Going the Distance for COVID-19: Relationships Among News Use,Psychological Distance,Risk Perceptions,and Behavioral Intentions

Abstract

In this article, we examine the relationship between news media use and levels of psychological distance associated with COVID-19. Our findings suggest that conservative media use is associated with greater perceived distance to the disease, while less partisan news use is associated with a smaller perceived distance. Moreover, perceived distance is associated with perceived severity of COVID-19, the perceived susceptibility associated with the disease, and intentions to get vaccinated/boosted against COVID-19. As a whole, we examined a mediation process through which media use predicts distance, distance then predicts severity and susceptibility, and distance, severity, and susceptibility predict behavioral intentions.

Keywords

partisan media use psychological distance risk perceptions vaccine intentions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AdFontesmedia.com. https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/

Allcott

Boxell

Conway

Gentzkow

Thaler

Yang

(2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, Article 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254

AllSides.com. https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

Ansolabehere

Schaffner

B. F.

(2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025

Ashworth

Thunström

Cherry

T. L.

Newbold

S. C.

Finnoff

D. C.

(2021). Emphasize personal health benefits to boost COVID-19 vaccination rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), Article e2108225118.

Becker

M. H.

Maiman

L. A.

Kirscht

J. P.

Haefner

D. P.

Drachman

R. H.

(1977). The health belief model and prediction of dietary compliance: A field experiment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 18, 348–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955344

Burak

L. J.

Meyer

(1997). Using the Health Belief Model to examine and predict college women’s cervical cancer screening beliefs and behavior. Health Care for Women International, 18(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339709516279

Caserotti

Girardi

Rubaltelli

Tasso

Lotto

Gavaruzzi

(2021). Associations of COVID-19 risk perception with vaccine hesitancy over time for Italian residents. Social Science & Medicine, 272, Article 113688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113688

Chandran

Menon

(2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/422116

10.

Chu

Liu

(2021). Integrating health behavior theories to predict American’s intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(8), 1878–1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.031

11.

Chu

Yang

J. Z.

(2020). Risk or efficacy? How psychological distance influences climate change engagement. Risk Analysis, 40(4), 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13446

12.

Dong

Jia

Tian

(2021). Understanding public transport satisfaction in post COVID-19 pandemic. Transport Policy, 101, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.004

13.

Dror

A. A.

Eisenbach

Taiber

Morozov

N. G.

Mizrachi

Zigron

Srouji

Sela

(2020). Vaccine hesitancy: The next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35(8), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00671-y

14.

Faasse

Newby

(2020). Public perceptions of COVID-19 in Australia: Perceived risk, knowledge, health-protective behaviors, and vaccine intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 551004. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551004

15.

Feldman

Maibach

E. W.

Roser-Renouf

Leiserowitz

(2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410

16.

Ferrer

R. A.

Klein

W. M. P.

Persoskie

Avishai-Yitshak

Sheeran

(2016). The tripartite model of risk perception (TRIRISK): Distinguishing deliberative, affective, and experiential components of perceived risk. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(5), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9790-z

17.

Frewer

L. J.

Miles

Marsh

(2002). The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 22(4), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00062

18.

Gerretsen

Kim

Caravaggio

Quilty

Sanches

Wells

Brown

E. E.

Agic

Pollock

B. G.

Graff-Guerrero

(2021). Individual determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. PLOS ONE, 16(11), Article e0258462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258462

19.

Hart

P. S.

Chinn

Soroka

(2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020950735

20.

Hayes

A. F.

(2020). Statistical methods for communication science. Routledge.

21.

Hmielowski

J. D.

Feldman

Myers

T. A.

Leiserowitz

Maibach

(2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 866–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/096366251348009

22.

Hmielowski

J. D.

Hutchens

M. J.

Beam

M. A.

(2020). Asymmetry of partisan media effects? Examining the reinforcing process of conservative and liberal media with political beliefs. Political Communication, 37(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1763525

23.

Janz

N. K.

Becker

M. H.

(1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101

24.

Jurkowitz

Mitchell

(2020). Cable TV and COVID-19: How Americans perceive the outbreak and view media coverage differ by main news source. Pew Research Center.

25.

Karlsson

L. C.

Soveri

Lewandowsky

Karlsson

Nolvi

Karukivi

Lindfelt

Antfolk

(2021). Fearing the disease or the vaccine: The case of COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 172, Article 110590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110590

26.

