In this excerpt from a series of seminars on knowledge generation in the arts, the sciences, and
the humanities, scholars of philosophy, history, and anthropology eaplore the meaning of
collaboration in their respective fields. The seminars, held at the Smithsonian Institution during
1991, compared the goals, techniques, and myths of creative and scholarly collaboration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashcroft, B.1989. The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literature. New York: Routledge .
2.
Bellah. R.N., R. Madsden, W.M. Sullivan, A. Swidler, and S.M. Tipton.1985. Habits of the heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Bellah, R.N., R. Madsden, W.M. Sullivan, A. Swidler, and S.M. Tipton.1991. The good society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
4.
Casagrande, J.B.1960. In the company of men: Twenty portraits by anthropologists . New York: Harper.
5.
Clifford, J., and G. Marcus.1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Daniel, P.1987. Official images: New Deal photography. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press .
7.
Fischer, M.M.J., and M. Abedi.1990. Debating Muslims: Cultural dialogues in postmodernity and tradition. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8.
Hamilton, D.1991. Research papers: Who's uncited now?Science251:25.
9.
Marcus, G., and M.M.J. Fischer.1986. Anthropology as a cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
10.
Rushdie, S.1989. The satanic verses. New York : Viking.
