Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Anticoagulation therapy is central to the management of thromboembolic disorders, and the use of direct oral anticoagulants offers several advantages over standard therapy with parenteral heparins and vitamin K antagonists. In phase III clinical trials, the direct oral anticoagulants (given once or twice daily) all demonstrated favorable benefit–risk profiles compared with conventional standard therapy for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism and for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In clinical practice, many factors may influence overall clinical outcomes in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, including adherence and persistence to the prescribed therapy, which becomes particularly important during long-term therapy. When choosing an anticoagulant for an individual patient, the pharmacological and clinical profile of the anticoagulant, its dosing regimen, and the patient’s clinical characteristics (eg, renal function and comorbidities) and preferences should be considered. This review examines the rationale for and clinical evidence of the selected dosing regimens of the direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The potential influence of dosing strategies (eg, once- or twice-daily dosing) and other factors on patient adherence and therapy persistence are also discussed.

Keywords

adherence persistence atrial fibrillation direct oral anticoagulant dosing regimen stroke venous thromboembolism

Introduction

Thromboembolic disorders such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke arising from atrial fibrillation (AF) are major public health concerns worldwide. Atrial fibrillation, which is estimated to have an incidence as high as 28.3 per 1000 person-years,¹ is associated with a 5-fold increase in stroke and a 3-fold increase in congestive heart failure and can also lead to cognitive dysfunction and premature death.^2,3 The worldwide projected incidence rate of VTE (comprising deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]) was reported as 0.21 to 1.48 per 1000 person-years, with a prevalence of 0.20% to 0.66%.⁴ Venous thromboembolism and its long-term complications (risk of recurrence, postthrombotic syndrome, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension)^5
–7 are associated with significant morbidity and mortality.^8,9 Postthrombotic syndrome affects 20% to 50% of patients with DVT, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension can occur in up to 9% of patients with PE within the first 2 years.^10
–12 Recurrence rates of VTE vary depending on patient characteristics, such as age and sex, and on the origin of the index event.¹³ Thromboembolic disorders represent a rapidly increasing burden to patients, physicians, and health care systems,^14,15 in part owing to the rise in the proportion of elderly people in many populations, such as in the United States.^16,17

Anticoagulation therapy is central to the management of thromboembolic disorders, and standard of care comprises heparins and/or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).^18
–20 However, VKA therapy is associated with several drawbacks: a slow onset of action, a narrow therapeutic window, a need for frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment, multiple drug–drug and food–drug interactions, and an increased risk of bleeding.^21,22 Low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are more predictable compared with VKAs; however, parenteral administration is a burden for some patients and health care systems.²¹ The direct oral anticoagulants (OACs) have been developed to overcome the limitations of traditional anticoagulant therapy. As a result of successful phase III trials, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban have been approved for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF and for the treatment and prevention of recurrent VTE (Table 1).^{23

–36}

Table 1.

Summary of Guidance for Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment and Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism and the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

		Apixaban	Dabigatran	Rivaroxaban	Edoxaban
Venous thromboembolism	Recommended dose: DVT and PE treatment	10 mg twice daily for the first 7 days followed by 5 mg twice daily	150 mg twice daily^a after 5-10 days of parenteral therapy	15 mg twice daily for 21 days followed by 20 mg od	60 mg od after 5-10 days of parenteral therapy
	Recommended dose: prevention of recurrent VTE	2.5 mg twice daily^b	150 mg twice daily^a	20 mg od	Not specified in current FDA prescribing information
	Dose adjustments^c (US label)	No dose adjustment required for patients with renal impairment For patients receiving doses greater than 2.5 mg twice daily, reduce dose by 50% when coadministered with drugs that are strong dual inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp^d	Dose adjustments for patients with CrCl ≤30 mL/min cannot be provided Avoid the coadministration of dabigatran with P-gp inhibitors in patients with CrCl 31-49 mL/min	No dose adjustment required for patients with CrCl 30-50 mL/min Avoid use in patients with CrCl <30 mL/min	30 mg od in patients with CrCl 15-50 mL/min, patients who weigh ≤60 kg, or patients who are taking certain concomitant P-gp inhibitor medications^e
	Dose adjustments^c (EU label)	No dose adjustment is necessary for patients with CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min In patients with CrCl 15-29 mL/min apixaban is to be used with caution	110 mg twice daily in patients with any of the following: aged ≥80 years; receiving verapamil^f Consider reducing dose to 110 mg twice daily in patients with any of the following: age 75-80 years old^g; CrCl 30-50 mL/min and a high risk of bleeding; a high risk of bleeding (eg, in whom coagulation tests have indicated excessive dabigatran exposure); gastritis, esophagitis, or gastroesophageal reflux	No dose adjustment is necessary for patients with a CrCl of 15-50 mL/min. However, if the risk of bleeding outweighs the risk for recurrent DVT or PE, a reduced dose of 15 mg od should be considered In patients with CrCl 15-30 mL/min rivaroxaban is to be used with caution	Not available
Atrial fibrillation	Recommended dose	5 mg twice daily	150 mg twice daily^d	20 mg od^h	60 mg od in patients with CrCl 51-95 mL/minⁱ
Atrial fibrillation	Dose adjustments^c (US label)	2.5 mg twice daily for patients with two of the following characteristics: age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL For patients receiving doses greater than 2.5 mg twice daily, reduce dose by 50% when coadministered with drugs that are strong dual inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp^d	75 mg twice daily in patients with CrCl 15-30 mL/min Consider reducing dose to 75 mg twice daily in patients with CrCl 30-50 mL/min if given with the P-gp inhibitors dronedarone or systemic ketoconazole^j,k	15 mg od for patients with 15-50 mL/min	30 mg od for patients with CrCl 15-50 mL/min
	Dose adjustments^c (EU label)	2.5 mg twice daily for patients with two of the following characteristics: age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL. 2.5 mg twice daily for patients with CrCl 15-29 mL/min	As for VTE treatment	15 mg od for patients with CrCl 15-49 mL/min	Not available

Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; CYP3A4, cytochrome P450 3A4; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; od, once daily; PE, pulmonary embolism; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

^aFor patients with CrCl >30 mL/min.

