Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Among the three primary gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer has the lowest incidence but the worst prognosis. Because of the poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients treated with existing treatments, immunotherapy is emerging as a potentially ideal alternative to surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Among immunotherapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been the most thoroughly studied, and many drugs have been successfully used in the clinic. CD47, a novel immune checkpoint, provides insights into ovarian cancer immunotherapy. This review highlights the mechanisms of tumor immune evasion via CD47-mediated inhibition of phagocytosis and provides a comprehensive insight into the progress of the relevant targeted agents in ovarian cancer.

Keywords

ovarian cancer immunotherapy CD47 immune checkpoint immune checkpoint inhibitors

Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the deadliest female malignancies, with the lowest incidence but the worst prognosis among all gynecological malignancies. According to clinical guidelines and expert consensus, cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for most patients with OC.¹ Related clinical symptoms are relieved under this standard treatment; however, OC is prone to recurrence and drug resistance, resulting in a five-year survival rate of less than 50%.² Despite significant progress in surgical techniques and drug therapies, the survival of patients with advanced OC has not improved. Therefore, there is an urgent need to get OC out of therapeutic dilemmas.³

Growing evidence has demonstrated that malignancy is a heterogeneous disease with immunogenicity, and its occurrence, development, and metastasis rely on immune suppression.⁴ Immunotherapy targeting immunogenicity is a hotspot of anti-tumor therapies and has been successfully used in clinics as a novel anti-tumor option after traditional treatments (e.g., surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy).⁵ Along with the discovery of immune checkpoints (ICs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the focus of research in tumor immunotherapy.^6–8 ICIs restore self-clearing and monitor the function of the immune system by blocking inhibitory signals. Various ICIs have shown anti-tumor activity in preclinical models, and some have been successfully used in clinics.^6–11 Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors have been the most successful and widely used ICIs.¹² Nevertheless, new ICIs are continuously being identified and developed.

The known ICIs primarily act on the adaptive immune system. However, only 10%-30% of patients with OC show long-term and durable responses, followed by acquired resistance, which remains a substantial dilemma.^7,12–14 CD47 has been identified as the first innate IC, restoring macrophages phagocytosis by blocking the “don’t eat me” signal.^15,16 CD47 is a promising therapeutic target to provide insights into new treatment options for patients with OC.

The Development of ICIs

Adaptive ICs

T cells mediated adaptive immune dominates in anti-tumor reaction.^5,14 Both the primary signals produced by the interaction between the major histocompatibility complex and T cells receptor (TCR) and the secondary signals offered by the co-stimulatory molecules are necessary to elicit intact T cell responses.¹⁴ Functioning as the assistant of T cell activation and proliferation, co-stimulatory molecules are also essential regulators of humoral immunity and cytokine production.¹⁷ However, increasing evidence has shown that some members, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), PD-L1, PD-L2, PD-1 homolog, and B7-H3, also provide critical inhibitory secondary signals.¹⁸ These inhibitory signals act as a “brake” to protect normal cells from the excessive T cells’ attack by attenuating T cell response.^18,19 Conversely, multiple tumors suppress anti-tumor immune responses and evade immune attacks by overexpressing these molecules.⁷

These brake-like molecules and related inhibitors have been dubbed as ICs and ICIs in cancer immunotherapy because of the satisfactory anti-tumor effects of targeting CTLA-4. 14,20,21 Mechanically, the increased anti-tumor effects appear to be the result of the simultaneous enhancement of effector T cell function and concurrent inhibition of Treg activity. In 2011, the FDA (the Food and Drug Administration) authorized the first ICI, Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Notably, subsequent approvals of Ipilimumab for the treatment of other malignancies have involved its use with the PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs.^22–24 PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are the most successful ICIs, which primarily act in the adaptive immune system to trigger tumor-specific T cells responses.²⁵ PD-L1 overexpresses on various human tumors and induces the phosphorylation ordephosphorylation process of intracellular signaling pathways when it binds to PD-1.^26–29 These signaling cascades suppress T cell proliferation, activation, and cytokine production, inhibiting the anti-tumor immune responses and promoting tumor growth.^9,13 Various anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs have been shown to have effective anti-tumor activities in, for example, melanoma, lung cancer, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL).^29–32 Multifarious PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, for example, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, and Nivolumab, have been approved worldwide for various malignancies.^33,34

Despite their proven efficacy, only 10%-30% of patients with solid tumors receiving PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 ICIs show long-term, durable responses, and the remainder mostly do not respond. This result is true in OC.^35–37 How to overcome acquired resistance in the development of ICIs is critical, prompting us to explore new targets in tumor immunotherapy to solve this predicament.

Innate ICs

The immune system consists of the innate and adaptive immune systems, both of which must be activated simultaneously to obtain sufficient anti-tumor effects.³⁸ CTLA-4 and PD-L1 has garnered considerable attention, which mainly acts on adaptive immunity, but the impact of innate immunity is ignored. In innate immune responses, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) present antigens after phagocytes take up tumor-specific antigens; NK cells directly kill tumor cells, or APCs trigger an adaptive immune response to participate in anti-tumor responses by presenting antigens to T cells.³⁹ Brake-like molecules are also found during the innate immune response.

CD47 is the first identified innate IC,⁴⁰ and Oldenborg described its anti-phagocytic effect by observing the rapid clearance of erythrocytes from CD47^−/− mice injected into wild-type mice, but macrophage depletion removed this effect.⁴¹ Van Buerger found that macrophages rapidly cleared senescent erythrocytes with reduced CD47 expression.⁴² Notably, CD47 has become a research hotspot since the revelation of its innate IC identity.

Biological Characteristics and Function of CD47

CD47 is a 50-kDa highly glycosylated-transmembrane immunoglobulin⁴³ possessing an extracellular IgV-like domain at the N-terminal, five highly hydrophobic membrane-spanning regions, and a short intracellular tail at the C-terminal, ubiquitously expressing on various normal cells.^44,45 The known ligands of CD47 include integrin,⁴⁰ thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα), SIRPγ.^16,45 Integrin or TSP-1 binding to CD47 is involved in cell adhesion, migration, aging, angiogenesis, platelet activation, and other biological functions.^45–51 Additionally, the connection of TSP-1 and CD47 inhibits anti-tumor immunity by regulating the immune system.^49,52 On the one hand, TSP-1/CD47-dependent signaling inhibits T cell function via limiting TCR-mediated first signal transduction and blocking H₂S-mediated T cell activation.^50,53 On the other hand, TSP-1 reduces macrophage activation by limiting lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-1β expression and total protein production in macrophages.⁵¹ Notably, mice myeloid macrophages without TSP1 or CD47 showed the reduced induction of mature IL-1β of lipopolysaccharide.^49,54 Simultaneously, decreased macrophage infiltration was observed in the absence of TSP-1.⁵⁵ Moreover, TSP-1 was initially identified as an angiogenesis inhibitor to suppress tumor growth by limiting angiogenesis and perfusion in the tumor vasculature.^56,57 Perhaps the bi-phasic effects of TSP-1 in cancers that therapies targeting TSP-1/CD47 have not progressed from preclinical studies into human trials.

SIRPα is the most researched ligand of CD47, which is mainly restricted to its expression on myeloid cells.^46,47,58,59 SIRPα consists of three immunoglobulin-like extracellular domains, a transmembrane region, and a cytoplasmic domain containing four immunoreceptor tyrosine inhibitory motifs (ITIMs).⁵⁹ The interactions between CD47 and SIRPα on macrophages recruit Src homology-2 (SH2)-containing tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) and SHP-2, leading to the phosphorylation of ITIMs. These upstream signals prevent myosin-IIA accumulation to form phagocytic synapses, leading to phagocytosis inhibitions.^{45,47,59–61} (Figure 1) This phenomenon could further induce APCs cross-presentation and initiate adaptive immunity. In a sense, the CD47-SIRPα axis bridges innate and adaptive immunity.^11,62,63 Overall, CD47 sends a “don’t eat me” suppressant signal to maintain immune tolerance and avoid excessive phagocytosis.

Figure 1.

