This study examines the role of interactivity in the presentation of science news on the World Wide Web. The authors propose and test a model of interactive information processing that suggests a relationship between interactivity, cognitive elaboration, and learning. A think-aloud method was employed to provide insight into study participants' mental processes during Web use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J.
1990. Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
2.
Anderson, J.
, and L. Reder. 1979. An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In Levels of processing in human memory, edited by L. Cermak and F. Craik, 385-403. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Baker, L.1989. Metacognition, comprehension monitoring and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review1:3-38.
4.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J.
, and K. Reardon. 1988. Monologue, dialogue, and telelog. In Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes, edited by R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, and S. Pingree, 135-161. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Bandura, A.
1994. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, edited by J. Bryant and D. Zillmann, 61-90. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Belmont, J. M.
, and E. C. Butterfield. 1971. Learning strategies as determinants of memory deficiencies. Cognitive Psychology2:411-420.
7.
Berry, C.1983. Learning from television news: A critique of the research. Journal of Broadcasting2:359-370.
8.
Booth, A.1970-1971. The recall of news items. Public Opinion Quarterly34:604-610.
9.
Bordewijk, J. L.
, and B. van Kaam. 1986. Towards a new classification of tele-information services. Intermedia14 (1): 16-21.
10.
Burbules, N.
, and T. Callister. 1996. Knowledge at the crossroads: Some alternative futures of hypertext learning environments. Educational Theory46 (1): 23-51.
11.
Calvi, L.1997. Navigation and disorientation: A case study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia6:305-320.
12.
Carmel, E.
, S. Crawford, and H. Chen. 1992. Browsing in hypertext: A cognitive study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics22:865-884.
13.
Darken, R. P.
, and J. L. Sibert. 1996. Navigating large virtual spaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction8 (1): 49-71.
14.
DeFleur, M. L.
, L. Davenport, M. Cronin, and M. DeFleur. 1992. Audience recall of news stories presented by newspaper, computer, television and radio. Journalism Quarterly69:1010-1022.
15.
Ericsson, K. A.
, and H. A. Simon. 1993. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Estes, W.K.
1988. Human learning and memory. In Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, edited by R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, and R. D. Luce, chap. 5. New York: John Wiley.
17.
Eveland, W. P.
, and S. Dunwoody. 2000. Examining information processing on the World Wide Web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology2:219-244.
18.
Foltz, P.
1996. Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In Hypertext and cognition, edited by J. -F. Rouet, J. Levonen, A. Dillon, and R. J. Spiro, 109-136. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Fredin, E.1997. Rethinking the news story for the Internet: Hyperstory prototypes and a model of the user. Journalism and Mass Communication Monographs163.
20.
Furnham, A.
, and B. Gunter. 1989. The primacy of print: Immediate cued recall of news as a function of the channel of communication. Journal of General Psychology116:305-310.
21.
Gardner, H.
1985. The mind's new science. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Gibson, J. J.
1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
Goffman, E.
1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
24.
Greene, R. L.
1992. Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Ha, L.
, and E. L. James. 1998. Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business Web sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media42:457-474.
26.
Halpern, D. H.
1997. The impact of different operationalizations of the media on political knowledge and learning: A meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada, May.
27.
Hamilton, R. J.1997. Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology22:299-318.
28.
Hawkins, R. P.
, and S. Pingree. 1997. Measuring time frames of communication behaviors in computer use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada, May.
29.
Hill, J. R.
, and M. J. Hannafin. 1997. Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research and Development45 (4): 37-64.
30.
Kipper, P.1991. The computer television marriage. Television Quarterly25 (3): 13-19.
31.
Landow, G. P.
1991. Position statement for Panel on Structure, Navigation and Hypertext: The status of the navigation problem. In Hypertext '91: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on hypertext, 364. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
32.
Lawless, K.
, and J. M. Kulikowich. 1996. Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research14 (4): 385-399.
33.
Marchionini, G.1988. Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos. Educational Technology28 (11): 8-12.
34.
Mayes, T.
, M. Kibby, and T. Anderson. 1990. Learning about learning from hypertext. In Designing hypermedia for learning, edited by D. H. Jonassen and H. Mandl, 227-250. New York: Springer-Verlag.
35.
McDaniel, M.
, and G. Einstein. 1989. Material appropriate processing: A contextualist approach to reading and study strategies. Educational Psychology Review1:113-146.
36.
McDonald, S.
, and R. J. Stevenson. 1996. Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics27 (1): 61-68.
37.
McMillan, S.1999. Health communication and the Internet: Relation between interactive characteristics of the medium and site creators, content and purpose. Health Communication11 (4): 375-390.
38.
Neuman, W. R.
, M. R. Just, and A. N. Crigler. 1992. Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning, 78-109. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Newhagen, J.1997. The role of feedback in the assessment of news. Information Processing and Management33 (5): 583-594.
40.
Newhagen, J.
, J. Cordes, and M. Levy. 1995. Nightly@nbc.com: Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the Internet. Journal of Communication45 (3): 164-175.
41.
Newhagen, J.
, and S. Rafaeli. 1996. Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication46:4-13.
42.
Ogan, C.1993. Listserver communication during the Gulf War: What kind of medium is the electronic bulletin board?Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media3:177-196.
43.
Price, V.
, and J. Zaller. 1993. Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly57:133-164.
44.
Rafaeli, S.
1988. Interactivity: From new media to communication. In Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes, edited by R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, and S. Pingree, 110-134. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Rafaeli, S.
, and F. Sudweeks. 1997. Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2 (4). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html.
46.
Rice, R.1988. Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication systems. Communication Yearbook12:436-476.
47.
Rice, R. E.
, and F. Williams. 1984. Theories old and new: The study of new media. In The new media: Communication, research, and technology, edited by R. E. Rice, 55-80. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Rouet, J. -F.
, and J. Levonen. 1996. Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In Hypertext and cognition, edited by J. -F. Rouet, J. Levonen, A. Dillon, and R. J. Spiro, 9-24. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Rumelhart, D. E.
, P. H. Lindsay, and D. A. Norman. 1972. A process model for long-term memory. In Organization of memory, edited by E. Tulving and W. Donaldson. New York: Academic Press.
50.
Salomon, G.1990. Cognitive effects with and of computer technology. Communication Research17 (1): 26-44.
51.
Shaw, R. E.
, and J. Bransford. 1977. Perceiving, acting and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Shoemaker, P.
, C. Schooler, and W. A. Danielson. 1989. Involvement with the media: Recall versus recognition of election information. Communication Research16:78-103.
53.
Simon, H. E.
, and L. Siklossy. 1972. Representations and meaning: Experiments with information processing systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sundar, S. S.
, J. Brown, and S. Kalyanaraman. 1999. Reactivity vs. interactivity: Impression formation effects of message contingency in political Web sites. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, May.
56.
Tripp, S. D.
, and W. Roby. 1990. Orientation and disorientation in a hypertext lexicon. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction17 (4): 120-124.
57.
Walther, J. B.1994. Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research20: 473-501.
58.
Westley, B. H.
, and M. MacLean. 1957. A conceptual model for communication research. Journalism Quarterly34:31-38.
59.
Wicks, R. H.
1992. Schema theory and measurement in mass communication research: Theoretical and methodological issues in news information processing. In Communication Yearbook. 15, edited by S. A. Deetz, 115-145. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Williams, F.
, R. E. Rice, and E. M. Rogers. 1988. Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press.
61.
Woodall, W. G.
, D. K. Davis, and H. Sahin. 1983. From the boob tube to the black box: Television news comprehension from an information processing perspective. Journal of Broadcasting27:1-23.
