Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The role of lipid lowering in reducing the risk of mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well established. Treatment particularly aimed at decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is effective in reducing the risk of death from coronary heart disease and stroke. Statins form the cornerstone of treatment. However, in some individuals with a high risk of CVD who are unable to achieve their target LDL-C due to either intolerance or lack of efficacy, there is the need for alternative therapies. This review provides an overview of the different classes of currently available lipid-lowering medications including statins, fibrates, bile acid sequestrants (resins), and omega-3 fatty acids. Data are presented on their indications, pharmacology, and the relevant end point clinical trial data with these drugs. It also discusses the human trial data on some novel therapeutic agents that are being developed including those for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia—the antisense oligonucleotide mipomersen and the microsomal transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide. Data are presented on phase II and III trials on agents with potentially wider applications, cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 inhibitors. The data on a licensed gene therapy for lipoprotein lipase deficiency are also presented.

Keywords

cardiovascular disease lipid lowering dyslipidemia statin fibrate bile acid sequestrant

Introduction

Dyslipidemia is one of the risk factors for progression of atherosclerotic disease which may account for up to 55% of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk after correction for age and gender.¹ Epidemiological and prospective studies have established the benefit of reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with a 1% reduction associated with a 1% decrease in CVD events.² Alternatively, a 40 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) reduction in LDL-C is associated with a 21% reduction in major CVD events.³ In the Helsinki heart study, a 1% increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is linked with a 3% reduction in cardiovascular events.⁴ The effects of high triglycerides (TGs), TG-rich lipoprotein remnants, and very LDLs (VLDLs) are uncertain,^5,6 but they are also associated with increased CVD risk through the effects on HDL and LDL particle sizes increasing the atherogenicity of LDL.^7,8

There are different guidelines with practical recommendations on the management of dyslipidemia. Lifestyle modification that includes dietary changes, weight reduction, exercise, decreased alcohol consumption, and smoking cessation is important in the management of hyperlipidemia.² However, in certain patients who have a high risk of CVD, the addition of drug therapy will be necessary to achieve beneficial effects. Lipid-lowering agents in current use are generally effective, but some are limited by their side effects. Statins are the first choice lipid-lowering drugs given their almost universal efficacy for CVD.³ However, only 50% of the high-risk patients attain LDL-C targets with statins,⁹ and the role of additional lipid-lowering therapies remains unclear.¹⁰ Hence, there is a need for development of new therapeutic agents aimed at those who cannot achieve current targets or who are intolerant to most or all of the existing therapies.

Currently Available Lipid-Lowering Therapies

Statins

Statins inhibit 2-hydroxyl-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis.^11,12 This leads to a reduced intracellular cholesterol concentration and subsequent upregulation of LDL receptors that encourages the removal of LDL-C from the circulation. “Mevastatin,” the first statin produced, was a fungal metabolite identified by Dr Endo and his team.¹² Statins are commonly prescribed drugs, and currently there are 7 available statins with 5 being off patent worldwide—lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, and atorvastatin (Table 1). Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are the most potent drugs,^13,14 and pitavastatin is licensed in a few countries.¹⁵ They display different pharmacokinetic properties, and some are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) pathway apart from pravastatin and rosuvastatin, which are metabolized by sulfation and conjugation or CYP2C9, respectively. Statins are effective in reducing LDL-C but with a wide range of efficacies by dose and drug.^13,16 Their benefits have been confirmed in CVD outcome studies (Table 2) and are indicated in their product licenses (Table 3).³ The reduction in LDL-C is dose dependent, with a 5% to 7% decrease with every dose doubling; they can also reduce TGs, but they have little effect on HDL-C.^13,17 Statins are safe and generally tolerated by most patients. However, higher doses that achieve greater LDL-C reduction are associated with more side effects³ such as gastrointestinal disturbances and myopathy.^18,19 Increase in liver enzymes particularly alanine and aspartate transaminases occurs in a small proportion of patients on statin therapy and may normalize on reducing the dose or stopping the statin. Hence, the baseline measurement of liver function test is important prior to commencing the statin therapy and stopping treatment if transaminases are raised more than 3 times the upper reference limit.¹⁸ The use of statin has also been associated with an increased incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus.²⁰

Table 1.

The Effect of Treatment With Different Statins on Lipid Profiles.^a

Statin	% Change in Lipid Profile
Statin	↓ TC	↓ LDL-C	↑ HDL-C	↓TG
Lovastatin	21-36	29-48	7-8	2-13
Pravastatin	15-22	20-30	3-6	8-13
Simvastatin	20-33	28-46	5-7	12-18
Fluvastatin	13-19	17-23	0.9	5-13
Atorvastatin	27-39	37-51	2-6	20-28
Pitavastatin	28-32	39-44	4-6	14-19
Rosuvastatin	33-40	46-55	8-10	20-26

Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

^aAdapted from data presented in the STELLAR and CURVES comparison studies and results on phase III and IV trials on pitavastatin.^13
–15

Table 2.

