Mouse transgenic and knock-out approaches have made fundamental contributions to our understanding of the molecular and cellular bases of learning and memory. These approaches have successfully identified a large number of molecules with either a central or modulatory role in learning and memory. However, there are limitations associated with first-generation mutant mice, which include, for example, the lack of temporal control over the mutation. Recent technical developments have started to address some of these shortcomings. Here, the authors review a newly developed inducible approach that takes advantage of synergistic interactions between subthreshold genetic and pharmacological manipulations. This approach is easily set up and can be used to study the functional interactions between molecules in signaling pathways. NEUROSCIENTIST 9(2): 104–109, 2003.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams JP, Sweatt JD. 2002. Molecular psychology: roles for the ERK MAP kinase cascade in memory. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol42: 135–63.
2.
Berman DE, Dudai Y. 2001. Memory extinction, learning anew, and learning the new: dissociations in the molecular machinery of learning in cortex. Science291: 2417–9.
3.
Brambilla R, Gnesutta N, Minichiello L, White G, Roylance AJ, Herron CE, and others. 1997. A role for the Ras signalling pathway in synaptic transmission and long-term memory. Nature390: 281–6.
4.
Cho YH, Giese KP, Tanila H, Silva AJ, Eichenbaum H. 1998. Abnormal hippocampal spatial representations in alphaCaMKIIT286A and CREBalphaDelta-mice. Science279: 867–9.
5.
Costa RM, Yang T, Huynh DP, Pulst SM, Viskochil DH, Silva AJ, and others. 2001. Learning deficits, but normal development and tumor predisposition, in mice lacking exon 23a of Nf1. Nature Genetics27: 399–405.
6.
Cullen PJ, Lockyer PJ. 2002. Integration of calcium and Ras signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol3: 339–48.
7.
Dudai Y. 2002. Molecular bases of long-term memories: a question of persistence. Curr Opin Neurobiol12: 211–6.
8.
Elgersma Y, Silva AJ. 1999. Molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol9: 209–13.
9.
Fanselow MS. 2000. Contextual fear, gestalt memories, and the hippocampus. Behav Brain Res110: 73–81.
10.
Feil R, Brocard J, Mascrez B, LeMeur M, Metzger D, Chambon P. 1996. Ligand-activated site specific recombination in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA93: 10887–90.
11.
Fink CC, Meyer T. 2002. Molecular mechanisms of CaMKII activation in neuronal plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol12: 293–9.
12.
Giese KP, Fedorov NB, Filipkowski RK, Silva AJ. 1998. Autophosphorylation at Thr286 of the a calcium-calmodulin kinase II in LTP and learning. Science279: 870–3.
13.
Giese KP, Friedman E, Telliez JB, Fedorov NB, Wines M, Feig LA, and others. 2001. Hippocampus-dependent learning and memory is impaired in mice lacking the Ras-guanine-nucleotide releasing factor 1 (Ras-GRF1). Neuropharmacology41: 791–800.
14.
Kida S, Josselyn S, Ortiz S, Kogan J, Chevere I, Masushige S, and others. 2002. CREB required for the stability of new and reactivated fear memories. Nature Neuroscience5: 348–55.
15.
Lisman J, Schulman H, Cline H. 2002. The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory. Nat Rev Neurosci3: 175–90.
Lowes VL, Ip NY, Wong YH. 2002. Integration of signals from receptor tyrosine kinases and g protein-coupled receptors. Neurosignals11: 5–19.
18.
Mansuy IM, Winder DG, Moallem TM, Osman M, Mayford M, Hawkins RD, and others. 1998. Inducible and reversible gene expression with the rtTA system for the study of memory. Neuron21: 257–65.
19.
Mayford M, Bach ME, Huang YY, Wang L, Hawkins RD, Kandel ER. 1996. Control of memory formation through regulated expression of a CaMKII transgene. Science274: 1678–83.
20.
Mayford M, Kandel ER. 1999. Genetic approaches to memory storage. Trends Genet15: 463–70.
21.
Nader K, Schafe GE, Le Doux JE. 2000. Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature (London) 406: 722–6.
22.
Ohno M, Frankland PW, Chen AP, Costa RM, Silva AJ. 2001. Inducible, pharmacogenetic approaches to the study of learning and memory. Nat Neurosci4: 1238–43.
23.
Ohno M, Frankland PW, Silva AJ. 2002. A pharmacogenetic inducible approach to the study of NMDA/alphaCaMKII signaling in synaptic plasticity. Current Biology12: 654–6.
24.
Otmakhov N, Griffith LC, Lisman JE. 1997. Postsynaptic inhibitors of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II block induction but not maintenance of pairing-induced long-term potentiation. J Neurosci17: 5357–65.
25.
Roses AD. 2000. Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine. Nature405: 857–65.
Silva AJ, Frankland PW, Marowitz Z, Friedmann E, Lazlo G, Cioffi D, and others. 1997. A mouse model for the learning and memory deficits associated with neurofibromatosis type I. Nature Genetics15: 281–4.
28.
Silva AJ, Paylor R, Wehner JM, Tonegawa S. 1992a. Impaired spatial learning in alpha-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice. Science257: 206–11.
29.
Silva AJ, Wang Y, Paylor R, Wehner JM, Stevens CF, Tonegawa S. 1992b. Alpha calcium/calmodulin kinase II mutant mice: deficient long-term potentiation and impaired spatial learning. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol57: 527–39.
30.
Sweatt JD. 2001. The neuronal MAP kinase cascade: a biochemical signal integration system subserving synaptic plasticity and memory. J Neurochem76: 1–10.
Villarreal DM, Do V, Haddad E, Derrick BE. 2002. NMDA receptor antagonists sustain LTP and spatial memory: active processes mediate LTP decay. Nat Neurosci5: 48–52.
