This study examines how narrative richness—defined as detail and elaboration in characters, plot, and context—shapes persuasive outcomes in antibiotic stewardship messaging. In a single-factor experiment (N = 1,264), compared to lean narratives or statistics, rich narratives most effectively elicited fear through heightened transportation, although they did not outperform lean narratives in evoking guilt. Fear increased risk perception through reduced psychological distance and greater self-referencing; guilt was positively associated with both. Elevated risk perception predicted more favorable attitudes and stronger behavioral intentions. These findings offer theoretical and practical implications for science communication strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship and other health behaviors.
AppelM.SchreinerC.HaffmansM. B.RichterT. (2019). The mediating role of event-congruent emotions in narrative persuasion. Poetics, 77, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101385
3.
BilandzicH. (2006). The perception of distance in the cultivation process: A theoretical consideration of the relationship between television content, processing experience, and perceived distance. Communication Theory, 16(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00273.x
4.
BurnkrantR. E.UnnavaH. R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289154015
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC.
6.
ChenM.BellR. A.TaylorL. D. (2016). Narrator point of view and persuasion in health narratives: The role of protagonist–reader similarity, identification, and self-referencing. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177147
7.
CohenJ. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
8.
DahlstromM. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Suppl. 4), 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
9.
de GraafA. (2014). The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: Similarity influences health beliefs through self-referencing. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12015
10.
de GraafA. (2023). The role of identification and self-referencing in narrative persuasion. Communications, 48(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2021-0029
11.
DillardJ. P. (2014). Language, style, and persuasion. In HoltgravesT. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 177–187). Oxford University Press.
12.
DillardJ. P.SeoK. (2013). Affect and persuasion. In DillardJ. P.ShenL. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 150–166). Sage.
13.
DunlopS. M.WakefieldM.KashimaY. (2008). Can you feel it? Negative emotion, risk, and narrative in health communication. Media Psychology, 11(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701853112
14.
DunlopS. M.WakefieldM.KashimaY. (2010). Pathways to persuasion: Cognitive and experiential responses to health-promoting mass media messages. Communication Research, 37(1), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209351912
15.
EckerU. K.ButlerL. H.HambyA. (2020). You don’t have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00266-x
16.
EscalasJ. E. (2007). Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/510216
17.
FoxJ.McKnightJ.SunY.MaungD.CrawfisR. (2020). Using a serious game to communicate risk and minimize psychological distance regarding environmental pollution. Telematics and Informatics, 46, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101320
18.
GreenM. C.AppelM. (2024). Narrative transportation: How stories shape how we see ourselves and the world. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 1–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.03.002
19.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
20.
HambyA.BrinbergD.JaccardJ. (2018). A conceptual framework of narrative persuasion. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 30(3), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000187
21.
HmielowskiJ. D.MatthewsA.ChuH. (2023). Going the distance for COVID-19: Relationships among news use, psychological distance, risk perceptions, and behavioral intentions. Science Communication, 45(4), 460–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231188694
KopfmanJ. E.SmithS. W.Ah YunJ. K.HodgesA. (1998). Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365508
24.
KreuterM. W.GreenM. C.CappellaJ. N.SlaterM. D.WiseM. E.StoreyD.ClarkE. M.O’KeefeD. J.ErwinD. O.HolmesK.HinyardL. J.HoustonT.WoolleyS. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904
25.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
26.
LazarusR. S. (2006). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 9–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.x
27.
LenthR. (2025). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.11.0. https://rvlenth.github.io/emmeans/
28.
LiuS.YangJ. Z. (2020). Incorporating message framing into narrative persuasion to curb e-cigarette use among college students. Risk Analysis, 40(8), 1677–1690. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13502
29.
McCulloughA. R.ParekhS.RathboneJ.Del MarC. B.HoffmannT. C. (2016). A systematic review of the public’s knowledge and beliefs about antibiotic resistance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 71, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv310
30.
Moyer-GuséE. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
31.
Moyer-GuséE.RaderK.LavisS. (2022). Transportation into an entertainment narrative about the MMR vaccine: An investigation of self-referencing and issue-related thoughts in narrative persuasion. Journal of Health Communication, 27(8), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2138641
32.
NabiR. L.GreenM. C. (2014). The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585
33.
NisbettR. E.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall.
34.
PaekH. J.OhS. H.HoveT. (2016). How fear-arousing news messages affect risk perceptions and intention to talk about risk. Health Communication, 31(9), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1037419
35.
RatcliffC. L.SunY. (2020). Overcoming resistance through narratives: Findings from a meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 46(4), 412–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz017
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
38.
ShenL. J.BigsbyE. (2013). The effects of message features: Content, structure, and style. In DillardJ. P.ShenL. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 20–35). Sage.
39.
SiedleckaE.CapperM. M.DensonT. F. (2015). Negative emotional events that people ruminate about feel closer in time. PLOS ONE, 10(2), Article e0117105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117105
40.
SlaterD. M.PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). Message variability and heterogeneity: A core challenge for communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11679170
41.
SlaterD. M.RounerD. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2006). Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1339–1351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206290212
45.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
46.
UllahS.LyuB.AhmadT.SamiA.KukretiM. (2024). A mediated moderation model of eco-guilt, personal and social norms and religiosity triggering pro-environmental behavior in tourists. Current Psychology, 43(8), 6830–6839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04894-6
47.
Van BovenL.KaneJ.McGrawA. P.DaleJ. (2010). Feeling close: Emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 872–885. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1531661
48.
WangS.HurlstoneM. J.LevistonZ.WalkerI.LawrenceC. (2019). Climate change from a distance: An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230
49.
WitteK. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
50.
XuJ. (2022). A meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of narrative vs. statistical evidence: Health vs. non-health contexts. Health Communication, 38(14), 3113–3123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2137750
51.
YangJ. Z.McAllisterC. (2020). Closer to the heart, closer to the mind: Using psychological distance to communicate a measles outbreak. Journal of Health Communication, 25(11), 895–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1851822
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
