Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and accounts for approximately 50% to 80% of all cases of dementia. The diagnosis of probable AD is based on clinical criteria and overlapping clinical features pose a challenge to accurate diagnosis. However, neuroimaging has been included as a biomarker in various published criteria for the diagnosis of probable AD, in the absence of a confirmatory diagnostic test during life. Advances in neuroimaging techniques and their inclusion in diagnostic and research criteria for the diagnosis of AD includes the use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging as a biomarker in various therapeutic and prognostic studies in AD. The development and application of a range of PET tracers will allow more detailed assessment of people with AD and will improve diagnostic specificity and targeted therapy of AD. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on PET imaging using the non-specific tracer [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and specific tracers that target amyloid and tau pathology in people with AD.

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging positron emission tomography amyloid and tau pathology tracers

Introduction

Dementia can be defined as an acquired and progressive impairment of cognitive functioning including memory, language, thinking, and perception resulting in disruption of activities of daily living (Goodman and others 2017). A recent report from the World Health Organization estimated approximately 50 million people currently have dementia worldwide (World Health Organization, 2020), affecting 7% to 8% of individuals aged more than 65 years and approximately 30% individuals aged more than 80 years (Dormont and Seidenwurm 2008). Fifty percent to 80% of all causes of dementia comprise of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which is the most common cause of dementia (Kanekar and Poot 2014) with the incidence doubling every 5 years after the age of 60 years (Corrada and others 2010). It has been found that it takes years for neurodegeneration in AD to manifest itself clinically (Villemagne and others 2013). The increase in the proportion of older people in the population worldwide, due to increase in life expectancy, harbors an epidemic of dementia in the coming years. It is imperative to take appropriate measures in advance to deal with a surge of dementia. Unfortunately, we are still struggling with accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of dementia subtypes. Accurate diagnosis is particularly important as management and prognosis vary significantly with dementia subtypes.

Neuroimaging has not only a supportive role in making the clinical diagnosis but also features in the diagnostic criteria for probable AD (Dubois and others 2007; McKhann and others 2011). Historically, brain imaging in people with dementia focused on ruling out treatable causes, such as mass lesions or subdural hematomas. Advancement in imaging modalities particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and regional cerebral blood flow–single photon emission computed tomography (rCBF-SPECT) has broadened the horizons of imaging in diagnosis of AD (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of Different Imaging Modalities in AD.^a

Modality	Sensitivity	Specificity
CT	80 (68-88)	87 (78-93)
MRI	83 (79-87)	85 (80-89)
FDG-PET	91 (86-94)	85 (79-91)
rCBF-SPECT	79 (72-85)	84 (78-88)

AD = Alzheimer’s disease; CT = computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; FDG-PET = [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography; rCBF-SPECT = regional cerebral blood flow–single photon emission computed tomography.

Summary of modalities and their respective diagnostic accuracies in percentage (95% CI) from previously published data (Bloudek and others 2011; Shivamurthy and others 2014).

The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and the Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA) established diagnostic criteria for AD in 1984 (McKhann and others 1984). Revised diagnostic criteria were proposed in 2007 by Dubois and colleagues, to include neuroimaging (Dubois and others 2007). Criteria were further revised by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Alzheimer’s Association included five most commonly investigated biomarkers namely positive amyloid-β (Aβ) PET or reduced Aβ in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and markers of neuronal injury, including raised CSF tau, typical temporo-parietal deficits on [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and hippocampal atrophy on structural MRI in diagnostic classification in 2011. The biomarkers were categorized into amyloid and tau-related neurodegeneration (McKhann and others 2011). In 2018, the tau and neurodegeneration/injury biomarkers were separated and placed in different categories. In this system each of the three biomarker groups consisted of CSF and an imaging biomarker namely, A—aggregated Aβ or associated pathologic state, which includes reduced CSF Aβ and positive amyloid PET; T—aggregated tau, which includes raised CSF phosphorylated tau and positive tau PET; and (N)—neurodegeneration or neuronal injury, which includes atrophy on structural MRI, deficits on FDG-PET and raised CSF total tau, collectively known as the AT(N) biomarker classification system (Jack and others 2018).

Higher diagnostic accuracy of PET imaging has led to its inclusion in diagnostic and research criteria for AD and it has also been used as a biomarker in various therapeutic and prognostic studies related to AD. PET imaging especially FDG-PET and amyloid PET, considering their diagnostic accuracy, their use in differential diagnosis of AD and evaluation of mild cognitive impairment conversion to AD and their clinical application, both meet criteria as suitable biomarkers for AD (Rice and Bisdas 2017). The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on the PET imaging using the non-specific tracer FDG and specific tracers targeting amyloid and tau pathology and their effectiveness in the diagnosis and prognosis of people with AD (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of non-specific and specific PET tracer’s findings and uses in AD.

	FDG-PET	Amyloid PET	Tau PET
Principles	Patterns of altered brain glucose metabolism	Binds amyloid-β fibrils in senile plaques	Binds paired helical filaments-tau in neurofibrillary tangles, neuropil threads, dystrophic neurites
Site	Hypo-metabolism in temporo-parietal cortex, and posterior cingulate (Shivamurthy and others 2014) reflecting loss of neuropil and synapse as well as functional impairment of the neurons (Ou and others 2019)	Diffuse cortical amyloid tracer binding, with predominance in frontal and posterior cingulate with a relative sparing of medial temporal cortex, occipital and sensorimotor cortex (Rowe and others 2008)	Tau tracer binding is significantly higher in the temporo-parietal cortex, and lower in subcortical regions (Lagarde and others 2019)
Clinical application	It can be used to support clinical diagnosis of AD (Jack and others 2018). It can also be used as a biomarker for blood-brain barrier abnormality (Sweeney and others 2019)	It can be used to establish clinical diagnosis of AD (Jack and others 2018) as well as in patient selection and evaluation of treatment response of novel anti-amyloid drugs (Okamura and others 2018)	It can be used to establish clinical diagnosis of AD (Jack and others 2018) as well as in patient’s recruitment and evaluation of treatment response in the clinical trials of the medications specifically targeting amyloid and tau (Okamura and others 2018)
Association with clinical severity of dementia	It can be used to measure severity of cognitive impairment and hence can be used as prognostic biomarker for AD (Mosconi and others 2009)	Little association has been established between amyloid burden and clinical severity of cognitive impairment and hence less useful as a prognostic biomarker for AD (Rabinovici and Jagust 2009)	A close relationship has been observed with tau pathology and severity of cognitive impairment and hence can be used as a prognostic biomarker for AD (Villemagne and others 2018)