Summary of Major Monotherapy CVD Outcome Trials.

Study	Treatment	Participants		Reduction in Outcome Events, %
Study	Treatment	Men	Women	MI	PCI/CABG	Death
LRC	Cholestyramine	10627	–	25	–	20
CDP	Niacin	3908	–	24	–	22
HHS	Gemfibrozil	4081	–	34	–	37
4S	Simvastatin	3617	827	34	37	42
WOSCOPS	Pravastatin	6595	–	31	37	32
CARE	Pravastatin	3583	576	27	27	24
LIPID	Pravastatin	7498	1516	29	20	22
AF/TexCAPS	Lovastatin	5608	997	40	33	N/A
VA-HIT	Gemfibrozil	2531	–	22	9	22
HPS	Simvastatin	15454	5082	26	24	13
GREACE	Atorvastatin	1256	344	59	51	43
ASCOT	Atorvastatin	8437	1956	29	21	13
CARDS	Atorvastatin	1929	909	36	31	27
JUPITER	Rosuvastatin	11001	6801	54	47	20

Abbreviations: LRC, lipid research clinics primary prevention trial; CDP, Coronary Drug Project; HHS, Helsinki heart study; 4S, Scandinavian simvastatin survival trial; WOSCOPS, West of Scotland coronary prevention study; CARE, Cholesterol and recurrent events; LIPID, long-term intervention with pravastatin in ischemic disease; AF/TexCAPS, Air Force/Texas coronary atherosclerosis prevention study; VA-HIT, Veterans Administration HDL-intervention trial; HPS, heart protection study; GREACE, The Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation; ASCOT, AngloScandinavian coronary outcomes study; CARDS, Collaborative atorvastatin diabetes study; JUPITER, Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin; MI, myocardial infraction; PCI/CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft; CVD, cardiovascular disease; N/A, not available.

Table 3.

Information on the Doses and Licensed Indications (UK and/or USA) of Different Classes of Currently Existing Lipid-Lowering Therapies.

