Images of female scientists and engineers in popular films convey cultural and social assumptions about the role of women in science, engineering, and technology (SET).This study analyzed cultural representations of gender conveyed through images of female scientists and engineers in popular films from 1991 to 2001. While many of these depictions of female scientists and engineers emphasized their appearance and focused on romance, most depictions also presented female scientists and engineers in professional positions of high status. Other images that showed the female scientists and engineers’ interactions with male colleagues, however, reinforced traditional social and cultural assumptions about the role of women in SET through overt and subtle forms of stereotyping. This article explores the significance of these findings for developing programs to change girls’ perceptions of scientists and engineers and attitudes toward SET careers.
American Association of University Women. 1998. Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
2.
American Association of University Women. 2000. Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
3.
Andre, T., M. Whigham, A. Hendrickson, and S. Chambers. 1999. Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching36 (6): 719-747.
4.
Archer, S. L.1985. Identity and the choice of social roles. In Identity in adolescence: Processes and contents (New directions for child development, Vol. 30), edited by A. S. Waterman, 79-99. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Baker, D., and R. Leary. 1995. Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching32 (1): 255-265.
6.
Baker-Sperry, L., and L. Grauerholz. 2003. The pervasiveness and persistence of the feminine beauty ideal in children’s fairy tales. Gender & Society15 (5): 711-726.
7.
Bandura, A.1969. Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In Handbook of socialization theory and research, edited by D. A. Goslin, 213-262. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8.
Bandura, A.1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Bandura, A., D. Ross, and S. A. Ross. 1963a. A comparative test of the status envy, social power, and secondary reinforcement theories of identificatory learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology67 (6): 527-534.
10.
Bandura, A., D. Ross, and S. A. Ross. 1963b. Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology66 (1): 2-11.
11.
Barman, C. R.1997. Students’ views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children (September): 18-23.
12.
Bem, S. L.1981. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review88 (4): 354-364.
13.
Bem, S. L.1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual identity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Bem, S. L.1994. In a male-centered world, female differences are transformed into female disadvantages. Chronicle of Higher Education (August 17): B1-B3.
15.
Bernt, P. W., J. P. Bernt, and S. V. Turner. 2003a. Gender patterns in middle school students’ media use. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April.
16.
Bernt, P. W., J. P. Bernt, and S. V. Turner. 2003b. Getting the media message. http://www.csm.ohiou.edu/mediamessage/findings.htm.
17.
Beuf, A.1974. Doctor, lawyer, household drudge. Journal of Communication24:142-145.
18.
Bigler, R. S.1995. The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children’s gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development66:1072-1087.
19.
Brown, L. M., and C. Gilligan. 1992. Meeting at the crossrooads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. New York: Ballantine.
20.
Carter, D. B., and G. D. Levy. 1988. Cognitive aspects of early sex-role development: The influence of gender schemas on preschoolers’ memories and preferences for sex-typed toys and activities. Child Development59:782-792.
21.
Chambers, D. W.1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education67 (2): 255-265.
22.
College Board Online. 1997. College-bound seniors. http://www.collegeboard.org/press/senior97/table14.html.
23.
Coltrane, S., and M. Messineo. 2000. The perpetuation of subtle prejudice: Race and gender imagery in 1990s television advertising. Sex Roles42 (5/6): 363-389.
24.
Comstock, G., and E. Scharrer. 2001. The use of television and other film-related media. In Handbook of children and the media, edited by D. Singer and J. Singer, 47-72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Dietz, T. L.1998. An examination of violence and gender role portrayals in video games: Implications for gender socialization and aggressive behavior. Sex Roles38 (5/6): 425-442.
26.
Dundes, L.2001. Disney’s modern heroine Pocahontas: Revealing age-old gender stereotypes and role discontinuity under a facade of liberation. Social Science Journal38 (3): 353-365.
27.
Edelbrock, C., and A. J. Sugawara. 1978. Acquisition of sex-typed preferences in preschool-aged children. Developmental Psychology14 (6): 614-623.
28.
Elasmar, M., K. Hasegawa, and M. Brain. 1999. The portrayal of women in U.S. prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media44 (1): 20-34.
29.
Erkut, S., J. P. Fields, R. Sing, and F. Marx. 1996. Diversity in girls’ experiences: Feeling good about who you are. In Urban adolescent girls: Resisting stereotypes, edited by B. Leadbeater and N. Way, 53-64. New York: New York University.
30.
Erkut, S., F. Marx, J. P. Fields, and R. Sing. 1999. Raising confident and competent girls: One size does not fit all. In Gender, culture and ethnicity, edited by L. A. Peplau, S. C. DeBro, R. C. Veniegas, and P. L. Taylor, 83-101. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
31.