^bWhen prevention of recurrent DVT and PE is indicated, the apixaban 2.5 mg twice-daily dose should be initiated following completion of 6 months of treatment with apixaban 5 mg twice daily or with another anticoagulant.

^cMild, moderate, and severe renal impairment is defined as CrCl 50-80 mL/min, 30-49 mL/min, and 15-29 mL/min, respectively.

^dFor patients receiving apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, avoid coadministration with strong dual inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp.

^eVerapamil, quinidine, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, oral itraconazole, or oral ketoconazole.

^fUS label states no dose adjustments are required for patients receiving verapamil, including those with moderate renal impairment.

^gConsider reducing dose in patients aged 75 to 80 years when thromboembolic risk is low and bleeding risk is high.

^hUS label specifies CrCl >50 mL/min and EU label specifies CrCl ≥50 mL/min.

ⁱEdoxaban should not be used in patients with CrCl >95 mL/min.

^jUS label states to avoid coadministration of dabigatran with P-gp inhibitors in patients with severe renal impairment.

^kEU label states that concomitant treatment with dabigatran and strong P-gp inhibitors (eg, systemic ketoconazole, cyclosporine, itraconazole, or dronedarone) is contraindicated.

Compared with the VKAs, direct OACs have a rapid onset of action, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that eliminate the need for routine coagulation monitoring, and minimal food and drug interactions.³⁷ These direct OACs are given either once daily (od) or twice daily in the approved indications. Effective anticoagulation is essential for the management of thromboembolic disorders, but therapeutic levels and clinical benefits are not achieved unless adherence remains high. This is particularly important during long-term therapy, such as stroke prevention in patients with AF. This article examines the rationale for and clinical evidence of the selected dosing regimens of the direct OACs for the treatment of VTE and stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF, and discusses the potential influence of dosing strategies on patient adherence and therapy persistence.

Acute and Extended Treatment of VTE

Current Anticoagulation Strategies and Understanding the Dosing Rationale of Direct OACs

Anticoagulation in patients with VTE aims to prevent thrombus extension and embolism and recurrent events, including potentially fatal PE.⁶ The traditional strategy is a dual-drug approach, usually with parenteral heparin (eg, LMWH) overlapping with and followed by a VKA (eg, warfarin).^18
–20 Anticoagulation is usually recommended for at least 3 months after an initial venous thromboembolic event, but the optimal duration of extended treatment is unknown, and depends on the individual benefit–risk balance for the patient (eg, nature of the first event, risks of recurrence, and bleeding).²⁰ Extended anticoagulation (>3 months) is beneficial in patients with VTE, and the direct OACs have demonstrated noninferiority in the reduction of recurrent venous thromboembolic events versus standard therapy.^{26,27,29,32,33,36,38,39}

Phase II dose-finding studies of anticoagulants usually focus on safety outcomes to ascertain the risk of bleeding across a range of doses and regimens. The phase II Oral Direct Factor Xa inhibitor BAY 59-7939 in patients with acute symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis (ODIXa-DVT) study in patients with a proximal DVT compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban 10, 20, or 30 mg twice daily, or 40 mg od with a standard regimen of enoxaparin overlapping with and followed by a VKA during a 12-week treatment period.⁴⁰ All rivaroxaban twice-daily regimens achieved a reduction in patients’ thrombotic burden at day 21 (without recurrent symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death) that was similar to levels observed with standard therapy.⁴⁰ The improvement in the thrombus burden after 21 days of treatment was not statistically significant with od versus twice-daily regimens; recurrent venous thromboembolic events and major bleeding events were uncommon in all treatment groups.⁴⁰ These results supported the idea that a twice-daily regimen may intensify the efficacy of the initial treatment.

Recurrence rates after discontinuing anticoagulant therapy can be high (7% of patients experience a recurrent episode within 12 months), and the risk of recurrence can persist.^26,41,42 Extended treatment with anticoagulants is often required for those at high risk of recurrence. A second phase II dose-ranging study of rivaroxaban investigated the potential of od administration for extended treatment.⁴³ Patients with an acute symptomatic DVT were treated with rivaroxaban od at doses of 20, 30, or 40 mg or standard therapy for 12 weeks. The incidence of the composite of symptomatic VTE and asymptomatic deterioration in thrombotic burden was similar for all doses, as were rates of bleeding.⁴³ Based on these results and those of the ODIXa-DVT study, the rivaroxaban regimen used in the phase III EINSTEIN program consisted of an initial intensified treatment with 15 mg twice daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg od for continued treatment.^26,27

The Botticelli study compared the efficacy and safety of 3 dosing regimens of apixaban (5 mg and 10 mg twice daily, and 20 mg od for 84-91 days) with standard LMWH/VKA therapy.⁴⁴ Efficacy and safety profiles were similar across the dosing regimens and did not differ significantly from standard treatment.⁴⁴ As a result, the treatment regimen tested in the phase III AMPLIFY study of apixaban consisted of the elevated (10 mg twice daily) regimen for intensified initial treatment followed by 5 mg twice daily.²⁹

