Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using the head, heart, and hands model, we examined a training program designed to catalyze national public engagement with climate change through informal science learning centers (e.g., aquariums, zoos). Survey data were collected from visitors (N = 7,285) observing 1,101 presentations at 117 U.S. institutions before and after presenters participated in communication training. Visitors who attended posttraining (vs. pretraining) presentations reported greater understanding of climate change (head), hope (heart), and intentions to engage in community action (hands). As hypothesized, results suggested these changes were due to an increase in presenters’ discussion of climate change and use of effective communication techniques.

Keywords

climate change science education public engagement with science civic engagement hope.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of Zoos and Aquariums. (2016). Zoo and aquarium statistics. Retrieved from https://www.aza.org/zoo-and-aquarium-statistics

Bales

S. N.

Sweetland

Volmert

(2015). How to talk about oceans and climate change: A FrameWorks MessageMemo. Washington, DC: Frameworks Institute. Retrieved from http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF_oceansclimate/climatechangeandtheocean_mm_final_2015.pdf

Besta

Mattingly

Błażek

(2016). When membership gives strength to act: Inclusion of the group into the self and feeling of personal agency. Journal of Social Psychology, 156(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1053838

Breckler

S. J.

(1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191-1205. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.47.6.1191

Bunten

Arvizu

(2013). Turning visitors into citizens: Using social science for civic engagement in informal science education centers. Journal of Museum Education, 38, 260-272.

Chadwick

A. E.

(2015). Toward a theory of persuasive hope: Effects of cognitive appraisals, hope appeals, and hope in the context of climate change. Health Communication, 30, 598-611.

Clayton

Fraser

Saunders

C. D.

(2009). Zoo experiences: Conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biology, 28, 377-397. doi:10.1002/zoo.20186

Clayton

Luebke

Saunders

Matiasek

Grajal

(2014). Connecting to nature at the zoo: Implications for responding to climate change. Environmental Education Research, 20, 460-475. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.816267

Corner

Markowitz

Pidgeon

(2014). Public engagement with climate change: The role of human values: Public engagement with climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 411-422. doi:10.1002/wcc.269

10.

Dvir

Eden

Avolio

B. J.

Shamir

(2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744. doi:10.2307/3069307

11.

Falk

J. H.

Reinhard

E. M.

Vernon

Bronnenkant

Heimlich

J. E.

Deans

N. L.

(2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit to a zoo or aquarium. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos & Aquariums.

12.

Feinberg

Willer

(2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56-62. doi:10.1177/0956797612449177

13.

Fleischer

(2013). From theory to practice: How Mass Audubon is incorporating strategic framing about climate change. Journal of Museum Education, 38, 273-278.

14.

Fowler

J. H.

Christakis

N. A.

(2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal, 337, a2338-a2338. doi:10.1136/bmj.a2338

15.

Fraser

Pantesco

Plemons

Gupta

Rank

S. J.

(2013). Sustaining the conservationist. Ecopsychology, 5(2), 70-79. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0076

16.

Fredricks

J. A.

Blumenfeld

P. C.

Paris

A. H.

(2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

17.

Geiger

(2015). Fostering discussion: The role of knowledge and perceived agreement in encouraging discussions about climate change (Unpublished master’s thesis). Penn State University, University Park.

18.

Geiger

Swim

J. K.

(2016). Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 79-90. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002

19.

Geiger

Swim

J. K.

Fraser

(2017). Empowering the public to talk about climate change. Manuscript submitted for publication.

20.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141

21.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full.pdf

22.

Joslyn

(2016). Words that change minds. Chronicle of Philanthropy, September, 20-24. Retrieved from http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF/chroniclephilanthropy_wordsthatchangeminds_2016.pdf

23.

Kreft

I. G.

de Leeuw

(1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

24.

Lakoff

(2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70-81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749

25.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1999). Hope: An emotion and a vital coping resource against despair. Social Research, 66, 653-678.

26.

Lorenzoni

Nicholson-Cole

Whitmarsh

(2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459. doi10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004

27.

Luebke

J. F.

Clayton

Saunders

C. D.

Matiasek

Kelly

L.-A. D.

Grajal

(2012). Global climate change as seen by zoo and aquarium visitors. Brookfield, IL: Chicago Zoological Society. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.1111&rep=rep1&type=pdf

28.

Macey

W. H.

Schneider

(2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.

29.