The CD47-SIRPα signal axis. The interaction between CD47 and SIRPα recruits SHP-1/2, leading to the phosphorylation of two tyrosine residues of ITIMs in the intracellular structural domain of SIRPα. Phosphorylation of SHP-1/2 prevents the accumulation of myosin-IIA, which forms phagocytic synapses, resulting in sending a “don’t eat me” signal. Blocking the CD47-SIRPa axis could restore phagocytosis. Abbreviations: SHP-1, Src homology 2 containing tyrosine phosphatase 1; SHP-2, Src homology 2 containing tyrosine phosphatase 2; ITIMs, immunoreceptor tyrosine inhibitory motifs.

CD47 Expression in OC and Its Possible Regulatory Mechanism

CD47 is overexpressed on OC cells and was identified as an OC tumor-specific marker in 1986.⁶³ Subsequently, diverse insights into its expression and regulation in OC have been proposed.

Regulatory factors, including Myc, NF-κB, and HIF-1, induce CD47 expression at the transcriptional level.^64–66 Myc oncogene has been confirmed to regulate CD47 and PD-L1 expression through direct joining to their promoters. CD47 and PD-L1 expression was decreased in a mouse xenograft tumor model with Myc suppression, and the anti-tumor immune response was enhanced. Conversely, the opposite phenomenon was observed with Myc activation.⁶⁴ HIF-1 binding to the promoter initiates transcription and increases CD47 expression, protecting breast cancer cells from phagocytosis.⁶⁵ Moreover, NF-κB directly connects with a super-enhancer near the CD47 gene to promote its expression upon stimulation by TNF-α in breast cancer.⁶⁷ Notably, the aforementioned transcriptional regulatory pathways must be further verified in OC models.

At the cellular level, the CD47 expression levels of exosomes in OC cells were observed to correlate with macrophage phagocytosis. Inhibition of exosome release and uptake can downregulate CD47 expression, increasing macrophage phagocytosis.⁶⁸ In general, the multifaceted regulatory mechanisms of CD47 expression imply diverse perspectives on CD47-targeted therapies.

Clinical Significance of Abnormal CD47 Expression in Patients With OC

Similar to various malignancies, CD47 high expression is associated with disease development and adverse clinical outcomes in OC.^38,46,69

In 2012, Weissman et al first observed that the expression level of CD47 mRNA is associated with prognosis in OC and other solid tumors. They revealed that CD47 expression in tumor tissues was more than three times that in the surrounding normal tissues. Further analysis demonstrated that high CD47 mRNA expression correlated with poorer progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in OC.⁴⁶ Another team found that CD47 overexpression enhanced growth and motility in TOV OC cell lines.⁷⁰ Wang et al not only observed high CD47 expression in 86 ovarian clear cell carcinomas by IHC but also confirmed that CD47 expression was correlated with surgical stage, drug resistance, and prognosis. Furthermore, it was an independent risk factor for prognosis.⁷¹ Subsequently, the same researchers proposed that CD47 comprised Lewis-y antigen, implicated in tumor cells adhesion, metastasis, and resistance. CD47 and Lewis-y were confirmed to be significantly highly expressed in OC, and their expressions were linearly correlated. High expression of CD47 and Lewis-y was statistically correlated with the FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, and differentiation degree.⁷² The effective component of CD47 was clarified in this study.

Opinions on the association between CD47 expression and prognosis differ. A retrospective exploratory analysis of 316 serous patients with OC in the Cancer Genome Atlas database showed no difference in disease-free survival and OS between patients with different CD47 expression levels. IHC was used on another 265 patient tumor samples to validate this conclusion. Upregulation of CD47 expression was observed in 48.7% of the patients, and the low-expression group showed better treatment responses. However, this result did not improve their prognosis, which might partially be explained by the presence of multiple immune evasion mechanisms in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) of OC.⁷³

A recent bioinformatics study offers several references to this confusion. The OC TME with CD47 overexpression in the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource database contained more M2 and Treg cell infiltration, promoting tumor cell immune escape. Additionally, the positive correlation between CD47 overexpression and T cell exhaustion further confirmed that CD47 might influence the infiltration abundance of immune cells in the TME to regulate OC biological behavior.⁷⁴

Mechanism of CD47-SIRPα Axis Targeted Therapy in OC

In 2009, Weissman et al observed the disappearance of AML cells in vitro and in xenografted mice with B6H12.2 (anti-human CD47 mAb). Surprisingly, the depletion of macrophages eliminated this phenomenon. It suggested that targeting the CD47-SIRPα axis eliminates tumors by restoring macrophage phagocytosis.⁷⁵ Anti-CD47/SIRPα mAbs and recombinant SIRPα-fusion proteins are thus considered promising immunotherapies based on these inspiring theories. These attractive immunotherapies may facilitate tumor clearance through the following pathways: (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Mechanisms of blocking CD47-SIRPα axis therapies in OC. First, blocking the CD47-SIRPα axis could clear tumor cells by restoring macrophage phagocytosis and promoting tumor-associated macrophages to differentiate toward the M1 subtype (upper right). Second, anti-CD47/SIRPα-blocking mAbs or SIRPα-fusion proteins could clear tumor cells through classical Fc-dependent mechanisms, including NK cell-mediated ADCC (lower left) and macrophage-mediated ADCP (upper right). Third, blocking the CD47-SIRPα axis might indirectly stimulate adaptive immunity by promoting DCs uptake by tumor cells and cross-presentation to CD8⁺ T cells (upper left). Fourth, blocking the CD47-SIRPα axis could directly clear tumor cells by caspase-independent apoptosis (lower right). Abbreviations: ADCC, antibody-dependent cytotoxicity; ADCP, antibody-dependent phagocytosis; DC, dendritic cells; M1, M1-like macrophages; M2, M2-like macrophages; NK cells, natural killer cells; OC, ovarian cancer.

First, anti-CD47/SIRPα-blocking mAbs restore macrophage-mediated phagocytosis by blocking the “don’t eat me” signal and non-blocking antibodies without such function. In xenotransplantation models, the exhaustion of clodronate-mediated phagocytes eliminated such mAbs-dependent anti-tumor effects, confirming that phagocytes as the primary effectors.^15,46,76 In this pathway, tumor-associated macrophages differentiate toward the M1-like phenotype, shifting immune-tolerant TME to attacking tumor cells.^46,77

Second, the balance between pro-phagocytic and anti-phagocytic signals determines phagocytosis. In other words, blocking the “don’t eat me” signal alone may be insufficient to gain effective anti-tumor effects.^62,78 Calreticulin (CRT), a dominant pro-phagocytic signal, highly expresses on various cancer cells’ surfaces, whereas barely on normal cells.^62,79 The Fc receptor is another pro-phagocytic molecule, which eliminates tumor cells through NK cells’ mediated antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC) and macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent phagocytosis (ADCP). Importantly, most anti-CD47/SIRPα mAbs or SIRPα fusion proteins contain an IgG (Fcγ) skeleton. The SIRPα-Fc fusion protein constructed by Huang et al. significantly enhanced ADCC and highlighted a potent anti-tumor effect in SK-OV3 and HO8910 OC cells.⁸⁰ Moreover, further research is necessary to clarify the roles of other pro-phagocytic molecules, including SLAMF and PtdSer, during the CD47-SIRPα axis blockade.^62,79

Third, inhibition of the CD47-SIRPα axis bridges innate and adaptive immunity. Weissman et al first observed that anti-CD47 antibody-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells promoted CD8⁺ T cell activation but inhibited CD4⁺ T cell initiation in vitro and in vivo.⁸¹ Furthermore, the interactions of CD47 with SIRPα suppress the biological behaviors of dendritic cells (DCs), such as maturation and cytokine production, resulting in the inhibition of T cell antigen presentation and adaptive immunity initiation.⁸² Blocking CD47-SIRPα can remove these inhibitory effects, enabling the cross-presentation of tumor antigens and activating adaptive immunity.^83,84

Fourth, direct induction of apoptosis is another mechanism, which has been observed in breast cancer, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and multiple myeloma (MM).^15,76,85,86 Notably, anti-CD47 antibodies mediated apoptosis via a caspase-independent pathway.⁸⁶

Clinical Drug Development Targeting CD47-SIRPα Axis in OC

Although no drugs targeting the CD47-SIRPα axis have been officially approved, related clinical trials have set off booms worldwide. As of August 29, 2022, 74 and 25 related clinical trials were registered in the United States National Clinical Trials Registry (NCT) system and China Drug Trials Registry (CDT) system, respectively. (Table 1) Additionally, we summarized and updated the latest clinical research involving OC. (Table 2)

Table 1.

