In the present work, the response surface methodology (RSM) approach has been used to investigate the mechanism of interface slip damping in layered tack-welded structures with varying surface roughness. Many experiments have been conducted on a number of mild steel specimens with various roughness conditions at the interfaces to study their effect on the damping capacity of the layered and jointed welded structures. The response is modeled using the RSM approach on experimental data. The significant coefficients are obtained by performing the analysis of variance at a 5% level of significance. The natural frequency and amplitude of excitation, kinematic coefficient of friction, surface roughness and relative dynamic slip at the interfaces have been observed to play vital roles on the damping capacity of such structures. The model sufficiency has been found to be satisfactory as the coefficient of determination (R2) and adjusted R2-statistic (R2adj) are found to be 96.9% and 96.8%, respectively.
AnnoY (1970) Transactions of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. (in Japanese) 36: 663.
2.
BelgaumkarBMMurtyASR (1968) Effect of root fixture conditions on the damping characteristics of cantilever beam. Journal of Science and Engineering Research India12: 147–154.
3.
BergerEJ (2002) Friction modeling for dynamic system simulation. Applied Mechanics Reviews55: 535–577.
4.
BergerEJBegleyMRMahajaniM (2000) Structural dynamic effects on interface response – formulation and simulation under partial slipping conditions. Journal of Applied Mechanics67: 785–792.
5.
BowdenFPTaborD (1950) The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6.
CameronTMGriffinJH (1990) An integrated approach for friction damper design. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics112: 175–175.
7.
CigerogluEAnNMenqCH (2007) A microslip friction model with normal load variation induced by normal motion. Nonlinear Dynamics50: 609–626.
8.
CigerogluEAnNMenqCH (2009) Forced response prediction of constrained and unconstrained structures coupled through frictional contacts. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power131: 022505.1–022505.11.
9.
CsabaG (1998) Forced response analysis in time and frequency domains of a tuned bladed disk with friction dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration214: 395–412.
10.
FerriAA (1995) Friction damping and isolation systems. Journal of Mechanical Design117: 196–206.
11.
FilippiSAkayAGolaMM (2004) Measurement of tangential contact hysteresis during microslip. Journal of Tribology126: 482–489.
12.
GoodmanLEKlumppJH (1956) Analysis of slip damping with reference to turbine blade vibration. Journal of Applied Mechanics23: 421–421.
13.
GroperM (1985) Microslip and macroslip in bolted joints. Experimental Mechanics25: 171–174.
14.
IwanWD (1967) On a class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous composite systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Applied Mechanics89: 612–617.
15.
KellySG (2000) Fundamentals of Mechanical Vibrations, Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Editions.
16.
KohKHGriffinJHFilippiSAkayA (2005) Characterization of turbine blade friction dampers. Transactions of the ASME127: 856–862.
17.
MasukoMItoYYoshidaK (1973) Theoretical analysis for a damping ratio of a jointed cantibeam. Bulletin of the JSME16: 1421–1432.
18.
MayerMAGaulL (2007) Segment-to-segment contact elements for modelling joint interfaces in finite element analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing21: 724–734.
19.
MenqCHBielakJGriffinJH (1986a) The influence of microslip on vibratory response—part I: a new microslip model. Journal of Sound and Vibration107: 279–293.
20.
MenqCHBielakJGriffinJH (1986b) The influence of microslip on vibratory response—part II: a comparison with experimental results. Journal of Sound and Vibration107: 295–307.
21.
MenqCHGriffinJH (1985) A comparison of transient and steady state finite element analyses of the forced response of a frictionally damped beam. Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress and Reliability in Design107: 19–25.
22.
Motosh N (1975) Stress distribution in Joints of bolted or riveted connections. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal of Engineering for Industry, 97 Series B1: 157–161.
23.
NandaBKBeheraAK (1999) Study on damping in layered and jointed structures with uniform pressure distribution at the interfaces. Journal of Sound and Vibration226: 607–624.
24.
NishiwakiNMasukoMItoYOkumuraI (1978) A study on damping capacity of a jointed cantilever beam (first report; experimental results). Bulletin of the JSME21: 524–531.
25.
OlofssonU (1995) Cyclic micro-slip under unlubricated conditions. Tribology International28: 207–217.
26.
PoppKPanningLSextroW (2003) Vibration damping by friction forces; theory and applications. Journal of Vibration and Control9: 419–448.
27.
Segalman DJ (1999) Observations on simulation of joint friction. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (CDROM-Proc 1999), DETC99/VIB-8188, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1–7.
28.
Segalman DJ (2001) An Initial Overview of Iwan Modeling for Mechanical Joints. Technical Report, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2001-0811.
29.
SegalmanDJ (2005) A four parameter Iwan model for lap-type joints. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal of Applied Mechanics72: 752–760.
30.
Sextro W (1999) Forced vibration of elastic structures with friction contacts. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, paper DETC99/VIB-8180, Las Vegas, NV, 12–15 September.
31.
SinghBNandaBK (2009) Study of damping in layered and jointed welded structures. International Journal of Design Engineering2: 169–190.
32.
SongYHartwigsenCJMcFarlandDMVakakisAFBergmanLA (2004) Simulation of dynamics of beam structures with bolted joints using Iwan beam elements. Journal of Sound and Vibration273: 249–276.