Faber, R. J., J. D. Brown, and J. M. McLeod. 1979. Coming of age in the global village: Television and adolescence. In Children communicating: Media and the development of thought, speech, understanding, edited by Ellen Wartella, 215-249. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Farmer, H., S. Rotella, C. Anderson, and J. Wardrop. 1998. Gender differences in science, math, and technology careers: Prestige level and Holland Interest Type. Journal of Vocational Behavior53:73-96.
33.
Fiebert, M.S.1990. Dimensions of the female roles. Psychological Reports67:633-634.
34.
Flicker, E.2003. Between brains and breasts—Women scientists in fiction film: On the marginalization and sexualization of scientific competence. Public Understanding of Science12 (4): 307-318.
35.
Fort, D. C., and H. L. Varney. 1989. How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children26 (8): 8-13.
36.
Fujioka, Y.1999. Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: Examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly76 (1): 52-75.
37.
Griffin, R. J., S. Sen, and R. Plotkin. 1994. Sex, schemata, and social status: TV character identification and occupational aspirations among adolescents. In Differences that make a difference: Examining the assumptions in gender research, edited by L. H. Turner and H. M. Sterk, 85-97. Westport, CT: Bergin Garvey.
38.
Hamilton, D. L., S. J. Sherman, and C. M. Ruvolo. 1990. Stereotype-based expectancies: Effects on information processing and social behavior. Journal of Social Behavior46 (2): 35-60.
39.
Hanson, S. L.2000. Gender, families, and science: Influences on early science training and career choices. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering6:169-187.
40.
Henke, J. B., D. Z. Umble, and N. J. Smith. 1996. Construction of the female self: Feminist readings of the Disney heroine. Women’s Studies in Communication19 (2): 229-249.
41.
Hill, J., and M. Lynch. 1983. The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives, edited by J. Brooks-Gunn and A. Petersen, 201-228. New York: Plenum.
42.
Hoerner, K. L.1996. Gender roles in Disney films: Analyzing behaviors from Snow White to Simba. Women’s Studies in Communication19 (2): 213-228.
43.
Hort, B. E., M. D. Leinbach, and B. I. Fagot. 1991. Is there coherence among the cognitive components of gender acquisition?Sex Roles24 (3/4): 195-207.
44.
Huston, A. C., and M. M. Alvarez. 1990. The socialization context of gender role development in early adolescence. In From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? edited by R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, and T. P. Gullotta, 156-179. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Internet Movie Database. 2001. Home page. http://www.us.imdb.com.
46.
Jacobowitz, T.1983. Relationship of sex, achievement, and science self-concept to the science career preferences of Black students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching20 (7): 621-628.
47.
Johnston, D. D., and D. H. Swanson. 2003. Invisible mothers: A content analysis of motherhood ideologies and myths in magazines. Sex Roles49 (1/2): 21-33.
48.
Kahle, J. B.1989. Images of scientists: Gender issues in science classrooms. The Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, No. 4, December.
49.
Kaiser Family Foundation. 1999. Kids and media at the new millennium: A comprehensive national analysis of children’s media use. http://www.kff.org/content/1999/1535/ChartPack.pdf.
50.
Kelly, A.1978. Girls and science: An international study of sex differences in school science achievement. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
51.
Kelly, A., and B. Smail. 1986. Sex stereotypes and attitudes to science among eleven-year-old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology56:158-168.
52.
Larson, M. S.1996. Sex roles and soap operas: What adolescents learn about single motherhood. Sex Roles35 (1/2): 97-110.
53.
Lauzen, M. M., and D. M. Dozier. 1999. Making a difference in prime time: Women on screen and behind the scenes in the 1995-96 television season. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43 (1): 1-19.
54.
Lee, J. D.1998. Which kids can become scientists? Effects of gender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly16 (3): 199-219.
55.
Levy, G. D., and B. Carter. 1989. Gender schema, gender constancy, and gender-role knowledge: The roles of cognitive factors in preschoolers’ gender-role stereotype attributions. Developmental Psychology25 (3): 444-449.
56.
Levy, G. D., A. L. Sadovsky, and G. L. Troseth. 2000. Aspects of young children’s perceptions of gender-typed occupations. Sex Roles42 (11/12): 993-1006.
57.
Liben, L. S., and M. L. Signorella. 1993. Gender-schematic processing in children: The role of initial interpretations of stimuli. Developmental Psychology29 (1): 141-149.
58.
Lips, H. M.1992. Gender- and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students’ academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior40:62-81.
59.
Lobel, T. E., and J. Menashri. 1993. Relations of conceptions of gender-role transgressions and gender constancy to gender-typed toy preferences. Developmental Psychology29 (1): 150-155.
60.
Long, M., G. Boiarsky, and G. Thayer. 2001. Gender and racial counter-stereotypes in science education television: A content analysis. Public Understanding of Science10 (3): 255-269.
61.
