In this paper, we study the dynamic of the predator–prey model based on mutual interference and its effects on searching efficiency. The parametric conditions, existence, and stability for trivial and boundary equilibrium points are studied. Also, it has shown that by applying the center manifold theorem and bifurcation theory, system undergoes Neimark–Sacker bifurcation across the neighborhood of a positive fixed point. Moreover, due to the bifurcation and chaos which objectively exist in a system, three chaos control strategies are designed and used. Moreover, to validate our theoretical and analytical discussions, numerical simulations are applied to show complex and chaotic behavior. Finally, theoretical discussions are validated with experimental field data.
AbramsPA. (1990) The effects of adaptive behavior on the type‐2 functional response. Ecology71: 877–885.
2.
Barrios‐O'NeillDKellyRDickJT, et al. (2016) On the context‐dependent scaling of consumer feeding rates. Ecology Letters19: 668–678.
3.
BeddingtonJR. (1975) Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. The Journal of Animal Ecology: 331–340.
4.
BurnettT. (1956) Effects of natural temperatures on oviposition of various numbers of an insect parasite (Hymenoptera, Chalcididae, Tenthredinidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America49: 55–59.
5.
ChenGFangJ-qHongY, et al. (2000) Controlling Hopf bifurcations: discrete-time systems. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society5: 29–33.
6.
ChenGYuX (1999) On time-delayed feedback control of chaotic systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications46: 767–772.
7.
ChenQTengZHuZ (2013) Bifurcation and control for a discrete-time prey–predator model with Holling-IV functional response. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science23: 247–261.
8.
ChengLCaoH (2016) Bifurcation analysis of a discrete-time ratio-dependent predator–prey model with Allee effect. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation38: 288–302.
9.
DinQ. (2017a) Complexity and chaos control in a discrete-time prey-predator model. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation49: 113–134.
10.
DinQ. (2017b) Global stability and Neimark-Sacker bifurcation of a host-parasitoid model. International Journal of Systems Science48: 1194–1202.
11.
DinQ. (2017c) Global stability of Beddington model. Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems16: 391–415.
12.
DinQ. (2017d) Neimark–Sacker bifurcation and chaos control in Hassell–Varley model. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications23: 741–762.
13.
DinQ. (2018a) Bifurcation analysis and chaos control in discrete-time glycolysis models. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry56: 904–931.
14.
DinQ. (2018b) A novel chaos control strategy for discrete-time Brusselator models. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry56: 3045–3075.
15.
DinQ. (2018c) Qualitative analysis and chaos control in a density-dependent host–parasitoid system. International Journal of Dynamics and Control6: 778–798.
16.
DinQ. (2019) Stability, bifurcation analysis and chaos control for a predator-prey system. Journal of Vibration and Control25: 612–626.
17.
DinQElsadanyAIbrahimS (2018) Bifurcation analysis and chaos control in a second-order rational difference equation. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation19: 53–68.
18.
DinQGümüşÖAKhalilH (2017) Neimark-sacker bifurcation and chaotic behaviour of a modified host–parasitoid model. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A72: 25–37.
19.
DinQIshaqueW (2020) Bifurcation analysis and chaos control in discrete-time eco–epidemiological models of pelicans at risk in the Salton Sea. International Journal of Dynamics and Control8: 132–148.
20.
DinQKhanMI (2021) A Discrete-Time Model for Consumer–Resource Interaction with Stability, Bifurcation and Chaos Control. Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems20: 1–35.
21.
DinQSaleemNShabbirMS (2020) A class of discrete predator–prey interaction with bifurcation analysis and chaos control. Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena15: 60.
22.
EnglundGÖhlundGHeinCL, et al. (2011) Temperature dependence of the functional response. Ecology Letters14: 914–921.
23.
FanY-HLiW-T (2004) Permanence for a delayed discrete ratio-dependent predator–prey system with Holling type functional response. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications299: 357–374.
24.
Ghandchi-TehraniMWilmshurstLIElliottSJ (2015) Bifurcation control of a Duffing oscillator using pole placement. Journal of Vibration and Control21: 2838–2851.
25.
HassellM. (1970) Parasite behaviour as a factor contributing to the stability of insect host-parasite interactions. Dynamics of Population.
26.
HassellM. (1971) Mutual interference between searching insect parasites. The Journal of Animal Ecology: 473–486.
27.
HassellMHuffakerCB (1969) Regulatory processes and population cyclicity in laboratory populations of Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). III. The development of population models. Population Ecology11: 186–210.