Registered Clinical Trials of Drugs Blocking CD47-SIRPα Axis in the NCT and CDT System.

Agent	CD47 Isotype	Mechanism	Condition or Disease	Phase	Enrollment	Start Date	Status	Preliminary clinical data reported (Ref.)
B6H12.2	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Malignancies (include ovarian cancer)	Cell lines animal mode	NA	NA	NA	^{43,46,75,87–89}
Hu5F9-G4 (Magrolimab)	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Solid Tumor (includes fallopian tube and ovarian cancers)	1	88	2014-08	Completed	⁸⁹, NCT02216409⁹⁰
			AML/MDS	1	20	2015-12	Completed	NCT02678338⁹¹
			Solid Tumor	1	78	2016-12-01	Completed	NCT02953782
			NHL	1	178	2016-12-21	Active, not recruiting	NCT02953509
			Hematological Malignancies	1	258	2017-09-08	Active, not recruiting	NCT02678338
			Hematological Malignancies	1	258	2017-09-08	Active, not recruiting	NCT03248479
			OC	1	34	2018-05-23	Completed	NCT03558139
			NHL/DLBCL	1	30	2018-06-19	Completed	NCT03527147
			Urothelial Carcinoma	1b/2	645	2019-06-01	Recruiting	NCT03869190
			AML	1	13	2019-10-08	Terminated	NCT03922477
			Solid Tumor	1	7	2020-07-28	Completed	NCT04403308
			AML	1/2	98	2020-07-28	Recruiting	NCT04435691
			MDS	3	520	2020-09-09	Recruiting	NCT04313881
			T-cell Lymphoma	1b/2	18	2020-12-24	Suspended	NCT04541017
			Neuroblastoma/Osteosarcoma	1	82	2021-04-16	Recruiting	NCT04751383
			AML	3	346	2021-06-01	Recruiting	NCT04778397
			MM	2	128	2021-06-28	Recruiting	NCT04778410
			Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma	2	230	2021-09-07	Recruiting	NCT04854499
			Solid Tumor	2	116	2021-10-01	Recruiting	NCT04827576
			MM	2	153	2021-12-09	Recruiting	NCT04892446
			Triple-Negative Breast Cancer	2	144	2021-12-14	Recruiting	NCT04958785
			B-cell Malignancies	1	76	2021-12-16	Recruiting	NCT04599634
			HL	2	24	2022-06-21	Recruiting	NCT04788043
			AML	3	432	2022-07-07	Recruiting	NCT05079230
CC-90002	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Hematologic Neoplasms	1	60	2015-03-12	Completed	⁹², NCT02367196
CC-90002	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Hematologic Neoplasms	1	28	2016-03-01	Terminated	NCT02641002
TTI-621	IgG1	SIRPα-IgG1 Fc Fusion Protein	Hematologic Malignancies/Solid Tumor	1	250	2016-01-31	Active, not recruiting	^93,94, NCT02663518^95,96
			Solid Tumor/Mycosis Fungoides	1	56	2016-09	Terminated	⁹⁷, NCT02890368⁹⁸
			Leiomyosarcoma	2	80	2021-06-22	Recruiting	NCT04996004
			MM	1	32	2021-10-28	Recruiting	NCT05139225
TTI-622	IgG4	SIRPα-IgG4 Fc Fusion Protein	Hematological Malignancies	1	386	2018-07-07	Recruiting	⁹⁹, NCT03530683
			MM	1	32	2021-10-28	Recruiting	NCT05139225
			OC	1/2	50	2022-02-14	Recruiting	NCT05261490
ALX148 (Evorpacept)	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Solid Tumor/NHL	1	174	2017-02-03	Active, not recruiting	¹⁰⁰, NCT03013218¹⁰¹
			Higher Risk MDS	1/2	173	2020-10-02	Recruiting	NCT04417517
			Head and Neck Cancer	2	183	2021-04-02	Recruiting	NCT04675294
			AML	1/2	97	2021-05-05	Active, not recruiting	NCT04755244
			Head and Neck Cancer	2	168	2021-05-10	Recruiting	NCT04675333
			HER2⁺ Cancers	1/2	93	2021-09-15	Recruiting	NCT05027139
			B-cell NHL	1/2	52	2021-10-13	Recruiting	NCT05025800
			Gastric Cancer	2/3	450	2022-01-15	Recruiting	NCT05002127
Ti-061	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Malignancies	1	160	2017-04-05	Terminated	EudraCT number, 2016-004372-22¹⁰²
SRF231	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Solid/Hematologic Cancers	1	148	2018-03-13	Completed	¹⁰³, NCT03512340¹⁰⁴
SHR-1603	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Malignancies	1	128	2018-12-13	Suspended	¹⁰⁵, NCT03722186
IBI188	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Malignancies	1	49	2019-01-10	Completed	NCT03717103
			Advanced Malignancies	1	20	2019-01-19	Completed	NCT03763149
			MDS	1	32	2020-08-24	Suspended	NCT04511975
			AML	1/2	126	2020-09-25	Unknown	¹⁰⁶, NCT04485052
			MDS	1	12	2020-09-30	Recruiting	NCT04485065
			Solid Tumor	1	120	2021-05-25	Recruiting	NCT04861948
IBI322	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47/PD-L1 BsAb	Advanced Malignancies	1	218	2020-07-31	Recruiting	¹⁰⁷, NCT04328831
			Advanced Lymphomas	1	51	2021-01-14	Recruiting	NCT04338659
			Hematologic Malignancy	1	230	2021-05-07	Recruiting	NCT04795128
			Advanced Solid Tumor	1	36	2021-06-20	Recruiting	NCT04912466
			Myeloid Tumor	1	124	2021-12-31	Not yet recruiting	NCT05148442
			NSCLC	2	80	2022-07-20	Not yet recruiting	NCT05296278
			SCLC	2	40	2022-07-22	Not yet recruiting	NCT05296603
AO-176	IgG2	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Solid Tumor (includes epithelial ovarian carcinoma)	1/2	183	2019-02-04	Active, not recruiting	^108,109, NCT03834948¹¹⁰
AO-176	IgG2	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	MM	1/2	157	2020-12-30	Active, not recruiting	NCT04445701
TG-1801	IgG4	Humanized anti- CD47/CD19 BsAb	B-Cell Lymphoma	1	16	2019-03-05	Recruiting	NCT03804996
TG-1801	IgG4	Humanized anti- CD47/CD19 BsAb	B-Cell Lymphoma/CLL	1	60	2021-04-23	Recruiting	NCT04806035
TJ4 (TJ011133)	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Solid Tumor/Lymphoma	1	98	2019-04-16	Active, not recruiting	¹¹¹, NCT03934814¹¹²
			AML/MDS	1/2	100	2020-03-25	Recruiting	NCT04202003¹¹³
			AML/MDS	1	38	2021-06-25	Active, not recruiting	NCT04912063
			Advanced Solid Tumor	1/2	96	2021-12-30	Recruiting	NCT05148533
			MM	1	8	2022-01-17	Terminated	NCT04895410
BI 765063 (OSE-172)	IgG4	Humanized against SIRPα mAb	Solid Tumor	1	116	2019-4-16	Recruiting	NCT03990233
BI 765063 (OSE-172)	IgG4	Humanized against SIRPα mAb	Solid Tumor	1	18	2020-12-15	Completed	NCT04653142
HX009	IgG4	Humanized anti- CD47/PD-1 BsAb	Advanced Solid Tumor	1	21	2019-06-12	Active, not recruiting	NCT04097769
			Advanced Solid Tumor	2	210	2021-05-12	Active, not recruiting	NCT04886271
			Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma	1/2	99	2021-12-31	Recruiting	NCT05189093
IMM01	IgG1	SIRPα-IgG1 Fc Fusion Protein	Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma	1	30	2019-09-09	Recruiting	CTR20191531¹¹⁴
IMM01	IgG1	SIRPα-IgG1 Fc Fusion Protein	AML/MDS	1/2	76	2022-01-01	Not yet recruiting	NCT05140811
AK117	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Neoplasms Malignant	1	159	2020-04-25	Active, not recruiting	NCT04349969¹¹⁵
			Neoplasms Malignant	1	162	2021-01-27	Recruiting	NCT04728334
			MDS	1/2	190	2021-06-18	Recruiting	NCT04900350
			AML	1/2	160	2021-07	Recruiting	NCT04980885
			Triple-negative Breast Cancer	2	80	2022-03-23	Recruiting	NCT05227664
			Advanced Malignant Tumors	1/2	114	2022-05-04	Recruiting	NCT05229497
			Advanced Malignant Tumors	1/2	130	2022-07-12	Recruiting	NCT05235542
			Metastatic Colorectal Cancer	2	114	2022-07-27	Recruiting	NCT05382442
ZL-1201	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Cancer	1	37	2020-05-11	Active, not recruiting	NCT04257617
IMC-002	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Solid Tumor/Lymphoma	1	24	2020-06-05	Recruiting	NCT04306224
IMC-002	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Cancer	1	24	2022-05-10	Recruiting	NCT05276310
SL-172154	IgG4	Bispecific SIRPα-Fc-CD40L Fusion Protein	OC	1	40	2020-07-29	Recruiting	NCT04406623¹¹⁶
DSP107	IgG4	Humanized anti- CD47/4-1BB BsAb	Advanced Solid Tumor	1/2	100	2020-10-07	Recruiting	¹¹⁷, NCT04440735
DSP107	IgG4	Humanized anti- CD47/4-1BB BsAb	Hematological Malignancies	1	36	2022-01-31	Recruiting	NCT04937166
SHR2150	IgG4	Selective TLR7 Agonist	Solid Tumor	1/2	50	2020-10-10	Recruiting	¹¹⁸, NCT04588324
IMM0306	IgG1	Humanized anti- CD47/CD20 BsAb	B-cell NHL	1	90	2021-01-15	Recruiting	¹¹⁹, NCT04746131
PF-07257876	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47/PD-L1 BsAb	Selected Advanced Tumors (include OC)	1	90	2021-08-15	Recruiting	¹²⁰, NCT04881045
STI-6643	IgG4	Humanized anti-CD47 mAb	Advanced Solid Tumor	1	24	2021-12-21	Recruiting	NCT04900519