Drug	Dosage	Indication	Contraindication and Caution	Adverse Effects	Drug Interactions
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins)
Fluvastatin	20 mg to a maximum of 80 mg	In conjunction with diet in primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemias	Contraindicated in pregnancy, breastfeeding, acute porphyria, acute liver disease; caution: liver disease, high alcohol intake, discontinue if persistently raised transaminases 3 times the upper limit of the reference range; statins should be used with caution in those at risk of rhabdomyolysis or myopathy (personal or family history of muscular disorders, renal impairment, hypothyroidism and the elderly)	Muscular (myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis), gastrointestinal disturbances, hypersensitivity skin reactions. Rarely interstitial lung disease and vasculitis	Increases plasma concentration of glibenclamide and phenytoin, enhances the anticoagulant effect of coumarins; decreased plasma concentration with rifampicin; increased risk of myopathy with fluconazole, daptomycin, cyclosporin, colchicine, fusidic acid, gemfibrozil, and nicotinic acid
Pravastatin	10 mg to a maximum of 40 mg	In conjunction with diet in primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemias		Muscular (myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis), gastrointestinal disturbances, hypersensitivity skin reactions. Rarely dysuria, nocturia and increased urinary frequency. Very rarely fulminant hepatic necrosis	Plasma concentration increased by erythromycin, clarithromycin, and darunavir; plasma concentration reduced by efavirenz; increased risk of myopathy with telithromycin, daptomycin, cyclosporin, colchicine, fusidic acid, gemfibrozil, and nicotinic acid
Lovastatin	20 mg to a maximum of 80 mg	Primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemias, prevention of cardiovascular events in high risk individuals		Muscular (myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis), gastrointestinal disturbances, hypersensitivity skin reactions, arthralgia, headaches, dizziness	Plasma concentration increased by itraconazole, ketoconazole, clarithromycin, telithromycin, boceprevir, telaprevir, and nefazodone; increased risk of myopathy with daptomycin, cyclosporin, colchicine, fusidic acid, danazol, diltiazem, verapamil, ranolazine gemfibrozil, and nicotinic acid
Pitavastatin	1 mg to a maximum of 4 mg	Primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemia		Muscular (myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis), gastrointestinal disturbances, hypersensitivity skin reactions, and dizziness	Plasma concentration increased with cyclosporin, erythromycin, rifampicin, atazanavir, and diltiazem; plasma concentration decreased with ritonavir, lopinavir, and itraconazole, increased risk of myopathy with gemfibrozil and nicotinic acid
Simvastatin	10 mg to a maximum of 80 mg	Primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemias, secondary prevention of cardiovascular events		Muscular (myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis), gastrointestinal disturbances, hypersensitivity skin reactions, sleep disturbance, and rarely anemia	Increased plasma concentrations with ranolazine, ticagrelor, dasatinib, imatinib, and grapefruit juice; plasma concentration decreased with St John wort, carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine, alitretinoin, bosentan, efavirenz and possibly with rifampicin; enhances the anticoagulant effect of coumarins; increased risk of myopathy with daptomycin, cyclosporin, colchicine, amiodarone or dronedarone, amlodipine, verapamil, macrolides, fusidic acid, triazole antifungals, protease inhibitors, gemfibrozil, nicotinic acid, and possibly with diltiazem and danazol
Atorvastatin	10 mg to a maximum of 80 mg	Primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemias, prevention of cardiovascular events in high-risk individuals		Muscular (myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis), gastrointestinal disturbances, hypersensitivity skin reactions, nasopharyngitis, epistaxis, hyperglycemia, blurred vision, rarely cholestasis and very rarely Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis	Plasma concentration increased with clarithromycin, possibly with dronedarone and grapefruit juice; it increases plasma concentration of ethinyl estradiol and norethisterone and possibly midazolam and digoxin; plasma concentration reduced with efavirenz and possibly with rifampicin and etravirine; may transiently reduce the anticoagulant effect of warfarin; increased risk of myopathy with daptomycin, cyclosporin, colchicine, telaprevir, tipranavir, fusidic acid, posaconazole, itraconazole, telithromycin, possibly with diltiazem, gemfibrozil, nicotinic acid, erythromycin, other protease inhibitors, and other imidazoles and triazoles
Rosuvastatin	5 mg to a maximum of 20 mg (40 mg in very severe hyperlipidemia)	Primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemias, prevention of cardiovascular events in high risk individuals		Muscular (myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis), gastrointestinal disturbances, hypersensitivity skin reactions. Diabetes mellitus, proteinuria and very rarely hematuria	Increased plasma concentration with eltrombopag possibly with dronedarone and tipranavir; it possibly enhances the anticoagulant effect of coumarins and phenindione and increases the plasma concentration of ethinyl estradiol, norgestrel, and the active metabolite of norgestimate; plasma concentration reduced by erythromycin; increased risk of myopathy with daptomycin, cyclosporin, colchicine, fusidic acid, gemfibrozil, nicotinic acid, and possibly with protease inhibitors
Ezetimibe
	10 mg daily	Used as an adjunct to statin therapy or as monotherapy in patients with statin intolerance. Licensed for familial sitosterolemia	Contraindication: moderate to severe hepatic impairment and breastfeeding; information on pregnancy not clear; caution: increased risk of myopathy with statins, and cholelithiasis with fibrates (discontinue if suspected)	Gastrointestinal disturbances, headaches, fatigue, myalgia, hypersensitivity reactions (rash, angioedema and anaphylaxis), hepatitis, very rarely pancreatitis, cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatine kinase, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis	Plasma concentration increases with cyclosporin; it possibly enhances the anticoagulant effect of coumarins
Fibrates
