Noisy stimuli may hold the key for optimal electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Possible mechanisms of noise’s impact upon neuronal function are discussed, including intracellular, extracellular, and systems-level mechanisms. Specifically, channel resonance, stochastic resonance, high conductance states, and network binding are investigated. These mechanisms are examined and possible directions of growth for the field are discussed, with examples of applications provided from the fields of deep brain stimulation or spinal cord injury. Together, this review highlights the theoretical basis and evidence base for the use of noise to enhance current stimulation paradigms of the nervous system.
AhlssarESosnikRHaldariluS. 2000. Transformation from temporal to rate coding in a somatosensory thalamocortical pathway. Nature406(6793):302–6. doi:10.1038/35018568
2.
AiharaTKitajoKNozakiDYamamotoY. 2010. How does stochastic resonance work within the human brain? Psychophysics of internal and external noise. Chem Phys375(2–3):616–24. doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.04.027
3.
AlaburdaA. 2005. Periodic high-conductance states in spinal neurons during scratch-like network activity in adult turtles. J Neurosci25(27):6316–21. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0843-05.2005. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0843-05.2005
4.
AshleyEALaskinJJOlenikLMBurnhamRSteadwardRDCummingDWheelerGD. 1993. Evidence of autonomic dysreflexia during functional electrical stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia31(9):593–605. doi:10.1038/sc.1993.95
5.
Babona-PiliposRPritchard-OhAPopovicMRMorsheadCM. 2015. Biphasic monopolar electrical stimulation induces rapid and directed galvanotaxis in adult subependymal neural precursors. Stem Cell Res Ther6(1):67. doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0049-6
6.
BaharSMossF. 2004. Stochastic resonance and synchronization in the crayfish caudal photoreceptor. Math Biosci188(1):81–97. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2003.09.004
7.
BédardCKrögerHDestexheA. 2006. Model of low-pass filtering of local field potentials in brain tissue. Phys Rev73(5):1–15. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.051911
8.
BenabidALWallaceBMitrofanisJXiaCPiallatBFraixV, and others. 2005. Therapeutic electrical stimulation of the central nervous system. C R Biol328(2):177–86. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2004.10.011
9.
BergR. 2017. Neuronal population activity in spinal motor circuits: greater than the sum of its parts. Front Neural Circuits11(103):1–8.
10.
BerryMJWarlandtDKMeisterM. 2018. The structure and precision of retinal spike trains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A94(10):5411–6.
11.
Borg-GrahamLJMonierCFreY. 1998. Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature7603(1979):619–23.
12.
BrookesMJGroomMJLiuzziLHillRMSmithHJFBrileyPM, and others. 2018. Altered temporal stability in dynamic neural networks underlies connectivity changes in neurodevelopment. Neuroimage174:563–75. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.008
13.
BryantBYHLSegundoJP. 1976. Spike initiation by transmembrane current: a white-noise analysis. J Physiol260:279–314.
14.
BuračasGTZadorAMDeWeeseMRAlbrightTD. 1998. Efficient discrimination of temporal patterns by motion-sensitive neurons in primate visual cortex. Neuron20(5):959–69. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80477-8
15.
ChaisanguanthumKSJoshuaMMedinaJFBialekWLisbergerSG. 2014. The neural code for motor control in the cerebellum and oculomotor brainstem. eNeuro. 1(1):1–16. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0004-14.2014. Available from: http://eneuro.sfn.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/ENEURO.0004-14.2014
16.
ChrobokLPalus-ChramiecKJeczmien-LazurJSBlasiakTLewandowskiMH. 2019. Gamma and infra-slow oscillations shape neuronal firing in the rat subcortical visual system. J Physiol128:31–9. doi:10.1113/JP275563
17.
ClarkeARobertsBMRanganathC. 2017. Neural oscillations during conditional associative learning. Neuroimage174:485–93. doi:10.1101/198838
CordoPInglisJTVerschuerenSCollinsJJMerfeldDMRosenblumS, and others. 1996. Noise in human muscle spindles. Nature383(6603):769–70. doi:10.1038/383769a0
20.