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CLL, chronic lymphatic leukemia; DLBCL, diffuse large B cell lymphoma; HL, Hodgkin's lymphoma; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; MM, multiple myeloma; NA, not available; NHL, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma; TLR7, Toll-like receptor 7.

The related references cited in Table 1 can be found in Anonymous Main Document. Some important ICIs in the table are written in bold.

Table 2.

Blocking CD47-SIRPα axis Applied in OC.

Treatment	Agent	Target	Model	Reference
Monotherapy	B6H12	CD47	SK-OV-3 OC Cell Lines	⁴⁶
	Anti-47 mAb	CD47	TOV-112D and TOV-21G EAOC Cell Lines	⁸⁷
	Anti-47 mAb	CD47	Ovarian CSCs	⁸⁷
	Hu5F9-G4	CD47	Ovarian/Fallopian Tube Cancer	^89,90
	BI 765063	SIRPα	OC	¹²¹
	AO-176	CD47	Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma	^108–110
Combined with Tumor-targeting Antibodies/Adaptive ICIs	Hu5F9-G4 + Avelumab (PD-L1)	CD47+PD-L1	Platinum-resistant/Refractory OC	¹²²
Bispecific Antibodies	PF-07257876	CD47+PD-L1	OC	NCT04881045
Bispecific Antibodies	SL-172154	SIRPα+CD40 L	OC	NCT04406623¹¹⁶
Other Combination Therapies	Anti-CD47 mAbs + Chemotherapy + Photodynamic Therapy	CD47	Ovarian carcinoma OVCAR-3 cell Lines	¹²³
	Dual CAR-T Cells	CD47+TAG-72	Ovarian carcinoma OVCAR-3 cell Lines	¹²⁴
	OV-αCD47	CD47	OC Cell Line A2780	¹²⁵
	TTI-662+ PLD	CD47	OC	NCT05261490

Abbreviations: CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T; OV, oncolytic virus; PLD, PEGylated liposomaldoxorubicin; TAG-72, tumor-associated glycoprotein 72.

The related references cited in Table 2 can be found in Anonymous Main Document.

Blocking CD47-SIRPα Axis Monotherapy

The research onanti-CD47 mAbs in OC started later than the research on AML, ALL, NHL, breast cancer, and bladder cancer, which may be related to its complex histological types and heterogeneities. In 2012, Weissman et al found that B6H12.2 and Bric126 effectively promoted human and mouse macrophage phagocytosis of SK-OV-3 OC cells in vitro, respectively. Furthermore, tumor growth suppression and significant survival improvement were demonstrated in xenotransplantation mice.⁴⁶ In 2017, Liu et al further observed increased macrophage infiltration abundance with B6H12.2 in xenograft OCs. In this study, OC stem cells (CSCs) were also found to highly express CD47, and robust phagocytosis of CSCs was induced with anti-CD47 mAbs. CSCs are known for their proliferation, recurrence, and resistance, suggesting that anti-CD47 mAbs may prevent and treat metastatic and recurrent OC.^87,126 Significant inhibition of tumor cell growth, migration, and invasion in TOV OC cell lines has been observed by applying CD47 shRNA and anti-CD47 mAbs.⁷⁰

BI 765063, a selective humanized-IgG4 mAb, blocks the CD47-SIRPα axis by antagonizing SIRPα. During a phase I study including nine advanced patients with OC, BI 765063 was well tolerated without reported dose-limited toxicities or hemotoxic adverse drug reactions and showed well-pharmacokinetics and efficacy (NCT04653142).¹²¹ Details are available on clinicaltrials.gov.

Blocking CD47-SIRPα Axis Therapy Combined With Tumor-Targeting Antibody

Blocking the CD47-SIRPα axis monotherapy has shown promising utilization, but the combination strategies of CD47-SIRPα inhibition may offer more therapeutic potential than that treatment.

The pro-phagocytic effects of CD47-SIRPα axis mAbs combined with the Fc-dependent effects (ADCC and ADCP) of tumor-targeting antibodies exert synergistic roles for maximum efficacy.^63,83 In 2010, Cao et al combined B6H12.2 with anti-CD20 mAb (rituximab) to eliminate lymphoma in mice engrafted with primary human NHL.⁸⁸ Hu5F9-G4 (Magrolimab), a humanized-IgG4 antibody, is the first CD47-targeting mAb with good clinical data to be tested in humans.⁹⁰ In a subsequent phase Ib trial, Magrolimab combined with rituximab showed promising activity and well-tolerated safety events in aggressive and indolent patients with NHL (NCT02953509).¹²⁷ Similarly, trastuzumab-mediated ADCP can significantly suppress ADCC-tolerant HER2⁺ breast cancer growth with the combination of anti-CD47 mAb.¹²⁸

In the absence of specific targets for OC, the combination of targeting PD1/PD-L1 therapies is the mainstream research in this field. Blocking the CD47-SIRPα axis has been shown to simultaneously restore macrophage phagocytosis and activate T cells, indicating that combinations of innate and adaptive ICIs may yield promising results.^64,81,129 In 2016, Weissman combined anti-CD47 mAb with anti-PD-L1 mAb to synergistically promote tumor cell phagocytosis in vitro, and tumor growth was suppressed in vivo, demonstrating the therapeutic synergy between innate and adaptive ICIs.¹³⁰ Subsequently, a complete phase 1b trial of Hu5F9-G4 combined with avelumab (PD-L1) showed a 56% stable disease rate in 18 platinum-resistant or refractory patients with OC, which facilitated further phase II trial evaluation (NCT03558139).¹²² AO-176 (NCT03834948),¹⁰⁸ TJ011133 (NCT03934814),¹¹³ and TTI-621 (NCT02663518)⁹⁶ in combination with various PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs are now in different trial stages.