Phase III clinical studies confirmed the efficacy and safety of the selected doses of apixaban (Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-Line Therapy [AMPLIFY] and Apixaban after the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis with First-Line Therapy–Extended Treatment [AMPLIFY-EXT]),^29,38 dabigatran (Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin for 6 Month Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism [RE-COVER], Phase III Study Testing Efficacy & Safety of Oral Dabigatran Etexilate vs Warfarin for 6 m Treatment for Acute Symp Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) [RE-COVER II], Twice-daily Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate in the Long Term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic VTE [RE-SONATE], and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thrombo Embolism (VTE) [RE-MEDY]),^32,33,39 edoxaban (Hokusai-VTE),³⁶ and rivaroxaban (EINSTEIN DVT, EINSTEIN PE, and EINSTEIN EXT)^26,27 for the treatment and/or secondary prevention of VTE. In all phase III clinical trials for the treatment of acute VTE, the direct OACs showed noninferior efficacy compared with standard therapy. Rates of major bleeding were significantly reduced with rivaroxaban and apixaban in EINSTEIN PE²⁷ and AMPLIFY,²⁹ respectively. Each of these direct OACs also demonstrated superior efficacy and an acceptable safety profile compared with placebo during extended treatment to prevent VTE recurrence.^26,38,39 It should be noted, however, the study designs and patient populations differed between these studies.

Stroke Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular AF

Anticoagulants reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with AF.⁴⁵ Guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation in patients with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2, but it can also be considered in patients with a lower risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 years (2 points), Diabetes mellitus, Stroke or transient ischemic attack (2 points), Vascular disease, Age 65–74, Sex category (female)] score of 1).⁴⁶ It should be noted, however, that the CHADS₂ scoring system ([Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 years, Diabetes mellitus, Stroke or transient ischemic attack (2 points)]; instead of CHA₂DS₂-VASc) was used in phase III stroke prevention trials with the direct OACs.^30,31,34,35

Current Anticoagulation Strategies and Understanding the Dosing Rationale of Direct OACs

Phase III clinical trials of stroke prevention in patients with AF used both twice daily (dabigatran and apixaban) and od (rivaroxaban and edoxaban) regimens. Prevention of Embolic and Thrombotic Events in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PETRO), a double-blind, dose-escalating phase II study, tested 3 dabigatran twice-daily regimens (50, 150, and 300 mg) in patients with nonvalvular AF.⁴⁷ The 150 and 300 mg twice-daily regimens were effective in preventing thromboembolic events, although they were associated with a higher rate of total bleeding events than the 50 mg twice-daily regimen.⁴⁷ The 150 mg twice-daily regimen was selected together with a lower dosing regimen of 110 mg twice daily in an attempt to reduce bleeding events in the phase III Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) trial.³⁰ For apixaban and rivaroxaban, the final doses tested in phase III trials were inferred from VTE treatment data, and indication-specific phase II dose-finding studies were not conducted.⁴⁸ For rivaroxaban, population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation were also undertaken to assist in dose selection.⁴⁹ The plasma concentration–time profile simulated in patients with AF and normal renal function was similar to the profile estimated using a rivaroxaban 20 mg od regimen in patients with DVT. Further simulations focusing on patients with AF and moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance of 30–49 mL/min) showed that, owing to decreased renal function and increased rivaroxaban plasma concentrations, the rivaroxaban 15 mg od regimen should reach a similar plasma concentration–time profile to that observed with the 20 mg od dose in patients with AF and normal renal function.⁴⁹ As a result, the rivaroxaban 20 mg od regimen (or 15 mg od dose in patients with creatinine clearance of 30–49 mL/min) was used in the phase III Rivaroxaban Once daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) study.³¹ For edoxaban, 30 and 60 mg od doses were tested in the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial.³⁵

Phase III trials revealed that rivaroxaban 20 mg (or 15 mg) od (ROCKET AF),³¹ dabigatran 110 mg twice daily (RE-LY),³⁰ and edoxaban 30 mg od (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48)³⁵ were as effective as dose-adjusted warfarin, whereas dabigatran 150 mg twice daily,³⁰ apixaban 5 mg twice daily (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation [ARISTOTLE]),³⁴ and edoxaban 60 mg od³⁵ showed superior efficacy to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF (Table 2). All direct OACs were associated with a significantly reduced risk of intracranial bleeding, one of the most feared complications of warfarin therapy.^30,31,34,35 However, gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly increased by edoxaban (60 mg od), dabigatran (150 mg twice daily), and rivaroxaban use.^30,31,35 Direct comparisons between these trials cannot be made because of the different study designs and patient populations. For example, ROCKET AF (rivaroxaban) enrolled higher risk patients with a mean CHADS₂ score of 3.5, compared with 2.1 in RE-LY (dabigatran) and ARISTOTLE (apixaban), and 2.8 in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (edoxaban). The time in therapeutic range (TTR) of international normalized ratios of warfarin therapy in these studies also varied between 55% in ROCKET AF, 64% in RE-LY, 62% in ARISTOTLE, and 65% in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Table 2). Further analyses of ROCKET AF and RE-LY found that the treatment effects of rivaroxaban and dabigatran, compared with warfarin, were consistent regardless of the trial center TTR levels.^53
–55

Table 2.