Gemfibrozil	0.9-1.2 g daily usually in two divided doses	In patients with hyperlipidemias type II to V with inadequate response or intolerance to statin. First-line therapy in patients with hypertriglyceridemia	Contraindication: alcohol abuse, biliary tract disease including gallstones, photosensitivity to fibrates; avoid in pregnancy and breastfeeding; caution: preferably avoid use with statins because of high risk of rhabdomyolysis, ensure adequate thyroxine replacement in hypothyroidism before commencing treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances, headaches, fatigue, vertigo, eczema, rarely; atrial fibrillation, pancreatitis, appendicitis, hepatitis, sexual dysfunction, bone marrow suppression, myopathy, myositis with rise in creatine kinase, exfoliative dermatitis and photosensitivity	Increased risk of myopathy with statins, daptomycin, and colchicine; increased risk of cholelithiasis with ezetimibe; it enhances the anticoagulant effect of coumarins and phenindione and may potentiate the effect of insulin or sulfonylureas; it increases the risk of hypoglycemia with repaglinide and possibly nateglinide
Fenofibrate	67 mg to a maximum of 267 mg.	In patients with hyperlipidemias type II to V with inadequate response or intolerance to statin. First-line therapy in patients with hypertriglyceridemia	Contraindication: gall bladder disease, pancreatitis, photosensitivity to ketoprofen; avoid in pregnancy and breastfeeding. Caution: monitor liver function tests and if significantly raised, discontinue, and avoid in severe liver disease; reduce dose in renal impairment; ensure adequate thyroxine replacement in hypothyroidism before commencing treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances, anorexia, less commonly cholestasis, weight gain, dizziness, headaches, fatigue, renal impairment, erectile dysfunction; very rarely hepatitis, pancreatitis and interstitial pneumopathies	Increased risk of myopathy with statins, daptomycin, and colchicine; increased risk of cholelithiasis with ezetimibe; it enhances the anticoagulant effect of coumarins and phenindione and may potentiate the effect of insulin or sulfonylureas
Bezafibrate	200 mg to a maximum of 600 mg	In patients with hyperlipidemias type II to V with inadequate response or intolerance to statin. First-line therapy in patients with hypertriglyceridemia	Contraindication: hypoalbuminemia, nephrotic syndrome, primary biliary cirrhosis and gall bladder disease; avoid in pregnancy and breastfeeding; caution: avoid in severe liver disease, reduce dose in renal impairment; ensure adequate thyroxine replacement before commencing treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances, anorexia, less commonly cholestasis, weight gain, dizziness, headaches, fatigue, renal impairment, erectile dysfunction, urticaria, photosensitivity reactions
Ciprofibrate	100 mg daily	In patients with hyperlipidemias type II to IV with inadequate response or intolerance to statin. First-line therapy in patients with hypertriglyceridemia	Contraindication: hypoalbuminemia, nephrotic syndrome, primary biliary cirrhosis and gall bladder disease; avoid in pregnancy and breastfeeding; caution: avoid in severe liver disease, reduce dose in renal impairment. Ensure adequate thyroxine replacement before commencing treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances, anorexia, less commonly cholestasis, weight gain, dizziness, headaches, fatigue, renal impairment, erectile dysfunction, urticaria, photosensitivity reactions; very rarely gallstones, hypoglycemia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leucopenia, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis
Bile acid sequestrants
Colesevelam hydrochloride	2.5 g to a maximum of 3.75 g if monotherapy usually in divided doses	Primary hypercholesterolemia in combination with a statin or monotherapy in statin intolerance	Contraindication: bowel or biliary obstruction; caution: hepatic impairment, pregnancy and breastfeeding, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal motility disorders, cyclosporin therapy; supplementation of fat soluble vitamins may be required with prolonged treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances such as constipation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and bloating; may worsen hypertriglyceridemia	Reduces absorption of glibenclamide, cyclosporin, ethinyl estradiol, levothyroxine, and possibly phenytoin
Cholestyramine	4 g to a maximum of 36 g daily in divided doses	Primary hypercholesterolemia with inadequate response or intolerance to statin	Contraindication: biliary obstruction; caution: pregnancy and breastfeeding; supplementation of fat soluble vitamins may be required with prolonged treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances such as constipation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and bloating; may worsen hypertriglyceridemia; rarely intestinal obstruction and hyperchloremic acidosis	Reduces absorption of paracetamol, thiazides, mycophenolate, raloxifene, and thyroid hormones; it possibly reduces absorption of tetracycline, valproate, bile acids, and cardiac glycosides; possibly enhances the hypoglycemic effect of acarbose and may potentiate or reduce the anticoagulant effect of coumarins and phenindione
Colestipol hydrochloride	5 g to a maximum of 30 g in divided doses	Primary hypercholesterolemia with inadequate response or intolerance to statin	Contraindication: pregnancy and breastfeeding; supplementation of fat soluble vitamins may be required with prolonged treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances such as constipation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and bloating; may worsen hypertriglyceridemia; rarely intestinal obstruction and hyperchloremic acidosis	Reduces absorption of thiazides diuretics and thyroid hormones; it possibly reduces absorption of tetracyclines, bile acids, and cardiac glycosides
Nicotinic acid
Niaspan	500 mg to a maximum of 1 g	Used in combination with statin in hyperlipidemia or as monotherapy if statin intolerance	Contraindication: arterial bleed, active peptic ulcer disease; avoid in pregnancy and breastfeeding, in severe liver disease; caution: acute coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, gout, history of peptic ulcer, renal impairment, discontinue if severe abnormalities in liver function test	Flushing, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, pruritus, rash. Less common palpitations, headache, dizziness, hypotension, syncope, reduced glucose tolerance, and myalgia	Increased risk of myopathy with statins
Omega-3-fatty acid compounds
Omega-3 acid ethyl esters	1 g to a maximum of 4 g depending on preparation	In hypertriglyceridemia, in combination with a statin in mixed hyperlipidemia or secondary prevention not adequately controlled with statin	Contraindication: avoid in pregnancy, no clear information; caution: hemorrhagic disorders, anticoagulant treatment	Gastrointestinal disturbances, less common, taste disorder, hypersensitivity reactions, headache, hyperglycemia, hepatic disorders
Omega-3-marine TGs	1 g to a maximum of 5 g capsules, 5 to 10 ml of liquid formulation depending on preparation	In hypertriglyceridemia, in combination with statin in severe hypertriglyceridemia	Contraindication: avoid in pregnancy, no clear information; caution: hemorrhagic disorders, anticoagulant treatment, aspirin sensitive asthma, type 2 diabetes	Occasional nausea and belching

