Teachers Count in the Classroom and in Policy: Legislation,Rules,and Regulations as Pathways in Gifted Education

Abstract

Policy is a powerful tool that guides many gifted education services and practices in states across the U.S. In addition to student services, policies can govern teacher preparation standards and qualifications for educators responsible for instructional delivery to academically talented learners. Essential to the process, institutions of higher education partner with states to provide standards-based endorsements for gifted education teachers. Arkansas, Iowa, and Kentucky serve as exemplars for enacting policies aimed at increasing the number of educators prepared to teach in the field of gifted education. Key features of their teacher education policies are summarized. In addition to formal teacher education policies, the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) offers a certificate in Exceptional Needs: Gifted. The NBPTS pathway creates recognition for a national level of accomplished teaching practice in gifted education also found in state policy.

Keywords

policy gifted education teacher licensure pre-service teachers in-service teachers higher education national board for professional teaching standards

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arkansans for Gifted and Talented Education (2022). Graduate classes and certification programs. https://giftedarkansas.org/GTcertification

Arkansas Department of Education (2018). Rules governing eligibility and financial incentives for National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. https://dese.ade.arkansas.gov/Files/20210224134750_National_Board_Teacher_Rules_–_FINAL_Effective_8-4-18.pdf

Certification of Teachers for Gifted Education (1998), Kentucky statues, Chapter 161.052. https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=3841

Council for Exceptional Children (n.d.). Initial practice-based professional preparation standards for gifted educators (K-12). In preparation.

Croft

. (2021). Personal communication [telephone].

Educational Testing Service (2022). Kentucky test requirements. ETS. https://www.ets.org/praxis/ky/requirements/

Endorsement for Teachers in Gifted Education (2022), Kentucky Law, Kentucky administrative rules, Title 16, Chapter 2, regulation 110. https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/titles/016/002/110/

Gallagher

J. J

. (1994). Current and historical thinking on education for gifted and talented students. In O’Connell-Ross

(Ed.), National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. An anthology of readings (pp. 83–107). Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Gallagher

J. J.

Clifford

R.M

. (2001). The missing support infrastructure in early childhood. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED439850

10.

Hendricks

. (2021). Personal communication [telephone].

11.

Johnsen

S. K.

VanTassel-Baska

Robinson

Cotabish

Dailey

Jolly

, et al. (2015). Using the national gifted education standards for teacher preparation (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.

12.

Julian

Barnes-Rose

. (2009). Rules: Gifted and talented program approval standards. Arkansas department of education. https://dese.ade.arkansas.gov/Files/20201223145241_2009_GT_Revised_Program_Approval_Standards.pdf

13.

Iowa Department of Education . (2021). Gifted licensure endorsement. Educate Iowa. https://educateiowa.gov/pk-12/advanced-learning-opportunities/gifted-talented#Laws-Rules-Legislation

14.

McKenzie

S. C.

Ritter

G. W

. (2017). National board-certified teacher incentive bonuses: Senate Bill 555. Policy Briefs. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=oepbrief

15.

National Association for Gifted Children & The Association for the Gifted, Council for Exceptional Children . (2013). NAGC-CEC teacher preparation standards in gifted education. http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/NAGC-20CEC-20CAEP-20standards-20-282013-20final-29.pdf

16.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2014). Exceptional needs standards for teachers of students ages birth – 21+, (2nd ed.). https://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ECYA-ENS.pdf

17.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2017). The proven impact of board-certified teachers on student achievement: Impact brief. https://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/impact_brief_final.pdf

18.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2022a). More than 2,000 teachers earn National Board certification; 130,000 now teach to the profession’s highest standards. https://www.nbpts.org/connect/newsroom/

19.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2022b). State rankings by percentage of National Board-certified teachers. https://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2021_StateRankings_All_NBCTs_Percent-of-Teaching-Population.pdf

20.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (n.d.a). Components. https://www.nbpts.org/certification/components/

21.

National Board for Professional Teaching StandardsL (n.d.b). Iowa. https://www.nbpts.org/support/in-your-state/ia/

22.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (n.d.c). Kentucky. https://www.nbpts.org/support/in-your-state/ky/

23.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards MH (n.d.d). Mission and history. https://www.nbpts.org/about/mission-history/

24.

Programs for the Gifted and Talented , (2022). Kentucky Law, Kentucky administrative rules. https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/titles/704/003/285/

25.

Rinn

A. N.

Mun

R. U.

Hodges

. (2020). 2018-2019 state of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://www.nagc.org/2018-2019-state-states-gifted-education

26.

Riser-Kositsky

. (2022). Education statistics: Facts about American schools. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/education-statistics-facts-about-american-schools/2019/01