This article uses an infamous case of data falsification in clinical research as a starting point for a deeper analysis of some of the motivations and obligations that could encourage misconduct in a clinical setting. The article argues that the use of alternative, less rigid experimental designs and protocols could help lessen the pressures on researchers to falsify clinical data pertaining to patient records, and that it is worth considering alternative designs to benefit patients and help promote integrity in medical research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arras, J.1990. Noncompliance in AIDS research. Hastings Center Report20 (5): 24-32.
2.
Beauchamp, T.
, and J. Childress. 1979. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Capron, A. M.
1989. Human experimentation. In Medical ethics, ed. R. Veatch, 125-172. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
4.
Dworkin, G.
1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Facklemann, K.1994. Breast cancer research on trial. Science News145, no. 18 (April 30): 282-286.
6.
Farnsworth, C.1994a. Canadian hospital questions researcher. The New York Times, 15 March, B10, C15.
7.
Farnsworth, C.1994b. Doctor says he falsified data to help patients. The New York Times, 1 April, A16.
8.
Fox, R.
, and J. DeMarco. 1990. Moral reasoning. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
Gorman, C.1994. Breast cancer: A diagnosis of deceit. Time, 28 March, 52-54.
10.
Kessler, D.
, and K. Feiden. 1995. Faster evaluation of vital drugs. Scientific American272 (3): 52.
11.
LaFollette, M. C.
1992. Stealing into print. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research
. 1992. Responsible science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.
Pojman, L.
1995. Ethics. 2nd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14.
Shrader-Frechette, K.
1994. The ethics of scientific research. Boston: Rowman and Littlefield.
15.
Veatch, R.
1987. The patient as partner: A theory of human experimentation ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
