This paper proposes a novel artificial bee colony with predation effect (ABCPE) algorithm for tuning a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller. The mathematical model of ABCPE algorithm to introduce predator effect in the foraging behavior of artificial bees colony algorithm has been formulated. The proposed algorithm has been tested on tuning problems of different process models. The simulation results reveal that the closed-loop responses are relatively fast and non-oscillatory as compared to the frequency response analysis method for reference tracking. Further, the results obtained using ABCPE are also compared with other evolutionary algorithms. The exhaustive analysis shows that the ABCPE-based solution approach leads to a set of tuning parameters having smaller overshoot, less setting time, and rise time compared to other solution approaches. The stability analysis using Nichols plot reveals that the phase margin of proposed algorithm is higher as compared to other tuning methods. Finally, the convergence behavior and robustness analysis reveals the effectiveness of the proposed approach to solve engineering design problems.
AmiriNSohrabiKEftekharianG, et al. (2023) Optimization and control of an energy-efficient vibration-driven robot. Journal of Vibration and Control29. doi: 10.1177/10775463231175543.
2.
BednekoffPA (2007) Foraging in the Face of Danger. IL: The University of Chicago Press Chicago.
3.
BequetteBW (2003) Process Control: Modeling, Design, and Simulation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Professional.
4.
BlanchettTKemberGDubayR (2000) PID gain scheduling using fuzzy logic. ISA Transactions39(3): 317–325.
5.
BrownJSLaundréJWGurungM (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. Journal of Mammalogy80(2): 385–399.
6.
CaoF (2020) PID controller optimized by genetic algorithm for direct-drive servo system. Neural Computing & Applications32(1): 23–30.
7.
ChopraVSinglaSKDewanL (2014) Comparative analysis of tuning a PID controller using intelligent methods. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica11(8): 235–249.
8.
ChopraVSinghNJKumarR, et al. (2022) Position control of pmbldc motor using SVR-and ANFIS-based controllers. National Academy Science Letters45(1): 57–60.
9.
DavendraDZelinkaISenkerikR (2010) Chaos driven evolutionary algorithms for the task of PID control. Computers & Mathematics with Applications60(4): 1088–1104.
10.
DhiebYYaichMGuermaziA, et al. (2019) PID controller tuning using ant colony optimization for induction motor. Journal of Electrical Systems15(1): 133–141.
11.
GanapathyKKumar CAJeromeJ (2016) Optimal tuning of PID controllers for dead-time systems using stud genetic algorithms. Journal of Vibration and Control22(10): 2503–2518.
12.
GontijoDSAraújoJMSantosTL, et al. (2023) Proportional-integral-derivative-acceleration robust controllers for vibrating systems. Journal of Vibration and Control29(5-6): 1243–1253.
13.
GriffinIBrutonJ (2003) On-Line PID Controller Tuning Using Genetic Algorithms. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin City University.
14.
GünA (2023) Attitude control of a quadrotor using PID controller based on differential evolution algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications229: 120518.
15.
HaynesTSenS (1995) Evolving behavioral strategies in predators and prey. In: International joint conference on artificial intelligence. Quebec, Canada, 20–25 August 1995, 113–126. Springer.
16.
HugieDMDillLM (1994) Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. Journal of Fish Biology45: 151–169.
17.
HussainKSallehMNMChengS, et al. (2019) On the exploration and exploitation in popular swarm-based metaheuristic algorithms. Neural Computing & Applications31(11): 7665–7683.
18.
JainNParmarGGuptaR, et al. (2018) Performance evaluation of GWO/PID approach in control of ball hoop system with different objective functions and perturbation. Cogent Engineering5(1): 1–18.
19.
JonesEIDornhausA (2011) Predation risk makes bees reject rewarding flowers and reduce foraging activity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology65(8): 1505–1511.
20.
JoodPAggarwalSKChopraV (2019) Performance assessment of a neuro-fuzzy load frequency controller in the presence of system non-linearities and renewable penetration. Computers & Electrical Engineering74: 362–378.
