Technology transfer, defined as the application of information into use, is often a difficult and frustrating process. Participants in the technology transfer process are usually heterophilous, so that technology receptors speak a different language than technology sources. This essay explores the concept of technology transfer and suggests strategies for its facilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H., and D. Herker. 1977. Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review2:217-230.
2.
Allen, T. J., M. L. Tushman, and D.M.S. Lee. 1979. Technology transfer as a function of position in the spectrum from research through development to technical services. Academy of Management Journal22 (4): 694-708.
3.
Backer, T. E.2001. Balancing program fidelity and adaptation issues in substance abuse prevention: A state-of-the-art review. Report. Los Angeles: HIRI.
4.
Carayannis, E. G., E. M. Rogers, K. Kurihara, and M. M. Allbritton. 1998. High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation18 (1): 1-11.
5.
Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthel. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35:128-152.
6.
Cottrill, C. A., E. M. Rogers, and T. Mills. 1989. Co-citation analysis of the scientific literature of innovation research traditions: Diffusion of innovations and technology transfer. Knowledge11 (2): 181-208.
7.
Cunningham, J. A., G. W. Martin, L. Coates, M. A. Herie, B. J. Turner, and J. Cordingley. 2000. Disseminating a treatment program to outpatient addiction treatment agencies in Ontario: A case study. Science Communication22 (2): 154-172.
8.
DeVol, R. C.1999. America's high-tech economy: Growth, development, and risks for metropolitan areas. Report. Santa Monica, CA: Miliken Institute.
9.
Dorf, R. C., and K.K.F. Worthington. 1989. Technology transfer: Research to commercial product. Engineering Management International5 (3): 185-191.
10.
Edwards, R. W., P. Jumper-Thurman, B. A. Plested, E. R. Oetting, and L. Swanson. 2000. Community readiness: Research to practice. Journal of Community Psychology28 (3): 291-307.
11.
Einsiedel, E. F., and D. L. Eastlick. 2000. Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy. Science Communication21 (4): 323-343.
12.
Eveland, J. D.1987. Diffusion, technology transfer, and implementation. Knowledge8 (2): 303-322.
13.
Ferguson, J. H.1995. The NIH Consensus Development Program. Journal of Quality Improvement21 (7): 332-336.
14.
Fisher, W. A., R. W. Zmud, W. Hamilton, and C. P. McLaughlin. 1986. The elusive product champion. Research Management9:13-17.
15.
Gibson, D. V., and E. M. Rogers. 1994. R&D collaboration on trial: The Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
Goodman, R. M., and A. Steckler. 1989. A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programs. Family and Community Health11 (4): 63-78.
17.
Green, L. W.1986. The theory of participation: A qualitative analysis of its expression in national and international health policies. Advances in Health Education and Health Promotion1: 211-236.
18.
Keller, R., and W. Holland. 1975. Boundary spanning roles in a research and development organization: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal18:388-393.
19.
Kennedy-Minott, R.1983. Technology transfer: An overview. Telecommunications17:104-108.
20.
Leonard-Barton, D.1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy17:251-287.
21.
Lomas, J.1991. Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annual Reviews of Public Health12:41-65.
22.
Lomas, J., M. Enkin, G. M. Anderson, W. J. Hannah, E. Vayda, and J. Singer. 1991. Opinion leaders vs. audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines: Delivery after previous Cesarean section. JAMA265 (17): 2206-2207.
23.
Plested, B. A., P. Jumper-Thurman, R. Edwards, and E. R. Oetting. 1998. Community readiness: A tool for effective community-based prevention. Prevention Researcher5 (2): 5-7.
24.
Ray-Coquard, I., T. Philip, M. Lehman, B. Fervers, F. Farsi, and F. Chauvin. 1997. Impact of a clinical guidelines program for breast and colon cancer in a French cancer center. JAMA278 (19): 1591-1595.
25.
Rogers, E. M.1989. The intellectual foundations and history of the agricultural extension model. Knowledge9:492-510.
26.
Rogers, E. M.1995. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed.New York: Free Press.
27.
Rogers, E. M.2000. Technology Ventures Corporation: A seven-year report of accomplishments. Report. Albuquerque, NM: Technology Ventures Corporation.
28.
Rogers, E. M., E. G. Carayannis, K. Kurihara, and M. M. Allbritton. 1998. Cooperative research and development agreements (CRADAs) as technology transfer mechanisms. R&D Management28 (2): 1-10.
29.
Rogers, E., B. J. Hall, M. Hashimoto, M. Steffensen, K. L. Speakman, and M. K. Timko. 1999. Technology transfer from university-based research centers: The University of New Mexico experience. Journal of Higher Education70 (6): 687-705.
30.
Rogers, E. M., and J. K. Larsen. 1984. Silicon Valley fever: Growth of high-tech culture.New York: Basic Books.
31.
Rogers, E. M., S. Takegami, and J. Yin. 2001. Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation21:253-261.
32.
Rogers, E. M., J. Yin, and J. Hoffmann. 2000. Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. Journal of the Association for University Technology Managers12:42-80.
33.
Shama, A.1992. Guns to butter: Technology-transfer strategies in the national laboratories. Journal of Technology Transfer17 (1): 18-24.
34.
Singhal, A., and E. M. Rogers. (2001). India's communication revolution: From bullock carts to cyber marts. New Delhi: Sage.
35.
Slaughter, S., and L. L. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
Smith, D. K., and R. C. Alexander. 1988. Fumbling the future: How Xerox invented, then ignored, the first personal computer. New York: William Morrow.
37.
Steffensen, M., E. M. Rogers, and K. Speakman. 1999. Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing15:93-111.
38.
Stewart, C. T.1987. Technology transfer vs. diffusion: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Technology Transfer12:72-72.
39.
Stewart, S. K., M. W. Adams, and B. J. Schroer. 1998. University/industry partnership in transferring continuous process improvement technology. Journal of Technology Transfer23 (3): 7-15.
40.
Tushman, M. L., and T. J. Scanlan. 1981a. Boundary spanning individuals: The role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal24:289-305.
41.
Tushman, M. L., and T. J. Scanlan. 1981b. Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal24:883-898.
42.
Valente, T. W.1994. Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
43.
Van de Ven, A. H., H. A. Angle, and M. S. Poole, eds. 1989. Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row.
44.
von Hippel, E.1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Williams, F., and D. V. Gibson. 1990. Introduction. In Technology transfer: A communication perspective, edited by F. Williams and D. V. Gibson, 9-18. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
