Authorship and authorship order are visual shortcuts that communicate student success. We content analyzed to what extent graduate students published as lead authors in 10 refereed communication and media journals over a decade (2007–2016) examining student authorship, coauthorship, and affiliations. Graduate students appeared in approximately 23% of the sampled articles with graduate students most often appearing as lead author on multiauthored articles. If there is an increasing expectation to secure lead authorship, students may need to navigate the authorship process. Guidelines are provided on how to assess and negotiate authorship based on intellectual contributions, tasks, and sustained commitment.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073.
3.
AtkinD. (1996). Telecommunications research article productivity in the U.S.: 1985-1993. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 1, 1–11.
4.
AustinA. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.
5.
BlakeK.BodleJ. V.AdamsE. E. (2004). A fifteen-year census of gender and journal productivity. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 59, 156–171.
6.
BozemanB.CorleyE. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.
7.
Brown-WrightD. A.DubickR. A.NewmanI. (1997). Graduate assistantship expectation and faculty perception: Implications for mentoring and training. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 410–416.
8.
BunzU. (2005). Publish or perish: A limited author analysis of ICA and NCA journals. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 703–720.
9.
CarlsonK.RossJ. (2010). Publication ethics: Conflicts, copyright, permission, and authorship. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, 25(4), 263–271.
10.
CarpenterS. (2008). A study of graduate student authorship in journalism and mass communication journals: 1997–2006. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 63(3), 224–240.
11.
CarpenterS.MakhadmehN.ThorntonL. J. (2015). Mentorship on the doctoral level: An examination of communication mentors’ traits and functions. Communication Education, 64(3), 366–384.
12.
ColeR. R.BowersT. A. (1973). Research article productivity of U.S. journalism faculties. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 246–254.
DongY. R. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369–390.
15.
FernandezM.WegerifR.MercerN.Rojas-DrummondS. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Instruction, 36(2), 40–54.
16.
GazniA.SugimotoC. R.DidegahF. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.
17.
HangelN.Schmidt-PfisterD. (2017). Why do you publish? On the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 529–544.
18.
HansonS. M. H. (1988). Collaborative research and authorship credit: Beginning guidelines. Nursing Research, 37(1), 49–52.
19.
HicksonI. I. I.StacksD. W.BodonJ. (1999). The status of research productivity in communication: 1915–1995. Communication Monographs, 66, 178–197.
JassawallaA. R.SashittalH. C. (1998). An examination of collaboration in high technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 237–254.
22.
KatzJ. S.MartinB. R. (1997). What is research collaboration?Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
23.
LarivièreV.DesrochersN.MacalusoB.MongeonP.Paul-HusA.SugimotoC. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435.
24.
LehmanJ. D.SchairerW. W.GuA.BlevinsJ. L.SculcoP. K. (2017). Authorship trends in 30 years of. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 1684–1687.
25.
MarušicA.BošnjakL.JeroncicA. (2011). A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics, and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLOS ONE, 6(9), Article e23477.
26.
McGrailM. R.RickardC. M.JonesR. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19–35.
27.
McNuttM. K.BradfordM.DrazenJ. M.HansonB.HowardB.JamiesonK. H.KiermerV.MarcusE.PopeB. K.SchekmanR.SwaminathanS.StangP. J.VermaI. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 2557−2560. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/02/26/1715374115
28.
MelinG.PerssonO. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Budapest Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.
29.
MillerG. R. (1979). The research team concept: An approach to graduate training. Communication Education, 28, 322–327.
30.
NeuendorfK. A.SkalskiP. D.AtkinD. J.Kogler-HillS. E.PerloffR. M. (2007). The view from the ivory tower: Evaluating doctoral programs in communication. Communication Reports, 20(1), 24–41.
31.
NeumanW. R.DavidsonR.JooS.ParkY. J.WilliamsS. E. (2008). The seven deadly sins of communication research. Journal of Communication, 5, 8220–8237.
32.
Page-AdamsD.ChengL.GogineniA.ShenC. (1995). Establishing a group to encourage writing for publication among doctoral students. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(3), 402–407.
33.
PaglisL. L.GreenS. G.BauerT. N. (2006). Does advisor mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476.
34.
PhillipsG.M. (1979). The peculiar intimacy of graduate study: A conservative view. Communication Education, 28(4), 339–445.
SchweitzerJ. C. (1988). Research article productivity by mass communication scholars. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 65, 479–484.
37.
StreetJ. M.RogersW. A.IsraelM.Braunack-MayerA. J. (2010) Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 70: 1458–1465.
38.
TryonG. S.BishopJ. L.HatfieldT. A. (2007). Doctoral students’ beliefs about authorship credit for dissertations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 1(3), 184–192.
39.
VincentR. C. (1991). Telecommunications research productivity of U.S. communication programs: 1984-1989. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 840–851.
40.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE., Eds.). Harvard University Press.
41.
WagnerC. S.LeydesdorffL. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(2), 185.
42.
WangJ.HicksD. (2015). Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 197–207.
43.
WangY.RodgersS.WangZ.ThorsonE. (2016). A seventeen-year study of graduate student authorship in advertising journals. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 71(1), 69–83.
44.
WerleyH. H.MurphyP. A.GoschS. M.GottesmannH.NewcombB. J. (1981). Research publication assignment: Nurses’ views. Research in Nursing and Health, 4, 261–279.
45.
WinstonR. B.Jr. (1985). A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 515–518.
46.
WrayK. B. (2006). Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 505–514.