DooseJDoronGBrechtMLindnerB. 2016. Noisy juxtacellular stimulation in vivo leads to reliable spiking and reveals high-frequency coding in single neurons. J Neurosci36(43):11120–32. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0787-16.2016. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0787-16.2016
DoseFMenossoRTaccolaG. 2013. Rat locomotor spinal circuits in vitro are activated by electrical stimulation with noisy waveforms sampled from human gait. Physiol Rep1(2):e00025. doi:10.1002/phy2.25
23.
DoseFTaccolaG. 2012. Coapplication of noisy patterned electrical stimuli and NMDA plus serotonin facilitates fictive locomotion in the rat spinal cord. J Neurophysiol108(11):2977–90. doi:10.1152/jn.00554.2012. Available from: http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/doi/10.1152/jn.00554.2012
24.
DoseFTaccolaG. 2016. Two distinct stimulus frequencies delivered simultaneously at low intensity generate robust locomotor patterns. Neuromodulation19(6):563–75. doi:10.1111/ner.12402
25.
DoseFZanonPCoslovichTTaccolaG. 2014. Nanomolar oxytocin synergizes with weak electrical afferent stimulation to activate the locomotor CPG of the rat spinal cord in vitro. PLoS One9(3):e92967. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092967
26.
EapenBCMurphyDPCifuDX. 2017. Neuroprosthetics in amputee and brain injury rehabilitation. Exp Neurol287:479–85. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.08.004
27.
EckleVSGrasshoffCMirakajVO’NeillPMBerryNGLeuwerM, and others. 2014. 4-Bromopropofol decreases action potential generation in spinal neurons by inducing a glycine receptor-mediated tonic conductance. Br J Pharmacol171(24):5790–801. doi:10.1111/bph.12880
28.
EldridgeCFMainenZFSejnowskiTJ. 1995. Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. Science268:1503–5.
29.
EschmannKCJBaderRMecklingerA. 2018. Topographical differences of frontal-midline theta activity reflect functional differences in cognitive control abilities. Brain Cogn123:57–64. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2018.02.002
30.
FaisalAASelenLPJWolpertDM. 2008. Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci9(4):292–303. doi:10.1038/nrn2258
FarmerSF. 1998. Rhythmicity, synchronization and binding in human and primate motor systems. J Physiol509(1):3–14. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.003bo.x
33.
FellousJMHouwelingARModiRHRaoRPTiesingaPHSejnowskiTJ. 2001. Frequency dependence of spike timing reliability in cortical pyramidal cells and interneurons. J Neurophysiol85(4):1782–7.
34.
FernandezFBroicherTTruongAWhiteJ. 2011. Membrane voltage fluctuations reduce spike frequency adaptation and preserve output gain in CA1 pyramidal neurons in a high conductance state. J Neurosci31(10):3880–93. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1256.Functional
35.
FrigonAGossardJP. 2010. Evidence for specialized rhythm-generating mechanisms in the adult mammalian spinal cord. J Neurosci30(20):7061–71. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0450-10.2010. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0450-10.2010
36.
Garcia-RillEMahaffeySHydeJRUrbanoFJ. 2018. Bottom-up gamma maintenance in various disorders. Neurobiol Dis128:31–9. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2018.01.010
GluckmanBJNetoffTINeelEJDittoWLSpanoMLSchiffSJ. 1996. Stochastic resonance in a neuronal network from mammalian brain. Phys Rev Lett77(19):4098–101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4098
39.
GrayCMKönigPEngelAKSingerW. 1989. Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature338(6213):334–7. doi:10.1038/338334a0
40.
GrayCMSingerW. 1989. Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A86(5):1698–702. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.5.1698
41.
GrillWM. 2018. Temporal pattern of electrical stimulation is a new dimension of therapeutic innovation. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 8:1–6.
42.
GutfreundYYaromYSegevI. 1995. Subthreshold oscillations and resonant frequency in guinea-pig cortical neurons: physiology and modelling. J Physiol483(3):621–40. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020611
43.