Summary of Phase III Studies of Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Dabigatran Versus Dose-Adjusted Warfarin in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.^{30,31,34,35,50
–52}

	Dabigatran		Rivaroxaban	Apixaban	Edoxaban
	RE-LY		ROCKET-AF	ARISTOTLE	ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48
Design	Open-label warfarin, blinded dabigatran dose		Double-blind	Double-blind	Double-blind
Number of patients randomized	18 113		14 264	18 201	21 105
Direct OAC treatment regimen	110 mg twice daily	150 mg twice daily	20 mg od^a	5 mg twice daily^b	30 mg od^c	60 mg od^c
Comparator	Warfarin	Warfarin	Warfarin	Warfarin	Warfarin
Mean TTR (warfarin patients)	64%		55%	62%	65%
CHADs score (mean)	2.1 vs 2.1	2.2 vs 2.1	3.5 vs 3.5	2.1 vs 2.1	2.8 vs 2.8	2.8 vs 2.8
Stroke or systemic embolism^d
Direct OAC vs comparator (%/year)	1.54 vs 1.72	1.12 vs 1.72	2.1 vs 2.4	1.27 vs 1.60	2.04 vs 1.80	1.57 vs 1.80
HR (95% CI)	0.89 (0.73-1.09)^e	0.65 (0.52-0.81)^e	0.88 (0.75-1.03)	0.79 (0.66-0.95)	1.13 (0.96-1.34)	0.87 (0.73-1.04)
P Value (noninferiority)	<.001	<.001	<.001	<.001	.005^f	<.001^f
P Value (superiority)	.27	<.001	.12	.01	.10	.08
Major bleeding
Direct OAC vs comparator (%/year)	2.92 vs 3.61	3.40 vs 3.61	3.6 vs 3.4	2.13 vs 3.09	1.61 vs 3.43	2.75 vs 3.43
HR (95% CI)	0.80 (0.70-0.93)^e	0.94 (0.82-1.08)^e	1.04 (0.90-1.20)	0.69 (0.60-0.80)	0.47 (0.41-0.55)	0.80 (0.71-0.91)
P Value	.003	.41	.58	<.001	<.001	<.001
Intracranial bleeding
Direct OAC vs comparator (%/year)	0.23 vs 0.76	0.32 vs 0.76	0.5 vs 0.7	0.33 vs 0.80	0.26 vs 0.85	0.39 vs 0.85
HR (95% CI)	0.30 (0.19-0.45)^e	0.41 (0.28-0.60)^e	0.67 (0.47-0.93)	0.42 (0.30-0.58)	0.30 (0.21-0.43)	0.47 (0.34-0.63)
P Value	<.001	<.001	.02	<.001	<.001	<.001
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Direct OAC vs comparator (%/year)	1.15 vs 1.07	1.56 vs 1.07	3.15% vs 2.16%^g	0.76 vs 0.86	0.82 vs 1.23	1.51 vs 1.23
HR (95% CI)	1.08 (0.85-1.38)^e	1.48 (1.18-1.85)^e	<.001	0.89 (0.70-1.15)	0.67 (0.53-0.83)	1.23 (1.02-1.50)
P Value	.52	.001		.37	<.001	.03
Fatal bleeding
Direct OAC vs comparator (%/year)	0.19% vs 0.33%	0.23% vs 0.33%	0.2 vs 0.5	34 vs 55 patients	0.13 vs 0.38	0.21 vs 0.38
HR (95% CI)	0.58 (0.35-0.97)^e	0.70 (0.43-1.14)^e	0.50 (0.31-0.79)		0.35 (0.21-0.57)	0.55 (0.36-0.84)
P Value	.039	.15	.003		<.001	.006

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OAC, oral anticoagulant; od, once daily; NR, not reported; TTR, time in therapeutic range of international normalized ratio.

^a15 mg od in patients with creatinine clearance 30-49 mL/min.

^b2.5 mg twice daily in patients with ≥2 of the following: age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL.

^cDose was halved (to 15 mg od or 30 mg od) if any of the following characteristics were present at randomization or during study: creatinine clearance 30-50 mL/min, body weight ≤60 kg, or concomitant treatment with verapamil or quinidine (or dronedarone after protocol amendment December 2010). If a patient stopped verapamil/quinidine/dronedarone after randomization, standard dosing was resumed (providing concomitant treatment was sole reason for dose reduction).

^dIntention-to-treat population for stroke or systemic embolism.

^eRelative risk.

^f P Value for noninferiority as assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population during treatment.

^g% (calculated from n/N) not %/year.

Adherence and Persistence to Therapy in Clinical Practice

Adherence, or compliance, to medication is defined as the process by which patients take their medications as prescribed and includes 3 components: initiation (beginning with administration of the first dose), implementation (the extent to which the actual dose taken corresponds to the prescribed dosing regimen from the first to the last dose, and the intensity of drug use for the duration of therapy), and discontinuation (the end of therapy; administration of the last dose at the end of the treatment period or because of premature discontinuation).⁵⁶ Persistence describes the duration of time from initiation to discontinuation of therapy.⁵⁷ Typically, patients who have medication available >80% of the time (based on prescription refill data), or a medication possession ratio of 80% to 100%, are considered to have acceptable adherence for the treatment of cardiovascular conditions.⁵⁸

Adherence to medication in clinical practice has been estimated as being ≤80%⁵⁹ and can be affected by numerous factors (Table 3).⁶⁰ Depending on the type of treatment regimen, adherence may be harder to achieve. For example, a single-drug, od, oral regimen will be easier to adhere to than a complex regimen with 2 or more drugs, food and drug interactions, and different routes of administration (Table 4). Estimates of adherence to short-term therapy range between 70% and 80%, but long-term therapy is associated with much lower levels of approximately 40% to 50%.⁶⁰ In a study of adherence in patients prescribed warfarin, approximately 92% of patients had ≥1 missed or extra bottle opening, 36% of patients missed >20% of bottle openings, and 4% of patients had >10% extra bottle openings.⁶¹ This poor adherence had a significant effect on anticoagulation control: patients who missed ≥20% of bottle openings were at increased risk of subtherapeutic coagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-2.96), and those who had >10% of extra bottle openings were more likely to be over-anticoagulated (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI 1.09-2.74).⁶¹ In routine clinical practice, warfarin therapy has been shown to be associated with poor treatment persistence. Recent analyses of real-world data from claims databases have shown that rivaroxaban is associated with better treatment persistence than warfarin in patients with AF.^62,63 Dabigatran has also been shown to have higher persistence than warfarin in patients with newly diagnosed AF.⁶⁴

Table 3.

