Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The phrase “I believe in science” presents a paradox, blending subjective belief with the evidence-based scientific method. Science is a dynamic, self-correcting process driven by empiricism, falsifiability, and peer review. However, the phrase often reflects trust in institutions rather than direct engagement with the scientific process and its elements. This paper explores how framing science as an iterative process, rather than a set of absolute truths, can improve evidence-based communication. Emphasizing methodology over belief can promote critical engagement with scientific discourse, resolving the paradox and promoting a deeper public understanding of science as an evolving pursuit of knowledge.

Keywords

philosophy of science epistemology science communication linguistics belief scientific method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bertoldo

Mays

Böhm

Poortinga

Poumadère

Tvinnereim

Arnold

Steentjes

Pidgeon

(2019). Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519865448

Brewer

P. R.

Ley

B. L.

(2012). Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691

Castillo

(2013). The scientific method: A need for something better? American Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(9), 1669–1671. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a3401

Cooper

(2019). Cognitive dissonance: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.277

Dawkins

(1997). Is science a religion? https://drjoe.ca/Quantum%20Leap/Religion/Richard%20Dawkins_%20Is%20Science%20A%20Religion_.pdf

De Cruz

. (2019). Religion and science ( Zalta

E.N.

, Ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-science/#WhatScieWhatReli

Goldenberg

M. J.

(2022). Public trust in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2152243

Kampourakis

McCain

(2019). The psychology of (un)certainty. In Uncertainty (pp. 19–32). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190871666.003.0002

Lilienfeld

D. E.

(2000). John snow: The first hired gun? American Journal of Epidemiology, 152(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/152.1.4

10.

McDowell

(1996). Mind and world. Harvard University Press.

11.

Millstone

van Zwanenberg

(2000). A crisis of trust: For science, scientists or for institutions? Nature Medicine, 6(12), 1307–1308. https://doi.org/10.1038/82102

12.

Palmer

(2022). Point of view: Why do people say, “I Believe in science?” The Journal of College Science Teaching, 51(5), 3–4.

13.

Sønderskov

K. M.

Dinesen

P. T.

(2016). Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Political Behavior, 38(1), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/48693813

14.

Zanatta

Zampieri

Basso

Thiene

(2017). Galileo Galilei: Science vs. faith. Global Cardiology Science & Practice, 2017(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21542/gcsp.2017.10

The Paradox of Belief in Science: A Proposal for Reconciliation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References