Lupaschuk, D., and C. Yewchuk. 1998. Student perceptions of gender roles: Implications for counsellors. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling20:301-318.
62.
Maccoby, E., and W. C. Wilson. 1957. Identification and observational learning from films. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology55:76-87.
63.
Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., and A. Hunt. 1988. Some factors affecting the image of the scientists drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science and Technological Education6(2): 159-166.
Matthews, B.1996. Drawing scientists. Gender and Education8 (2): 231-243.
66.
Mazzarella, S. R., and N. O. Pecora. 1999. Growing up girls: Popular culture and the construction of identity. New York: Peter Lang.
67.
Mead, M., and R. Metraux. 1957. Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science126:384-390.
68.
Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
Morgan, M.1982. Television and adolescents’ sex role stereotypes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43 (5): 947-955.
70.
Movie Box Office. 2001. Movie box office reports. http://www.about.com.
71.
National Science Foundation. 2000. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf00327.
72.
National Science Foundation. 2003. New formulas for America’s workforce: Girls in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
73.
Newton, L. D., and D. P. Newton. 1998. Primary children’s conceptions of science and the scientists: Is the impact of a national curriculum breaking down the stereotype?International Journal of Science Education20 (9): 1137-1149.
74.
Nihlen, A. S., and B. A. Bailey. 1988. Children’s display of gender schemas through interaction with nontraditional workers. Anthropology and Education Quarterly19:155-162.
75.
O’Bryant, S. L., and C. R. Corder-Bolz. 1978. The effects of television on children’s stereotyping of women’s work roles. Journal of Vocational Behavior12:233-244.
76.
Orenstein, P.1994. School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.
77.
Phillips, L.1998. The girls report: What we know and need to know about growing up female. New York: National Council for Research on Women.
78.
Pierce, K.1993. Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: The making of a new woman or an old lady?Sex Roles29 (1/2): 59-68.
79.
Pierce, K.1997. Women’s magazine fiction: A content analysis of the roles, attributes, and occupations of main characters. Sex Roles37 (7/8): 581-593.
80.
Rosenthal, D. B.1993. Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics93 (4): 212-216.
81.
Rosser, S. V., and M. Zieseniss. 2000. Career issues and laboratory climates: Different challenges and opportunities for women engineers and scientists (survey of fiscal year 1997 POWRE awardees). Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering6:95-114.
82.
Ruble, D. F., and C. Stangor. 1986. Stalkingthe elusive schema: Insights from developmental and social psychological analyses of gender schemas. Social Cognition4:227-261.
83.
Ruvolo, A. P., and H. R. Markus. 1992. Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition10 (1): 95-124.
84.
Schank, R., and R. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85.
Serbin, L. A., and C. Sprafkin. 1986. The salience of gender and the process of sex typing in three-to seven-year-old children. Child Development57:1188-1199.
86.
Signorella, M. L., R. S. Bigler, and L. S. Liben. 1993. Developmental differences in children’s gender schemata and others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review13:147-183.
87.
Signorelli, N.1997. A content analysis: Reflections of girls in the media. Report for the Kaiser Family Foundation and Children Now. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/1260-gendr.cfm.
88.
Slater, A., and M. Tiggemann.2002. A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles46 (9/10): 343-349.
89.
Song, J., and K. Kim. 1999. How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education21 (9): 957-977.
90.
Steinke, J.1997. A portrait of a woman as a scientist: Breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes. Public Understanding of Science6 (4): 409-428.
91.
Steinke, J.1998. Connecting theory and practice: Women scientist role models in television programming. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media42:142-151.
92.
Steinke, J.1999. Women scientist role models on screen: A case study of Contact. Science Communication21:111-136.
93.
Steinke, J.2004. Science in cyberspace: Science and engineering World Wide Web sites for girls. Public Understanding of Science13 (1): 7-30.
94.
Steinke, J., and M. Long. 1996. A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children’s educational science programs. Science Communication18 (2): 91-115.
95.
Tan, A., Y. Fujioka, and N. Lucht. 1997. Native American stereotypes, TV portrayals, and personal contact. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly74 (2): 265-284.
96.
Tenenbaum, H. R., and C. Leaper. 2003. Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities. Developmental Psychology39 (1): 34-47.
97.
Turner-Bowker, D. M.1996. Gender stereotyped descriptors in children’s picture books: Does “Curious Jane” exist in the literature?Sex Roles35 (7/8): 461-488.
98.
Valdivia, A. N.1998. Clueless in Hollywood: Single moms in contemporary family movies. Journal of Communication Inquiry22 (3): 272-292.
99.
Weinraub, M., L. P. Clemens, A. Sockloff, T. Ethridge, E. Gracely, and B. Myers. 1984. The development of sex role stereotypes in the third year: Relationships to gender labeling, gender identity, sex-typed toy preference, and family characteristics. Child Development55:1493-1503.