AD = Alzheimer’s disease; FDG-PET = FDG-PET = [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography.

FDG-PET Imaging in AD

[¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) relies on the detection of the classic pattern of hypometabolism in the temporoparietal regions, corresponding to sites of neurodegeneration. The reliance of the brain on glucose for its activity allows FDG, a glucose analogue, to be used to measure glucose transporter mediated uptake, following which activity is trapped in the cells after phosphorylation. Thus, it can be used to measure neuronal dysfunction, which is inversely proportional to the glucose uptake (Hoffman and others 2000; Nasrallah and Dubroff 2013). A distinct pattern of hypo-metabolism (Figure 1) on FDG-PET can distinguish AD from other causes of dementia and it can distinguish people with AD from healthy controls with sensitivity and specificity of 93% to 97% and 86% (Mehta and Thomas 2012). However, to differentiate people with AD from people with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) the sensitivity remains at 99% but specificity drops to 71% and 65%, respectively (Daniela and others 2014; Mosconi and others 2008). The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved FDG-PET to distinguish between AD and FTD based on its improved accuracy over clinical criteria (Foster and others 2007). Moreover, use of FDG-PET has also been recommended by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine and the European Academy of Neurology (EANM-EAN) both in people with dementia (Nobili and others 2018) and in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Arbizu and others 2018; Nobili and others 2018). Recently, it has been observed that FDG-PET has significant clinical utility not only for early diagnosis but also helps in differential diagnosis of people with uncertain diagnosis of dementia (Perini and others 2020)

Figure 1.

Typical regional cerebral [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) hypo-metabolism patterns in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Patterns are presented as z score maps based on significantly hypo-metabolic voxels relative to non-demented comparison population. AD pattern of glucose hypo-metabolism involves predominantly temporoparietal association cortices, posterior cingulate, and precuneus. In advanced disease, prefrontal association cortices show additional hypo-metabolism. Primary sensorimotor and visual neocortices are relatively spared. DLB has cortical hypo-metabolism similar to that of AD but with additional involvement of occipital cortex. FTD demonstrates frontal lobar or frontal and temporal polar cortical hypo-metabolism with relative sparing of parietal association cortex and preservation of primary somatomotor and visual cortices. ANT = anterior; INF = inferior; LAT = lateral; MED = medial; POST = posterior; SUP = superior. Reproduced with permission (Bohnen and others 2012).

Hypo-metabolism in the posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus are characteristics of early stages of AD on FDG-PET and the temporoparietal hypo-metabolism appears even before structural changes (Martin-Macintosh and others 2016). As AD pathology advances FDG-PET typically shows widely distributed cortical hypo-metabolism with extension into the frontal lobes, especially the prefrontal association cortex with sparing of anterior cingulate gyrus (Brown and others 2014). The typical AD pattern shows sparing of sensory cortex, motor cortex, visual cortex, cerebellum, basal ganglia, and thalamus (Hoffman and others 2000; Mosconi and others 2008). Mostly hypo-metabolism is bilateral; however, asymmetry is not uncommon (Landau and others 2011). Interestingly, hippocampal hypo-metabolism is an early disease feature and does not show progression from mild to moderate AD, corresponding with Braak stages of AD (Braak and Braak 1991). It is established that hippocampal hypo-metabolism occurs in the early stages of AD and that neocortical involvement occurs in later stages of the illness (Ishii and others 1998), with progression occurring in a stereotypical pattern via brain networks (Brown and others 2019). A sensitivity of 93% to 97% and specificity of 86% of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of AD has been reported in previous studies (Mehta and Thomas 2012) Recently, it has been concluded that FDG PET is independent from “N” biomarker proposed in AT(N) framework for AD diagnosis as consumption of glucose driven by astrocytes, rather than neurons (Ou and others 2019).

Figures 2 to 4 are examples of FDG-PET imaging corresponding to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores of the people with AD. The golden color represents normal metabolism, orange color indicates mild to moderate hypo-metabolism, and purple color represents moderate to severe hypo-metabolism.

Figure 2.

Axial (above left), sagittal (above right), and coronal planes (below left) of fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging of an 81-year-old female with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 26.

Figure 3.

Axial (above left), sagittal (above right), and coronal planes (below left) of fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging of a 69-year-old male with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 20.

Figure 4.

There have been many studies evaluating the role of metabolic imaging in AD. The focus of research has shifted to early stages of AD especially in its prodromal phase of amnesic MCI and more recently to preclinical dementia (Bilgel and Resnick 2020). MCI is defined as cognitive decline, higher than expected for a particular age without interfering with activities of daily living (Gauthier and others 2006). It has been estimated that approximately 10% to 15% of patients with amnesic MCI progress to AD annually (Jack and others 2010; Jack and others 2012). A higher chance of conversion from MCI to AD, a greater brain atrophy and poorer cognition have been noted in amyloid- and tau-positive individuals with reduced FDG uptake on PET (Ou and others 2019).