Factors Influencing Adherence.⁶⁰

Category	Factors
Patient-centered factors	Demographic factors: age, ethnicity, sex, education, marital status
	Psychosocial factors: beliefs, motivation, attitude
	Patient–prescriber relationship
	Health literacy
	Patient knowledge
	Physical difficulties
	Tobacco smoking or alcohol intake
	Forgetfulness
	History of good adherence
Therapy-related factors	Route of administration
	Treatment complexity
	Duration of the treatment period
	Medication side effects
	Degree of behavioral change required
	Taste of the medication
	Requirements for drug storage
Health care system factors	Lack of accessibility
	Long waiting time
	Difficulty in getting prescriptions filled
	Unhappy clinic visits
Social and economic factors	Inability to take time off work
	Cost and income
	Social support
Disease factors	Disease symptoms
Disease factors	Severity of the disease

Table 4.

Dosing Strategies and Impact on Adherence.

Strategy	Impact on adherence
Once-daily dosing	Simple regimen, easier to remember
Multiple daily dosing	Complex regimen, potentially increased risk of missing a dose
Oral drug	Convenient route of administration; patient prefers a format that is easy to swallow
Subcutaneous injection	Requires training if self-injecting or a nurse to administer, hospital stay may be required, patient may be needle-phobic
Taken without food	Convenient, reduced level of patient responsibility
Taken with food	Potentially increases the risk of missing a dose, incorrect use or irregular timings; increased patient responsibility
Limited to no food and drug interactions	Convenient, reduced level of patient responsibility
Multiple food and drug interactions	Complex regimen, increases risk of missing a dose or incorrect use, increases patient responsibility
Single-drug approach	Convenient, reduced level of patient responsibility
Multiple-drug approach	Complex regimen, different dosing requirements to remember
No routine drug/ coagulation monitoring requirements	Convenient, limits impact on patient
Routine drug/ coagulation monitoring	Complex regimen, increased contact with health services, increased level of responsibility and greater burden for patient (eg, productivity loss, childcare, and transport)

Potential Impact of Dosing Strategies on Adherence and Persistence

Patients receiving medications for cardiovascular diseases showed higher adherence with od compared with more frequently scheduled dosing regimens.^65,66 A meta-analysis of dosing frequency and adherence specific to oral therapies demonstrated significantly higher adherence rates for od regimens.⁶⁷ Lower health care resource utilization costs were also associated with od regimens compared with multiple dosing over a range of acute and chronic diseases.⁶⁷

Nonadherence leads to poor clinical outcomes, higher rates of hospitalization, and increased financial burden.⁶⁰ In a UK analysis of hypertension drug regimens, hospital admission costs were indirectly linked to adherence when it was shown that serious cardiovascular outcomes occurred less frequently in patients taking a single-tablet regimen compared with patients receiving individual component therapy.⁶⁸ An inversely proportional correlation between dosing frequency and adherence to medication has been established for a diverse range of medical conditions, including patients with cardiovascular disease.^{65,66,69

–73} A review of 51 studies of patients with chronic conditions showed that the “taking adherence” (number of bottle openings divided by the prescribed number of doses) was 93.0% for od dosing (95% CI 91.2-94.7) versus 85.6% for twice-daily dosing (95% CI 82.5-88.8).⁷³ In 29 chronic cardiovascular disease studies, od dosing regimens had higher adherence compared with twice-daily and 3-times-daily regimens by approximately 14.0% and 27.5%, respectively.⁶⁵ Significant improvements in adherence and a reduction in health care resource utilization and costs were also observed when reducing the frequency of oral therapies (from multiple dosing to od dosing) across acute and chronic disease conditions.⁶⁷

There are currently limited real-world data comparing adherence and use of the direct OACs with standard therapy.⁷⁴ Use of a direct OAC (either od or twice daily) is currently mentioned by the European Heart Rhythm Association guidelines as a plausible strategy to optimize adherence.⁷⁵ It has been reported that an od dosing regimen has been associated with higher adherence than a twice-daily regimen in patients with cardiovascular disease,⁶⁶ as well as in patients with AF receiving medication for diabetes or hypertension.⁷⁶ Several studies have reported real-life persistence with the direct OACs. Data from the Dresden new oral anticoagulant registry showed low rates of rivaroxaban discontinuation in the daily care of unselected patients with AF, with 90.9% of patients remaining on therapy after the first 6 months of treatment, and an overall discontinuation rate of 13.6/100 person-years.^77,78 In addition, data from this registry also demonstrated that 85% of patients receiving rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE were still taking rivaroxaban at 6 months, indicating a high persistence rate.⁷⁹ A cross-sectional cohort study of patients receiving dabigatran (administered twice daily) in a real-life setting showed that 30% of patients had missed their medication and 12% had inadequate adherence.⁸⁰ Elsewhere, the use of dabigatran in patients with AF has been shown by real-world data to be well tolerated and effective compared with warfarin, and associated with rates of discontinuation ranging from 3.2% to 6.5% for 110 mg and 150 mg twice-daily doses, respectively, and 25.8/100 patient-years overall.^81,82 However, it should be noted that the reported persistence (or discontinuation) rate with dabigatran may not be directly related to its dosing regimen (ie, twice daily); in the RE-LY clinical trial, dyspepsia was the most frequently cited adverse event with dabigatran use (11.8% for 110 mg dose and 11.3% for 150 mg dose, compared with 5.8% for warfarin), which was thought to have contributed to its discontinuation rates (15% to 16% at 1 year).³⁰