28.
HassellMLawtonJBeddingtonJ (1976) The components of arthropod predation: I. The prey death-rate. The Journal of Animal Ecology: 135–164.
29.
HassellMRogersD (1972) Insect parasite responses in the development of population models. The Journal of Animal Ecology: 661–676.
30.
HassellMVarleyG (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature223: 1133–1137.
31.
HassellMPMayRM (1973) Stability in insect host-parasite models. The Journal of Animal Ecology: 693–726.
32.
HeXLiCPanX, et al. (2014) Impulsive control and Hopf bifurcation of a three-dimensional chaotic system. Journal of Vibration and Control20: 1361–1368.
33.
HeethoffMRallBC (2015) Reducible defence: chemical protection alters the dynamics of predator–prey interactions. Chemoecology25: 53–61.
34.
HohbergKTraunspurgerW (2005) Predator–prey interaction in soil food web: functional response, size-dependent foraging efficiency, and the influence of soil texture. Biology and Fertility of Soils41: 419–427.
35.
HollingCS. (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European Pine Sawfly1. The Canadian Entomologist91: 293–320.
36.
IshaqueWDinQTajM, et al. (2019) Bifurcation and chaos control in a discrete-time predator–prey model with nonlinear saturated incidence rate and parasite interaction. Advances in Difference Equations2019: 1–16.
37.
JeschkeJMKoppMTollrianR (2002) Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecological Monographs72: 95–112.
38.
KalinkatGBroseURallBC (2013) Habitat structure alters top-down control in litter communities. Oecologia172: 877–887.
39.
KalinoskiRMDeLongJP (2016) Beyond body mass: how prey traits improve predictions of functional response parameters. Oecologia180: 543–550.
40.
LiBHeZ (2014) Bifurcations and chaos in a two-dimensional discrete Hindmarsh–Rose model. Nonlinear Dynamics76: 697–715.
41.
LiuBZhangYChenL (2004) Dynamic complexities of a Holling I predator–prey model concerning periodic biological and chemical control. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals22: 123–134.
42.
LotkaAJ. (1925) Elements of Physical Biology. Williams & Wilkins.
43.
LuoX-SWangB-HChenG-R, et al. (2004) Controlling chaos and hyperchaos by switching modulation of systems parameters. International Journal of Modern Physics B18: 2686–2690.
44.
MaXDinQRafaqatM, et al. (2020) A density-dependent host-parasitoid model with stability, bifurcation and chaos control. Mathematics8: 536.
45.
MobayenSBaleanuDTchierF (2017) Second-order fast terminal sliding mode control design based on LMI for a class of non-linear uncertain systems and its application to chaotic systems. Journal of Vibration and Control23: 2912–2925.
46.
MurdochWWMarksJ (1973) Predation by coccinellid beetles: experiments on switching. Ecology54: 160–167.
47.
OgataK. (2010) Modern Control Engineering. Prentice hall.
PawarSDellAISavageVM (2012) Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths. Nature486: 485–489.
50.
PengMZhangZLimC, et al. (2018) Hopf bifurcation and hybrid control of a delayed ecoepidemiological model with nonlinear incidence rate and Holling type II functional response. Mathematical problems in engineering2018: 1–12.
51.
PengMZhangZWangX (2017) Hybrid control of Hopf bifurcation in a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with two delays. Advances in Difference Equations2017: 1–20.
52.
RallBCBroseUHartvigM, et al. (2012) Universal temperature and body-mass scaling of feeding rates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences367: 2923–2934.
53.
RogersD. (1972) Random search and insect population models. The Journal of Animal Ecology41: 369–383.
54.
RogersDHassellM (1974) General models for insect parasite and predator searching behaviour: interference. The Journal of Animal Ecology43: 239–253.
RoyamaT. (1971) A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Population Ecology13: 1–91.
57.
SolomonM. (1949) The natural control of animal populations. The Journal of Animal Ecology18: 1–35.
58.
VolterraV. (1926) Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species Considered Mathematically 1. Nature Publishing Group.
59.
Vucic‐PesticORallBCKalinkatG, et al. (2010) Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths. Journal of Animal Ecology79: 249–256.
60.
WattK. (1959) A mathematical model for the effect of densities of attacked and attacking species on the number attacked. The Canadian Entomologist91: 129–144.
61.
WenGXuDXieJ (2005) Controlling Hopf bifurcations of discrete-time systems in resonance. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals23: 1865–1877.