Blocking CD47-SIRPα Axis With Bispecific Antibody

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have been developed based on combination therapy with targeting-tumor antibodies, which are expected to be more effective and precise. The BsAbs skeleton contains two binding arms, one arm blocks the CD47-SIRPα axis, and the other arm binds tumor-specific antigens, which ensures that BsAbs specifically kill cancer cells.

Majeti et al constructed a BsAb targeting CD47 and CD20 arms with less affinity for CD47 and more affinity for CD20 than the parental antibodies. Decreased tumor burden and prolonged survival in human NHL-engrafted mice were observed with BsAb; more importantly, less blood cell destruction occurred in the BsAb group than in the combination therapy group.¹¹⁹ IMM0306, the related agent, is in the recruitment stage (NCT04746131).

Similar to combination therapy, BsAbs were designed to co-target CD47/SIRPα and PD-1/PD-L1 in OC. PF-07257876, a dual checkpoint inhibiting BsAb, simultaneously blocks CD47 and PD-L1 to maximize anti-tumor immunity. The preferential targeting of tumor cells in the TME is attributed to its high affinity for PD-L1 and weak affinity for CD47. It can additionally activate DCs and macrophages and increase CD8⁺ T cells in the TME.¹¹⁹ In a phase I dose escalation and expansion study of PF-07257876, patients with OC tolerated the priming and subsequent dose (NCT04881045).

Other Combination Therapy

The strategy of anti-CD47/SIRPα monotherapy combined with chemotherapy relies on a pro-phagocytosis effect rather than an Fc-dependent effect. Almost all chemotherapies can cause inflammatory reactions and further increase macrophage infiltration in the TME.¹³¹ As aforementioned, CRT is an essential pro-phagocytic signal, and some chemotherapy drugs, such as anthracyclines, can induce additional CRT translocation to the cell surface, which might enhance the activity of anti-CD47 mAbs. Notably, normal cells also highly express CRT with these chemotherapies, suggesting that this strategy may increase toxicity.^60,78 Hongrapipat et al. found that the combination of chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy drugs with the Fab’ segment of anti-CD47 antibody might improve the reactivity of OC OVCAR-3 cells to drugs.¹²³

CAR-T cells have revolutionized anti-tumor therapy for hematological malignancies but have shown disappointing activity in most solid tumors.¹³² Shu et al generated dual CAR-T cells co-targeting CD47 and TAG-72. TAG-72 is an aberrantly glycosylated glycoprotein overexpressed in adenocarcinomas, including ovarian, colorectal, and gastric adenocarcinomas. These dual CAR-T cells effectively eliminated OVCAR-3 cells in vitro and suppressed tumor growth in OC xenografted mice. Furthermore, the damage to normal tissues was reduced owing to the specific targeting of TAG-72.¹²⁴ The ability of oncolytic virus (OV) to infiltrate drugs into the TME makes it an attractive alternative for anti-tumor therapy.¹³³ Researchers constructed OV-αCD47, which delivered anti-CD47 mAb. OV-αCD47, especially those with the IgG1 skeleton, prolonged survival in OC-engrafted mice by enhancing innate immunity (NK cell cytotoxicity and macrophage phagocytosis) and performing an oncolytic function.¹²⁵

Most of these studies are in the preclinical stage, and additional efforts are warranted to promote the early application of research results to clinics.

Limitations and Future Perspectives

Although preclinical data on CD47-SIRPα axis blockade has highlighted the promising therapeutic potential of blocking the “don’t eat me” signal to recover phagocytosis, the development of related drugs is not all plain sailing. The most common AE of anti-CD47 mAbs is the off-target effect caused by widespread expression of CD47 in normal cells, among which hematotoxicity is the most intractable.

As early as 2017, the phase 1 clinical trial of Ti-061(CD47 mAb) was prematurely terminated owing to unexpected case deaths.¹³⁴ Subsequently, CD47 mAb CC-90002 was declared to have failed the phase I clinical trial (NCT02641002) owing to severe hemagglutination.⁹² The repetitive failures have resulted in the uncertain future of such drug development. The superior phase 1b results of Magrolimab in combination with azacitidine in patients with MDS and AML promoted the enthusiasm for CD47-targeted drug development to a high priority until 2019. A low priming dose (1 mg/kg) was used to remove the aged erythrocytes and induce compensatory hematopoiesis to overcome anemia. Moreover, newborn erythrocytes can tolerate the maintenance (30 mg/kg) dose.^127,135 Unfortunately, the FDA suspended some clinical trials (i.e., NCT04313881) of the Magrolimab in combination with azacitidine owing to apparent imbalances of suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions across study arms in January 2022. However, most experts have posited that these SUSARs may be more related to the hematotoxicity of Magrolimab or the additive toxicity of azacitidine than to affecting the overall CD47 mAbs. As expected, the FDA quickly lifted the restrictions after reviewing the combined safety data from each trial in April. Pharmaceutical companies have different attitudes toward CD47-targeted drugs. The recent discontinuation of several CD47-targeting programs by AbbVie and Zai Lab has been attributed to strategic reasons rather than safety concerns. By contrast, Innovent and Akesobio are actively advancing CD47-related projects.

In summary, within controlled AEs, CD47-targeted drugs remain the focus of tumor immunotherapy. Notably, strategies have been developed to overcome these limitations, such as anti-SIRPα mAbs, SIRPα-fusion proteins, BsAbs, dual ICIs BsAbs, dual CAR-T cells, and OC-CD47. Alternatively, researchers have engineered TAX2, the first-ever antagonist of the TSP-1/CD47 axis. TAX2 selectively targets tumor-overexpressed TSP-1 and inhibits tumor angiogenesis while activating the anti-tumor immune system without destroying blood cells.¹³⁶

Although blocking the CD47-SIRPα axis has shown promising activities in OC preclinical models, based on the experience with PD-1/PD-L1,¹³⁷ this novel therapy might have use as an adjunctive therapy or in combination with other therapies to maximize efficacy. In the future, with the disclosure of the complete upstream and downstream pathways of the CD47-SIRPα axis, more potent blocking CD47-SIRPα axis therapies with fewer side effects will be certain to the clinical application of OC treatment.

Conclusion

In conclusion,CD47-SIRPα axis plays a notable role in inhibiting macrophage phagocytosis, promoting tumors to evade immune surveillance through sending “don’t eat me” anti-phagocytic signals. Therapeutic approaches that inhibit the CD47-SIRPα axis are novel, promising treatments for OC. However, the limitations of these therapies cannot be ignored, and further studies and clinical trials are necessary for continuous improvement.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University.

Ethical Approval

All authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

ORCID iD

Xukai Luo

Appendix

References

Wang

Lee

Lim

Choi

. TRPV1 antagonist DWP05195 induces ER stress-dependent apoptosis through the ROS-p38-CHOP pathway in human ovarian cancer cells. Cancers. 2020;12(6):1702. doi:10.3390/cancers12061702

Baldwin

Huang

Miller

, et al. Ten-year relative survival for epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):612-618. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318264f794

Torre

Bray

Siegel

Ferlay

Lortet-Tieulent

Jemal

. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;65(2):87-108. doi:10.3322/caac.21262

Krishnan

Schaar

Tallapragada

Dorigo

. Tumor associated macrophages in gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149(1):205-213. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.014

Yang

. Cancer immunotherapy: Harnessing the immune system to battle cancer. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(9):3335-3337. doi:10.1172/JCI83871

Galluzzi

Humeau

Buque

Zitvogel

Kroemer

. Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(12):725-741. doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0413-z

Sharma

Siddiqui

Anandhan

, et al. The next decade of immune checkpoint therapy. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(4):838-857. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1680

Tan

Bagley

Wen

, et al. Systematic review of combinations of targeted or immunotherapy in advanced solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(7):e002459. doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-002459

Chen

Jiang

Jin

Zhang

. Regulation of PD-L1: A novel role of pro-survival signalling in cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(3):409-416.