When choosing between direct OACs, differences between the dosing regimens should be considered as one factor based on the physician’s understanding of the specific patient’s history of compliance with medications, as well as other factors such as the patient’s renal function, comorbidities, and preference, particularly for patients requiring long-term therapy.⁴⁸ The od dosing regimens may be associated with improved adherence in patients receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy for VTE (39% to 61% higher likelihood of adherence) or nonvalvular AF (26% higher likelihood of adherence) compared with twice-daily regimens.^76,83 Simple and convenient therapy offered by direct OACs may change patients’ attitudes toward anticoagulant use and improve adherence to treatment. This will assist elderly patients, who are more likely to have multiple comorbidities and take concomitant medicines, and those who require long-term anticoagulant treatment.⁸⁴

Treatment satisfaction is also an important patient-reported outcome to consider in clinical studies. Low treatment satisfaction could lead to lower adherence and therapy persistence. Data from subanalyses of the open-label EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies showed that rivaroxaban was associated with clinically significant improvements in patient-reported benefits and burden compared with standard therapy.^85,86 This reported benefit was consistent over 12 months in patients with DVT, suggesting that adherence was maintained.⁸⁵

It is important to emphasize that pharmacological data do not predict clinical outcomes.⁸⁷ The od dosing regimens selected for rivaroxaban were based on data from phase II and phase III clinical studies and the expectation that od regimens would provide a simple and convenient administration, potentially improving adherence. Although all the direct OACs have relatively short half-lives (apixaban ∼12 hours, edoxaban 10-14 hours, dabigatran 12-14 hours, and rivaroxaban 5-13 hours), dabigatran and apixaban are given twice daily for the treatment of VTE and for stroke prevention in AF, whereas rivaroxaban and edoxaban are given od.^23
–25,88 The inhibitory constants (K_i) for factor Xa (apixaban: 0.08 nmol/L, edoxaban: 0.56 nmol/L, and rivaroxaban: 0.4 nmol/L) and thrombin (dabigatran: 4.5 nmol/L) are low.^89

–92 For example, the plasma levels of rivaroxaban at 24 hours after dosing (ie, C_trough levels prior to the next dose) are estimated to be well above the K_i value (ie, concentrations required to cause 50% inhibition of factor Xa).⁹³ There is currently no clinical evidence to support improved outcomes with twice-daily dosing relative to od dosing in a situation of a missed dose, and further studies and data from routine clinical practice would be needed to provide evidence and insights. Nevertheless, all direct OACs have demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials regardless of whether dosed od or twice daily.^{26,27,29

–36,38,39}

Conclusion

Several direct OACs are being incorporated into routine clinical practice and present simplified and effective therapeutic options for the management of several thromboembolic disorders. These agents are given either od or twice daily, with specific regimens based on data from dose-finding studies and/or pharmacokinetic modeling, and subsequently confirmed in large, randomized phase III trials. Because of their relatively short half-lives (eg, compared with VKAs), strict adherence to the respective dosing schedule is essential to maintain effective anticoagulation. Adherence and persistence may differ in real-world versus strictly controlled clinical trial settings. Evidence suggests that od dosing regimens have better adherence levels compared with twice-daily dosing regimens. However, there are many factors that can influence adherence to therapy and treatment persistence in routine clinical practice. When choosing a direct OAC for a patient, the dosing regimen should be considered alongside other aspects affecting the suitability of one agent over another, including efficacy and risk of bleeding, and the patient’s renal function and comorbidities.^94
–96 Patient education and regular follow-ups are also important to ensure good adherence and optimal clinical outcomes.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Emma Marlow, who provided editorial support with funding from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article; Professor Alpesh Amin is a consultant and speaker for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and DSI. Professor Joel C. Marrs has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Editorial support was funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.

References

Piccini

Hammill

Sinner

. Incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation and associated mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1993-2007. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(1):85–93.

Manolis

Rosei

Coca

. Hypertension and atrial fibrillation: diagnostic approach, prevention and treatment. Position paper of the Working Group ‘Hypertension Arrhythmias and Thrombosis’ of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012;30(2):239–252.

Lau

. Pacing for atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2003;89(1):106–112.

Liu

Phatak

Dillon

Mitchell

. Epidemiology and mortality of venous thromboembolism across patient populations: a systematic literature review. Value Health. 2013;16(3):A272. Abstract PCV5.

Anderson

Jr Spencer

. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 suppl 1):I9–I16.

McRae

Ginsberg

. Initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2004;110(9 suppl 1):I3–I9.

Fanikos

Piazza

Zayaruzny

Goldhaber

. Long-term complications of medical patients with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102(4):688–693.

Cohen

. Long-term benefits of preventing venous thromboembolic events. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(6):877–889.

Prandoni

. Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparins: clinical implications of the recent European guidelines. Thromb J. 2008;6:13.

10.

Wells

Anderson

. The diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:457–463.

11.

Vazquez

Freeman

VanWoerkom

Rondina

. Contemporary issues in the prevention and management of postthrombotic syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(11):1824–1835.

12.