Patients with MCI have a range of abnormalities, with hypo-metabolism ranging from a pattern of mild deficits to more extensive metabolic reduction and cognitive resilience mitigates the effect of neurodegenerative pathologies on the onset and severity of cognitive symptoms (Stern 2012). Analysis of glucose reduction pattern can have predictive value when considering conversion of MCI due to AD pathology to AD in the future. It has been suggested that FDG-PET generally has a higher accuracy than MRI for diagnosing early AD despite difficulty in detection of hypo-metabolic pattern on FDG-PET visually (Matsunari and others 2007). It has been noted that both more severe and progressive hypo-metabolism on FDG-PET in MCI patients are associated with a faster progression to AD (Landau and others 2011; Zhang and others 2012). A group of researchers have developed a hypo-metabolic convergence index (HCI) to denote the extent of cerebral glucose metabolism on FDG-PET corresponding to patients with AD. The HCI could discriminate people with AD from MCI and healthy controls and in turn can predict MCI to probable AD progression (Chen and others 2011). It has also been stated that FDG-PET can be used as a surrogate endpoint in the evaluation of treatment response in clinical trials of novel drugs in AD (Chen and others 2010). Effectiveness of FDG-PET in monitoring progression of AD and the close relationship with clinical symptoms, has resulted in its use in selection of participants and outcome assessment in AD and other dementia-related clinical trials (Chow and others 2013; Potkin and others 2001).

Amyloid PET Imaging in AD

The amyloid-β plaque deposition in patients with AD, lead researchers to develop experimental radiotracers, specific to amyloid such as Pittsburg compound B (PiB). It has been demonstrated using amyloid PET imaging that amyloid deposition starts around 15 years before the development of clinical manifestations of dementia or MCI (Jack and others 2013; Villemagne and others 2013). However, a recent study, demonstrated that subtle cognitive decline precedes amyloid accumulation (Elman and others 2020) thus paving the way for further research to gain better insight.

The currently used criteria from the Amyloid Imaging Task Force (Johnson and others 2013) stated that the use of amyloid PET should be restricted to situations with significant diagnostic ambiguity and its use has potential to alter management by increasing diagnostic certainty. However, amyloid positivity does not equate to cognitive decline or a clinical diagnosis of dementia and can be found in cognitively healthy people (Jansen and others 2015) making it difficult to define a clear role of amyloid PET in clinical practice.

For the purpose of amyloid imaging, 11-C labeled PET tracer PiB was used initially in human beings (Klunk and others 2004). However, the short half-life of 11-C of 20 minutes restricts its use in clinical practice, as it requires close proximity to a cyclotron and radiochemistry facilities. High-affinity binding of PiB specifically to insoluble fibrillary Aβ makes it suitable for in vivo detection of Aβ. Notably, specific binding of PiB to cortical areas has been noted in more than 90% of people with AD (Rabinovici and Jagust 2009). Furthermore, to overcome the limitations of 11-C, three [¹⁸F]-labeled tracers with relatively long half- life of 110 minutes have been investigated in clinical trials and they have been developed for commercial purposes. The 3′-fluoro-derivative, [¹⁸F]flutemetamol, stilbene derivative [¹⁸F]florbetaben, and styrylpyridine derivative [¹⁸F]florbetapir reveal high-affinity binding very similar to PiB for fibrillary amyloid (Hatashita and others 2014; Morris and others 2016). [¹⁸F]florbetapir exhibits high accuracy in detecting deposition of brain amyloid and has been approved by the U.S. FDA in 2012, to be used for investigating AD or other causes of cognitive impairment. Furthermore, [¹⁸F]flutemetamol and [¹⁸F]florbetaben have been approved by the U.S. FDA in 2013 and 2014, respectively (Clark and others 2011; Filippi and others 2018).

Clinical amyloid PET image interpretation is based on the presence of uptake in cortical gray matter (Figure 5). Moderate to frequent amyloid tracer deposition on visual analysis has been interpreted as positive for AD, with absent or minimal amyloid tracer deposition on PET interpreted as negative for AD. For research purposes, region-specific accumulation of the amyloid tracer is assessed, using the cerebellum for normalization (Schwarz and others 2017; van Berckel and others 2013). Other areas like the pons, centrum semiovale, or cerebellar white matter can also be used as reference regions. For the purpose of semiquantitative analysis, the ratio of the reference region and region of interest (ROI) is calculated. This is called the standardized up- take value ratio (SUVR). The value of SUVR depends on the ROI, radiotracer and the reference region chosen. A threshold is selected based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and SUVR of ROI greater than the threshold, is then regarded as positive for Aβ deposition (Thurfjell and others 2014). In an attempt to identify the neural basis of executive function in amnestic MCI subjects according to Aβ positivity, it was concluded that disease progression was associated with Aβ burden in different brain regions. The impairment of executive function in Aβ- was closely associated with anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), whereas Aβ+ were highly correlated to AD related brain regions. Interestingly, clinical progression in Aβ− and Aβ+, was associated with ACC and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), respectively (Yoon and others 2019).

Figure 5.

Topographic differences between amyloid and neurodegeneration. Alzheimer’s disease versus cognitively normal voxel mapping. Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) (left) statistical parametric mapping (SPM) of PiB retention ratio. MRI (right) voxel-based morphometry (VBM) of MRI gray matter density. Plaque deposition but not gray matter loss is seen in the prefrontal cortex while gray matter loss but not plaque deposition is seen in the medial and basal temporal lobes. Reproduced with permission (Jack and others 2008).