Fibrates

Fibrates are agonists of peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α), a nuclear transcription factor that regulates the expression of many enzymes and genes.²¹ Their primary action is to decrease TGs and increase HDL-C in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and mixed hyperlipidemia. The TG synthesis is decreased by stimulating fatty acid uptake and beta-oxidation in the mitochondria, noncompetitive inhibition of diacylglycerol acyltransferase-2 (DGAT2), increased lipoprotein lipase (LPL) levels via induction of LPL synthesis and reduction in apolipoprotein C3, and directly through decreased VLDL secretion and increased LDL receptor-mediated clearance of TG-rich lipoproteins. The HDL-C is increased by stimulating the expression of apolipoprotein A1 and A2. Treatment with a fibrate may be associated with increase in LDL-C due to increased LPL-dependent conversion of VLDL to LDL-C. Clofibrate was the first drug of this class developed in the 1960s; however, it has now been discontinued due to adverse effects associated with it.²² Fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate are the commonly used therapies. A dose of 267 mg of fenofibrate is slightly more potent than the 200 mg dose that is equivalent in potency to other fibrates. Fibrates (Table 2) have been shown in meta-analyses to reduce CVD events by 10% to 13%^23,24 in monotherapy and may also improve microvascular disease in patients with diabetes. Fenofibrate is the only fibrate shown to lower the plasma urate levels.²⁵ They do not add to risk reduction with statins in patients with diabetes and good control of LDL-C.²⁶ They may offer greater benefit if added to a statin in patients with low HDL-C and high TGs, although this remains to be confirmed in a large clinical trial.⁷ However, a combination of gemfibrozil with a statin is discouraged due to the increased risk of myopathy and hepatotoxicity, as gemfibrozil decreases glucuronidation of statins thereby reducing its excretion.²⁷

Bile Acid Sequestrants

Cholesterol is secreted into the gut through the biliary system and directly through the action of perilipin in enterocytes in the ileum.²⁸ Bile acid sequestrants decrease LDL-C by binding to bile acids in the gut and preventing their reabsorption leading to decreased enterohepatic concentration of bile acids and cholesterol. The decreased level of bile acids stimulates upregulation of hepatic LDL receptors leading to increased LDL-C clearance from the circulation. They increase HDL-C by 3% to 5% and increase TG levels by stimulating hepatic VLDL production through its action on the liver-X receptor.²⁹ Bile acid sequestrants also reduce blood glucose through their effect on the farnesoid-X receptor. Cholestyramine, colestipol, and colesevelam are currently available therapies, and colesevelam has been shown to decrease hemoglobin A_1c by 0.4% to 0.6% and is thus also licensed for glycemic control.³⁰ Colesevelam decreases LDL-C by about 16% to 19%, and combination with statins produces a greater than 40% decrease.²⁹ Some end point evidence exists for the use of bile acid sequestrants. In the Lipid Research Clinics trial, cholestyramine decreased CVD events by 25% (Table 2).³¹ The use of these agents is limited by their frequent gastrointestinal side effects. They interfere with the absorption of micronutrients such as vitamin A, D, E, K, iron, folic acid, and magnesium. They also reduce the absorption of medications such as warfarin and to a lesser extent thiazide diuretics and digoxin.³⁰

Niacin/Nicotinic Acid

Niacin or vitamin B₃ is the oldest lipid-lowering therapy. Its mode of action is still not entirely clear, but it has favorable effects on all aspects of an abnormal lipid profile.^32,33 It decreases VLDL and TG synthesis in the liver by inhibiting diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2 (DGAT-2) and hormone-sensitive lipase activity.³³ The LDL-C is decreased by increased catabolism of apolipoprotein B (apo B) and TG levels are decreased by niacin, leading to increased LDL particle size and decreased LDL particle number. Niacin increases HDL-C by promoting production of apolipoprotein A-1 and reducing its clearance through the ATP synthase β-chain holoparticle receptor. Niacin monotherapy reduced the CVD risk by 22% in the Coronary Drug Project (Table 2).³⁴ It, unlike ezetimibe, also leads to significant regression of carotid intima–media thickness when combined with statin therapy as demonstrated by the Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6-HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis (ARBITER 6-HALTS) trial.³⁵ The use of niacin is limited by flushing due to increased prostaglandin D₂ synthesis. Niacin treatment is also associated with increased rates of new diabetes and deterioration in glycemic control.^36,37 End point studies of niacin combined with statins have been disappointing. In the Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes (AIM-HIGH) study, patients with established high CVD risk and dyslipidemia where secondary optimization of LDL-C was allowed, extended release (ER) of niacin did not reduce CVD events.³⁸ The Heart Protection Study-2/Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS-2/THRIVE) study investigated the effect of the combination of niacin and laropiprant (Tredaptive) with a statin on CVD events in patients at high risk of CVD after initial optimization of LDL-C levels.^10,37 Niacin–laropiprant failed to show any significant reduction in CVD events but showed an increased incidence of nonfatal side effects, and it has since been withdrawn.

