A consensual approach to the use of knowledge, called the "Convening Process, " was
successfully used to improve practice by the National Institute of Education. The
Convening Process and its effectiveness are described and compared to the well-
established Consensus Development Program in NIH. Differences and similarities are
seen in the conceptualization and operation of the two programs. Commonalities in
sources of knowledge validation in the programs are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S.M., and C.U. Lowe (1984) "The consensus development program." Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization (March): 369-385.
2.
Bland, J.D. (1982) "A comparison of two evaluation processes: A convening activity versus the traditional." Presented at the Evaluation Research Society, Baltimore.
3.
Gold, N. (1982) "Stakeholders and program evaluation: characterizations and reflections." Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
4.
Greene, D., E. Holms, C. Sewell, and D. Summers (1982) "Results from the review of the District of Columbia Public Schools competency based curriculum and student progress plan." Washington, DC: National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Education (April).
5.
Jacoby, I. (1985) "The consensus development program of the National Institute of Health: current practices and historical perspectives." Int. J. of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1 (2): 420-432.
6.
Jacoby, I. (1983) "Biomedical technology: information dissemination and the the NIH consensus development process." Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 5: 245-261.
7.
Klein, S., N. Gold, and C. Stalford (1986) "The Convening Process: A new technique for applying knowledge to practice." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8 (Summer).
8.
Larson, J.L., and E.M. Rogers (1984) "Consensus development conference: a cross-cultural study." Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization (June): 537-548.
9.
Louis, K.S. (1983) "Dissemination systems: some lessons from programs of the past,"in W. Paisley and M. Butler (eds.) Knowledge Utilization Systems in Education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Mullan, F., and I. Jacoby (1985) "The town meeting for technology: the maturation of consensus conferences." J. of the American Medical Association , 253 (August): 1068-1072.
11.
Patton, M.Q. (1978) Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Rogers, E.M. and Shoemaker, F. (1971) Communication of Innovations: a cross-cultural approach (2nd ed.) New York: Praeger.
13.
Stevenson, J. (1981) "Assessing evaluation utilization in human service agencies," in J. Ciarlo (ed.) Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Thurston, P., and E. House (1981) "The NIE adversary hearings on minimum competency testing," in Phi Delta Kappan (October): 87-89.
15.
Weiss, C. (1981) "Measuring the use of evaluation," in J. Ciarlo (ed.) Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