Quantitative analysis of amyloid tracer uptake on PET has been used to monitor the therapeutic response in clinical trials of novel drugs. Recently, 165 subjects with a diagnosis of prodromal or mild AD treated with a human monoclonal antibody, aducanumab, which target aggregated Aβ were included in the study and found a reduction in Aβ plaques on [¹⁸F]florbetapir PET using a regional analysis of SUVR change (Sevigny and others 2016). Moreover, another drug, Verubecestat is an oral β-site amyloid precursor protein–cleaving enzyme-1 (BACE-1) inhibitor that reduces the Aβ level, clinical trials of which have used amyloid PET to evaluate treatment response (Egan and others 2018). For the past 25 years, most of the clinical trials involving AD have focused on Aβ, based on the hypothesis that the progression of AD begins following Aβ accumulation, resulting in synapse loss and neuronal cell death. Clinical trials of novel drugs that help reduce the formation of Aβ or enhance clearance, have partly achieved this aim but remain unsuccessful in improving cognitive function or slowing cognitive decline (Oxford and others 2020).

Many people with AD may show cortical uptake on amyloid PET in the cingulum, precuneus and frontal, parietal, and lateral temporal cortices (Wolk and Klunk 2009). It is included in research criteria for the diagnosis of AD. However, the timing of amyloid deposition specific to AD is not clear as previously it was thought that deposition begins at a very preclinical stage (Jack and others 2013). Recently, contradictory evidence has emerged indicating that cognitive impairment may precede the amyloid deposition and can predict the amyloid positivity (Elman and others 2020). Furthermore, amyloid deposition is not pathognomonic for AD and it can be found in those who are cognitively normal (Jansen and others 2015) or those who have other neurodegenerative diseases. However, evidence suggests that MCI to AD conversion risk is higher in people having positive results on amyloid PET. Interestingly, negative amyloid PET has a high negative predictive value for conversion to AD in MCI subjects (Nordberg and others 2013; Okello and others 2009) and the conversion time is inversely correlated with Aβ deposition (Hatashita and Wakebe 2017). Although amyloid deposition on PET and hypo-metabolism FDG-PET are thought to be equally specific, it has been suggested that amyloid PET is more sensitive for the diagnosis of AD (Rabinovici and others 2011). A significant negative correlation between [¹⁸F]florbetaben and FDG-PET uptake in temporal and parietal lobes bilaterally was found recently suggesting amyloid burden corresponds to hypo-metabolism on FDG-PET (Chiaravalloti and others 2018). Amyloid PET was not considered to be useful in routine clinical practice in patients with AD previously, but recent studies have evaluated the role of amyloid PET especially [¹⁸F]flumetamol in clinical practice and reported that amyloid PET has clinical utility in ascertaining diagnosis of dementia, differential diagnosis, clinical decisions like change in diagnosis and influencing change in management plan (Leuzy and others 2019b; Zwan and others 2017) and long-term prediction of dementia (Hanseeuw et al., 2020). Moreover, clinical utility of amyloid PET has been investigated recently in distinguishing cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) from cognitively healthy population and hence negative amyloid PET scan may help rule out the conditions with CAA including AD in future (Charidimou and others 2017).

Tau PET Imaging in AD

Recent reports on the role of PET in cognitive impairment and dementia have focused on the role of tracers that demonstrate cerebral tau burden (Figure 6). Tau proteins encompass six isoforms ranging from 352 to 441 amino acids and help stabilizing the microtubules which are responsible for intracellular transport and cytoskeletal support. Tau proteins are further subdivided into two groups consisting of number of repeats (3R, 4R) based on microtubule-binding domains (Buée and others 2000). In its pathological state, tau becomes hyper-phosphorylated and accumulates as intraneuronal neuro-fibrillary tangles (NFTs). The distribution of NFTs forms the basis of Braak’s pathologic staging of AD and this is correlated with cognitive impairment (Braak and Braak 1991). Moreover, in comparison to amyloid plaques, NFT density has been found to be strongly associated with brain atrophy, impairment in higher mental functions and synaptic dysfunction in people with AD (Guillozet and others 2003). In a recent study in younger people with AD related pathology, tau was found to be present much earlier than amyloid pathology and, contrary to most of the previous studies, it seems that tau may be responsible for initiation of the disease process in AD (Yoshida and others 2019).

Figure 6.

Chemical structures and representative uptake images in amyloid-β-positive Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients using selected first-generation (upper portion of the figure) and second-generation (lower portion of the figure) tau positron emission tomography (PET) tracers. The characteristics in terms of clinical research diagnosis, age, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores are presented for each patient above the respective image. For the creation of parametric images for all tracers, areas of the cerebellar cortex were used as reference. Reproduced with permission (Leuzy and others 2019a).