GuzulaitisRHounsgaardJAlaburdaA. 2016. Irregular firing and high-conductance states in spinal motoneurons during scratching and swimming. J Neurosci36(21):5799–807. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0320-16.2016. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0320-16.2016.
44.
HamaniCMcAndrewsMPCohnMOhMZumstegDShapiroCM, and others. 2008. Memory enhancement induced by hypothalamic/fornix deep brain stimulation. Ann Neurol63(1):119–23. doi:10.1002/ana.21295
45.
HänggiP. 2002. Stochastic resonance in biology: how noise can enhance detection of weak signals and help improve biological information processing. ChemPhysChem3(3):285–90. doi:10.1002/1439-7641(20020315)3:3<285::AID-CPHC285>3.0.CO;2-A
46.
HarschARobinsonHP. 2000. Postsynaptic variability of firing in rat cortical neurons: the roles of input synchronization and synaptic NMDA receptor conductance. J Neurosci20(16):6181–92. doi:20/16/6181
47.
HerikstadRBakerJLachauxJPGrayCMYenSC. 2011. Natural movies evoke spike trains with low spike time variability in cat primary visual cortex. Neuroscience31(44):15844–60. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5153-10.2011. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5153-10.2011
48.
HolinskiBMazurekKEveraertDToossiALucas-OsmaATroykP, and others. 2016. Intraspinal microstimulation produces over-ground walking in anesthetized cats. J Neural Eng13(4):1–17.
49.
HouwelingARBrechtM. 2008. Behavioural report of single neuron stimulation in somatosensory cortex. Nature451(7174):65–8. doi:10.1038/nature06447
HunterJDMiltonJGThomasPJCowanJD. 1998. Resonance effect for neural spike time reliability. J Neurophysiol80(3):1427–38.
52.
KennedyAWayneGKaifoshPAlviñaKAbbottLFSawtellNB. 2014. A temporal basis for predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands in an electric fish. Nat Neurosci17(3):416–22. doi:10.1038/nn.3650
53.
KhaindravaVSalinPMelonCUgrumovMKerkerian-Le-GoffLDaszutaA. 2011. High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus impacts adult neurogenesis in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis42(3):284–91. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.018
54.
LlinasRRGraceAAYaromY. 1991. In vitro neurons in mammalian cortical layer 4 exhibit intrinsic oscillatory activity in the 10- to 50-Hz frequency range. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A88(3):897–901. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.3.897
ManetteOFLMaierMA. 2004. Temporal processing in primate motor control: Relation between cortical and EMG activity. IEEE Trans Neural Networks15(5):1260–7. doi:10.1109/TNN.2004.833127
57.
ManjarrezEDiez-MartínezOMéndezIFloresA. 2002. Stochastic resonance in human electroencephalographic activity elicited by mechanical tactile stimuli. Neurosci Lett324(3):213–6. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00212-4
58.
ManjarrezERojas-PiloniGMéndezIFloresA. 2003. Stochastic resonance within the somatosensory system: effects of noise on evoked field potentials elicited by tactile stimuli. J Neurosci23(6):1997–2001.
59.
MarderEBucherD. 2001. Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements. Curr Biol11(23):986–96. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00581-4
60.
MarkowitzDACollmanFBrodyCDHopfieldJJTankDW. 2008. Rate-specific synchrony: using noisy oscillations to detect equally active neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A105(24):8422–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803183105. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0803183105
61.
MartinezLPerezTMirassoCRManjarrezE. 2007. Stochastic resonance in the motor system: effects of noise on the monosynaptic reflex pathway of the cat spinal cord. J Neurophysiol97(6):4007–16. doi:10.1152/jn.01164.2006. Available from: http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/doi/10.1152/jn.01164.2006
62.
McCreeryDBAgnewWFYuenTGBullaraLA. 1988. Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng16(5):463–81. doi:10.1007/BF02368010
63.