10.

Burugu

Dancsok

Nielsen

. Emerging targets in cancer immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;52(Pt 2):39-52. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.10.001

11.

Liu

Ren

, et al. Dual targeting of innate and adaptive checkpoints on tumor cells limits immune evasion. Cell Rep. 2018;24(8):2101-2111. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.062

12.

Chen

Han

. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: Past, present, and future. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(9):3384-3391. doi:10.1172/JCI80011

13.

Taube

Klein

Brahmer

, et al. Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(19):5064-5074. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3271

14.

Nandi

Pathak

Verma

, et al. T cell costimulation, checkpoint inhibitors and anti-tumor therapy. J Biosci. 2020;45(1):50. doi:10.1007/s12038-020-0020-2

15.

Chao

Weissman

Majeti

. The CD47-SIRPα pathway in cancer immune evasion and potential therapeutic implications. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24(2):225-232. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2012.01.010

16.

Zhao

Matlung

Kuijpers

van den Berg

. On the mechanism of CD47 targeting in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(42):E2844-E2845. doi:10.1073/pnas.1209265109

17.

Greenwald

Freeman

Sharpe

. The B7 family revisited. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:515-548. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115611

18.

Zou

Chen

. Inhibitory B7-family molecules in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(6):467-477. doi:10.1038/nri2326

19.

Seliger

Quandt

. The expression, function, and clinical relevance of B7 family members in cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61(8):1327-1341. doi:10.1007/s00262-012-1293-6

20.

Krummel

Allison

. CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J Exp Med. 1995;182(2):459-465. doi:10.1084/jem.182.2.459

21.

Leach

Krummel

Allison

. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science. 1996;271(5256):1734-1736. doi:10.1126/science.271.5256.1734

22.

Graziani

Lisi

Tentori

Navarra

. Monoclonal antibodies to CTLA-4 with focus on ipilimumab. Exp Suppl. 2022;113:295-350. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91311-3_10

23.

Davies

Flaherty

. Melanoma in 2017: Moving treatments earlier to move further forwards. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(2):75-76. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.183

24.

Peggs

Quezada

Chambers

Korman

Allison

. Blockade of CTLA-4 on both effector and regulatory T cell compartments contributes to the antitumor activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. J Exp Med. 2009;206(8):1717-1725. doi:10.1084/jem.20082492

25.

Dong

Zhu

Tamada

Chen

. B7-H1, a third member of the B7 family, costimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat Med. 1999;5(12):1365-1369.

26.

Hino

Kabashima

Kato

, et al. Tumor cell expression of programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 is a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma. Cancer. 2010;116(7):1757-1766. doi:10.1002/cncr.24899

27.

Shimoji

Shimizu

Sato

, et al. Clinical and pathologic features of lung cancer expressing programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Lung Cancer. 2016;98:69-75. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.04.021

28.

de Guillebon

Roussille

Frouin

Tougeron

. Anti program death-1/anti program death-ligand 1 in digestive cancers. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7(8):95-101. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v7.i8.95

29.

Hamanishi

Mandai

Ikeda

, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(34):4015-4022. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3397

30.

Abdel-Rahman

. PD-L1 expression and outcome of advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents: A meta-analysis. Immunotherapy. 2016;8(9):1081-1089.

31.

Brahmer

Reckamp

Baas

, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):123-135. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1504627

32.

Uram

Wang

, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2509-2520. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1500596

33.

Normann

Turzer

Diep

, et al. Early experiences with PD-1 inhibitor treatment of platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(4):e56. doi:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e56

34.

Varga

Piha-Paul

Ott

, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with programmed death ligand 1-positive advanced ovarian cancer: Analysis of KEYNOTE-028. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152(2):243-250. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.017

35.

Yarchoan

Hopkins

Jaffee

. Tumor mutational burden and response rate to PD-1 Inhibition. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(25):2500-2501. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1713444

36.

Sibaud

. Dermatologic reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors: Skin toxicities and immunotherapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(3):345-361. doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0336-3

37.

Kalbasi

Ribas

. Tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(1):25-39. doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0218-4

38.

Wang

, et al. Immunotherapy: Reshape the tumor immune microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2022;13:844142. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.844142

39.

Rakoff-Nahoum

Medzhitov

. Toll-like receptors and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(1):57-63.

40.

Brown

Hooper

Gresham

. Integrin-associated protein: A 50-kD plasma membrane antigen physically and functionally associated with integrins. J Cell Biol. 1990;111(6 Pt 1):2785-2794.

41.

Oldenborg

Zheleznyak

Fang

Lagenaur

Gresham

Lindberg

. Role of CD47 as a marker of self on red blood cells. Science. 2000;288(5473):2051-2054. doi:10.1126/science.288.5473.2051

42.

Burger

Hilarius-Stokman

de Korte

van den Berg

van Bruggen

. CD47 functions as a molecular switch for erythrocyte phagocytosis. Blood. 2012;119(23):5512-5521. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-386805

43.

Lindberg

Gresham

Schwarz

Brown

. Molecular cloning of integrin-associated protein: an immunoglobulin family member with multiple membrane-spanning domains implicated in alpha v beta 3-dependent ligand binding. J Cell Biol. 1993;123(2):485-496. doi:10.1083/jcb.123.2.485

44.

Mawby

Holmes

Anstee

Spring

Tanner

. Isolation and characterization of CD47 glycoprotein: a multispanning membrane protein which is the same as integrin-associated protein (IAP) and the ovarian tumour marker OA3. Biochem J. 1994;304 ( Pt 2)(2):525-530.

45.

Brown

Frazier

. Integrin-associated protein (cd47) and its ligands. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11(3):130-135. doi:10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01906-1

46.

Willingham

Volkmer

Gentles

, et al. The CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPa) interaction is a therapeutic target for human solid tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(17):6662-6667. doi:10.1073/pnas.1121623109

47.

Matozaki

Murata

Okazawa

Ohnishi

. Functions and molecular mechanisms of the CD47-SIRPalpha signalling pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19(2):72-80. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2008.12.001

48.

Kale

Rogers

Ghimire

. Thrombospondin-1 CD47 Signalling: From mechanisms to medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):4062. doi:10.3390/ijms22084062

49.

Kaur

Bronson

Pal-Nath

Miller

Soto-Pantoja

Roberts

. Functions of thrombospondin-1 in the tumor microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4570. doi:10.3390/ijms22094570

50.

Miller

Kaur

Ivins-O'Keefe

Roberts

. Thrombospondin-1 is a CD47-dependent endogenous inhibitor of hydrogen sulfide signaling in T cell activation. Matrix Biol. 2013;32(6):316-324. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2013.02.009

51.

Stein

Miller

Ivins-O'Keefe

Kaur

Roberts

. Secreted thrombospondin-1 regulates macrophage interleukin-1β production and activation through CD47. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19684. doi:10.1038/srep19684

52.

Kaur

Roberts

. Divergent modulation of normal and neoplastic stem cells by thrombospondin-1 and CD47 signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;81(Pt A):184-194. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2016.05.005

53.

Kaur

Schwartz

Miller

Roberts

. CD47-dependent regulation of H-S biosynthesis and signaling in T cells. Methods Enzymol. 2015;555:145-168. doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2014.11.023

54.

Lopez-Dee

Pidcock

Gutierrez

. Thrombospondin-1: multiple paths to inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2011;2011:296069. doi:10.1155/2011/296069

55.

Agah

Kyriakides

Lawler

Bornstein

. The lack of thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) dictates the course of wound healing in double-TSP1/TSP2-null mice. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(3):831-839. doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64243-5

56.

Kaur

Martin-Manso

Pendrak

Garfield

Isenberg

Roberts

. Thrombospondin-1 inhibits VEGF receptor-2 signaling by disrupting its association with CD47. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(50):38923-38932. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.172304

57.

Kazerounian

Yee

Lawler

. Thrombospondins in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(5):700-712. doi:10.1007/s00018-007-7486-z

58.

Liu

Kwon

. Is CD47 an innate immune checkpoint for tumor evasion? J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):12. doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0381-z

59.