Following the failure of anti-amyloid therapies for AD, various radiotracers have been developed recently to target tau pathology, lead to paradigm shift toward tau as a therapeutic target (Giacobini and Gold 2013). The earliest radiotracer to target tau in vivo was [¹⁸F]-labeled THK-523 or ([¹⁸F]-6-(2-fluoroethoxy)-2-(4-aminophenyl)quinoline) but unfortunately, a very high retention in white matter precludes its use in research or clinical trials (Fodero-Tavoletti and others 2011; Villemagne and others 2014). Furthermore, several [¹⁸F]-labeled arylquinoline derivatives were developed as candidate tau PET radiotracers such as [¹⁸F]THK-5105 and [¹⁸F]-THK-5117 (Harada and others 2015; Okamura and others 2014). [¹⁸F]THK-5351, a recent radiotracer, has shown to improve tau binding affinity with better imaging characteristics and lower white matter retention than other THK radio-ligands from the series (Harada and others 2016). Furthermore, benzimidazole pyrimidine derivatives a different type of radiotracers namely, [¹⁸F]AV-1451 (T807) and [¹⁸F]AV-680 (T808) have been developed (Chien and others 2013; Zhang and others 2012). Interestingly, these tracers have low retention in white matter and evident high affinity for paired helical tau aggregates. Furthermore, [¹⁸F]AV-1451 showed distribution of tau pathology according to Braak staging (Cho and others 2016; Marquié and others 2017). Other radiotracers, namely pyridinyl-butadienyl-benzothiazole derivative 11-C-PBB3 and pyrrolo-pyridine-isoquinolone amine derivative MK-6240 have shown a noticeable promise for detection of tau pathology (Hostetler and others 2016; Maruyama and others 2013). Notably, MK-6240 has shown minimal radiotracer uptake in normal brain tissue (Hostetler and others 2016). There are a few newer radiotracers such as [¹⁸F]RO-948 (previously referred to as [¹⁸F]RO69558948), [¹⁸F] PI-2620, [¹⁸F]GTP1, and [¹⁸F]JNJ64349311 (Declercq and others 2017; Gobbi and others 2017; Leuzy and others 2019a; Sanabria Bohórquez and others 2019) have been used for tau imaging. Moreover, accumulation of tau in the medial temporal lobe is independent of Aβ deposition and is related to age, whereas outside the medial temporal lobe, it is correlated with Aβ deposition (Lockhart and others 2017; Pontecorvo and others 2017). Of note, AD patients demonstrated higher ligand retention in the key brain areas affected by AD pathology, namely medial frontal, temporal, inferior parietal cortices in comparison to normal healthy controls (Wong and others 2018). Hence, it has been suggested that tau imaging may be suitable for the accurate staging of AD (Schwarz and others 2018) and could be useful in assessing its prognosis.

Conclusion

FDG-PET continues to have a role in diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring the effects of therapeutic interventions in AD. Amyloid PET has been used in the clinical trials of novel drugs that help reduce formation of Aβ or enhance clearance but in the absence of favorable outcome, the role of amyloid PET tracers is unclear. However, usefulness of amyloid PET in the diagnosis of CAA, can justify its clinical utility in future. Failure of anti-amyloid therapies for AD, lead to paradigm shift toward tau as a therapeutic target and it can be predicted that development and application of tau PET tracers will allow more specific assessment of patients with AD and related taupathies. Despite these differences, it is hoped that PET imaging will improve diagnostic specificity and targeted therapy of AD.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Shailendra Mohan Tripathi

References

Arbizu

Festari

Altomare

Walker

Bouwman

Rivolta

, and others, for the EANM-EAN Task Force for the prescription of FDG-PET for dementing neurodegenerative disorders. 2018. Clinical utility of FDG-PET for the clinical diagnosis in MCI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:1497–508. doi:10.1007/s00259-018-4039-7

Bilgel

Resnick

. 2020. Amyloid positivity as a risk factor for memory decline and lower memory performance as an indicator of conversion to amyloid positivity: chicken and egg. Biol Psychiatry 87:782–4. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.006

Bloudek

Spackman

Blankenburg

Sullivan

. 2011. Review and meta-analysis of biomarkers and diagnostic imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 26:627–45. doi:10.3233/JAD-2011-110458

Bohnen

Djang

DSW

Herholz

Anzai

Minoshima

2012. Effectiveness and safety of 18F-FDG PET in the evaluation of dementia: a review of the recent literature. J Nucl Med 53:59–71. doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.0965

Braak

1991. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82:239–59. doi:10.1007/bf00308809

Brown

Deng

Neuhaus

Sible

Sias

Lee

, and others. 2019. Patient-tailored, connectivity-based forecasts of spreading brain atrophy. Neuron 104:856–868.e5. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.037

Brown

RKJ

Bohnen

Wong

Minoshima

Frey

. 2014. Brain PET in suspected dementia: patterns of altered FDG metabolism. Radiographics 34:684–701. doi:10.1148/rg.343135065

Buée

Bussière

Buée-Scherrer

Delacourte

Hof

. 2000. Tau protein isoforms, phosphorylation and role in neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Res Rev 33:95–130. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(00)00019-9

Charidimou

Farid

Baron

J-C

2017. Amyloid-PET in sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Neurology 89:1490–8. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004539

10.

Chen

Ayutyanont

Langbaum

JBS

Fleisher

Reschke

Lee

, and others. 2011. Characterizing Alzheimer’s disease using a hypometabolic convergence index. Neuroimage 56:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.049

11.

Chen

Langbaum

JBS

Fleisher

Ayutyanont

Reschke

Lee

, and others. 2010. Twelve-month metabolic declines in probable Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment assessed using an empirically pre-defined statistical region-of-interest: findings from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Neuroimage 51:654–64. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.064

12.

Chiaravalloti

Castellano

Ricci

Barbagallo

Sannino

Ursini

, and others. 2018. Coupled imaging with [18F]FBB and [18F]FDG in AD subjects show a selective association between amyloid burden and cortical dysfunction in the brain. Mol Imaging Biol 20:659–66. doi:10.1007/s11307-018-1167-1

13.

Chien

Bahri

Szardenings

Walsh

M-Y

, and others. 2013. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. J Alzheimers Dis. 34:457–68. doi:10.3233/JAD-122059

14.

Cho

Choi

Hwang

Lee

Kim

Lee

, and others 2016. Tau PET in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 87:375–83. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002892

15.

Chow

Fam

Graff-Guerrero

Verhoeff

NPG

Tang-Wai

Masellis

, and others 2013. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in semantic dementia after 6 months of memantine: an open-label pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 28:319–25. doi:10.1002/gps.3832

16.

Clark

Schneider

Bedell

Beach

Bilker

Mintun

, and others. 2011. Use of florbetapir-PET for imaging beta-amyloid pathology. JAMA 305:275–83. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.2008

17.

