Based on the authors’ experiences conducting family research using varied methodological and conceptual approaches, the intent of this article is to offer practical advice for developing a successful research proposal that builds on existing work and makes a compelling case for the investigator’s family focus, study design, and analytic approach. The article highlights key challenges unique to family research and offers suggestions and strategies for addressing the challenges.
AbramsonC.DohanD. (2015). Beyond text: Using arrays to present and analyze ethnographic data. Sociological Methods, 45, 272-319. doi:10.1177/0081175015578740
2.
AlderferM. A.FieseB. H.GoldJ. I.CutuliJ. J.HolmbeckG. N.GoldbeckL.. . . PattersonJ. (2008). Evidence-based assessment in pediatric psychology: Family measures. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33, 1046-1061. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsm083
3.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
4.
AyresL.KavanaughK.KnaflK. (2003). Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 871-883. doi:10.1177/1049732303013006008
BreneolS.BelliveauJ.CassidyC.CurranJ. (2017). Strategies to support transitions from home to hospital for children with medical complexity: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 72, 91-104. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.04.011
7.
CampbellL.KashyD. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00023
8.
CookW. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 500-509. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.500
9.
CookW.KennyD. (2006). Examining the validity of self-report assessments of family functioning: A question of the level of analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 209-216. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.209
10.
DochertyS.VorderstrasseA.BrandonD.JohnsonC. (2017). Visualization of multidimensional data in nursing science. Western Journal of Nursing, 39, 112-126. doi:10.1177/0193945916672448
11.
EisikovitsZ.KorenC. (2010). Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1642-1655. doi:10.1177/1049732310376520
12.
FeethamS. (1991). Conceptual and methodological issues in research of families. In WhallA.FawcettJ. (Eds.), Family theory development in nursing: State of the science and art (pp. 55-68). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
13.
FeethamS.FrinkB. (1998). Issues in health services research: Children and families. In BroomeM.KnaflK.PridhamK.FeethamS. (Eds.), Handbook of children and families in health and illness (pp. 280-297). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
Gibson-YoungL.Turner-HensonA.GeraldL.VanceD.LozanoD. (2014). The relationships among family management behaviors and asthma morbidity in maternal caregivers of children with asthma. Journal of Family Nursing, 20, 442-461. doi:10.1177/1074840714552845
15.
HamiltonE.CarrA. (2016). Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures. Family Process, 55, 16-30. doi:10.1111/famp.12200
16.
KamibeppuK.MurayamaS.OzonoS.SakamotoN.IwaiT.AsamiK.. . . IshidaY. (2015). Predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms among adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer: Importance of monitoring survivors’ experiences of family functioning. Journal of Family Nursing, 21, 529-550. doi:10.1177/1074840715606247
17.
KellyK.GanongL. (2011). Shifting family boundaries in after the diagnosis of cancer in stepfamilies. Journal of Family Nursing, 17, 105-132. doi:10.1177/1074840710397365
18.
KnaflK. A.AyresL. (1996). Managing large qualitative data sets in family research. Journal of Family Nursing, 2, 350-364. doi:10.1177/107484079600200402
19.
KnaflK. A.DeatrickJ.HavillN. (2012). Continued development of the Family Management Style Framework. Journal of Family Nursing, 18, 11-34. doi:10.1177/1074840711427294
20.
KnaflG.DixonJ.O’MalleyJ.GreyM.DeatrickJ.GalloA.KnaflK. A. (2009). Analysis of cross-sectional univariate measurements for family dyads using linear mixed modeling. Journal of Family Nursing, 15, 130-151. doi:10.1177/1074840709331641
21.
KnaflG.KnaflK. A.McCorkleR. (2005). Mixed models incorporating intra-familial correlation through spatial autoregression. Research in Nursing & Health, 28, 348-356. doi:10.1002/nur.20082
LyonsK.SayerA. (2005). Longitudinal dyad models in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1048-1060. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00193.x
24.
MaguireM. (1999). Treating the dyad as the unit of analysis: A primer on three analytic approaches. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 213-233. doi:10.2307/353895
25.
McCubbinH. I.ThompsonA. I.McCubbinM. A. (1996). Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation: Inventories for research and practice. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
PritchettR.KempJ.WilsonP.MinnisH.BryceG.GillbergC. (2010). Quick, simple measures for use in clinical practice and research: A systematic review. Family Practice, 28, 172-187. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmq080
28.
RayensM.SvavarsdottirE. (2003). A new methodological approach in nursing research: Actor, partner, and interaction effect model for family outcomes. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 409-419. doi:10.1002/nur.10100
29.
RedekerN.AndersonR.BakkenS.CorwinE.DochertyS.DorseyS.. . . GradyP. (2015). Advancing symptom science through use of common data elements. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47, 377-388. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12155
30.
RyanP.SawinK. J. (2009). The individual and family self-management theory: Background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nursing Outlook, 57, 217-225. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004
31.
SawinK. (2016). Measurement in family nursing: Established instruments and new directions [Guest Editorial]. Journal of Family Nursing, 22, 287-297. doi:10.1177/1074840716656038
32.
UpholdC.StricklandO. (1989). Issues related to the unit of analysis in family research. Western Journal of Nursing, 11, 405-417. doi:10.1177/019394598901100403
33.
WhittemoreR.ChaoA.JangM.MingesK. E.ParkC. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung, 43, 453-461. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014
34.
WrightL. M.BellJ. M. (2009). Beliefs and illness: A model for healing. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: 4th Floor Press.