McCreeryDBAgnewWFYuenTGHBullaraL. 1990. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng37(10):996–1001. doi:10.1109/10.102812
64.
MillerJPSweetJABaileyCMMunyonCNLudersHOFastenauPS. 2015. Visual-spatial memory may be enhanced with theta burst deep brain stimulation of the fornix: a preliminary investigation with four cases. Brain138(7):1833–42. doi:10.1093/brain/awv095
65.
MunozDPPelissonDGuittonD. 1991. Movement of neural activity on the superior colliculus motor map during gaze shifts. Science251:1358–60. doi:10.1126/science.2003221
66.
NishimuraYMorichikaYIsaT. 2009. A subcortical oscillatory network contributes to recovery of hand dexterity after spinal cord injury. Brain132(3):709–21. doi:10.1093/brain/awn338
67.
PanzeriSPetersenRSSchultzSRLebedevMADiamondME. 2002. Coding of stimulus location by spike timing in rat somatosensory cortex. Neurocomputing44:573–8. doi:10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00428-9
68.
PanzeriSSchultzSR. 2001. A unified approach to the study of temporal, correlational, and rate coding. Neural Comput13(6):1311–49. doi:10.1162/08997660152002870
69.
PareDShinkEGaudreauNEDestexheALangEJ. 1998. Impact of spontaneous synaptic activity on the resting properties of cat neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol79(3):1450–60.
70.
ParkisMAFeldmanJLRobinsonDMFunkGD. 2003. Oscillations in endogenous inputs to neurons affect excitability and signal processing. J Neurosci23(22):8152–8.
71.
PrescottSASejnowskiTJ. 2008. Spike-rate coding and spike-time coding are affected oppositely by different adaptation mechanisms. J Neurosci28(50):13649–61. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1792-08.2008. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1792-08.2008
72.
RizzoMKocsisJWaxmanS. 1994. Slow sodium conductances of dorsal root ganglion neurons: intraneuronal homogeneity and interneuronal heterogeneity. J Neurophysiol72(6):2796–816.
73.
RoachJPPiddeAKatzEWuJOgnjanovskiNAtonSJ, and others. 2018. Resonance with subthreshold oscillatory drive organizes activity and optimizes learning in neural networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A115(13):201716933. doi:10.1073/pnas.1716933115. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1716933115
74.
RobsonETweedyCManzanzaNTaylorJPAtkinsonPRandallF, and others. 2018. Impaired fast network oscillations and mitochondrial dysfunction in a mouse model of alpha-synucleinopathy (A30P). Neuroscience377:161–73. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.02.032
75.
RowlandNSammartinoFTomasyzyczykJLozanoA. 2016. Deep brain stimulation of the fornix: engaging therapeutic circuits and networks in Alzheimer disease. Neurosurgery63(Suppl. 1):1–5.
76.
SankarTChakravartyMMBescosALaraMObuchiTLaxtonAW, and others. 2015. Deep brain stimulation influences brain structure in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimul8(3):645–54. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.020
77.
SchalowGBlancYJeltschWZächGA. 1996. Electromyographic identification of spinal oscillator patterns and recouplings in a patient with incomplete spinal cord lesion: oscillator formation training as a method to improve motor activities. Gen Physiol Biophys15(Suppl. 1):121–220.
78.
SchneidmanEFreedmanBSegevI. 1998. Ion channel stochasticity may be critical in determining the reliability and precision of spike timing. Neural Comput10(7):1679–703. doi:10.1162/089976698300017089
79.
SchreiberS. 2003. Influence of ionic conductances on spike timing reliability of cortical neurons for suprathreshold rhythmic inputs. J Neurophysiol91(1):194–205. doi:10.1152/jn.00556.2003. Available from: http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/doi/10.1152/jn.00556.2003
80.
SoberSSponbergSNemenmanITingL. 2018. Millisecond spike timing codes for motor control. Trends Neurosci41(10):644–8.
81.
SongWMartinJH. 2017. Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord. J Neurophysiol117(3):1143–55. doi:10.1152/jn.00584.2016
82.
