Specialized knowledge with a claim on the public's attention and understanding can be characterized as topical literacy. Among such literacies, scientific literacy has recently captured significant attention. The author describes three popular perspectives on scientific literacy—science content, how science works, and the impact of science on society—and analyzes their rationales and appropriateness for the task at hand.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
. 1989. Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
2.
Anderson, C.1993. DOE pulls plug on SSC contractor. Science261 (August 13): 822.
3.
Bauer, H. H.
1994. Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
4.
Carson, R.
1962. Silent spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Culotta, E.1991. Science's 20 greatest hits take their lumps. Science251 (March 15): 1308.
6.
Hazen, R. M.
, and J. Trefil. 1991. Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy. New York: Doubleday.
7.
Hirsch, E. D.
1987. Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Kusch, P.1960. Educating for scientific literacy in physics. School & Society88 (April 23): 198.
9.
Menzel, H.
1958. The flow of information among scientists: Problems, opportunities, and research questions. New York: Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Research.
10.
NAS-NRC (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council)
. 1959. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information. Washington, DC: NAS-NRC.
11.
NASW (National Association of Science Writers)
. 1958. Science, the news, and the public. New York: New York University Press.
12.
The Royal Society (UK)
. 1948. Report and papers submitted to the Royal Society Scientific Information Conference. London: The Royal Society.
13.
Sagan, C.
1996. The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Ballantine Books.
14.
Shamos, M. H.
1995. The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
15.
Shermer, M.
1997. Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, supersition, and other confusions of our time. New York: W. H. Freeman.
16.
Snow, C. P.
1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Strauss, W.
, and N. Howe. 1991. Generations: The history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow.
18.
Tannenbaum, P.1963. Communication of science information. Science140:579-583.
19.
Taube, M.
1958. An evaluation of use studies of scientific information. Washington, DC: Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Directorate of Research Communication.
20.
Thistle, M. W.1958. Popularizing science. Science127:951-955.
21.
Thorne, K.
1994. Black holes and time warps: Einstein's outrageous legacy. New York: W. W. Norton.
22.
Ubell, E.1957. Covering the news of science. American Scientist45:330A-350A.
23.
University of Michigan, Survey Research Center
. 1959. Science, satellites, and the public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Survey Research Center.
