The structural control of the building is a critical part of mitigating the catastrophic consequences of the earthquakes. The active control of structures has gained popularity in the construction industry because of its ability to adapt to different ground motion characteristics. The active tuned mass damper (ATMD) is one of the most versatile devices used for active structural control. This paper uses the ATMD and variable fractional order fuzzy PID (VFOFPID) controller for improving the performance of building structures subjected to horizontal ground motions. Having obtained the response of an 11-story shear building with this controller, the optimized control forces are determined through the pattern search algorithm and the performance indices of the system subjected to 100 different ground motions are evaluated. The performance indices are compared with those of uncontrolled as well as genetic fuzzy and fuzzy PID controlled structure. The results indicate that the VFOFPID controller proposed here can effectively reduce the drift and the absolute acceleration of the structure.
AdhikariRYamaguchiH (1997) Sliding mode control of buildings with ATMD. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics26(4): 409–422.
2.
ArdeshiriRRKashaniHNReza-AhrabiA (2019) Design and simulation of self-tuning fractional order fuzzy PID controller for robotic manipulator. International Journal of Automation and Control13(5): 595–618.
3.
BalochMASaadNIsmailI, et al. (2010) Design and analysis of PI-fuzzy controller for temperature control system. In: 2010 Fourth Asia International Conference on Mathematical/Analytical Modelling and Computer Simulation, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 26–28 May 2010: IEEE, 378–383.
4.
BaoyaCChunxiangL (2012) Design of active tuned mass damper based on robust control. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), Zhangjiajie, China, 25–27 May 2012: IEEE, 760–764.
5.
ChangJCSoongTT (1980) Structural control using active tuned mass dampers. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division106(6): 1091–1098.
6.
ChopraAK (2017) Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. United Kingdom: Pearson.
7.
DaiJXuZ-DGaiP-P, et al. (2021) Optimal design of tuned mass damper inerter with a Maxwell element for mitigating the vortex-induced vibration in bridges. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing148: 107180.
8.
DasSPanIDasS, et al. (2012) A novel fractional order fuzzy PID controller and its optimal time domain tuning based on integral performance indices. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence25(2): 430–442.
9.
DattaT (1996) Control of dynamic response of structures. Emerging Trends in Vibration and Noise Engineering1: 101.
10.
DequanSGuiliGZhiweiG, et al. (2012) Application of expert fuzzy PID method for temperature control of heating furnace. Procedia Engineering29: 257–261.
11.
GadSMeteredHBassuinyA, et al. (2017) Multi-objective genetic algorithm fractional-order PID controller for semi-active magnetorheologically damped seat suspension. Journal of Vibration and Control23(8): 1248–1266.
12.
GaoHKwokKSamaliB (1999) Characteristics of multiple tuned liquid column dampers in suppressing structural vibration. Engineering Structures21(4): 316–331.
13.
GucluRYaziciH. (2008) Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers. Journal of Sound and Vibration318(1–2): 36–49.
14.
KanagarajN (2019) Design and performance evaluation of fuzzy variable fractional-order [PI] λDµ controller for a class of first-order delay-time systems. Studies in Informatics and Control28(4): 443–452.
15.
KimYMYouKPYouJY, et al. (2013) LQR control of along-wind response of a tall building. Applied Mechanics and Materials421: Trans Tech Publ: 767–771.
16.
KooBKwonWWonS (2015) Active vibration control of a strip in a continuous galvanizing line using PI λ D μ-type fractional-order PID controller. In: 2015 54th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), Hangzhou, China, 28–30 July 2015: IEEE, 740–745.
17.
LiH-XGatlandH (1996) Conventional fuzzy control and its enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)26(5): 791–797.
18.
MohammedRHBendaryFElserafiK (2016) Trajectory tracking control for robot manipulator using fractional order-fuzzy-PID controller. International Journal of Computer Applications134(15): 22–29.
19.
PatelNCSahuBKBagartyDP, et al. (2019) A novel application of ALO-based fractional order fuzzy PID controller for AGC of power system with diverse sources of generation. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education58(2): 465–487.
20.
PourzeynaliSLavasaniHHModarayiAH (2007) Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms. Engineering Structures29(3): 346–357.
21.
ShahiMSohrabiMREtedaliS (2018) Seismic control of high-rise buildings equipped with ATMD including soil-structure interaction effects. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami12(3): 1850010.
22.
SharmaRRanaKKumarV (2014) Performance analysis of fractional order fuzzy PID controllers applied to a robotic manipulator. Expert Systems with Applications41(9): 4274–4289.
23.
SoyguderSKarakoseMAlliH (2009) Design and simulation of self-tuning PID-type fuzzy adaptive control for an expert HVAC system. Expert Systems with Applications36(3): 4566–4573.
24.
SpencerBJrSoongT (1999) New applications and development of active, semi-active and hybrid control techniques for seismic and non-seismic vibration in the USA. In: Proceedings of International Post-SMiRT Conference Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibration of Structures, Cheju, Korea, August 1999.
25.
SymansMDConstantinouMC (1999) Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures21(6): 469–487.
26.
WuJCYangJN (2000) LQG control of lateral–torsional motion of Nanjing TV transmission tower. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics29(8): 1111–1130.
27.
XuZ-DGuoY-Q (2008) Neuro-fuzzy control strategy for earthquake-excited nonlinear magnetorheological structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering28(9): 717–727.
28.
XuZ-DShenY-PGuoY-Q (2003) Semi-active control of structures incorporated with magnetorheological dampers using neural networks. Smart Materials and Structures12(1): 80–87.
29.
YanXXuZ-DShiQ-X (2020) Fuzzy neural network control algorithm for asymmetric building structure with active tuned mass damper. Journal of Vibration and Control26(21–22): 2037–2049.
30.
YaoJT (1972) Concept of structural control. Journal of the Structural Division98(7): 1567–1574.
31.
YouK-PYouJ-YKimY-M (2014) LQG control of along-wind response of a tall building with an ATMD. Mathematical Problems in Engineering2014(9): 1–7.
32.
ZamaniA-ATavakoliSEtedaliS, et al. (2018) Online tuning of fractional order fuzzy PID controller in smart seismic isolated structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering16(7): 3153–3170.
