Knowledge synthesis is an important strategy for helping educators benefit from federal and
other investments in research and development. This article describes federal R&D efforts to
make more effective use of knowledge syntheses. It concludes with research-based "Guidelines
for Knowledge Synthesis in Education" formatted as a checklist to help educators in the
development and evaluation of synthesis documents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvermann, D., Moore, D. , & Conley, M. (Eds.). ( 1988). Research within reach: Secondary school reading . Newark, DE: International Reading Association. (1987 version: ED 282187)
2.
Anderson, D. R., & Collins, P. A. (1988). The impact on children's education: Television's influence on cognitive development. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ED 295 271)
3.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC.National Academy of Education, National Institute of Education, Center for the Study of Reading. (ED 253 865)
4.
Chelminsky, E., & Morra, L. G. (1984). Evaluation synthesis for the legislative user. In W. H. Yeaton & P. M. Wortman (Eds.), New directions for program evaluation, No. 24: Issues in data synthesisSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (EJ 309 343)
5.
Chipman, S., Segal, J., & Glaser, R. (1985). Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Cooper, H. M. (1983). Six reviews of research of desegregation and black achievement: What they tell about knowledge synthesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec. (1984 version: ED 252 646)
7.
Cooper, H. M. (1984). The integrative research review. A systematic approach.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Cooper, H. M. (1985). A taxonomy of literature reviews. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ED 254 541)
9.
Cooper, H. M. (1986a). Literature-searching strategies of integrative research reviewers: A first survey. Knowledge, 8, 372-383.
10.
Cooper, H. M. (1986b, October). Moving beyond meta -analysis. Paper presented at a conference, "Workshop on the Future of Meta-analysis," sponsored by the National Committee on Statistics, Hedgeville, WV.
11.
Dervin, B. (1983). Information as a user construct: The relevance of perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 153-184). Philadelphia: Temple University Press .
12.
Glaser, E. M. (1980). Using behavioral science strategies for defining the state-of-the-art. Journal ofapplied Behavioral Science, 16, 79-92.
13.
Hollifield, J. (1987). A bility grouping in elementary schools (ERIC Digest). ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education, University of Illinois, Urbana. (ED 290 542)
14.
Jackson, G. B. (1980). Method for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50(3), 438-460. (EJ 239 575)
15.
Katz, L. G. (1986). Issues in the dissemination of child development knowledge. In L. G. Katz, Professionalism, child development, and dissemination: Three papers. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education , University of Illinois, Urbana . (ED 275 402)
16.
Kennedy, M. M. (1983). Working knowledge. Knowledge, 5(2), 193-211.
17.
Klein, S. S. (1978). Toward consensus on minimum criteria for educational products. In Criteria for reviewing educational products. Syracuse, NY: Educational Products Information Exchange Institute and ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources. (ED 147 318)
18.
Klein, S. S. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook for achieving sex equity through education. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press. (ED 290 810)
19.
Klein, S. S., Gold, N., & Stalford, C. (1986). The convening process: A new technique for applying knowledge to practice . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8(2),189-204. (EJ 351 776)
20.
Landesman, J., & Reed, L. J. (1983). How to write a synthesis document for educational practitioners. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthests and interpretation (pp. 576-642). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
National Institute of Education. (1975). Catalog ofNIE education products (2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (ED 126 625)
23.
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Rich, R. (1983). Knowledge synthesis and problem solving. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 285-312). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
Roberts, J. (1983). Quick turnaround synthesis/interpretation for practitioners. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 423-486). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26.
Segal, J., Chipman, S., & Glaser, R. (1985). Thinking and learning skills: Relating Instruction to research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5-11.
28.
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Best-evidence synthesis: Why less is more. Educational Researcher, 16(4), 15.
29.
Stalford, C. B. (1987). Congruence in theory and practice: The convening process and the consensus development program. Knowledge, 9(1), 4-18.
30.
Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1983a). Epistemological problems in organizing social science knowledge for application. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 45-84). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1983b). Types of synthesis and their criteria . In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 343-362). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32.
Vian, K., & Johansen, R. (1983). Knowledge synthesis and computer-based communications systems: Changing behaviors and concepts. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
Walbert, H. J., & Haertel, E. H. (Eds.). (1980). Research integration: The state-of-the-art [Entire issue]. Evaluation in Education, 4(1).
34.
Ward, S. A. (1976, March 1). Summary of results of survey of current NIE synthesis activities. Memorandum to Harold Hodgkinson, Emerson Elliott, and NIE Associate Directors, National Institute of Education, Washington, DC.
35.
Ward, S. A. (1983). Documentation of a consensus-building approach to knowledge synthesis. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 551-574). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36.
Ward, S. A., & Reed, L. J. (Eds.). (1983). Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
37.
Weller, C. R., & Brandhorst, T. (Eds.). (1987). ERIC clearinghouse publications: An annotated bibliography of Information Analysis Products and other major publications of the ERIC clearinghouses, January-December 1986. Rockville, MD: ERIC Processing and Reference Facility .
38.
Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