Corrada

Brookmeyer

Paganini-Hill

Berlau

Kawas

. 2010. Dementia incidence continues to increase with age in the oldest old: the 90+ study. Ann Neurol 67:114–21. doi:10.1002/ana.21915

18.

Daniela

Orazio

Alessandro

Mariano

Leonardo

Pasquale Anthony

, and others 2014. A survey of FDG- and amyloid-PET imaging in dementia and GRADE analysis. BioMed Research International. doi:10.1155/2014/785039

19.

Declercq

Rombouts

Koole

Fierens

Mariën

Langlois

, and others. 2017. Preclinical evaluation of 18F-JNJ64349311, a novel PET tracer for tau imaging. J Nucl Med 58:975–81. doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.185199

20.

Dormont

Seidenwurm

. 2008. Dementia and movement disorders. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:204–6.

21.

Dubois

Feldman

Jacova

Dekosky

Barberger-Gateau

Cummings

, and others. 2007. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 6:734–46. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3

22.

Egan

Kost

Tariot

Aisen

Cummings

Vellas

, and others. 2018. Randomized trial of Verubecestat for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 378:1691–703. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706441

23.

Elman

Panizzon

Gustavson

Franz

Sanderson-Cimino

Lyons

, and others. 2020. Amyloid-β positivity predicts cognitive decline but cognition predicts progression to amyloid-β positivity. Biol Psychiatry 87:819–28. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.12.021

24.

Filippi

Chiaravalloti

Bagni

Schillaci

2018. 18F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for the molecular neuroimaging of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 8:268–81.

25.

Fodero-Tavoletti

Okamura

Furumoto

Mulligan

Connor

McLean

, and others. 2011. 18F-THK523: a novel in vivo tau imaging ligand for Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 134:1089–100. doi:10.1093/brain/awr038

26.

Foster

Heidebrink

Clark

Jagust

Arnold

Barbas

, and others. 2007. FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 130:2616–35. doi:10.1093/brain/awm177

27.

Gauthier

Reisberg

Zaudig

Petersen

Ritchie

Broich

, and others. International Psychogeriatric Association Expert Conference on Mild Cognitive Impairment. 2006. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet 367:1262–70. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68542-5

28.

Giacobini

Gold

2013. Alzheimer disease therapy—moving from amyloid-β to tau. Nat Rev Neurol 9:677–86. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.223

29.

Gobbi

Knust

Körner

Honer

Czech

Belli

, and others 2017. Identification of three novel radiotracers for imaging aggregated tau in Alzheimer’s disease with positron emission tomography. J Med Chem 60:7350–70. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00632

30.

Goodman

Lochner

Thambisetty

Wingo

Posner

Ling

. 2017. Prevalence of dementia subtypes in United States Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 2011-2013. Alzheimers Dement 13:28–37. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.04.002

31.

Guillozet

Weintraub

Mash

Mesulam

. 2003. Neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid, and memory in aging and mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 60:729–36. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.5.729

32.

Hanseeuw

Malotaux

Dricot

Quenon

Sznajer

Cerman

, and others. 2020. Defining a Centiloid scale threshold predicting long-term progression to dementia in patients attending the memory clinic: an [18F] flutemetamol amyloid PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:302–10. doi:10.1007/s00259-020-04942-4

33.

Harada

Okamura

Furumoto

Furukawa

Ishiki

Tomita

, and others. 2015. [¹⁸F]THK-5117 PET for assessing neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:1052–61. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3035-4

34.

Harada

Okamura

Furumoto

Furukawa

Ishiki

Tomita

, and others 2016. 18F-THK5351: a novel PET radiotracer for imaging neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med 57:208–14. doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.164848

35.

Hatashita

Wakebe

2017. Amyloid-β deposition and long-term progression in mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease defined with amyloid PET imaging. J Alzheimers Dis 57:765–73. doi:10.3233/JAD-161074

36.

Hatashita

Yamasaki

Suzuki

Tanaka

Wakebe

Hayakawa

2014. [18F]Flutemetamol amyloid-beta PET imaging compared with [11C]PIB across the spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:290–300. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2564-y

37.

Hoffman

Welsh-Bohmer

Hanson

Crain

Hulette

Earl

, and others. 2000. FDG PET imaging in patients with pathologically verified dementia. J Nucl Med 41:1920–8.

38.

Hostetler

Walji

Zeng

Miller

Bennacef

Salinas

, and others 2016. Preclinical characterization of 18F-MK-6240, a promising PET Tracer for in vivo quantification of human neurofibrillary tangles. J Nucl Med 57:1599–606. doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.171678

39.

Ishii

Imamura

Sasaki

Yamaji

Sakamoto

Kitagaki

, and others. 1998. Regional cerebral glucose metabolism in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 51:125–30. doi:10.1212/WNL.51.1.125

40.

Jack

Bennett

Blennow

Carrillo

Dunn

Haeberlein

, and others. 2018. NIA-AA Research Framework. Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 14:535–62. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018

41.

Jack

Knopman

Jagust

Petersen

Weiner

Aisen

, and others. 2013. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 12:207–16. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70291-0

42.

Jack

Knopman

Jagust

Shaw

Aisen

Weiner

, and others. 2010. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 9:119. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6

43.

Jack

Lowe

Senjem

Weigand

Kemp

Shiung

, and otherd. 2008. 11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of AD and amnestic MCI. Brain 131:665–680. doi:10.1093/brain/awm336

44.

Jack

Vemuri

Wiste

Weigand

Lesnick

Lowe

, and others. 2012. Shapes of the trajectories of 5 major biomarkers of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 69:856–67. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.3405

45.