Ezetimibe

Ezetimibe inhibits cholesterol absorption through inhibition of the duodenal Niemann-Pick C1-like protein.³⁹ In combination with statin therapy, it decreases LDL-C although its effect in reducing cardiovascular events is controversial. Studies of adding ezetimibe to statins in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) such as ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolaemia Enhances Artherosclerosis Regression (ENHANCE) of carotid intima-media thickness⁴⁰ and of combination therapy on CVD events in the underpowered Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS)⁴¹ have not shown any beneficial effect. Recently, in the Study of Heart And Renal Protection (SHARP) combination therapy with statin reduced CVD events by 27% in patients with advanced renal failure.⁴² Some small studies have suggested ezetimibe may improve hepatic steatosis.³⁹ Ezetimibe is generally well tolerated but can cause nausea or bloating. The outcome data on the effect of ezetimibe and simvastatin combination therapy in reducing the risk of CVD in patients with acute coronary syndrome in the IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) study are still awaited.¹⁰

Omega-3 Fatty Acids

Omega-3 fatty acids that include docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) have been shown to decrease CVD events in monotherapy in patients with CVD or at high risk of developing CVD.^43,44 However, individual studies examining the CVD effect of omega-3 fatty acids have shown conflicting results with early studies being positive and later studies negative. Meta-analyses of omega-3 fatty acids added to optimal statin therapy suggest they give no added benefit.⁴⁵ Their mechanism of action is complex and not fully understood, but it may involve the regulation of genes involved in lipid metabolism. They are known to reduce TGs in a dose-dependent manner. In the Multi-center plAcebo-controlled Randomised double-blINd 12-week study with an open label extension (MARINE; AMR-101; Amarin Pharmaceuticals, Dublin, Eire), an EPA preparation has been shown in patients with high TGs (>750 mg/dL; 8.5 mmol/L) to reduce TGs by 33% to 45%.⁴⁶ The suggested mechanism for TG reduction includes suppression of lipogenesis, decreased TG synthesis through inhibition of DGAT-2 and increased beta-oxidation in the mitochondria.⁴⁴ They are well tolerated with mild gastrointestinal disturbance being the most commonly reported adverse symptom.⁴⁶

New Therapies for Dyslipidemia

Statins remain the cornerstone of drug-based lipid management allied with lifestyle changes such as dietary modification, weight reduction, and exercise. However, if the desired level of LDL-C is not achieved with statins even after titration to the highest tolerable dose, then other treatment options may need to be considered. A considerable number of new therapies for dyslipidemia are in development (Table 4).^47,48 New lipid-lowering therapies can be classified based on their role, either as LDL-C reducing agents or as drugs that target other lipids such as HDL-C or TGs.

Table 4.

Summary of Major Trials on Novel Cholesterol-Lowering Therapies.

Drug	Study Type	Participants	Dose and Route of Administration	Effects on Lipid Profile (%)				Adverse Effects
Drug	Study Type	Participants	Dose and Route of Administration	T CHOL	LDL-C	HDL-C	TG	Adverse Effects
ApoB 100 inhibitors
Mipomersen	Phase III	51 (M = 22, F = 29)	200 mg weekly, SC	−21	−25	−2	−17	Injection site reactions, raised ALT ≥ 3× ULN in 4 patients
PCSK-9 inhibitors
AMG 145	Phase II	157 (M = 57, F = 100)	280-420 mg, SC	−(30-44)	−(41-63)	+(6-7)	–	Myalgia. Otherwise well-tolerated
SAR236553/REGN727	Phase II	183 (M = 87, F = 96)	50-300 mg, SC	−(23-45)	−(40-72)	+(4-9)	−(6-19)	Mild injection site reactions, 1 case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis
MTP inhibitors
Lomitapide	Phase III	29 (M = 16, F = 13)	5-60 mg, PO	−46	−50	−12	−45	Raised ALT ≥ 3× ULN in 10 patients, increased hepatic fat
CETP inhibitors
Anacetrapib	Phase II	1623 (M = 1247, F = 376)	100 mg, PO	–	−44	+146	−7	Compared to placebo no change in BP, electrolytes or aldosterone
Evacetrapib	Phase II	156 (M = 76, F = 86	30-500 mg, PO	–	−(14-36)	+(54-129)	−(3-11)	Well tolerated, no rise in BP, or changes in glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid activity

Abbreviation: ALT, alanine transaminases; AMG, alpha 2-macroglobulin; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; BP, blood pressure; CETP, cholesterol ester transfer protein; F, female; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; M, male; MTP, microsomal transfer protein; PCSK-9, pro-protein convertase subtilisin kexin 9; PO, perioral; SC, subcutaneous; T CHOL, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; ULN, upper limit of the normal range.

LDL-cholesterol-Lowering Therapies

Patients with heterozygous FH respond to statin and ezetimibe therapy, but statins show reduced or absent efficacy in patients with homozygous FH who do not have functioning LDL receptors. Novel treatments to reduce LDL-C include drugs with a primary license indication for orphan disorders such as homozygous FH and drugs that interfere with the production of VLDL and hence LDL either through disruption of apoB synthesis or through interference with transfer factors involved in loading lipids onto the nascent particle. Mipomersen is an antisense oligonucleotide to apoB which reduces LDL-C by 25% in homozygous FH but is limited by injection site reactions and hepatic steatosis.⁴⁹ Lomitapide is a microsomal transfer protein inhibitor⁵⁰ which reduces LDL-C by 50% but causes hepatic steatosis.⁵¹ The side effects of these drugs restrict them at the moment to orphan indications.