21.
JosephSBDadaEGAbidemiA, et al. (2022) Metaheuristic Algorithms for PID Controller Parameters Tuning: Review, Approaches and Open Problems. Cambridge, MA: Heliyon.
22.
KarabogaDBasturkB (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (abc) algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization39(3): 459–471.
23.
KumarVGaurPMittalA (2014) ANN based self-tuned PID like adaptive controller design for high performance pmsm position control. Expert Systems with Applications41(17): 7995–8002.
24.
LaumannsMRudolphGSchwefelHP (1998) A spatial predator-prey approach to multi-objective optimization: a preliminary study. In: International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Berlin, Heidelberg, 27–30 September 1998, 241–249. Springer.
25.
LiX (2003) A real-coded predator-prey genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, Faro, Portugal, 8–11 April 2003, 207–221. Springer.
26.
LimaSL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution17(2): 70–75.
27.
MartinsOOAdekunleAAArowoloMO, et al. (2022) The effect of an evolutionary algorithm’s rapid convergence on improving dc motor response using a PID controller. Scientific African17: e01327.
28.
MitchellWA (2009) Multi-behavioral strategies in a predator–prey game: an evolutionary algorithm analysis. Oikos118(7): 1073–1083.
29.
NagarajBMurugananthN (2010) A comparative study of PID controller tuning using GA, EP, PSO and ACO. In: 2010 international conference on communication control and computing technologies, Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, 7–9 October 2010, 305–313. IEEE.
30.
NagarajBSubhaSRampriyaB (2008) Tuning algorithms for PID controller using soft computing techniques. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security8(4): 278–281.
31.
NarangNDhillonJKothariD (2012) Multiobjective fixed head hydrothermal scheduling using integrated predator-prey optimization and powell search method. Energy47(1): 237–252.
32.
OgataKYangY (2002) Modern Control Engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice hall India, Vol. 4.
33.
O’DwyerA (2009) Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules. London, UK: Imperial College Press.
34.
PereiraDSPintoJO (2005) Genetic algorithm based system identification and PID tuning for optimum adaptive control. In: Proceedings, 2005 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics,Monterey, USA, 24-28 July, 2005, 801–806. IEEE.
35.
PluhacekMSenkerikRDavendraD, et al. (2013) Designing PID controller for dc motor by means of enhanced pso algorithm with dissipative chaotic map. In: Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications. Springer, 475–483.
36.
SaadMSJamaluddinHDarusIZM (2015) Active vibration control of a flexible beam using system identification and controller tuning by evolutionary algorithm. Journal of Vibration and Control21(10): 2027–2042.
37.
SihA (1998) Game theory and predator–prey response races. Game Theory and Animal Behavior: 221–238.
38.
SilvaANevesACostaE (2002) An empirical comparison of particle swarm and predator prey optimisation. In: Irish conference on artificial intelligence and cognitive science, Limerick, Ireland, 12–13 September 2002, 103–110. Springer.
39.
SinghNJDhillonJKothariD (2016) Synergic predator-prey optimization for economic thermal power dispatch problem. Applied Soft Computing43: 298–311.
40.
SinghNJDhillonJKothariD (2018a) Multi-objective thermal power load dispatch using chaotic differential evolutionary algorithm and Powell’s method. Soft Computing22(7): 2159–2174.
41.
SinghNJDhillonJKothariD (2018b) Multiobjective thermal power load dispatch using adaptive predator–prey optimization. Applied Soft Computing66: 370–383.
42.
SreekanthPHariA (2016) Genetic algorithm based self-tuning regulator for ball and hoop system. In: 2016 Conference on emerging devices and smart systems (ICEDSS), Namakkal, India, 4–5 March 2016, 147–152. IEEE.
43.
ZengGQLuKDDaiYX, et al. (2014) Binary-coded extremal optimization for the design of PID controllers. Neurocomputing138: 180–188.
