Anchored by construal level theory and appraisal theories of emotion, this study examines whether discrete emotions vary along with perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts. We found that reduced psychological distance perception led to an increase in concrete emotions such as anger, fear, sadness, and guilt. In contrast, increased psychological distance perception led to an increase in hope—an abstract emotion. Compared to anger, anxiety, and hope, fear, guilt, and shame had more limited impact on climate mitigation action and policy support. Trait empathy moderated the effect of psychological distance manipulation on distance perception and emotions.
BeerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2004). What is unique about self-conscious emotions?Psychological Inquiry, 15, 126-129.
3.
BrüggerA.DessaiS.Devine-WrightP.MortonT. A.PidgeonN. F. (2015). Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1031-1037. doi:10.1038/nclimate2760
4.
ChadwickA. E. (2015). Toward a theory of persuasive hope: Effects of cognitive appraisals, hope appeals, and hope in the context of climate change. Health Communication, 30, 598-611. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.916777
5.
ChuH.YangJ. Z. (2018). Taking climate change here and now–mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Global Environmental Change, 53, 174-181. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.013
6.
CohenM. S.KosslynS. M.BreiterH. C.DiGirolamoG. J.ThompsonW. L.AndersonA. K.. . . BelliveauJ. W. (1996). Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation: A mapping study using functional MRI. Brain, 119, 89-100. doi:10.1093/brain/119.1.89
7.
DavisJ. I.GrossJ. J.OchsnerK. N. (2011). Psychological distance and emotional experience: What you see is what you get. Emotion, 11, 438-444. doi:10.1037/a0021783
8.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimenional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
9.
DennisS. A.GoodsonB. M.PearsonC. (2018). MTurk workers’ use of low-cost “virtual private servers” to circumvent screening methods: A research note (Working paper). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3233954
10.
DessaiS.SimsC. (2010). Public perception of drought and climate change in southeast England. Environmental Hazards, 9, 340-357. doi:10.3763/ehaz.2010.0037
11.
DohertyT. J.ClaytonS. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 265-276. doi:10.1037/a0023141
12.
DoréB.OrtL.BravermanO.OchsnerK. N. (2015). Sadness shifts to anxiety with time and distance from national tragedy in Newtown CT. Psychological Science, 26, 363-373. doi:10.1177/0956797614562218
13.
FergusonM. A.BranscombeN. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 135-142. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010
14.
FrijdaN. H. (1992). The empirical status of the laws of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 467-477.
15.
FrijdaN. H.KuipersP.Ter SchureE. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212
16.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
17.
HanD.DuhachekA.AgrawalN. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1047-1064. doi:10.1086/678300
18.
HanS.LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 158-168. doi:10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70023-2
19.
HarthN. S.LeachC. W.KesslerT. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18-26. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.005
20.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
HuffC.TingleyD. (2015). “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2, 2053168015604648. doi:10.1177/2053168015604648
22.
JonesC.HineD. W.MarksA. D. (2017). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis, 37, 331-341. doi:10.1111/risa.12601
23.
KarshN.EyalT. (2015). How the consideration of positive emotions influences persuasion: The differential effect of pride versus joy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 27-35. doi:10.1002/bdm.1826
24.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25.
LeeA. R. (2017). Psychological proximity to issues of the elderly: The role of age-morphing technology in campaigns for the elderly. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 311-323. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.046
LernerJ. S.GonzalezR. M.SmallD. A.FischhoffB. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144-150. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01433
28.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.146
29.
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205. doi:10.1126/science.1161958
30.
LuH.SchuldtJ. P. (2016). Compassion for climate change victims and support for mitigation policy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 192-200. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.007
ManningC.MangasH.AmelE.TangH.HumesL.FooR.. . . CargosK. (2018). Psychological distance and response to human versus non-human victims of climate change. In FilhoW. L.MaransR. W.CallewaertJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sustainability and social science research (pp. 143-161). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_8
33.
McDonaldR. I.ChaiH. Y.NewellB. R. (2015). Personal experience and the “psychological distance” of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109-118. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.003
34.
MühlbergerA.NeumannR.WieserM. J.PauliP. (2008). The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses. Emotion, 8, 192-198. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.192
35.
MyersT. A.NisbetM. C.MaibachE. W.LeiserowitzA. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113, 1105-1112. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6
36.
O’NeillS.Nicholson-ColeS. (2009). “Fear won’t do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355-379. doi:10.1177/1075547008329201
37.
OjalaM. (2008). Recycling and ambivalence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of household recycling among young adults. Environment and Behavior, 40, 777-797. doi:10.1177/0013916507308787
PennebakerJ. W.HarberK. D. (1993). A social stage model of collective coping: The Loma Prieta earthquake and the Persian Gulf War. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 125-145. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01184.x
40.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.GoldmanR. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
ReidmillerD. R.AveryC. W.EasterlingD. R.KunkelK. E.LewisK. L. M.MaycockT. K.StewartB. C. (Eds.). (2018). Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.
43.
RickardL. N.YangZ. J.SchuldtJ. P. (2016). Here and now, there and then: How “departure dates” influence climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 38, 97-107. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.003
44.
SchuldtJ. P.RickardL. N.YangJ. Z. (2018). Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 147-153. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.001
45.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
46.
SmithC. A.LazarusR. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 233-269. doi:10.1080/02699939308409189
47.
SmithN.LeiserowitzA. (2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34, 937-948. doi:10.1111/risa.12140
48.
SnyderC. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249-275. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1304_01
49.
SpenceA.PoortingaW.PidgeonN. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957-972. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
50.
SwimJ. K.BloodhartB. (2013). Admonishment and praise: Interpersonal mechanisms for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Ecopsychology, 5, 24-35. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0065
51.
SwimJ. K.BloodhartB. (2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9, 446-468. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.987304
52.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
53.
ToussaintL.WebbJ. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 673-685. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.6.673-686
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
56.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660-671. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
57.
WhitmarshL. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 351-374. doi:10.1080/13669870701552235
58.
WorlandJ. (2019, March5). Wildfires, flooding and droughts could make climate change an issue in 2020. Some are pushing for it to be the top one. Time. Retrieved at http://time.com/5543102/2020-election-climate-change/
59.
YangJ. Z.ChuH. (2018). Who is afraid of the Ebola outbreak? The influence of discrete emotions on risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 21, 834-853. doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1247378
60.
YangJ. Z.ChuH.KahlorL. (2019). Fearful conservatives, angry liberals: Information processing related to the 2016 Presidential Election and Climate Change. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96, 742-766. doi:10.1177/1077699018811089
61.
YangJ. Z.SeoM.RickardL. N.HarrisonT. M. (2015). Information sufficiency and attribution of responsibility: Predicting support for climate change policy and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Risk Research, 18, 727-746. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.910692
62.
YzerbytV.DumontM.WigboldusD.GordijnE. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533-549. doi:10.1348/014466603322595266
63.
ZhaoX.LeiserowitzA. A.MaibachE. W.Roser-RenoufC. (2011). Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. Journal of Communication, 61, 713-731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01563.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
