An evaluation is made of Goldberg's (1992) 100 Unipolar Markers of the five-factor model of personality. The factor structure of these items in samples of older men from the Normative Aging Study and undergraduate students are examined, and both item transformation and consistency testing approaches are used to evaluate replications of the five-factor structure. Results show that the five-factor structure is difficult to replicate in the sample of older men. While item transformations and sample trimming based on a consistency test did improve the quality of the replication in this older, nonstudent sample, both methods have serious drawbacks. The five-factor solution appeared in the student sample without sample trimming or data transformation. Additionally, in both student and nonstudent samples, oblique rotation resulted in inter-factor correlations relevant to more general issues in the study of trait structure. We conclude that the 100 Unipolar Markers may be unsuitable for use in older populations or with nonstudent samples.
Aldwin, C. M.
, & Levenson, M. R. (1994). Aging and personality assessment. In M. P. Lawton & J. Teresi (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (pp. 182-209). New York: Springer.
2.
Benet, V.
, & Waller, N. G. (1995). The Big Seven factor model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701-718.
3.
Benet-Martinez, V.
, & Waller, N. G. (1997). Further evidence for the cross-sectional generality of the Big Seven factor model: Indigenous and imported Spanish personality constructs.Journal of Personality, 65, 567-598.
4.
Bossé, R.
, Ekerdt, D. J., & Silbert, J. E. (1984). The Veterans Administration Normative Aging Study. In S. A. Mednick, M. Harway, & K. M. Finello (Eds.), Handbook of longitudinal research (pp. 273-289). New York: Praeger.
5.
Buechly, R.
, & Ball, H. (1952). A new test of validity for the group MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 299-301.
6.
Butcher, J. N.
, Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
Cattell, R. B.
(1966). The data box: Its ordering of total resources in terms of possible relational systems. In R. B. Cattell (Ed), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 67-128). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
8.
Cattell, R. B.
(1978). The scientific use offactor analysis. New York: Plenum.
9.
Clemans, W. V.
(1966). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative scores. Psychometric Monographs. Monograph No. 14.
10.
Cunningham, W. H.
, Cunningham, I. C. M., & Green, R. T. (1977). The ipsative process to reduce response set bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 379-384.
11.
Drasgow, F.
, Levine, M. V., & McLaughlin, M. E. (1987). Detecting inappropriate test scores with optimal and practical appropriateness indices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 59-79.
12.
Dunlap, W. P.
, & Cornwell, J. M. (1994). Factor analysis of ipsative measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 115-126.
13.
Eysenck, H. J.
(1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
14.
Goldberg, L. R.
(1978). The reliability of reliability: The generality and correlates of intra-individual consistency in responses to structured personality inventories. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 269-291.
15.
Goldberg, L. R.
(1990). An alternative "Description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
16.
Goldberg, L. R.
(1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
17.
Gorsuch, R. L.
(1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Greene, R. L.
(1979). Response consistency on the MMPI: The TR index. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 69-71.
19.
Hamilton, D. L.
(1968). Personality attributes associated with extreme response style. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 192-203.
20.
Harnisch, D. L.
, & Linn, R. L. (1981). Analysis of item response patterns: Questionable test data and dissimilar curriculum practices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 133-146.
21.
Harnisch,L.
, & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). A comparison of appropriateness indices based on item response theory. In R. Hambleton (Ed.), Applications of item response theory (pp. 104-122). Vancouver, BC: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.
22.
Horn, J. L.
, & Cattell, R. B. (1965). Vehicles, ipsatization, and the multiple-method measurement of motivation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 265-279.
23.
Jackson, D. J.
, & Alwin, D. F. (1980). The factor analysis of ipsative measures. Sociological Methods and Research, 9, 218-238.
24.
Lanning, K.
(1991). Consistency, scalability, and personality measurement. New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
McCrae, R. R.
(1989). Why I advocate the five-factor model: Joint factor analyses of the NEO-PI with other instruments. In D. M. Buss, & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237-245). New York: Springer.
26.
McCrae, R. R.
, & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1985). Updating Norman's "adequate taxonomy": Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.
27.
McCrae, R. R.
, & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
28.
Mroczek, D. K. (1993). Personality and psychopathology in older men: The five-factor model and the MMPI-2 (Doctoral Dissertation, Boston University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53 (4-B),5-5.
29.
Mroczek, D. K.
, Hurt, S. W., & Berman, W. H. (in press). Conceptual and methodological issues in the assessment of personality disorders in older adults. In E. Rosowsky, R. C. Abrams, & R. A. Zweig (Eds.), Personality disorders in older adults: Emerging issues in diagnosis and treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
Mulaik, S. A.
(1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Norman, W. T.
(1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
32.
Ozer, D. J.
, & Reise, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 357-388.
33.
Reise, S. P.
, & Waller, N. G. (1993). Traitedness and the assessment of response pattern scalability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 143-151.
34.
Schaie, K. W.
, & Hertzog, C. (1985). Measurement in the psychology of aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (2nd ed., pp. 61-94). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
35.
Tatsuoka, K. K.
, & Linn, R. L. (1983). Indices for detecting unusual response patterns: Link between two general approaches and potential applications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 81-96.
36.
Tatsuoka, K. K.
, & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1982). Detection of aberrant response patterns. Journal of Educational Statistics,7, 215-232.
37.
Tellegen
,(1988). The analysis of consistency in personality ratings.Journal of Personality, 56, 621-663.
38.
Tellegen, A.
(1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122-130.
39.
Wechsler, D.
(1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
40.
Wrigley, C. S.
, & Neuhaus,J. O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. American Psychologist, 10, 418-419.