Lang

Pesavento

Bonderman

Yuan

. Risk factors and basic mechanisms of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a current understanding. Eur Respir J. 2013;41(2):462–468.

13.

Zhu

Martinez

Emmerich

. Venous thromboembolism: risk factors for recurrence. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(3):298–310.

14.

Miyasaka

Barnes

Gersh

. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114(2):119–125.

15.

Deitelzweig

Johnson

Lin

Schulman

. Prevalence of clinical venous thromboembolism in the USA: Current trends and future projections. Am J Hematol. 2011;86(2):217–220.

16.

White

. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 suppl 1):14–18.

17.

Naccarelli

Varker

Lin

Schulman

. Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(11):1534–1539.

18.

Goldhaber

Morrison

. Cardiology patient pages. Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Circulation. 2002;106(12):1436–1438.

19.

Key

Kasthuri

. Current treatment of venous thromboembolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(3):372–375.

20.

Kearon

Akl

Comerota

. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 suppl):e419S–e494S.

21.

Eikelboom

Weitz

. New anticoagulants. Circulation. 2010;121(13):1523–1532.

22.

Garcia

Ageno

Libby

. Update on the diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism. Br J Haematol. 2005;131(3):301–312.

23.

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer. Eliquis^® Summary of Product Characteristics. 2014. Published June 20, 2011. Web site. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002148/WC500107728.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.

24.

Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Pradaxa^® Summary of Product Characteristics. 2015. Published December 15, 2009. Web site. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000829/WC500041059.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2015.

25.

Bayer Pharma AG. Xarelto^® Summary of Product Characteristics. 2015. Published December 1, 2009. Web site. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000944/WC500057108.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2015.

26.

The EINSTEIN Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2499–2510.

27.

The EINSTEIN–PE Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(14):1287–1297.

28.

Prins

Lensing

AWA

Bauersachs

. Oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and PE randomized studies. Thromb J. 2013;11(1):21.

29.

Agnelli

Buller

Cohen

. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(9):799–808.

30.

Connolly

Ezekowitz

Yusuf

. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–1151.

31.

Patel

Mahaffey

Garg

. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–891.

32.

Schulman

Kearon

Kakkar

. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(24):2342–2352.

33.

Schulman

Kakkar

Goldhaber

. Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis. Circulation. 2014;129(7):764–772.

34.

Granger

Alexander

McMurray

. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–992.

35.

Giugliano

Ruff

Braunwald

. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2093–2104.

36.

The Hokusai-VTE Investigators. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1406–1415.

37.

Garcia

Libby

Crowther

. The new oral anticoagulants. Blood. 2010;115(1):15–20.

38.

Agnelli

Buller

Cohen

. Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(8):699–708.

39.

Schulman

Kearon

Kakkar

. Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(8):709–718.

40.

Agnelli

Gallus

Goldhaber

. Treatment of proximal deep-vein thrombosis with the oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939): the ODIXa-DVT (Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor BAY 59-7939 in patients with acute symptomatic Deep-Vein Thrombosis) study. Circulation. 2007;116(2):180–187.

41.

Heit

Mohr

Silverstein

Petterson

O’Fallon

Melton

III . Predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):761–768.

42.

Kearon

Gent

Hirsh

. A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(12):901–907.

43.

Buller

Lensing

AWA

Prins

. A dose-ranging study evaluating once-daily oral administration of the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in the treatment of patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: the Einstein-DVT Dose-Ranging Study. Blood. 2008;112(6):2242–2247.

44.

Botticelli Investigators, Buller

Deitchman

Prins

Segers

. Efficacy and safety of the oral direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban for symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. The Botticelli DVT dose-ranging study. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(8):1313–1318.

45.

Tendera

Syzdól

Parma

. ARISTOTLE RE-LYs on the ROCKET. What’s new in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation? Cardiol J. 2012;19(1):4–10.

46.

Camm

Lip

GYH

De Caterina

. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–2747.

47.

Ezekowitz

Reilly

Nehmiz

. Dabigatran with or without concomitant aspirin compared with warfarin alone in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (PETRO Study). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(9):1419–1426.

48.

Renda

De Caterina

. The new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: Once daily or twice daily? Vascul Pharmacol. 2013;59(3-4):53–62.

49.

Mueck

Lensing

AWA

Agnelli

Décousus

Prandoni

Misselwitz

. Rivaroxaban: population pharmacokinetic analyses in patients treated for acute deep-vein thrombosis and exposure simulations in patients with atrial fibrillation treated for stroke prevention. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50(10):675–686.

50.

Connolly

Ezekowitz

Yusuf

Reilly

Wallentin

. Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(19):1875–1876.

51.

Connolly

Wallentin

Yusuf

. Additional events in the RE-LY trial. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1464–1465.

52.

Eikelboom

Wallentin

Connolly

. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2363–2372.

53.

Piccini

Hellkamp

Lokhnygina

. Relationship between time in therapeutic range and comparative treatment effect of rivaroxaban and warfarin: results from the ROCKET AF trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(2):e000521.

54.

Wallentin

Yusuf

Ezekowitz

. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9745):975–983.

55.

Wallentin

Lopes

Hanna

. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin at different levels of predicted international normalized ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2013;127(22):2166–2176.

56.

Vrijens

De Geest

Hughes

. A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;73(5):691–705.

57.

Cramer

Roy

Burrell

. Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health. 2008;11(1):44–47.

58.

Bryson

Rumsfeld

. Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation. 2009;119(23):3028–3035.

59.

Heidbuchel

Verhamme

Alings

. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013;15(5):625–651.

60.

Jin

Sklar

Min

SOV

Chuen

. Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: a review from the patient’s perspective. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008;4(1):269–286.