Kim

H. S.

(2018). Time matters: Framing antismoking messages using current smokers’ preexisting perceptions of temporal distance to smoking-related health risks. Health Communication, 33(3), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579

27.

Kirkpatrick

A. W.

(2021). The spread of fake science: Lexical concreteness, proximity, misinformation sharing, and the moderating role of subjective knowledge. Public Understanding of Science, 30(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520966165

28.

Levendusky

(2013). How partisan media polarize America. University of Chicago Press.

29.

Luan

Hertwig

. (2022). Does risk perception motivate preventive behavior during a pandemic? A longitudinal study in the United States and China. American Psychologist, 77(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000885

30.

Liberman

Trope

(1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5

31.

(2022). Predicting intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19 and seasonal flu: The role of consideration of future and immediate consequences. Health Communication, 37(8), 952–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1877913

32.

Mach

K. J.

Salas Reyes

Pentz

Taylor

Costa

C. A.

Cruz

S. G.

Thomas

K. E.

Arnott

J. C.

Donald

Jagannathan

Kirchhoff

C. J.

Rosella

L. C.

Klenk

(2021). News media coverage of COVID-19 public health and policy information. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), Article 220. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00900-z

33.

Merolla

Ramakrishnan

S. K.

Haynes

(2013). “Illegal,” “undocumented,” or “unauthorized”: Equivalency frames, issue frames, and public opinion on immigration. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713002077

34.

Motta

Stecula

(2021). The influence of partisan media in the face of global pandemic: How news media influenced COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xj4nq

35.

Motta

Stecula

Farhart

(2020). How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the U.S. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423920000396

36.

Oliver

M. B.

Raney

A. A.

Bryant

(Eds.). (2019). Media effects. Routledge.

37.

Pelled

Lukito

Foley

Zhang

Sun

Pevehouse

J. C.

Shah

D. V.

(2021). Death across the news spectrum: A time series analysis of partisan coverage following mass shootings in the United States between 2012 and 2014. International Journal of Communication, 15, Article 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13739

38.

Qiao

Tam

C. C.

(2021). Risk exposures, risk perceptions, negative attitudes toward general vaccination, and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina. American Journal of Health Promotion, 36(1), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171211028407

39.

Reiter

P. L.

Pennell

M. L.

Katz

M. L.

(2020). Acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine among adults in the United States: How many people would get vaccinated? Vaccine, 38(42), 6500–6507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.043

40.

Sánchez

A. M.

Coleman

C. W.

Ledgerwood

(2021). Does temporal distance influence abstraction? A large pre-registered experiment. Social Cognition, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.3

41.

Schuldt

J. P.

Rickard

L. N.

Yang

Z. J.

(2018). Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.001

42.

Shah

Yang

J. Z.

Kahlor

(2022). Psychological distance, risk perception, and affect: Texas residents’ support for carbon capture and storage. Journal of Risk Research, 26, 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2022.2116084

43.

Shih

T. J.

Wijaya

Brossard

(2008). Media coverage of public health epidemics: Linking framing and issue attention cycle toward an integrated theory of print news coverage of epidemics. Mass Communication & Society, 11(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701668121

44.

Spence

Poortinga

Pidgeon

(2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x

45.

Todorov

Goren

Trope

(2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.002

46.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020319

47.

Trope

Liberman

(2012). Construal level theory. In Van Lange

P. A.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Try Higgins

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 118–134). SAGE.

48.

Trope

Liberman

Wakslak

(2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X

49.

Utych

S. M.

(2021). Messaging mask wearing during the COVID-19 crisis: Ideological differences. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 8(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2020.15

50.

van Stekelenburg

Schaap

Veling

Buijzen

. (2021). Investigating and improving the accuracy of U.S. citizens’ beliefs about the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), Article e24069. https://doi.org/10.2196/24069

51.

Wakslak

C. J.

Trope

Liberman

Alony

(2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135(4), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641

52.

Wong

J. C. S.

Yang

J. Z.

Liu

(2022). It’s the thoughts that count: How psychological distance and affect heuristic influence support for aid response measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2109394

53.

Zhao

Crimmins

E. M.

Ailshire

J. A.

(2020). Media trust and infection mitigating behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. British Medical Journal Global Health, 5(10), Article e003323. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003323