Maibach

E. W.

Leiserowitz

Rosenthal

Roser-Renouf

Cutler

(2016). Is there a climate “spiral of silence” in America? New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Climate-Spiral-Silence-March-2016.pdf

30.

Marshall

(2014). Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

31.

McCormick

(2016). Assessing climate change vulnerability in urban America: Stakeholder-driven approaches. Climatic Change, 138, 397-410. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1757-3

32.

McCright

A. M.

Dunlap

R. E.

(2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163-1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003

33.

Nisbet

M. C.

(2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23. doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23

34.

Norgaard

K. M.

(2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. Cambridge MIT Press.

35.

Ojala

(2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18, 625-642. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.637157

36.

O’Neill

Nicholson-Cole

(2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355-379. doi:10.1177/1075547008329201

37.

Pinheiro

Bates

DebRoy

Sarkar

, & R Core Team. (2014). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R package Version 3.1-117) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html

38.

Putnam

R. D.

(2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

39.

Ranney

M. A.

Clark

(2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 49-75. doi:10.1111/tops.12187

40.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

41.

R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/fullrefman.pdf

42.

Rogelj

den Elzen

Höhne

Fransen

Fekete

Winkler

. . . . Meinshausen

(2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534, 631-639. doi:10.1038/nature18307

43.

Schultz

P. W.

Zelezny

(2003). Reframing environmental messages to be congruent with American values. Human Ecology Review, 10, 126-136.

44.

Schweizer

Davis

Thompson

J. L.

(2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 42-62. doi:10.1080/17524032.2012.753634

45.

Sheppard

(2010). The first rule of fighting climate change: Don’t talk about climate change. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2010/01/gop-pollster-luntz-tells-enviros-stop-talking-climate

46.

Simon

Volmert

Bunten

Kendall-Taylor

(2014). The value of explanation: Using values and causal explanations to reframe climate and ocean change. Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute.

47.

Singleton

(2010). Head, heart and hands model for transformative learning: Place as context for changing sustainability values. Education, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/content/head-heart-and-hands-model-for-transformative-learning-place-as-context-for-changing-sustainability-values_2015_03/

48.

Sipos

Battisti

Grimm

(2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: Engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 68-86. doi:10.1108/14676370810842193

49.

Sobel

M. E.

(1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290. doi:10.2307/270723

50.

Sundblad

E.-L.

Biel

Garling

(2008). Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environment and Behavior, 41, 281-302. doi:10.1177/0013916508314998

51.

Swim

J. K.

Bloodhart

(2013). Admonishment and praise: Interpersonal mechanisms for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Ecopsychology, 5(1), 24-35. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0065

52.

Swim

J. K.

Bloodhart

(2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9, 446-468. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.987304

53.

Swim

J. K.

Fraser

(2013). Fostering hope in climate change educators. Journal of Museum Education, 38, 286-297.

54.

Swim

J. K.

Fraser

(2014). Zoo and aquarium professionals’ concerns and confidence about climate change education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 495-501.

55.

Swim

J. K.

Fraser

Geiger

(2014). Teaching the choir to sing: Use of social science information to promote public discourse on climate change. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 30(1), 91-117.

56.

Swim

J. K.

Geiger

(2017). From alarmed to dismissive: Implications of self-categorized concern and engagement for climate change actions and knowledge. Manuscript submitted for publication.

57.

Swim

J. K.

Geiger

Fraser

Pletcher

(2017). Climate change education at nature-based museums. Curator, 60, 101-119. doi:10.1111/cura.12187

58.

Tong

E. M. W.

Fredrickson

B. L.

Chang

Lim

Z. X.

(2010). Re-examining hope: The roles of agency thinking and pathways thinking. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1207-1215. doi:10.1080/02699930903138865

59.

Volmert

(2014). Getting to the heart of the matter: Using metaphorical and causal explanation to increase public understanding of climate and ocean change. Retrieved from http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF_oceansclimate/occ_metaphor_report.pdf

60.

Walton

G. M.

(2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 73-82.

61.

Weber

E. U.

Stern

P. C.

(2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66, 315-328. doi:10.1037/a0023253

62.

Weick

K. E.

(1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1), 40-49.

63.

Wolsko

Ariceaga

Seiden

(2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7-19. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005

64.

Zhang

Zyphur

M. J.

Preacher

K. J.

(2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 695-719. doi:10.1177/1094428108327450

Catalyzing Public Engagement With Climate Change Through Informal Science Learning Centers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References