SparksDLGandhiNJ. 2003. Single cell signals: an oculomotor perspective. Prog Brain Res142:35–53. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(03)42005-0
83.
SrivastavaKHHolmesCMVellemaMPackARElemansCPHNemenmanI, and others. 2017. Motor control by precisely timed spike patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A114(5):1171–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1611734114. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1611734114
84.
StaceyWCDurandDM. 2000. Stochastic resonance improves signal detection in hippocampal CA1 neurons. J Neurophysiol83(3):1394–402.
85.
StaceyWCDurandDM. 2001. Synaptic noise improves detection of subthreshold signals in hippocampal CA1 neurons. J Neurophysiol86:1104–12. doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1104
StopferMBhagavanSSmithBHLaurentG. 1997. Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature390(6655):70–4. doi:10.1038/36335
88.
TaccolaG. 2011. The locomotor central pattern generator of the rat spinal cord in vitro is optimally activated by noisy dorsal root waveforms. J Neurophysiol106(2):872–84. doi:10.1152/jn.00170.2011. Available from: http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/doi/10.1152/jn.00170.2011
89.
TepavacDSchwirtlichL. 1997. Detection and prediction of FES-induced fatigue. J Electromyogr Kinesiol7(1):39–50. doi:10.1016/S1050-6411(96)00008-9
90.
TeradaSSakuraiYNakaharaHFujisawaS. 2017. Temporal and rate coding for discrete event sequences in the hippocampus. Neuron94(6):1248-1262.e4. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.024
91.
TolhurstDMovshonJADeanA. 1983. The statistical reliability of single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision Res23:775–85.
92.
ToupsJVFellousJThomasPJSejnowskiTJTiesingaPH. 2012. Multiple spike time patterns occur at bifurcation points of membrane potential dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol8(10):1–19. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002615
93.
TurkerKSPowersRK. 1999. Effects of large excitatory and inhibitory inputs on motoneuron discharge rate and probability. J Neurophysiol82(2):829–40.
94.
van RossumMCWO’BrienBJSmithRG. 2003. Effects of noise on the spike timing precision of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol89(5):2406–19. doi:10.1152/jn.01106.2002
95.
van RullenRThorpeSJ. 2001. Rate coding versus temporal order coding: what the retinal ganglion cells tell the visual cortex. Neural Comput13(6):1255–83. doi:10.1162/08997660152002852
96.
Vázquez-RodríguezBAvena-KoenigsbergerASpornsOGriffaAHagmannPLarraldeH. 2017. Stochastic resonance at criticality in a network model of the human cortex. Sci Rep7(1):1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13400-5
97.
WatanabeRNKohnAF. 2015. Fast oscillatory commands from the motor cortex can be decoded by the spinal cord for force control. J Neurosci35(40):13687–97. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1950-15.2015. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/lookup/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1950-15.2015
98.
WeitzAJFangZLeeHJFisherRSSmithWCChoyMK, and others. 2015. Optogenetic fMRI reveals distinct, frequency-dependent networks recruited by dorsal and intermediate hippocampus stimulations. Neuroimage107:229–41. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.039
99.
WhiteJAKlinkRAlonsoAKayAR. 1998. Noise from voltage-gated ion channels may influence neuronal dynamics in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol80(1):262–9. doi:10.1038/342175a0
100.
WiesenfeldKMossF. 1995. Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and squids. Nature373(6509):33–6. doi:10.1038/373033a0
101.
WilanowskiGPiotrkiewiczM. 2012. Is spike frequency adaptation an artefact? Insight from human studies. Front Cell Neurosci6:1–4. doi:10.3389/fncel.2012.00050
102.
WoodSJSlaterC. 2001. Safety factor at the neuromuscular junction. Prog Neurobiol64(4):393–429. doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00055-1
103.
ZhaoHSteigerANohnerMYeH. 2015. Specific intensity direct current (DC) electric field improves neural stem cell migration and enhances differentiation towards βIII-tubulin+ neurons. PLoS One10(6):e0129625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129625
