The act-and-wait concept is a recently developed type of controller, which is receiving growing interest because of its promising features with respect to the control of systems with feedback delay. Although most of its advantages have been widely discussed and verified experimentally, a detailed analysis of the nonlinear behavior of this type of controller is still missing. In this paper, we apply the act-and-wait controller to the digital position control of a single-degree-of-freedom system. The analysis shows both the linear stability and the post-bifurcation behavior of the system, comparing the system with a regular proportional-differential controller and with the act-and-wait controller. The performed investigation confirms most of the advantages of the act-and-wait controller, already known in the literature, regarding the enlargement of the stable region and the possibility of achieving deadbeat control, also in the presence of delay. On the other hand it shows some drawbacks of this controller, related to the post-bifurcation behavior, which presents unbounded motions, and to the robustness of the stability, which appears to be limited.
AeyelsDWillemsJL (1992) Pole assignment for linear time-invariant system by periodic memoryless output feedback. Automatica28(6): 1159–1168.
2.
AtayFM (1999) Balancing the inverted pendulum using position feedback. Applied Mathematics Letters12: 51–56.
3.
BemporadA (1998) Reference governor for constrained nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control43(3): 415–419.
4.
CsernakGStepanG (2010) Digital control as source of chaotic behavior. International Journal of Bifurcations and Chaos20(5): 1365–1378.
5.
EnikovETStepanG (1998) Microchaotic motion of digitally controlled machines. Journal of Vibration and Control4(4): 427–443.
6.
GawthropPJ (2010) Act-and-wait and intermittent control: Some comments. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology18(5): 1195–1198.
7.
GawthropPJWangL (2007) Intermittent model predictive control. Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering221(7): 1007–1008.
8.
GawthropPJLoranILakieM (2011) Intermittent control: A computational theory of human control. Biological Cybernetics104(1–2): 31–51.
9.
Habib G (2013) Stability and bifurcation analysis of mechanical systems subject to digital position control. PhD Thesis, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, and Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary.
10.
Habib G, Rega G and Stepan G (2012a) Improving the digital position control of a single-DoF system via the act-and-wait control concept. In: EUROMECH 532 – 1st international conference on time-periodic systems: Current trends in theory and applications, TU Darmstadt, Germany, 27–30 August 2012.
11.
HabibGRegaGStepanG (2012b) Analytical investigation of single and double Neimark-Sacker bifurcations. Periodica Polytechnica56(1): 13–22.
12.
HabibGRegaGStepanG (2013a) Nonlinear bifurcation analysis of a single-DoF model of a robotic arm subject to digital position control. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics8(1): 011009.
13.
Habib G, Rega G and Stepan G (2013b) Stability analysis of a two-DoF mechanical system subject to proportional-derivative digital position control. Journal of Vibration and Control. Epub ahead of print 9 August 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1077546312474014.
14.
HallerGStepanG (1996) Micro-chaos in digital control. Journal of Nonlinear Science6: 415–448.
15.
InspergerT (2006) Act-and-wait concept for continuous-time control system with feedback delay. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology14(5): 974–977.
16.
Insperger T and Stepan G (2004) Optimization of digital control with delay by periodic variation of the gain parameters. In: IFAC workshop on adaptation and learning in control and signal processing, and IFAC workshop on periodic control systems, Yokohama, Japan, 30 August–1 September 2004, pp. 145–150.
17.
InspergerTStepanG (2007a) Act-and-wait control concept for discrete-time systems with feedback delay. IET Control Theory & Applications1(3): 553–557.
18.
Insperger T and Stepan G (2007b) Case study on the act-and-wait concept for the control of periodic robot motions with feedback delay. In: 12th IFToMM world congress. Besançon, France, 18--21 June 2007.
19.
InspergerTStepanG (2011) Semi-Discretization for Time-Delay Systems – Stability and Engineering Applications, New York, NY: Springer.
20.
InspergerTKovacsLGalambosP (2010a) Increasing the accuracy of digital force control process using the act-and-wait concept. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics15(2): 291–298.
21.
InspergerTWahiPColomboA (2010b) Full characterization of the act-and-wait control for first-order unstable lag processes. Journal of Vibration and Control16(7–8): 1209–1233.
22.
KhargonekarPPPoollaKRooseD (1985) Robust control of linear time-invariant plants using periodic compensation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control3(11): 1088–1096.
23.
KonishiKKokameHHaraN (2011) Delayed feedback control based on the act-and-wait concept. Nonlinear Dynamics63(3): 513–519.
24.
KovacsLLKovecsesJStepanG (2008) Analysis of effects of differential gain on dynamic stability of digital force control. International Journal of Nonlinear Mechanics43: 514–520.
25.
KrutovaIN (2001) Studying stability of the flexible spacecraft with a discrete control system. Automation and Remote Control62(12): 1964–1977.
26.
KuznetsovYA (1998) Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, New York, NY: Springer.
27.
LiBSongXZhaoJ (2013) Act-and-wait theory for continuous-time systems with random feedback delays. Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory13(2): 171–179.
28.
MagniLScattoliniR (2004) Model predictive control of continuous-time nonlinear systems with piecewise constant control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control49(6): 900–906.
29.
NataleC (2003) Interaction Control of Robot Manipulators, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
30.
Nicosia S, Tomei P and Tornambe A (1990) Discrete time modeling of flexible robots. In: 29th conference on decision and control, Honolulu, HI, pp. 539–544.
31.
SicilianoBVillaniL (1999) Robot Force Control, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32.
SieberJKrauskopfB (2005) Extending the permissible control loop latency for the controlled inverted pendulum. Dynamical Systems: An International Journal20(2): 189–199.
33.
SmithOJC (1959) A controller to overcome dead time. ISA Journal6(2): 28–33.
