work, and social contexts. Communication Education, 42(3), 215–223.
68.
ZhangY.WangF. (2024). Developments and trends in flow research over 40 years: A bibliometric analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), 92948.