Other novel agents reduce LDL-C by inhibiting pro-protein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK-9), a plasma and hepatocellular protein that controls LDL receptor expression.⁵² Antibodies to PCSK-9 deliver up to 70% reduction in LDL-C when added to other therapies or in statin-intolerant patients and may have a large potential application in patients with CVD. Large-scale CVD end point trials of adding these agents to optimal LDL-C-lowering strategies are just beginning.

HDL-C Raising Drugs

Statins do not address all lipid-related CVD risk. Epidemiological studies show that higher HDL-C is associated with a better prognosis even after statin treatment. Some of this residual risk is ascribed to HDL.^7,53 The newest agents that raise HDL-C are cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors.⁴⁸ These can raise HDL-C by 30% to 100% and reduce LDL-C by 0% to 40%. The original compound in the class torcetrapib was highly effective in improving lipid profiles but increased CVD events by 30%, possibly by raising blood pressure.⁵⁴ Dalcetrapib raised HDL-C by 30% but had no effect on LDL-C and in reducing CVD events.⁵⁵ Two other CETP inhibitors—anacetrapib and evacetrapib—that raise HDL-C and also reduce LDL-C by 40% remain in development.

Gene Therapy for Lipid Disorders

Initial attempts at gene therapy for homozygous FH were unsuccessful. More recently, the development of adeno-associated viral vectors has led to the development of a gene therapy for lipoprotein lipase deficiency (LPLD).⁵⁶ The LPLD is associated with severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis, and there is no treatment for homozygotes apart from a highly fat-restricted diet. Treatment with alipogene tiparvovec transiently reduces TGs in patients with LPLD but does reduce the frequency of pancreatitis by 80%.

Conclusion

Many therapies that reduce LDL-C have been proven to reduce CVD risk in monotherapy. Statins remain as first-line treatment, and they are safe. Combination therapy with other currently used lipid-lowering drugs such as niacin and ezetimibe has not shown beneficial effects in CVD risk reduction. Despite the efficacy of statins in LDL-C lowering there still remains a residual risk of CVD, and it is important that this is addressed. Newer therapies are being developed to further reduce LDL-C. Some have been disappointing with respect to their safety and tolerability profiles. The PCSK-9 inhibitors and CETP inhibitors anacetrapib and evacetrapib appear promising. These newer agents can be used as alternatives to statins in patients who are statin intolerant, or they can be used in combination therapy to help achieve LDL-C targets, especially in high-risk individuals thereby reducing the risk of CVD. As noted with torcetrapib, LDL-C lowering is not always associated with CVD risk reduction. Therefore, these new lipid-lowering therapies should provide evidence of improved CVD outcome. Safety and efficacy data in large clinical trials will ascertain the benefits of these agents.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Yusuf

Hawken

Ounpuu

. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937–952.

Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486–2497.

Baigent

Blackwell

Emberson

. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–1681.

Sacks

. The role of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease: expert group recommendations. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(2):139–1343.

Sarwar

Sandhu

Ricketts

. Triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary disease: collaborative analysis of 101 studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9726):1634–1639.

Di Angelantonio

Sarwar

Perry

. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA. 2009;302(18):1993–2000.

Chapman

Ginsberg

Amarenco

. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1345–1361.

Mikhailidis

Elisaf

, Rizzo M, et al. “European panel on low density lipoprotein (LDL) subclasses”: a statement on the pathophysiology, atherogenicity and clinical significance of LDL subclasses. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2011;9(5):533–571.

Santos

Waters

Tarasenko

. A comparison of non-HDL and LDL cholesterol goal attainment in a large, multinational patient population: the Lipid Treatment Assessment Project 2. Atherosclerosis. 2012;224(1):150–153.

10.

Wierzbicki

AS.

All at sea: new lipid-lowering drug trials continue to disappoint. Int J Clin Pract. In press.

11.

Wierzbicki

Poston

Ferro

. The lipid and non-lipid effects of statins. Pharmacol Ther. 2003;99(1):95–112.

12.

Steinberg

. Thematic review series: the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. An interpretive history of the cholesterol controversy, part V: the discovery of the statins and the end of the controversy. J Lipid Res. 2006;47(7):1339–1351.

13.

Jones

Davidson

Stein

. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(2):152–160.

14.

Jones

Kafonek

Laurora

Hunninghake

. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study). Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(5):582–587.

15.

Betteridge

. Pitavastatin—results from phase III & IV. Atheroscler Suppl. 2010;11(3):8–14.

16.

Law

Wald

Thompson

. By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease? BMJ. 1994;308(6925):367–372.

17.

Stein

Lane

Laskarzewski

Comparison of statins in hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(4A):66B–69B.

18.

Armitage

. The safety of statins in clinical practice. Lancet. 2007;370(9601):1781–1790.

19.

Joy

Hegele

. Narrative review: statin-related myopathy. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(12):858–868.

20.

Sattar

Preiss

Murray

. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet. 2010;375(9716):735–742.

21.

