Institutional policies and scientific practice have changed, in response to public concern about
scientific misconduct. Not much research has been done either to understand the phenomenon
or to evaluate the responses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailar, J.C., M. Angell, S. Boots, E.S. Myers, N. Palmer, M. Shipley, and P. Woolf.1990. Ethics and policy in scientific publication . Bethesda, MD: Council of Biology Editors.
2.
LaFollette, M.C.1988. Ethical misconduct in research publication: An annotated bibliography. Final Report to the National Science Foundation under Grant 840994.
3.
Null, C.1990. Planning grant on preserving scientific integrity in the behavioral sciences. NSF Grant 9012479.
4.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research.1992. Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
Sieber, J.1991. Scientists' responses to ethical issues in research . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Cambridge, MA, November.
6.
Swazey, J.1989. Professional values and ethical issues in the graduate education of scientists and engineers. NSF Grant 8913159.
7.
—. 1991. The osmosis factor: Ethics and values in graduate education . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Cambridge, MA, November.
8.
—. 1992. Advisors, mentors, and role models in graduate and professional education: Implications for the recruitment, training, and retention of physician investigators. Background Paper for Institute of Medicine Committee on Career Paths for Clinical Research, NAS, June.