Jansen

Ossenkoppele

Knol

Tijms

Scheltens

Verhey

FRJ

, and others 2015. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 313:1924–38. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4668

46.

Johnson

Minoshima

Bohnen

Donohoe

Foster

Herscovitch

, and others. Alzheimer’s Association, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Amyloid Imaging Taskforce, 2013. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimers Dement 9:E1–E16. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.002

47.

Kanekar

Poot

. 2014. Neuroimaging of vascular dementia. Radiol Clin North Am. 52:383–401. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2013.11.004

48.

Klunk

Engler

Nordberg

Wang

Blomqvist

Holt

, and others 2004. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol 55: 306–19. doi:10.1002/ana.20009

49.

Lagarde

Olivieri

Caillé

Gervais

Baron

J-C

Bottlaender

, and others. 2019. [18F]-AV-1451 tau PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and suspected non-AD tauopathies using a late acquisition time window. J Neurol 266:3087–97. doi:10.1007/s00415-019-09530-7

50.

Landau

Harvey

Madison

Koeppe

Reiman

Foster

, and others, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. 2011. Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI. Neurobiol Aging 32:1207–18. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.07.002

51.

Leuzy

Chiotis

Lemoine

Gillberg

P-G

Almkvist

Rodriguez-Vieitez , and others 2019a. Tau PET imaging in neurodegenerative tauopathies—still a challenge. Mol Psychiatry 24:1112–34. doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0342-8

52.

Leuzy

Savitcheva

Chiotis

Lilja

Andersen

Bogdanovic

, and others 2019b. Clinical impact of [18F]flutemetamol PET among memory clinic patients with an unclear diagnosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:1276–86. doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04297-5

53.

Lockhart

Schöll

Baker

Ayakta

Swinnerton

Bell

, and others 2017. Amyloid and tau PET demonstrate region-specific associations in normal older people. Neuroimage 150:191–9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.051

54.

Marquié

Chong

MST

Antón-Fernández

Verwer

Sáez-Calveras

Meltzer

, and others 2017. [F-18]-AV-1451 binding correlates with postmortem neurofibrillary tangle Braak staging. Acta Neuropathol 134:619–28. doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1740-8

55.

Martin-Macintosh

Broski

Johnson

Hunt

Cullen

Peller

. 2016. Multimodality imaging of neurodegenerative processes: part 1. The basics and common dementias. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:871–82. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12842

56.

Maruyama

Shimada

Suhara

Shinotoh

Maeda

, and others. 2013. Imaging of tau pathology in a tauopathy mouse model and in Alzheimer patients compared to normal controls. Neuron 79:1094–108. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.037

57.

Matsunari

Samuraki

Chen

W-P

Yanase

Takeda

Ono

, and others 2007. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and optimized voxel-based morphometry for detection of Alzheimer’s disease: aging effect on diagnostic performance. J Nucl Med 48:1961–70. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.042820

58.

McKhann

Drachman

Folstein

Katzman

Price

Stadlan

. 1984. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 34:939–44. doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939

59.

McKhann

Knopman

Chertkow

Hyman

Jack

Kawas

, and others. 2011. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:263–9. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005

60.

Mehta

Thomas

2012. The role of PET in dementia diagnosis and treatment. Appl Radiol 41:8–15.

61.

Morris

Chalkidou

Hammers

Peacock

Summers

Keevil

2016. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F amyloid PET tracers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:374–85. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3228-x

62.

Mosconi

Mistur

Switalski

Tsui

Glodzik

, and others. 2009. FDG-PET changes in brain glucose metabolism from normal cognition to pathologically verified Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:811–22. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-1039-z

63.

Mosconi

Tsui

Herholz

Pupi

Drzezga

Lucignani

, and others, 2008. Multicenter standardized 18F-FDG PET diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and other dementias. J Nucl Med 49:390–8. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.045385

64.

Nasrallah

Dubroff

2013. An overview of PET neuroimaging. Semin Nucl Med 43:449–61. doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.06.003

65.

Nobili

Arbizu

Bouwman

Drzezga

Agosta

Nestor

, and others. 2018. European Association of Nuclear Medicine and European Academy of Neurology recommendations for the use of brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in neurodegenerative cognitive impairment and dementia: Delphi consensus. Eur J Neurol 25:1201–17. doi:10.1111/ene.13728

66.

Nordberg

Carter

Rinne

Drzezga

Brooks

Vandenberghe

, and others. 2013. A European multicentre PET study of fibrillar amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:104–14. doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2237-2

67.

Okamura

Furumoto

Fodero-Tavoletti

Mulligan

Harada

Yates

, and others. 2014. Non-invasive assessment of Alzheimer’s disease neurofibrillary pathology using 18F-THK5105 PET. Brain 137:1762–71. doi:10.1093/brain/awu064

68.

Okamura

Harada

Ishiki

Kikuchi

Nakamura

Kudo

2018. The development and validation of tau PET tracers: current status and future directions. Clin Transl Imaging 6:305–16. doi:10.1007/s40336-018-0290-y

69.

Okello

Koivunen

Edison

Archer

Turkheimer

Någren

, and others. 2009. Conversion of amyloid positive and negative MCI to AD over 3 years. Neurology 73:754–60. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b23564

70.

Y-N

J-Q

Guo

Cui

Chen

K-L

, and others, on behalf of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. 2019. FDG-PET as an independent biomarker for Alzheimer’s biological diagnosis: a longitudinal study. Alzheimers Res Ther 11:57. doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0512-1

71.

Oxford

Stewart

Rohn

TT.

2020. Clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease: a hurdle in the path of remedy. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2020:5380346. doi:10.1155/2020/5380346

72.