61.

Kimmel

Chen

Price

. The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin: results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):229–235.

62.

Laliberté

Cloutier

Nelson

. Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(7):1317–1325.

63.

Nelson

Song

Coleman

. Medication persistence and discontinuation of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(12):2461–2469.

64.

Zalesak

Siu

Francis

. Higher persistence in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran versus warfarin. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(5):567–574.

65.

Coleman

Roberts

Sobieraj

Lee

Alam

Kaur

. Effect of dosing frequency on chronic cardiovascular disease medication adherence. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(5):669–680.

66.

Bae

Dobesh

Klepser

. Adherence and dosing frequency of common medications for cardiovascular patients. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(3):139–146.

67.

Srivastava

Arora

Kataria

Cappelleri

Sadosky

Peterson

. Impact of reducing dosing frequency on adherence to oral therapies: a literature review and meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:419–434.

68.

Belsey

. Optimizing adherence in hypertension: a comparison of outcomes and costs using single tablet regimens vs individual component regimens. J Med Econ. 2012;15(5):897–905.

69.

Shi

Hodges

Yurgin

Boye

. Impact of dose frequency on compliance and health outcomes: a literature review (1966-2006). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2007;7(2):187–202.

70.

Claxton

Cramer

Pierce

. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001;23(8):1296–1310.

71.

Iskedjian

Einarson

MacKeigan

. Relationship between daily dose frequency and adherence to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy: evidence from a meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2002;24(2):302–316.

72.

Parienti

Bangsberg

Verdon

Gardner

. Better adherence with once-daily antiretroviral regimens: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(4):484–488.

73.

Coleman

Limone

Sobieraj

. Dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18(7):527–539.

74.

Kakkar

Mueller

Bassand

. Risk profiles and antithrombotic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: perspectives from the international, observational, prospective GARFIELD Registry. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63479.

75.

Heidbuchel

Verhamme

Alings

. EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(27):2094–2106.

76.

Laliberté

Nelson

Lefebvre

Schein

Rondeau-Leclaire

Duh

. Impact of daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Adv Ther. 2012;29(8):675–690.

77.

Beyer-Westendorf

Werth

Koehler

. Real life efficacy of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation—first results of the prospective NOAC registry (NCT01588119). Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts). 2012;120(21). Abstract 1156.

78.

Beyer-Westendorf

Forster

Ebertz

. Drug persistence with rivaroxaban therapy in atrial fibrillation patients-results from the Dresden non-interventional oral anticoagulation registry. Europace. 2015;17(4):530–538.

79.

Beyer-Westendorf

Koehler

Werth

. Real life efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for extended VTE treatment—first results of the prospective NOAC registry (NCT01588119). Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts). 2012;120(21). Abstract 2267.

80.

Schulman

Shortt

Robinson

Eikelboom

. Adherence to anticoagulant treatment with dabigatran in a real-world setting. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(7):1295–1299.

81.

Larsen

Rasmussen

Skjøth

. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in “real-world” patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(22):2264–2273.

82.

Beyer-Westendorf

Ebertz

Förster

. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran therapy in daily-care patients with atrial fibrillation. Results from the Dresden NOAC Registry. Thromb Haemost. 2015;113(6):1247–1257.

83.

Laliberté

Bookhart

Nelson

. Impact of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among patients with venous thromboembolism. Patient. 2013;6(3):213–224.

84.

Robert-Ebadi

Righini

. Anticoagulation in the elderly. Pharmaceuticals. 2010;3(12):3543–3569.

85.

Bamber

Wang

Prins

. Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy in the treatment of acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2013;110(4):732–741.

86.

Prins

Bamber

Cano

. Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy in the treatment of pulmonary embolism; results from the EINSTEIN PE trial. Thromb Res. 2015;135(2):281–288.

87.

Kreutz

. A clinical and pharmacologic assessment of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing for rivaroxaban. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014;38(2):137–149.

88.

Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Savaysa^® Prescribing Information. 2015. Published January 2015. Web site. http://dsi.com/prescribing-information-portlet/getPIContent?productName=Savaysa&inline=true. Accessed January 2015.

89.

Wong

Crain

Xin

. Apixaban, an oral, direct and highly selective Factor Xa inhibitor: in vitro, antithrombotic and antihemostatic studies. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(5):820–829.

90.

Wienen

Stassen

Priepke

Ries

Hauel

. In-vitro profile and ex-vivo anticoagulant activity of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and its orally active prodrug, dabigatran etexilate. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98(1):155–162.

91.

Furugohri

Isobe

Honda

. DU-176b, a potent and orally active Factor Xa inhibitor: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profiles. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(9):1542–1549.

92.

Perzborn

Strassburger

Wilmen

. In vitro and in vivo studies of the novel antithrombotic agent BAY 59-7939—an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(3):514–521.

93.

Mueck

Stampfuss

Kubitza

Becka

. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of rivaroxaban. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53(1):1–16.

94.

January

Wann

Alpert

. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):e1–e76.

95.

Vazquez

Rondina

. Current state of anticoagulants to treat deep venous thrombosis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(3):463.

96.

Savelieva

Camm

. Practical considerations for using novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2013;37(1):32–47.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Management of Thromboembolic Disorders

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Acute and Extended Treatment of VTE

Current Anticoagulation Strategies and Understanding the Dosing Rationale of Direct OACs

Stroke Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular AF

Current Anticoagulation Strategies and Understanding the Dosing Rationale of Direct OACs

Adherence and Persistence to Therapy in Clinical Practice

Potential Impact of Dosing Strategies on Adherence and Persistence

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References