Barclay

Brown

. The SIRP family of receptors and immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(6):457-464. doi:10.1038/nri1859

60.

Obeid

Tesniere

Ghiringhelli

, et al. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death. Nat Med. 2007;13(1):54-61. doi:10.1038/nm1523

61.

Kharitonenkov

Chen

Sures

Wang

Schilling

Ullrich

. A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors. Nature. 1997;386(6621):181-186.

62.

Feng

Jiang

Kim

BYS

Zhang

Weissman

. Phagocytosis checkpoints as new targets for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(10):568-586. doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0183-z

63.

Logtenberg

MEW

Scheeren

Schumacher

. The CD47-SIRPα immune checkpoint. Immunity. 2020;52(5):742-752. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.011

64.

Casey

Tong

, et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science. 2016;352(6282):227-231. doi:10.1126/science.aac9935

65.

Zhang

Xiang

, et al. HIF-1 regulates CD47 expression in breast cancer cells to promote evasion of phagocytosis and maintenance of cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(45):E6215-E6223. doi:10.1073/pnas.1520032112

66.

Jia

Yan

Tian

, et al. CD47/SIRPα pathway mediates cancer immune escape and immunotherapy. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(13):3281-3287. doi:10.7150/ijbs.60782

67.

Betancur

Abraham

Yiu

, et al. A CD47-associated super-enhancer links pro-inflammatory signalling to CD47 upregulation in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14802. doi:10.1038/ncomms14802

68.

Shimizu

Sawada

Kobayashi

, et al. Exosomal CD47 plays an essential role in immune evasion in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2021;19(9):1583-1595. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0956

69.

Jiang

Sun

Tian

Song

. Targeting CD47 for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):180. doi:10.1186/s13045-021-01197-w

70.

Wang

Lin

Hsu

, et al. CD47 promotes cell growth and motility in epithelial ovarian cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;119:109105. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109105

71.

Wang

Tan

Zhang

, et al. Expression and significance of CD44, CD47 and c-met in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(2):3391-3404. doi:10.3390/ijms16023391

72.

Tan

Zhuang

Zhu

, et al. Lewis Y antigen modified CD47 is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis and promotes early ovarian cancer metastasis. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5(9):2777-2787.

73.

Brightwell

Grzankowski

Lele

, et al. The CD47 “don't eat me signal” is highly expressed in human ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(2):393-397. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.325

74.

Chen

Wang

Chen

Hou

Jiang

. Targeting CD47 as a Novel Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:924740. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.924740

75.

Majeti

Chao

Alizadeh

, et al. CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell. 2009;138(2):286-299. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.045

76.

Feng

Zhao

Shen

. CD47: The next checkpoint target for cancer immunotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;152:103014. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103014

77.

Zhang

Hutter

Kahn

, et al. Anti-CD47 treatment stimulates phagocytosis of glioblastoma by M1 and M2 polarized macrophages and promotes M1 polarized macrophages in Vivo. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153550. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153550

78.

Chao

Jaiswal

Weissman-Tsukamoto

, et al. Calreticulin is the dominant pro-phagocytic signal on multiple human cancers and is counterbalanced by CD47. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(63):63ra94. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001375

79.

Lecoultre

Dutoit

Walker

. Phagocytic function of tumor-associated macrophages as a key determinant of tumor progression control: A review. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e001408. doi:10.1136/jitc-2020-001408

80.

Huang

Liu

, et al. A SIRPα-Fc fusion protein enhances the antitumor effect of oncolytic adenovirus against ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol. 2020;14(3):657-668. doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12628

81.

Tseng

Volkmer

Willingham

, et al. Anti-CD47 antibody-mediated phagocytosis of cancer by macrophages primes an effective antitumor T-cell response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(27):11103-11108. doi:10.1073/pnas.1305569110

82.

Demeure

Tanaka

Mateo

Rubio

Delespesse

Sarfati

. CD47 engagement inhibits cytokine production and maturation of human dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2000;164(4):2193-2199. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.2193

83.

Barclay

Van den Berg

. The interaction between signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) and CD47: structure, function, and therapeutic target. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:25-50. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120142

84.

Liu

Cron

, et al. CD47 blockade triggers T cell-mediated destruction of immunogenic tumors. Nat Med. 2015;21(10):1209-1215. doi:10.1038/nm.3931

85.

Manna

Frazier

. CD47 mediates killing of breast tumor cells via Gi-dependent inhibition of protein kinase A. Cancer Res. 2004;64(3):1026-1036.

86.

Mateo

Lagneaux

Bron

, et al. CD47 ligation induces caspase-independent cell death in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Med. 1999;5(11):1277-1284.

87.

Liu

Wei

Gao

, et al. CD47 promotes ovarian cancer progression by inhibiting macrophage phagocytosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(24):39021-39032.

88.

Chao

Alizadeh

Tang

, et al. Anti-CD47 antibody synergizes with rituximab to promote phagocytosis and eradicate non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cell. 2010;142(5):699-713. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.044

89.

Liu

Wang

Zhao

, et al. Pre-clinical development of a humanized Anti-CD47 antibody with Anti-Cancer therapeutic potential. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137345. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137345

90.

Sikic

Lakhani

Patnaik

, et al. First-in-human, first-in-class phase I trial of the Anti-CD47 antibody HU5F9-G4 in patients with advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(12):946-953. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02018

91.

Brierley

Staves

Roberts

, et al. The effects of monoclonal anti-CD47 on RBCs, compatibility testing, and transfusion requirements in refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Transfusion. 2019;59(7):2248-2254. doi:10.1111/trf.15397

92.

Narla

Modi

Bauer

, et al. Modulation of CD47-SIRPα innate immune checkpoint axis with Fc-function detuned anti-CD47 therapeutic antibody. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(2):473-489. doi:10.1007/s00262-021-03010-6

93.

Petrova

Viller

Wong

, et al. TTI-621 (SIRPαFc) a CD47-blocking innate immune checkpoint inhibitor with broad antitumor activity and minimal erythrocyte binding. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(4):1068-1079. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1700

94.

Lin

GHY

Chai

Lee

, et al. TTI-621 (SIRPαFc), a CD47-blocking cancer immunotherapeutic, triggers phagocytosis of lymphoma cells by multiple polarized macrophage subsets. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0187262. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187262

95.

Johnson

LDS

Banerjee

Kruglov

, et al. Targeting CD47 in Sézary syndrome with SIRPαFc. Blood Adv. 2019;3(7):1145-1153. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2018030577

96.

Ansell

Maris

Lesokhin

, et al. Phase I study of the CD47 blocker TTI-621 in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(8):2190-2199. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3706

97.

Kruglov

Johnson

LDS

Minic

, et al. The pivotal role of cytotoxic NK cells in mediating the therapeutic effect of anti-CD47 therapy in mycosis fungoides. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(4):919-932. doi:10.1007/s00262-021-03051-x

98.

Querfeld

Thompson

Taylor

, et al. Intralesional TTI-621, a novel biologic targeting the innate immune checkpoint CD47, in patients with relapsed or refractory mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome: A multicentre, phase 1 study. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8(11):e808-e817. doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00271-4

99.

Lin

GHY

Viller

Chabonneau

, et al. Abstract 2709: TTI-622 (SIRPα-IgG4 Fc), a CD47-blocking innate immune checkpoint inhibitor, suppresses tumor growth and demonstrates enhanced efficacy in combination with antitumor antibodies in both hematologic and solid tumor models. Cancer Res. 2018;78(13_suppl):2709.

100.

Kauder

Kuo

Harrabi

, et al. ALX148 blocks CD47 and enhances innate and adaptive antitumor immunity with a favorable safety profile. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201832. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201832

101.

Lakhani

Chow

LQM

Gainor

, et al. Evorpacept alone and in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab in patients with advanced solid tumours (ASPEN-01): A first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(12):1740-1751. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00584-2

102.

Evans

Italiano

Eskens

, et al. Phase 1-2 study of TI-061 alone and in combination with other anti-cancer agents in patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15_suppl l):TPS3109-TPS3109. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.TPS3109

103.