Perini

Rodriguez-Vieitez

Kadir

Sala

Savitcheva

Nordberg

2020. Clinical impact of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET among memory clinic patients with uncertain diagnosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:612–22. doi:10.1007/s00259-020-04969-7

73.

Pontecorvo

Devous

Navitsky

Salloway

Schaerf

, and others, 18F-AV-1451-A05 Investigators. 2017. Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition. Brain 140:748–63. doi:10.1093/brain/aww334

74.

Potkin

Anand

Fleming

Alva

Keator

Carreon

, and others. 2001. Brain metabolic and clinical effects of rivastigmine in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 4:223–30. doi:10.1017/S1461145701002528

75.

Rabinovici

Jagust

. 2009. Amyloid imaging in aging and dementia: testing the amyloid hypothesis in vivo. Behav Neurol 21:117–28. doi:10.3233/BEN-2009-0232

76.

Rabinovici

Rosen

Alkalay

Kornak

Furst

Agarwal

, and others. 2011. Amyloid vs FDG-PET in the differential diagnosis of AD and FTLD. Neurology 77:2034–42. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823b9c5e

77.

Rice

Bisdas

2017. The diagnostic value of FDG and amyloid PET in Alzheimer’s disease—a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 94:16–24. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.07.014

78.

Rowe

Ackerman

Browne

Mulligan

Pike

O’Keefe

, and others. 2008. Imaging of amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism. Lancet Neurol 7:129–35. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2

79.

Sanabria Bohórquez

Marik

Ogasawara

Tinianow

Gill

Barret

, and others. 2019. [18F]GTP1 (Genentech Tau Probe 1), a radioligand for detecting neurofibrillary tangle tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:2077–89. doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04399-0

80.

Schwarz

Shcherbinin

Slieker

Risacher

Charil

Irizarry

, and others, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. 2018. Topographic staging of tau positron emission tomography images. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 10:221–31. doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2018.01.006

81.

Schwarz

Senjem

Gunter

Kemp

Spychalla

Vemuri

, and others, 2017. Optimizing PiB-PET SUVR change-over-time measurement by a large-scale analysis of longitudinal reliability, plausibility, separability, and correlation with MMSE. Neuroimage 144:113–27. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.056

82.

Sevigny

Chiao

Bussière

Weinreb

Williams

Maier

, and others. 2016. The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 537:50–6. doi:10.1038/nature19323

83.

Shivamurthy

VKN

Tahari

Marcus

Subramaniam

. 2014. Brain FDG PET and the diagnosis of dementia. Am J Roentgenol 204:W76–W85. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.12363

84.

Stern

. 2012. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 11:1006–012. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6

85.

Sweeney

Montagne

Sagare

Nation

Schneider

Chui

, and others. 2019. Vascular dysfunction—the disregarded partner of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 15:158–67. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.222

86.

Thurfjell

Lilja

Lundqvist

Buckley

Smith

Vandenberghe

, and others. 2014. Automated quantification of 18F-flutemetamol PET activity for categorizing scans as negative or positive for brain amyloid: concordance with visual image reads. J Nucl Med 55:1623–8. doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.142109

87.

van Berckel

BNM

Ossenkoppele

Tolboom

Yaqub

Foster-Dingley

Windhorst

, and others. 2013. Longitudinal amyloid imaging using 11C-PiB: methodologic considerations. J Nucl Med 54:1570–6. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.113654

88.

Villemagne

Burnham

Bourgeat

Brown

Ellis

Salvado

, and others, Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Research Group, 2013. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 12:357–67. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70044-9

89.

Villemagne

Doré

Burnham

Masters

Rowe

. 2018. Imaging tau and amyloid-β proteinopathies in Alzheimer disease and other conditions. Nat Rev Neurol 14:225–36. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2018.9

90.

Villemagne

Furumoto

Fodero-Tavoletti

Mulligan

Hodges

Harada

, and others, 2014. In vivo evaluation of a novel tau imaging tracer for Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:816–26. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2681-7

91.

Wolk

Klunk

. 2009. Update on amyloid imaging: from healthy aging to Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 9:345–52. doi:10.1007/s11910-009-0051-4

92.

Wong

Comley

Kuwabara

Rosenberg

Resnick

Ostrowitzki

, and others. 2018. Characterization of 3 novel tau radiopharmaceuticals, 11C-RO-963, 11C-RO-643, and 18F-RO-948, in healthy controls and in Alzheimer Subjects. J Nucl Med 59:1869–76. doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.209916

93.

World Health Organization. 2020. Dementia fact sheets. 21st September 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia

94.

Yoon

Kim

Choo

ILH

Park

Seo

, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2019. Distinct neural correlates of executive function by amyloid positivity and associations with clinical progression in mild cognitive impairment. Yonsei Med J 60:935–43. doi:10.3349/ymj.2019.60.10.935

95.

Yoshida

Hata

Ichimata

Nishida

2019. Tau and amyloid-β pathology in Japanese forensic autopsy series under 40 years of age: prevalence and association with APOE genotype and suicide risk. J Alzheimers Dis 72: 641–52. doi:10.3233/JAD-190196

96.

Zhang

Arteaga

Cashion

Chen

Gangadharmath

Gomez

, and others. 2012. A highly selective and specific PET tracer for imaging of tau pathologies. J Alzheimers Dis 31:601–12. doi:10.3233/JAD-2012-120712

97.

Zwan

Bouwman

Konijnenberg

van der Flier

Lammertsma

Verhey

FRJ

, and others. 2017. Diagnostic impact of [18F]flutemetamol PET in early-onset dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther 9:2. doi:10.1186/s13195-016-0228-4

Alzheimer’s Dementia: The Emerging Role of Positron Emission Tomography

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

FDG-PET Imaging in AD

Amyloid PET Imaging in AD

Tau PET Imaging in AD

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References