Lalloyer

Staels

. Fibrates, glitazones, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(5):894–899.

22.

Wierzbicki

. FIELDS of dreams, fields of tears: a perspective on the fibrate trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(4):442–449.

23.

Saha

Kizhakepunnur

Bahekar

Arora

. The role of fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular disease—a pooled meta-analysis of long-term randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. Am Heart J. 2007;154(5):943–953.

24.

Jun

Foote

. Effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9729):1875–1884.

25.

Idzior-Walus

Sieradzki

Rostworowski

. Effects of comicronised fenofibrate on lipid and insulin sensitivity in patients with polymetabolic syndrome X. Eur J Clin Invest. 2000;30(10):871–878.

26.

Ginsberg

Elam

Lovato

. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1563–1574.

27.

Franssen

Vergeer

Stroes

Kastelein

. Combination statin-fibrate therapy: safety aspects. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11(2):89–94.

28.

Abumrad

Davidson

. Role of the gut in lipid homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(3):1061–1085.

29.

Manghat

Wierzbicki

. Colesevelam—a specifically engineered bile acid sequestrant. Future Lipidol. 2008;3(3):237–255.

30.

Jialal

Abby

Misir

Nagendran

. Concomitant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glycated hemoglobin with colesevelam hydrochloride in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7(3):255–258.

31.

The Lipid Research Clinics (LRC) Coronary Primary Prevention Trial Investigators. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1984;251(3):351–364.

32.

Carlson

. Nicotinic acid: the broad-spectrum lipid drug. A 50th anniversary review. J Intern Med. 2005;258(2):94–114.

33.

Wierzbicki

. Niacin: the only vitamin that reduces cardiovascular events. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(4):379–385.

34.

The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Clofibrate and niacin in coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1975;231(4):360–381.

35.

Taylor

Villines

Stanek

. Extended-release niacin or ezetimibe and carotid intima-media thickness. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(22):2113–2122.

36.

Sazonov

Maccubbin

McCrary Sisk

Canner

PL.

Effects of niacin on the incidence of new onset diabetes and cardiovascular events in patients with normoglycemia and impaired fasting glucose. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(4): 297–302.

37.

Micheal

O'Riordan

“If not dead, not healthy”: Niacin full results in HPS2-THRIVE aired at ACC; 2013. http://www.theheart.org/article/1515533.do. Accessed March 11, 2013.

38.

Boden

Probstfield

Anderson

. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(24):2255–2267.

39.

Wierzbicki

. The ezetimibe Jonah: the trials and tribulations of an unlucky drug. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(12):1207–1208.

40.

Kastelein

Akdim

Stroes

. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(14):1431–1443.

41.

Rossebo

Pedersen

Boman

. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1343–1356.

42.

Baigent

Landray

Reith

. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2181–2192.

43.

Wierzbicki

. A fishy business: omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(8):1142–1146.

44.

Harris

Miller

Tighe

Davidson

Schaefer

. Omega-3 fatty acids and coronary heart disease risk: clinical and mechanistic perspectives. Atherosclerosis. 2008;197(1):12–24.

45.

Kwak

Myung

Lee

Seo

. Efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplements (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(9):686–694.

46.

Bays

Ballantyne

Kastelein

Isaacsohn

Braeckman

Soni

. Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (AMR101) therapy in patients with very high triglyceride levels (from the Multi-center, plAcebo-controlled, Randomized, double-blINd, 12-week study with an open-label Extension MARINE. trial). Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(5):682–690.

47.

Wierzbicki

. Lipid-altering agents: the future. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58(11):1063–1072.

48.

Wierzbicki

Hardman

Viljoen

. New lipid-lowering drugs: an update. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(3):270–280.

49.

Raal

Santos

Blom

. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9719):998–1006.

50.

Wierzbicki

Hardman

Prince

. Future challenges for microsomal transport protein inhibitors. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2009;7(3):277–286.

51.

Cuchel

Meagher

du Toit Theron

. Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2013;381(9860):40–46.

52.

Wierzbicki

Hardman

Viljoen

. Inhibition of pro-protein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) as a treatment for hyperlipidaemia. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2012;21(5):667–676.

53.

Fruchart

Sacks

Hermans

. The residual risk reduction initiative: a call to action to reduce residual vascular risk in patients with dyslipidemia. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(10 suppl):1K–34K.

54.

Barter

Caulfield

Eriksson

. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2109–2122.

55.

Schwartz

Olsson

Abt

. Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(22):2089–2099.

56.

Wierzbicki

Viljoen

. Alipogene tiparvovec: gene therapy for lipoprotein lipase deficiency. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(1):7–10.

Lipid-Lowering Agents

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Currently Available Lipid-Lowering Therapies

Statins

Fibrates

Bile Acid Sequestrants

Niacin/Nicotinic Acid

Ezetimibe

Omega-3 Fatty Acids

New Therapies for Dyslipidemia

LDL-cholesterol-Lowering Therapies

HDL-C Raising Drugs

Gene Therapy for Lipid Disorders

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References