Peluso

Adam

Armet

, et al. The Fully human anti-CD47 antibody SRF231 exerts dual-mechanism antitumor activity via engagement of the activating receptor CD32a. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1):e000413. doi:10.1136/jitc-2019-000413

104.

Patnaik

Spreafico

Paterson

, et al. Results of a first-in-human phase I study of SRF231, a fully human, high-affinity anti-CD47 antibody. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl l):3064-3064. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3064

105.

Gao

Zhang

Yang

Duan

Zhong

. Two validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods with different pretreatments for the quantification of an anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody in rat and cynomolgus monkey serum compared with an electrochemiluminescence method. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019;175:112792. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2019.112792

106.

Cao

, et al. Combined strategies for effective cancer immunotherapy with a novel anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(2):353-363. doi:10.1007/s00262-021-02989-2

107.

Wang

Zhou

, et al. Tumor-selective blockade of CD47 signaling with a CD47/PD-L1 bispecific antibody for enhanced anti-tumor activity and limited toxicity. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70(2):365-376. doi:10.1007/s00262-020-02679-5

108.

Andrejeva

Capoccia

Hiebsch

, et al. Novel SIRPα antibodies that induce single-agent phagocytosis of tumor cells while preserving T Cells. J Immunol. 2021;206(4):712-721. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.2001019

109.

Puro

Bouchlaka

Hiebsch

, et al. Development of AO-176, a next-generation humanized anti-CD47 antibody with novel anticancer properties and negligible red blood cell binding. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19(3):835-846. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-1079

110.

Burris III

Spira

Taylor

, et al. A first-in-human study of AO-176, a highly differentiated anti-CD47 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl l):2516-2516. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2516

111.

Meng

Wang

Guo

Cao

Shen

. TJC4, a differentiated anti-CD47 antibody with novel epitope and RBC sparing properties. Blood. 2019;134(suppl ment_1):4063-4063. doi:10.1182/blood-2019-122793

112.

Mehta

Harb

, et al. Lemzoparlimab, a differentiated anti-CD47 antibody in combination with rituximab in relapsed and refractory non-hodgkin’s lymphoma: Initial clinical results. Blood. 2021;138(suppl 1):3542-3542. doi:10.1182/blood-2021-150606

113.

Jiang

, et al. A phase i/iia study of Lemzoparlimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD47, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS): Initial phase I results. Blood. 2020;136(suppl 1):30-31.

114.

Sun

Zheng

, et al. Preliminary results of a first-in-human phase I dtudy of IMM01, SIRPα Fc protein in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl l):2550-2550. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2550

115.

Gan

Coward

Mislang

ARA

, et al. Safety of AK117, an anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors in a phase I study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl l):2630-2630. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2630

116.

Lakhani

Richardson

Kristedja

, et al. 429 Phase 1 dose escalation study of the agonist redirected checkpoint, SL-172154 (SIRPα-Fc-CD40L) in subjects with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(suppl 2):A459-A459. doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-SITC2021.429

117.

Cendrowicz

Jacob

Greenwald

, et al. DSP107 combines inhibition of CD47/SIRPα axis with activation of 4-1BB to trigger anticancer immunity. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41(1):4197. doi:10.1186/s13046-022-02256-x

118.

Luo

Culbert

Kaufmann

Jiang

Lin

. Correction to nanoscale metal-organic framework co-delivers TLR-7 agonists and anti-CD47 antibodies to modulate macrophages and orchestrate cancer immunotherapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144(34):15907. doi:10.1021/jacs.2c07990

119.

Piccione

Juarez

Liu

, et al. A bispecific antibody targeting CD47 and CD20 selectively binds and eliminates dual antigen expressing lymphoma cells. MAbs. 2015;7(5):946-956. doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1062192

120.

Chen

Dominik

Stanfield

, et al. Dual checkpoint blockade of CD47 and PD-L1 using an affinity-tuned bispecific antibody maximizes antitumor immunity. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(10):e003464. doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-003464

121.

Champiat

Cassier

Kotecki

, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and preliminary biomarker data of first-in-class BI 765063, a selective SIRPα inhibitor: Results of monotherapy dose escalation in phase 1 study in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl l):2623-2623. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2623

122.

Lakhani

Patnaik

Liao

, et al. A phase Ib study of the anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab with the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab (A) in solid tumor (ST) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(5_suppl l):18-18. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.5_suppl.18

123.

Hongrapipat

Kopecˇkova

Liu

Prakongpan

Kopecek

. Combination chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy with Fab’ fragment targeted hpma copolymer conjugates in human ovarian carcinoma cells. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(5):696-709. doi:10.1021/mp800006e

124.

Shu

Evtimov

Hammett

, et al. Engineered CAR-T cells targeting TAG-72 and CD47 in ovarian cancer. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021;20:325-341. doi:10.1016/j.omto.2021.01.002

125.

Tian

Teng

, et al. Targeting Fc receptor-mediated effects and the “don’t eat me” signal with an oncolytic virus expressing an anti-CD47 antibody to treat metastatic ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(1):201-214. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1248

126.

Huang

Tian

, et al. Ovarian cancer stem cell-specific gene expression profiling and targeted drug prescreening. Oncol Rep. 2014;31(3):1235-1248. doi:10.3892/or.2014.2976

127.

Advani

Flinn

Popplewell

, et al. CD47 Blockade by Hu5F9-G4 and rituximab in non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(18):1711-1721. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1807315

128.

Upton

Banuelos

Feng

, et al. Combining CD47 blockade with trastuzumab eliminates HER2-positive breast cancer cells and overcomes trastuzumab tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(29):e2026849118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2026849118

129.

Gordon

Maute

Dulken

, et al. PD-1 expression by tumour-associated macrophages inhibits phagocytosis and tumour immunity. Nature. 2017;545(7655):495-499. doi:10.1038/nature22396

130.

Sockolosky

Dougan

Ingram

, et al. Durable antitumor responses to CD47 blockade require adaptive immune stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(19):E2646-E2654. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604268113

131.

Williams

Senterman

Hopkins

Faught

Fung-Kee-Fung

. Histopathologic assessment of chemotherapy effects in epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed primary surgical debulking. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106(1):160-163. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.029

132.

Sadelain

Riviere

Riddell

. Therapeutic T cell engineering. Nature. 2017;545(7655):423-431. doi:10.1038/nature22395

133.

Russell

, et al. An oncolytic herpesvirus expressing E-cadherin improves survival in mouse models of glioblastoma. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;37:45-54. doi:10.1038/nbt.4302

134.

Evans

Italiano

Eskens

, et al. Phase 1-2 study of TI-061 alone and in combination with other anti-cancer agents in patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15):TPS3109. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_supp

135.

Sallman

Donnellan

Asch

, et al. The first-in-class anti-CD47 antibody Hu5F9-G4 is active and well tolerated alone or with azacitidine in AML and MDS patients: Initial phase 1b results. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl l):7009-7009. doi:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.7009

136.

Jeanne

Sarazin

Charle

, et al. Targeting ovarian carcinoma with TSP-1:CD47 antagonist TAX2 activates Anti-Tumor immunity. Cancers. 2021;13(19):5019. doi:10.3390/cancers13195019

137.

Boussiotis

. Molecular and biochemical aspects of the PD-1 checkpoint pathway. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1767-1778. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1514296

Blocking CD47-SIRPα Signal Axis as Promising Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

The Development of ICIs

Adaptive ICs

Innate ICs

Biological Characteristics and Function of CD47

CD47 Expression in OC and Its Possible Regulatory Mechanism

Clinical Significance of Abnormal CD47 Expression in Patients With OC

Mechanism of CD47-SIRPα Axis Targeted Therapy in OC

Clinical Drug Development Targeting CD47-SIRPα Axis in OC

Blocking CD47-SIRPα Axis Monotherapy

Blocking CD47-SIRPα Axis Therapy Combined With Tumor-Targeting Antibody

Blocking CD47-SIRPα Axis With Bispecific Antibody

Other Combination Therapy

Limitations and Future Perspectives

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Ethical Approval

ORCID iD

Appendix

References