Several of our most familiar statistical measures of important socioeconomic phenomena
are examined with the aim of suggesting that excessive reliance on such facile
quantifications of complex social realities may distort the perceptions of both policy
makers and the general public.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrett, W. (1979) The Illusion of TechniqueGarden City, NY: Anchor Books.
2.
Berger, P.L. and T. Luckmann (1967) The Social Construction of RealityGarden City, NY: Anchor Books.
3.
Biderman, A.D. and A.J. Reiss Jr. (1967) "On exploring the 'dark figure' of crime."Annals of the Amer. Academy of Pol. and Social Sci. 374 (November): 1-15.
4.
Campbell, D.T. (1975) "Assessing the impact of planned social change," in G. M. Lyons (ed.) Social Research and Public Policies . Hanover, NH: Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.
5.
Carley, M. (1981) Social Measurement and Social Indicators. London: Allen & Unwin.
6.
De Neufville, J.I. ( 1981) "Meeting human needs in the U.S.: a century of social policy and social indicators."Presented at a symposium on the Applicability of Indicators of Social Economic Change for Development Planning, sponsored by UNESCO and the UN University in collaboration with the Korean National Commission for UNESCO, Seoul, Republic of Korea, September 1-14.
7.
Etzioni, A. and E.W. Lehman (1969) "Some dangers in 'valid' social measurement," pp. 45-62 in B. M. Gross (ed.), Social Intelligence for America's Future: Explorations in Societal Problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Fox, K.A. (1974) Social Indicators and Social TheoryNew York: John Wiley.
Hauser, P.M. (1975) Social Statistics in UseNew York: Russell Sage.
11.
Henriot, P.J. (1972) Political Aspects of Social Indicators: Implications for Research. New York: Russell Sage.
12.
——— (1975) Social Indicators and Public Policy. Amsterdam:Elsevier Scientific.
13.
Jazairi, N.T. (1976) Approaches to the Development of Health IndicatorsParis: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
14.
Johnston, D.F. and M.J. Carley (1981) "Social Measurement and Social Indicators."Annals of the Amer. Academy of Pol. and Social Sci. 453 (January): 237-253.
15.
Kuhn, T.S. (1961) "Measurement in modern physical science," pp. 31-63 in H. Woolf (ed.) Quantification. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
16.
Machlup, F. (1979) "Uses, value, and benefits of knowledge."Knowledge1 (September) : 62-81.
17.
MacRae, D., Jr. (forthcoming) Value Indicators and Public PolicyNew York:Russell Sage.
18.
Piore, M.J. (1980) "On the conceptualization of labor market reality," pp. 67-95 in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (ed.) The Utilization of the Social Sciences in Policy Making in the United States: Case Studies.Paris:OECD.
19.
Rossi, R.J. and K.J. Gilmartin (1980) The Handbook of Social IndicatorsNew York: Garland STPM Press.
20.
Rein, M. (1976) Social Science and Public PolicyNew York: Penguin.
21.
Schon, D.A. (1979) "Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem-setting in social policy," pp. 254-283 in A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought.Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press.
22.
Smeeding, T. (1979) "On the distribution of net income: comment."Southern Econ. J.45, 3: 932-944.
23.
Sorokin, P.A. (1956) Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related SciencesChicago:Henry Regnery.
24.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1977) Social Indicators 1976Washington, DC:Government Printing Office.
25.
——— (1976) Current Population Reports, Special Studies Series P-23, 62. Washington, DC:Government Printing Office.
26.
——— (1979) Current Population Reports Series P-60, 125. Washington, DC:Government Printing Office.
27.
——— (1953) Nonwhite Population by Race1950U.S. Census of Population, Special Report P-E, 3B. Washington, DC:Government Printing Office.
28.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1969) Toward a Social ReportWashington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
Winch, P. (1958) The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to PhilosophyLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30.
Ycas, M.A. (1978) "An introduction of the Income Survey Development Program," in U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP),Proceedings of the Conference on Potential for Analysis. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
