Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the scientific understanding of astronomical pictures by experts and nonexperts. It explored how both groups perceive astronomical images and their understanding of both what they are seeing and the science that underlies the images. Data comprised n = 8,866 responses from a survey linked to the NASA Astronomical Picture of the Day website and four focus groups held at the Harvard—Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Results indicated that variations in presentation of color, explanation, and scale affect comprehension of astronomical imagery. With those who are more expert, shorter, more technical explanations are effective; however, scales are still necessary for complete comprehension. Experts tend to look at the images from a more scientific, data-oriented perspective while nonexperts are more likely to focus, especially initially, on the aesthetic or emotional values of the images. Results provide suggestions for educational outreach to the public.

Keywords

Expert/Novice Differences Deep Space Imagery Educational Outreach

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arcand, K.K. , Watzke, M. , Smith, L.F. , Smith, J.K. , Smith, R.K. , & Holterman ten Hove, K. (2009, September). Aesthetics & Astronomy. Conference proceedings of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Meeting, Millbrae, CA.

Arnheim, R. ( 1954). Art and visual perception. Berkeley : University of California Press.

Ballantyne, R. , & Packer, J. ( 2005). Solitary vs. shared: Exploring the social dimension of museum learning. Curator, 48, 177-192.

Berlyne, D.E. ( 1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. New York, NY: Wiley.

Chi, M.T.H. , Feltovich, P.J. , & Glaser, R. ( 1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.

Chi, M.T.H. , Glaser, R. , & Rees, E. ( 1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cook, M.P. ( 2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles . Science Education, 90, 1073-1091.

Cupchik, G.C. , Shereck, L. , & Spiegel, S. ( 1994). The effects of textual information on artistic communication . Visual Arts Research, 20, 62-78.

diSessa, A.A. ( 2004). Metarepresentations: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293-331.

10.

Falk, J.H. ( 2005). Free-choice environmental learning: Framing the discussion . Environmental Education Research, 11, 265-280.

11.

Fechner, G.T. ( 1871). Vorschule der Asthetik. Hildesheim , Germany: Olms.

12.

Larkin, J.H. , McDermott, J. , Simon, D.P. , & Simon, H.A. ( 1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems . Science, 208, 1335-1342.

13.

Leder, H. , Belke, B. , Oeberst, A. , & Augustin, D. ( 2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments . British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508.

14.

Locher, P. , Smith, J.K. , & Smith, L.F. ( 2001). The influence of presentation format and viewer training in the visual arts on the perception of pictorial and aesthetic qualities of paintings. Perception, 30, 449-465.

15.

Millis, K. ( 2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1, 320-329.

16.

Nodine, C.F. , Locher, P.J. , & Krepinski, E.A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and the aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo, 26, 219-227.

17.

Patrick, M.D. , Carter, G. , & Wiebe, E.N. ( 2005). Visual representations of DNA replication: Middle grades students’ perceptions and interpretations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 353-365.

18.

Pekarik, A.J. ( 2004). To explain or not to explain. Curator , 47, 12-18.

19.

Rounds, J. ( 2004). Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator, 47, 389-412.

20.

Russell, P.A. ( 2003). Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings . British Journal of Psychology, 94, 99-110.

21.

Russell, P.A. , & Milne, S. ( 1997). Meaningfulness and hedonic value of paintings: Effects of titles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15, 61-73.

22.

Silvia, P.J. ( 2006). Artistic training and interest in visual art: Applying an appraisal model of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies in the Arts, 24, 139-161.

23.

Simon, H.A. ( 1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-20.

24.

Smith, J.K. ( 2008). Learning in informal settings. In E. M. Anderman & L. H. Anderman (Eds.), Psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 572-575). Farmington Hills, MI: Cengage Learning.

25.

Smith, J.K. ( 2009, August). Art, aesthetics, and society. Division 10 Presidential Address, annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

26.

Smith, J.K. , & Carr, D.W. ( 2001). In Byzantium. Curator, 44, 335-354.

27.

Smith, J.K. , & Smith, L.F. ( 2001). Spending time on art. Empirical Studies in the Arts, 19, 229-236.

28.

Smith, J.K. , & Smith, L.F. ( 2003). Origins of Impressionism: Relating behavior to perceived learning. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 4, 80-85.

29.

Smith, J.K. , & Wolf, L.F. ( 1996). Museum visitor preferences and intentions in constructing aesthetic experience. Poetics: A Journal of Empirical Research in the Arts and Literature, 24, 219-238.

30.

Smith, L.F. ( 2009, September). Aesthetics and astronomy: What do we see? Inaugural Professorial Lecture, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

31.

Smith, L.F. , & Smith, J.K. ( 2006). The nature and growth of aesthetic fluency. In P. Locher , C. Martindale , L. Dorfman , V. Petrov , & D. Leontiev (Eds.). New directions in aesthetics, creativity, and the psychology of art (pp. 47-58). Amityville, NY: Baywood.

32.

Smith, L.F. , Smith, J.K. , Kowal-Arcand, K. , Smith, R.K. , & Holterman ten Hove, K. (2009, August). Aesthetics and astronomy: How experts and novices perceive astronomical images. Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

33.

Tinio, P.L. ( 2005). The museum tour: Characteristics of the tour guide, the tour group, and the visitor. New York, NY: Whitney Museum of American Art.

34.

Wundt, W.M. ( 1874). Grundzuge der physiologischen Pscyhologie. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.

35.

Wyatt, R. ( 2008). Visualizing astronomy: The astronomical image. Part two. CAPjournal, 2, 26.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

Aesthetics and Astronomy: Studying the Public’s Perception and Understanding of Imagery From Space

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material